阿尔卡特 One Touch Idol 4S 智能手机简短评测

Name: Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
Brand: Alcatel

配件齐全，同类最强？ One Touch Idol 4S是阿尔卡特的新款旗舰智能手机，附带了许多配件。然而，仔细看看会发现它的一些缺点。

Andreas Osthoff (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 01/03/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Alcatel Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S (One Touch Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 8 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 510 - 3 GB VRAM

Memory

3 GB

Display

5.50 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 534 PPI, 电容式, 10点触控, AMOLED, glossy: yes

Storage

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 21 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm 耳机插孔, Card Reader: microSD存储卡高达 200 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 重力传感器，电子罗盘，霍尔传感器，陀螺仪, USB-OTG, WiFi直连, SAR: 1.134 W/kg

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (1/2/5/8), LTE Cat.4 (B1/3/7/8/20/28A, 150 Mbps 下载, 50 Mbps 上传), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 6.99 x 153.9 x 75.4

Battery

3000 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix (闪光灯，自动对焦)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (前闪光, 84° 广角)

Additional features

Speakers: 前置立体声 (2x 3.6 瓦特), Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 模块化电源适配器, USB线, SIM工具, JBL耳机, 屏幕保护膜, 手机保护壳 (透明), 虚拟现实眼镜, Google-Apps, VR-Apps, AntiVirus, Waves MaxxAudio, WPS Office, Xender Data Transfer, 12 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

149 g, Power Supply: 64 g

Price

449 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Case

Size Comparison

Connectivity

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
OnePlus 3T Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	313 MBit/s +784%
ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	298 MBit/s +742%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 32 GB eMMC Flash	35.4 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	337 MBit/s +841%
OnePlus 3T Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	257 MBit/s +618%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 32 GB eMMC Flash	35.8 MBit/s

Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S: Turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S

LG G5

Samsung Galaxy S7

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S

LG G5

Samsung Galaxy S7

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S

LG G5

Samsung Galaxy S7

Canon EOS 70D

Display


631 cd/m²	628 cd/m²	650 cd/m²
621 cd/m²	625 cd/m²	659 cd/m²
624 cd/m²	639 cd/m²	672 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 672 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 638.8 cd/m² Minimum: 6.14 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 625 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.27

	Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"	Honor 8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	ZTE Axon 7 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"	OnePlus 3T Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"	BlackBerry DTEK60 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"
Screen		-16%	-9%	-30%	-6%
Brightness middle	625	451 -28%	328 -48%	421 -33%	590 -6%
Brightness	639	443 -31%	334 -48%	430 -33%	608 -5%
Brightness Distribution	92	93 1%	88 -4%	84 -9%	88 -4%
Black Level *		0.4
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.9	5.4 8%	4.6 22%	7.1 -20%	6.6 -12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	14.6	9.9 32%	14.7 -1%	15.3 -5%	14.3 2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.8	6.7 -76%	2.8 26%	6.8 -79%	4.3 -13%
Gamma	2.27 ^97%	2.33 ^94%	2.29 ^96%	2.23 ^99%	1.88 ^117%
CCT	7196 ^90%	8262 ^79%	6612 ^98%	7866 ^83%	6966 ^93%
Contrast		1128

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

235.8 Hz

≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 235.8 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 235.8 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Performance

