阿尔卡特 One Touch Idol 4S 智能手机简短评测
Case
Connectivity
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
Display
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 625 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
Gamma: 2.27
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Honor 8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | ZTE Axon 7 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | OnePlus 3T Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | BlackBerry DTEK60 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -16% | -9% | -30% | -6% | |
| Brightness middle | 625 | 451 -28% | 328 -48% | 421 -33% | 590 -6% |
| Brightness | 639 | 443 -31% | 334 -48% | 430 -33% | 608 -5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 93 1% | 88 -4% | 84 -9% | 88 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.4 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.9 | 5.4 8% | 4.6 22% | 7.1 -20% | 6.6 -12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.6 | 9.9 32% | 14.7 -1% | 15.3 -5% | 14.3 2% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 6.7 -76% | 2.8 26% | 6.8 -79% | 4.3 -13% |
| Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.33 94% | 2.29 96% | 2.23 99% | 1.88 117% |
| CCT | 7196 90% | 8262 79% | 6612 98% | 7866 83% | 6966 93% |
| Contrast | 1128 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 235.8 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 235.8 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 235.8 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8549 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms). | ||
Performance
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 32 GB eMMC Flash | Honor 8 32 GB eMMC Flash | ZTE Axon 7 64 GB eMMC Flash | OnePlus 3T 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | BlackBerry DTEK60 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 14% | 67% | 212% | 7% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 56.3 | 23.59 -58% | 51.3 -9% | 58.5 4% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 74.6 | 53.7 -28% | 78.4 5% | 78.8 6% | |
| Random Write 4KB | 14.45 | 31.5 118% | 16.22 12% | 74.4 415% | 15.1 4% |
| Random Read 4KB | 36.53 | 34.16 -6% | 121.1 232% | 123.6 238% | 43.1 18% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 80.8 | 119.3 48% | 150.9 87% | 165.3 105% | 79 -2% |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 231.9 | 247.5 7% | 406.5 75% | 436.4 88% | 257.4 11% |
Emissions
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 3T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Frequency Comparison (Checkboxes select/deselectable!)
Energy Management
| Off / Standby |   0.01 / 0.19 Watt |
| Idle |  0.76 / 1.02 / 1.04 Watt |
| Load |
4.4 / 10.4 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 3000 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh | BlackBerry DTEK60 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -31% | 3% | -37% | -12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.76 | 0.78 -3% | 0.64 16% | 0.61 20% | 0.7 8% |
| Idle Average * | 1.02 | 1.89 -85% | 0.84 18% | 1.77 -74% | 1.13 -11% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.04 | 2.02 -94% | 0.87 16% | 1.81 -74% | 1.2 -15% |
| Load Average * | 4.4 | 5.28 -20% | 6.02 -37% | 6.67 -52% | 6.52 -48% |
| Load Maximum * | 10.4 | 5.44 48% | 10.45 -0% | 10.98 -6% | 9.75 6% |
* ... smaller is better
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 3000 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh | BlackBerry DTEK60 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 415 | 499 20% | 411 -1% | 494 19% | 779 88% |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
阿尔卡特One Touch Idol 4S是否可以与对手并驾齐驱？不完全可以。鉴于它拥有时尚的底盘，良好的显示效果，齐全的配件，这款智能手机对得起它的价格。然而，它的竞争对手缺点却更少。Idol 4S有通话质量平庸，前置摄像头不佳这方面的缺点，并且在性能和运行时间测验中的表现稍有不足。
一个拥有优秀外壳和艳丽屏幕的主流智能手机，可惜，它的竞争对手更胜一筹。
该机的虚拟现实眼镜更像是一个漂亮的噱头，与三星的Gear VR相比功能有限。实际上，标榜的Boom按键也同样不能打动我们。 阿尔卡特的One Touch Idol 4S不算是一个错误的选择，更好的设备在高达450欧元（〜475美元）的价格区间。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
- 12/29/2016 v6 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Price comparison
