Oppo A74 5G评测--经济实惠的5G智能手机，续航时间长
Possible competitors in comparison
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Oppo A74 5G SD 480, Adreno 619 | 190 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
| 80 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Vivo Y72 5G Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2 | 193 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.58" | 2408x1080 | |
| 80.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2 | 190 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
| 79.3 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2021 | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3 | 205 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 |
案例、设备和操作
Oppo A74 5G大部分由塑料制成，只有正面有熊猫玻璃保护。尽管如此，其制造质量还是给人留下了良好的印象，其特点是缝隙干净，手感舒适。然而，音量按钮却异常狭窄。
A74 5G的设备处于一个吸引人的水平。NFC已经到位，Oppo的智能手机也支持全面的双SIM卡。存储空间也可以通过microSD卡扩展，但不支持exFAT文件系统。
Wi-Fi 5是一个合适的Wi-Fi标准，与我们的参考路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX12相结合，可以实现稳定的传输速率。A74 5G在移动中显示出普通的连接特性，并提供广泛的频率覆盖。
谷歌的Android 11与ColorOS 11.1被用作操作系统，这是该制造商的其他智能手机的老熟人。在测试时，安全更新是在2021年3月5日更新的，因此不再是最新的。A74 5G应该在三年内每季度更新一次。
OPPO A74 5G支持VoLTE以及Wi-Fi通话，拿在耳边时有良好的语音质量。扬声器回声明显，麦克风范围也只是一般。噪声抑制效果很好，但巨大的噪声会导致很窄的频率响应，这使得扬声器听起来非常不自然和空洞。
触摸屏提供了保护膜，具有良好的滑行性能。通过触摸敏感的表面快速而准确地实现了输入，较高的刷新率也使在系统中的导航变得令人愉快的流畅。电源键上的指纹扫描仪和二维面部识别可用于生物识别安全。两者的工作都相当可靠，并且有一个吸引人的解锁速度。
| Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT) | |
| SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB | |
| Average of class Smartphone (36.9 - 1269, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Oppo A74 5G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Vivo Y72 5G | |
| SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Oppo A74 5G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (11.4 - 49.7, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Vivo Y72 5G | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Vivo Y72 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
| Oppo A74 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
| Vivo Y72 5G | |
| Oppo A74 5G | |
相机 - Oppo A74 5G的额外超广角
在规格表上，背面的相机设置与Oppo的A74非常相似，但它得到了一个额外的超广角，其细节有点低，向边缘模糊，但总体上有一个体面的成像性能。我们喜欢主摄像头在黑暗中的照片，变焦的效果比4G机型好一点。
OPPO再次依靠相同的1600万像素型号的前置摄像头。视频可以用全高清录制，两边最好都是每秒30帧。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide-angleWide-angleUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow-Light
显示屏 - Oppo智能手机采用LTPS面板和PWM技术
Oppo A74 5G的6.5英寸LTPS显示屏具有全高清+分辨率，工作频率为90赫兹。不支持HDR。亮度相当好，由于黑值较低，该智能手机提供了一个强大的对比度。
在出厂设置中，显示屏相当冷，但可以通过设置进行调整。如果你相应地提高色温，你将得到自然的色彩再现，而不必在色彩空间支持上做出妥协。
尽管是LCD，Oppo使用PWM进行亮度控制。其频率相当高，所以应该很少有用户会遇到问题。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 582 cd/m²
Contrast: 1663:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
| Oppo A74 5G LTPS, 2400x1080, 6.5" | Vivo Y72 5G IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G TFT-LCD, 1600x720, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -10% | -38% | -101% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39.6 ? | 42 ? -6% | 43.6 ? -10% | 66.8 ? -69% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 17.6 ? | 20 ? -14% | 29.2 ? -66% | 40.8 ? -132% |
| PWM Frequency | 2404 ? | |||
| Screen | -52% | -4% | -87% | |
| Brightness middle | 582 | 419 -28% | 550 -5% | 543 -7% |
| Brightness | 573 | 384 -33% | 515 -10% | 512 -11% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 87 -7% | 86 -9% | 85 -10% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.7 -100% | 0.32 9% | 0.63 -80% |
| Contrast | 1663 | 599 -64% | 1719 3% | 862 -48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 3.32 -84% | 1.8 -0% | 4.9 -172% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.4 | 5.06 -49% | 3.1 9% | 8.6 -153% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 3 -50% | 2.5 -25% | 6.3 -215% |
| Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.203 100% | 2.28 96% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 6736 96% | 7236 90% | 6326 103% | 8120 80% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -31% /
-44% | -21% /
-10% | -94% /
-90% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2404 Hz | ≤ 14 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2404 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 14 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2404 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命
Oppo A74 5G采用的是入门级SoC 高通骁龙480 5G并可使用6GB的工作内存。该系统提供了良好的性能，甚至比去年600系列的小机型还要快。游戏可以顺利运行，但在要求较高的游戏中，细节必须减少。我们无法确定在任何时候都会出现过度加热。
下巴一侧的扬声器表现平平，具有金属特性，随着音量的增加而变形。然而，对于日常生活中的偶尔使用，它是足够的。另外，还有一个不错的音频插孔（信噪比：73.63 dBFS）或蓝牙。
A74 5G在电池运行时间方面可以带来积极的惊喜，因为它比 4G型号并经常提供比竞争对手更好的结果。
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oppo A74 5G | |
| Vivo Y72 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (16 - 31, n=9) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oppo A74 5G | |
| Vivo Y72 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (17 - 19, n=9) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oppo A74 5G | |
| Vivo Y72 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (9.9 - 19, n=9) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oppo A74 5G | |
| Vivo Y72 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (6.4 - 6.7, n=9) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo A74 5G | Vivo Y72 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 15% | 45% | 44% | 20% | 240% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 492.6 | 956 94% | 939 91% | 858 74% | 760 ? 54% | 1839 ? 273% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 265.3 | 13.6 -95% | 398 50% | 381.7 44% | 297 ? 12% | 1425 ? 437% |
| Random Read 4KB | 153.2 | 164.4 7% | 151.6 -1% | 174.6 14% | 152.9 ? 0% | 277 ? 81% |
| Random Write 4KB | 115.8 | 179.4 55% | 162.8 41% | 167.1 44% | 131.6 ? 14% | 309 ? 167% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Oppo A74 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Oppo A74 5G 5000 mAh | Vivo Y72 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G 5000 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi Websurfing | 1223 | 1084 -11% | 1113 -9% | 1235 1% | 984 ? -20% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - Oppo A74 5G并非一切都好
Oppo A74 5G在一些方面比 A74 LTE并依靠90赫兹的LCD，而不是60赫兹的OLED，以及其他一些东西。然而，Oppo通过使用PWM，使LC技术的一个优势没有得到发挥。SoC是更新的，这不仅意味着更高的性能，也意味着更好的效率，这反映在明显更长的电池运行时间。此外，5G版本也有一个NFC芯片。相机也被补充了一个超宽镜头。
Oppo A74 5G在正确的地方有所改进，但在其他方面做出了让步。
另一方面，制造商取消了对microSD插槽的exFAT支持，并采用了较慢的快速充电技术（18瓦）。然而，Oppo以一个吸引人的价格管理了一个好的中档智能手机。在这一领域的强大替代品是 Galaxy A32 5G和 Redmi Note 10 5G这两款手机也都配备了LC显示屏。
价格和可用性
OPPO A74 5G已经开始销售，价格远低于建议零售价，可以在Amazon上找到。,Cyberport和Otto.
Oppo A74 5G
- 08/18/2021 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
