Notebookcheck Logo

Oukitel U16 Max 智能手机简短评测

中国黄金标准。这台来自远东的巨型智能手机不仅尺寸和重量惊人,同时也具备不错的功能,售价130欧元(约145美元)。我们好奇的是这台中国设备这次在哪里走了捷径。
Android ARM Phablet Smartphone Touchscreen
Oukitel U16 Max (U Series)
Processor
Mediatek MT6753 8 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T720 MP2, Core: 1300 MHz
Memory
3 GB 
Display
6.00 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 245 PPI, 5点触控, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 24 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: microSD 最高支持 128GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速感应器,近距感应器, OTG
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, 4G: 800/900/1800/2100/2600MHz, 3G: WCDMA 900/2100MHz, 2G: GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9 x 165 x 83
Battery
4000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, Keyboard Light: yes, 保护壳,数据线,电源适配器, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
223 g, Power Supply: 52 g
Price
110 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Oukitel U16 Max
Oukitel U16 Max
Oukitel U16 Max
Oukitel U16 Max
Oukitel U16 Max
Oukitel U16 Max
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Oukitel U16 Max
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
99.7 MBit/s
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
48.6 MBit/s -51%
iperf3 receive AX12
Oukitel U16 Max
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
99.1 MBit/s
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.2 MBit/s -52%
GPS Oukitel U16 Max
GPS Oukitel U16 Max
GPS Oukitel U16 Max
GPS Oukitel U16 Max
GPS Oukitel U16 Max
GPS Oukitel U16 Max
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
Back camera: This box is really orange
Back camera: This box is really orange
Front camera: The colors are pale but at least it is orange!
Back camera: In fall, the yellow tint would be fitting.
Back camera: The sky is more gray than blue.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
On the edges the sharpness becomes visibly less.
On the edges the sharpness becomes visibly less.
The color deviations are significant in some cases.
In bright lighting, the color noise is not so strong and many details are still recognizable.
399
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
404
cd/m²
403
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
400
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
IPS tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 417 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 404.9 cd/m² Minimum: 18.16 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 417 cd/m²
Contrast: 1986:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 14.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.19
Oukitel U16 Max
1280x720, 6"
Ulefone Metal
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Elephone P8000
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
LG Stylus 2
IPS, 1280x720, 5.7"
Screen
-21%
-16%
2%
7%
Brightness middle
417
312
-25%
338
-19%
419
0%
370
-11%
Brightness
405
315
-22%
329
-19%
408
1%
374
-8%
Brightness Distribution
94
87
-7%
95
1%
83
-12%
92
-2%
Black Level *
0.21
0.56
-167%
0.36
-71%
0.35
-67%
0.25
-19%
Contrast
1986
557
-72%
939
-53%
1197
-40%
1480
-25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
11.9
6.8
43%
9.38
21%
6.6
45%
6.1
49%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
21.5
14
35%
12.6
41%
16.5
23%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
14.4
7.1
51%
10.33
28%
7.9
45%
7
51%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.77 79%
2.3 96%
2.08 106%
2.25 98%
CCT
12820 51%
7402 88%
10118 64%
8576 76%
8350 78%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.2 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
72 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 50 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
38295 Points
Ulefone Metal
37103 Points -3%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
37286 Points -3%
LG Stylus 2
28232 Points -26%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
30365 Points -21%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Ulefone Metal
609 Points
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
608 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
569 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Ulefone Metal
2458 Points
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
2442 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
1362 Points
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
Points
Ulefone Metal
7059 Points
Elephone P8000
6892 Points
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
7045 Points
LG Stylus 2
4307 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
3827 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
Points
Ulefone Metal
6469 Points
Elephone P8000
6283 Points
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
6456 Points
LG Stylus 2
3744 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
3369 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
10549 Points
Ulefone Metal
10371 Points -2%
Elephone P8000
10433 Points -1%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
10347 Points -2%
LG Stylus 2
9085 Points -14%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
7298 Points -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
300 Points
Ulefone Metal
293 Points -2%
Elephone P8000
286 Points -5%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
291 Points -3%
LG Stylus 2
53 Points -82%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
157 Points -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
248 Points
Ulefone Metal
243 Points -2%
Elephone P8000
236 Points -5%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
241 Points -3%
LG Stylus 2
42 Points -83%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
128 Points -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
1098 Points
Ulefone Metal
1057 Points -4%
Elephone P8000