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	159866 Points +91%
BlackBerry DTEK60 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	134232 Points +61%
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	122524 Points +47%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	94671 Points +13%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	83564 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	75533 Points -10%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	1881 Points +28%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	1726 Points +17%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	1475 Points
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	1280 Points -13%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	1204 Points -18%
BlackBerry DTEK60 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	Points -100%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	5481 Points +60%
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	4236 Points +24%
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	3867 Points +13%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	3427 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	2511 Points -27%
BlackBerry DTEK60 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	Points -100%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	30810 Points +74%
BlackBerry DTEK60 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	29651 Points +68%
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	23319 Points +32%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	20235 Points +14%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	18127 Points +2%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	17695 Points
OnePlus One 801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330	16692 Points -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	34494 Points +61%
BlackBerry DTEK60 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	33037 Points +54%
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	24310 Points +14%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	22157 Points +4%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	21668 Points +1%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	21398 Points
OnePlus One 801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330	18074 Points -16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	22426 Points +104%
BlackBerry DTEK60 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	21822 Points +98%
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	20408 Points +85%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	15531 Points +41%
OnePlus One 801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330	13167 Points +19%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	11532 Points +5%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	11020 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	2698 Points +98%
BlackBerry DTEK60 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	2666 Points +96%
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	2577 Points +89%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	1363 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	1342 Points -2%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	1273 Points -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	4619 Points +262%
BlackBerry DTEK60 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	4466 Points +250%
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	3310 Points +160%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	1275 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	1252 Points -2%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	1112 Points -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	2587 Points +44%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	1800 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	1793 Points 0%
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	1452 Points -19%
BlackBerry DTEK60 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	1106 Points -39%
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	1099 Points -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	2500 Points +187%
BlackBerry DTEK60 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	2265 Points +160%
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	2221 Points +155%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	961 Points +10%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	870 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	856 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
BlackBerry DTEK60 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	2837 Points +274%
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	2528 Points +233%
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	2418 Points +219%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	818 Points +8%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	759 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	745 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	2482 Points +39%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	1800 Points +1%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	1788 Points
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	1783 Points 0%
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	1728 Points -3%
BlackBerry DTEK60 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	1328 Points -26%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	59 fps +168%
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	53 fps +141%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	43 fps +95%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	31 fps +41%
OnePlus One 801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330	29 fps +32%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	22 fps
BlackBerry DTEK60 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	fps -100%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	91 fps +194%
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	88 fps +184%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	41 fps +32%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	31 fps
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	30 fps -3%
OnePlus One 801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330	28 fps -10%
BlackBerry DTEK60 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	fps -100%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	45 fps +384%
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	28 fps +201%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	19 fps +104%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	14 fps +51%
OnePlus One 801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330	12 fps +29%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	9.3 fps
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	46 fps +207%
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	39 fps +160%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	19 fps +27%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	15 fps
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	14 fps -7%
OnePlus One 801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330	12 fps -20%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	32 fps +581%
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	16 fps +240%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	11 fps +134%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	9.4 fps +100%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	4.7 fps
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	32 fps +240%
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	31 fps +230%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	10 fps +6%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	9.6 fps +2%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	9.4 fps

PCMark for Android - Work performance score
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	6735 Points +39%
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	5664 Points +17%
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	4970 Points +2%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	4964 Points +2%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	4852 Points
BlackBerry DTEK60 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	4589 Points -5%
OnePlus One 801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330	3571 Points -26%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	2218 Points +37%
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	2165 Points +33%
BlackBerry DTEK60 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	2141 Points +32%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	2034 Points +25%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	1623 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	1297 Points -20%
OnePlus One 801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330	1131 Points -30%
System
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	3952 Points +69%
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	3307 Points +41%
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	3130 Points +34%
BlackBerry DTEK60 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	2897 Points +24%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	2582 Points +10%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	2338 Points
OnePlus One 801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330	1768 Points -24%
Memory
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	2556 Points +37%
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	1954 Points +5%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	1861 Points
BlackBerry DTEK60 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	1642 Points -12%
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	1489 Points -20%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	798 Points -57%
OnePlus One 801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330	587 Points -68%
Graphics
BlackBerry DTEK60 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	4763 Points +201%
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	4631 Points +193%
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	4444 Points +181%
OnePlus One 801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330	2382 Points +51%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	1703 Points +8%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	1635 Points +3%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	1581 Points
Web
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	1009 Points
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	994 Points -1%
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	963 Points -5%
BlackBerry DTEK60 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	927 Points -8%
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	891 Points -12%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	843 Points -16%
OnePlus One 801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330	661 Points -34%

Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | JetStream 1.1

Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	10692 Points +19%
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	9798 Points +9%
BlackBerry DTEK60 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	9473 Points +5%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	9005 Points
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	8062 Points -10%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	3402 ms *
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	3097 ms * +9%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	2979 ms * +12%
BlackBerry DTEK60 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	2880 ms * +15%
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	2719 ms * +20%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	64 Points +23%
BlackBerry DTEK60 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	55.2 Points +6%
OnePlus 3T SD 821, Adreno 530	54.5 Points +5%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510	52 Points
ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	44.75 Points -14%

