Oppo RX17 Pro
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 25 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 27 scores (from 40 reviews)
Reviews for the Oppo RX17 Pro
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Look beyond the RX17 Pro's spangly two-tone colour scheme and it's tough to spot any real substance - it feels like a decent mid-range phone that's hamstrung by a few superfluous features and out-of-date software.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: What Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The RX17 Pro is a good smartphone for those looking for a host of new technologies, such as in-screen fingerprint sensors and face-unlocking, plus some key basics such as long battery life with fast charging and a beautiful design. But there are better and cheaper options out there, such as the Xiaomi Mi 8 Pro and the OnePlus 6T.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It's a close battle between this and the OnePlus 6T, and while Oppo's phone is weaker in some respects, it has a more eye-catching design and a cool ToF camera. Still, for the asking price, there are arguably better options available.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Oppo RX17 Pro is a solid phone from Oppo. It looks smart, modern and, unlike some previous Oppo models, isn’t weird or a tech try-hard; it’s the ideal device for its first foray in the UK market.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Oppo RX17 Pro is a more attractive phone for the European market than was the Find X. A gimmicky sliding camera makes way for a solid device that costs less, has a great display and a refreshing, premium design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In a market where the OnePlus 6T exists, is fairly difficult to recommend the RX17 Pro, but on the whole it's a good all-round phone. Plus, it'll charge up faster than anything you've ever used before.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The RX17 Pro is a great looking phone with good performance and a lush display. But with a Snapdragon 710 rather than the better 845 it’s just impossible not to compare it to the OnePlus 6T which looks the same, has better software for the western market and, importantly, costs less.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Once again, the pricing of the Oppo R17 Pro puts it in a tough spot and makes it hard to recommend over the similarly-priced competition. Especially when the competition consists almost entirely of flagship models. Perhaps over the course of few months, the Oppo R17 Pro will get cheaper and it will be worth considering.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The RX17 Pro could be considered a high-end entry into the mid-range, but with the wealth of functionality Oppo has squeezed in here, there’s every reason to compare it against 2018’s flagship handsets. What remains is how well all these promising features play out in real-world use and whether or not the phone has the stones to compete with more classically-styled flagships in the field of performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/08/2018
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The RX17 Pro is priced closely to the OnePlus 6T, which has the cutting-edge Snadpragon 845 to brag with, while the RX17 Pro will be relying on eye-catching looks, a better fingerprint scanner, and hopefully, a more versatile camera. And things do look promising right now!
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/06/2018
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As the RX17 Pro is just over the OnePlus 6T’s €550 price point this is definitely a phone to keep an eye on. Many will prefer to get the 6T, although Oppo believes it is aiming at a more discerning market than OnePlus, hence the slightly more expensive price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/06/2018
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 87% features: 70% display: 86% mobility: 81%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/09/2018
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/24/2019
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/30/2019
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 85% display: 93% mobility: 90% workmanship: 93%
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Hipertextual ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/08/2018
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/27/2018
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 52% features: 82%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/26/2018
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 71% display: 89% mobility: 84% workmanship: 85%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 70% features: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 76% features: 83% display: 84% mobility: 92% ergonomy: 73%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/06/2018
Source: Computer Totaal NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: XGN NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/25/2018
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/06/2018
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: DGL.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/13/2018
Source: Ferra.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 82%
Comment
unknown:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
unknown: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.40":
只有较少的手机有很大的屏幕。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.