Oppo RX17 Neo
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 25 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 10 scores (from 13 reviews)
Reviews for the Oppo RX17 Neo
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
This is a tricky one to judge. There are parts of the Oppo RX17 Neo we love, like its excellent battery life and bold screen. However, charging that is both slow and micro USB-based seems totally out of place in 2019, and at the price you can get metal and glass phones. They feel more impressive, although Oppo has done a good job of making plastic look like glass here. Your hands won’t be too easily fooled, though. Buy this if battery life is your top priority, and you’ve been put off Huawei and Honor phones recently.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gadgetspeak EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At the start of April a review of a sibling unit to this one can be found on Gadgetspeak. So here what is quite a similar product on the face of it, however there are surprises like a fingerprint reader that is normally invisible on the screen.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/16/2018
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: XGN NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Le monde numerique FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% display: 70% mobility: 70%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 95% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: i2Hard RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/13/2018
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% display: 84% mobility: 86%
Source: Helpix RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/01/2018
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 512:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 660:
高性能中档ARM SoC,具有8个CPU Kryo 260内核(集群中的4个高速2.2 GHz内核和2个省电1.8 GHz内核)和Adreno 512 GPU。采用14纳米工艺制造。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.41":
只有较少的手机有很大的屏幕。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.