* ... smaller is better

	Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 32 GB eMMC Flash	Honor 8 32 GB eMMC Flash	ZTE Axon 7 64 GB eMMC Flash	OnePlus 3T 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	BlackBerry DTEK60 32 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5		14%	67%	212%	7%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	56.3	23.59 -58%	51.3 -9%		58.5 4%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	74.6	53.7 -28%	78.4 5%		78.8 6%
Random Write 4KB	14.45	31.5 118%	16.22 12%	74.4 415%	15.1 4%
Random Read 4KB	36.53	34.16 -6%	121.1 232%	123.6 238%	43.1 18%
Sequential Write 256KB	80.8	119.3 48%	150.9 87%	165.3 105%	79 -2%
Sequential Read 256KB	231.9	247.5 7%	406.5 75%	436.4 88%	257.4 11%

Emissions

Max. Load

Idle


42.1 °C	40.8 °C	36.8 °C
40.5 °C	41.2 °C	36.5 °C
38.9 °C	38.9 °C	35.7 °C

Maximum: 42.1 °C
Average: 39 °C


35.3 °C	39.2 °C	39.8 °C
34.3 °C	36.5 °C	39 °C
33.9 °C	36.4 °C	36.7 °C

Maximum: 39.8 °C
Average: 36.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 33.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 3T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Frequency Comparison (Checkboxes select/deselectable!)

Energy Management

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.01 / 0.19 Watt
Idle	0.76 / 1.02 / 1.04 Watt
Load	4.4 / 10.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 3000 mAh	Honor 8 3000 mAh	ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh	OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh	BlackBerry DTEK60 3000 mAh
Power Consumption		-31%	3%	-37%	-12%
Idle Minimum *	0.76	0.78 -3%	0.64 16%	0.61 20%	0.7 8%
Idle Average *	1.02	1.89 -85%	0.84 18%	1.77 -74%	1.13 -11%
Idle Maximum *	1.04	2.02 -94%	0.87 16%	1.81 -74%	1.2 -15%
Load Average *	4.4	5.28 -20%	6.02 -37%	6.67 -52%	6.52 -48%
Load Maximum *	10.4	5.44 48%	10.45 -0%	10.98 -6%	9.75 6%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 54)		6h 55min

	Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 3000 mAh	Honor 8 3000 mAh	ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh	OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh	BlackBerry DTEK60 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	415	499 20%	411 -1%	494 19%	779 88%

Pros

+ 优秀外壳

+ 非常艳丽的AMOLED屏幕

+ 良好的扬声器

+ 齐全的配件（VR眼镜）

+ 4K视频录制

Cons

- 仅仅是microUSB 2.0

- 低速的WiFi

- 相对较低的性能

- 容易发热

- 混合插槽（双SIM卡或microSD）

- 平庸的通话质量

- 没有指纹识别

Verdict

In review: Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S. Test model courtesy of Alcatel Germany.

阿尔卡特One Touch Idol 4S是否可以与对手并驾齐驱？不完全可以。鉴于它拥有时尚的底盘，良好的显示效果，齐全的配件，这款智能手机对得起它的价格。然而，它的竞争对手缺点却更少。Idol 4S有通话质量平庸，前置摄像头不佳这方面的缺点，并且在性能和运行时间测验中的表现稍有不足。

一个拥有优秀外壳和艳丽屏幕的主流智能手机，可惜，它的竞争对手更胜一筹。

该机的虚拟现实眼镜更像是一个漂亮的噱头，与三星的Gear VR相比功能有限。实际上，标榜的Boom按键也同样不能打动我们。阿尔卡特的One Touch Idol 4S不算是一个错误的选择，更好的设备在高达450欧元（〜475美元）的价格区间。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S - 2016-12-29 12/29/2016 v6 ^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

90%

Keyboard

70 / 75 → 94%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

40 / 60 → 67%

Weight

92%

Battery

89%

Display

84%

Games Performance

42 / 63 → 67%

Application Performance

54 / 70 → 77%

Temperature

90%

Noise

100%

Audio

60 / 91 → 66%

Camera

67%

Average

75%

85%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1692 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 阿尔卡特 One Touch Idol 4S 智能手机简短评测

Andreas Osthoff, 2017-01- 3 (Update: 2017-01- 5)