Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar阿尔卡特 One Touch Pop 4S 智能手机简短评测
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| UMI Max | |
| Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| UMI Max | |
| Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Honor 5C | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Honor 5C | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 445 cd/m²
Contrast: 4450:1 (Black: 0.1 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 10 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.87
| Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Vernee Mars IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Honor 5C IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | ZTE Blade V7 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | UMI Max IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | UMI Super Euro Edition IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Acer Liquid Zest Plus IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Lenovo Moto G4 Play IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Lenovo Moto Z AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -5% | -40% | -45% | -9% | -13% | -32% | -34% | 43% | |
| Brightness middle | 445 | 345 -22% | 515 16% | 409 -8% | 522 17% | 418 -6% | 414 -7% | 412 -7% | 485 9% |
| Brightness | 424 | 339 -20% | 498 17% | 411 -3% | 498 17% | 410 -3% | 420 -1% | 414 -2% | 490 16% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 85 1% | 93 11% | 96 14% | 86 2% | 85 1% | 94 12% | 94 12% | 92 10% |
| Black Level * | 0.1 | 0.14 -40% | 0.49 -390% | 0.38 -280% | 0.23 -130% | 0.31 -210% | 0.33 -230% | 0.42 -320% | |
| Contrast | 4450 | 2464 -45% | 1051 -76% | 1076 -76% | 2270 -49% | 1348 -70% | 1255 -72% | 981 -78% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 9.8 | 7.1 28% | 6.2 37% | 9.4 4% | 6.9 30% | 4.4 55% | 8.1 17% | 5.6 43% | 2.1 79% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.4 | 13.9 24% | 11.4 38% | 17.6 4% | 12.3 33% | 6.5 65% | 13.8 25% | 9.7 47% | 5.5 70% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 10 | 6.7 33% | 7.4 26% | 11.6 -16% | 9.2 8% | 3.6 64% | 9.6 4% | 6.9 31% | 2.6 74% |
| Gamma | 2.87 77% | 2.47 89% | 2.28 96% | 2.25 98% | 2.38 92% | 2.36 93% | 2 110% | 2.4 92% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 7990 81% | 7711 84% | 8664 75% | 9597 68% | 8687 75% | 6993 93% | 7754 84% | 8422 77% | 6843 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 88.14 | ||||||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 88 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 40 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 48 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Honor 5C | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| UMI Max | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 5C | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 5C | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| UMI Max | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| UMI Max | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Honor 5C | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| UMI Max | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Honor 5C | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| UMI Max | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Honor 5C | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| UMI Max | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Honor 5C | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| UMI Max | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| GFXBench | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Honor 5C | |
| UMI Max | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Honor 5C | |
| UMI Max | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Honor 5C | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| UMI Max | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Honor 5C | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| UMI Max | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Honor 5C | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| UMI Max | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Honor 5C | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| UMI Max | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 0.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
ZTE Blade V7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 46.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 11% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor 5C audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.18 / 0.32 Watt |
| Idle |  0.93 / 1.41 / 2.36 Watt |
| Load |
3.79 / 5.39 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S 2960 mAh | Vernee Mars 3000 mAh | Honor 5C 3000 mAh | ZTE Blade V7 2540 mAh | UMI Max 4000 mAh | UMI Super Euro Edition 4000 mAh | Acer Liquid Zest Plus 5000 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -10% | -4% | 18% | 16% | -23% | 0% | 17% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.93 | 1.02 -10% | 0.89 4% | 0.73 22% | 1.02 -10% | 0.84 10% | 0.83 11% | 0.68 27% |
| Idle Average * | 1.41 | 1.69 -20% | 2.07 -47% | 0.92 35% | 1.53 -9% | 1.94 -38% | 2.06 -46% | 1.58 -12% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.36 | 1.82 23% | 2.15 9% | 0.93 61% | 1.62 31% | 2.07 12% | 2.08 12% | 1.61 32% |
| Load Average * | 3.79 | 4.39 -16% | 3.46 9% | 4.47 -18% | 2.91 23% | 5.88 -55% | 3.53 7% | 3.36 11% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.39 | 6.79 -26% | 5.18 4% | 5.96 -11% | 2.93 46% | 7.67 -42% | 4.49 17% | 3.91 27% |
* ... smaller is better
| Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S 2960 mAh | Vernee Mars 3000 mAh | Honor 5C 3000 mAh | ZTE Blade V7 2540 mAh | UMI Max 4000 mAh | UMI Super Euro Edition 4000 mAh | Acer Liquid Zest Plus 5000 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | ||||||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 531 | 427 -20% | 584 10% | 519 -2% | 588 11% | 638 20% | 815 53% | 630 19% |
Pros
Cons
阿尔卡特One Touch Pop 4S是一台精心设计，有着合理配置的实惠的中端智能手机。我们特别喜欢它的扬声器，因为它是这个价位最好的扬声器之一。总体上来说，阿尔卡特的智能手机并没有是我们完全满意，原因来自于在它在日常使用中的一些缺点。
大多数的按键是出色的，但它们的位置（电源键）并不适合单手使用。高分辨率的IPS面板有着高亮度和高对比度的特性-但只在纯白背景上才得以体现。在实际使用中它的亮度明显偏低，是的有时在室内使用都需要LCD面板的最大亮度，尽管高对比度仍然保持。虽然联科发SOC在基准测试中的结果很具有吸引力，但主观系统性能不能与竞争对手相比。指纹解锁是一个很好的功能，但在这台手机上的指纹扫描仪的识别率偏低，并不能真正地在日常使用中提供附加值。
阿尔卡特One Touch Pop 4S是一台平实的中端智能手机，但在某些方面的设计并没有考虑从周全。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Alcatel One Touch Pop 4S
- 12/05/2016 v5.1 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Price comparison
