Oppo RX Series
Processor: unknown, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 660Graphics Adapter: unknown, Qualcomm Adreno 512
Display: 6.40 inch, 6.41 inch
Weight: 0.156kg, 0.183kg
Average of 37 scores (from 53 reviews)
Oppo RX17 Pro
Specifications
Notebook: Oppo RX17 ProProcessor: unknown
Graphics Adapter: unknown
Display: 6.40 inch, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.183kg
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Look beyond the RX17 Pro's spangly two-tone colour scheme and it's tough to spot any real substance - it feels like a decent mid-range phone that's hamstrung by a few superfluous features and out-of-date software.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: What Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The RX17 Pro is a good smartphone for those looking for a host of new technologies, such as in-screen fingerprint sensors and face-unlocking, plus some key basics such as long battery life with fast charging and a beautiful design. But there are better and cheaper options out there, such as the Xiaomi Mi 8 Pro and the OnePlus 6T.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It's a close battle between this and the OnePlus 6T, and while Oppo's phone is weaker in some respects, it has a more eye-catching design and a cool ToF camera. Still, for the asking price, there are arguably better options available.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Oppo RX17 Pro is a solid phone from Oppo. It looks smart, modern and, unlike some previous Oppo models, isn’t weird or a tech try-hard; it’s the ideal device for its first foray in the UK market.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Oppo RX17 Pro is a more attractive phone for the European market than was the Find X. A gimmicky sliding camera makes way for a solid device that costs less, has a great display and a refreshing, premium design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In a market where the OnePlus 6T exists, is fairly difficult to recommend the RX17 Pro, but on the whole it's a good all-round phone. Plus, it'll charge up faster than anything you've ever used before.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The RX17 Pro is a great looking phone with good performance and a lush display. But with a Snapdragon 710 rather than the better 845 it’s just impossible not to compare it to the OnePlus 6T which looks the same, has better software for the western market and, importantly, costs less.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Once again, the pricing of the Oppo R17 Pro puts it in a tough spot and makes it hard to recommend over the similarly-priced competition. Especially when the competition consists almost entirely of flagship models. Perhaps over the course of few months, the Oppo R17 Pro will get cheaper and it will be worth considering.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The RX17 Pro could be considered a high-end entry into the mid-range, but with the wealth of functionality Oppo has squeezed in here, there’s every reason to compare it against 2018’s flagship handsets. What remains is how well all these promising features play out in real-world use and whether or not the phone has the stones to compete with more classically-styled flagships in the field of performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/08/2018
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The RX17 Pro is priced closely to the OnePlus 6T, which has the cutting-edge Snadpragon 845 to brag with, while the RX17 Pro will be relying on eye-catching looks, a better fingerprint scanner, and hopefully, a more versatile camera. And things do look promising right now!
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/06/2018
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As the RX17 Pro is just over the OnePlus 6T’s €550 price point this is definitely a phone to keep an eye on. Many will prefer to get the 6T, although Oppo believes it is aiming at a more discerning market than OnePlus, hence the slightly more expensive price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/06/2018
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 87% features: 70% display: 86% mobility: 81%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/09/2018
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/24/2019
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/30/2019
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 85% display: 93% mobility: 90% workmanship: 93%
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Hipertextual ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/08/2018
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/27/2018
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 52% features: 82%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/26/2018
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 71% display: 89% mobility: 84% workmanship: 85%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 70% features: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 76% features: 83% display: 84% mobility: 92% ergonomy: 73%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/06/2018
Source: Computer Totaal NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: XGN NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/25/2018
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/06/2018
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: DGL.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/13/2018
Source: Ferra.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 82%
Oppo RX17 Neo
Specifications
Notebook: Oppo RX17 NeoProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 660
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 512
Display: 6.41 inch, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.156kg
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
This is a tricky one to judge. There are parts of the Oppo RX17 Neo we love, like its excellent battery life and bold screen. However, charging that is both slow and micro USB-based seems totally out of place in 2019, and at the price you can get metal and glass phones. They feel more impressive, although Oppo has done a good job of making plastic look like glass here. Your hands won’t be too easily fooled, though. Buy this if battery life is your top priority, and you’ve been put off Huawei and Honor phones recently.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gadgetspeak EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At the start of April a review of a sibling unit to this one can be found on Gadgetspeak. So here what is quite a similar product on the face of it, however there are surprises like a fingerprint reader that is normally invisible on the screen.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/16/2018
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: XGN NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Le monde numerique FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% display: 70% mobility: 70%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 95% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: i2Hard RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/13/2018
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% display: 84% mobility: 86%
Source: Helpix RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/01/2018
Comment
Oppo:
unknown:
Qualcomm Adreno 512:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
:
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
SD 660:
高性能中档ARM SoC,具有8个CPU Kryo 260内核(集群中的4个高速2.2 GHz内核和2个省电1.8 GHz内核)和Adreno 512 GPU。采用14纳米工艺制造。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
No weight comment found (one expected)!
76.24%: No rating comment found (one expected)!
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.