1077 Points -2%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
1090 Points -1%
LG Stylus 2
728 Points -34%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
741 Points -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
208 Points
Ulefone Metal
195 Points -6%
Elephone P8000
183 Points -12%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
197 Points -5%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
103 Points -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
169 Points
Ulefone Metal
158 Points -7%
Elephone P8000
148 Points -12%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
160 Points -5%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
83 Points -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
1104 Points
Ulefone Metal
1084 Points -2%
Elephone P8000
1072 Points -3%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
1076 Points -3%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
699 Points -37%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
20 fps
Ulefone Metal
12 fps -40%
Elephone P8000
12 fps -40%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
13 fps -35%
LG Stylus 2
4.9 fps -75%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
10 fps -50%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
12 fps
Ulefone Metal
19 fps +58%
Elephone P8000
12 fps 0%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
12 fps 0%
LG Stylus 2
5.1 fps -57%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
5.9 fps -51%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
9.2 fps
Ulefone Metal
6.4 fps -30%
Elephone P8000
4.2 fps -54%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
4.7 fps -49%
LG Stylus 2
1.8 fps -80%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
4.7 fps -49%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
2.9 fps
Ulefone Metal
2.9 fps 0%
Elephone P8000
4.2 fps +45%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
4.5 fps +55%
LG Stylus 2
3.9 fps +34%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
2.2 fps -24%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
6.5 fps
Ulefone Metal
4.5 fps -31%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
2.9 fps -55%
LG Stylus 2
fps -100%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
3.4 fps -48%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
2.9 fps
Ulefone Metal
8.9 fps +207%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
3.1 fps +7%
LG Stylus 2
fps -100%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
1.4 fps -52%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
4040 Points
Ulefone Metal
4079 Points +1%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
2979 Points -26%
LG Stylus 2
4030 Points 0%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
2517 Points -38%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
21899 ms *
Ulefone Metal
13397 ms * +39%
Elephone P8000
23047 ms * -5%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
14218 ms * +35%
LG Stylus 2
12713 ms * +42%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
14983 ms * +32%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
16.72 Points
Ulefone Metal
17.83 Points +7%
Elephone P8000
20.7 Points +24%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
18.05 Points +8%
LG Stylus 2
17.8 Points +6%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
16.47 Points -1%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
2734 Points
Ulefone Metal
2738 Points 0%
Elephone P8000
3256 Points +19%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
2892 Points +6%
LG Stylus 2
2742 Points 0%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
2534 Points -7%
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
24.56 MB/s
Ulefone Metal
27.6 MB/s +12%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
27.97 MB/s +14%
LG Stylus 2
49.73 MB/s +102%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
29.59 MB/s +20%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
36.27 MB/s
Ulefone Metal
49.6 MB/s +37%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
42.76 MB/s +18%
LG Stylus 2
74.9 MB/s +107%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
47.67 MB/s +31%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
11.24 MB/s
Ulefone Metal
7.87 MB/s -30%
Elephone P8000
12.6 MB/s +12%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
10.4 MB/s -7%
LG Stylus 2
7.3 MB/s -35%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
9.1 MB/s -19%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
18.5 MB/s
Ulefone Metal
22.18 MB/s +20%
Elephone P8000
23.5 MB/s +27%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
22.2 MB/s +20%
LG Stylus 2
9.8 MB/s -47%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
20.9 MB/s +13%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
69.9 MB/s
Ulefone Metal
39.91 MB/s -43%
Elephone P8000
72 MB/s +3%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
70.1 MB/s 0%
LG Stylus 2
75.9 MB/s +9%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
65.2 MB/s -7%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Oukitel U16 Max
231.1 MB/s
Ulefone Metal
228.8 MB/s -1%
Elephone P8000
233 MB/s +1%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
209.4 MB/s -9%
LG Stylus 2
130.3 MB/s -44%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
174.2 MB/s -25%

Legend

 
Oukitel U16 Max Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Ulefone Metal Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Elephone P8000 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG Stylus 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 35 °C34.6 °C32.8 °C 
 34.3 °C35 °C33.4 °C 
 34.1 °C33.2 °C32.8 °C 
Maximum: 35 °C
Average: 33.9 °C
30.9 °C31.1 °C31.9 °C
30.9 °C31 °C32.2 °C
30.2 °C30.9 °C31.9 °C
Maximum: 32.2 °C
Average: 31.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  28.8 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.641.52525.435.53125.332.14032.930.25033.632.96331.626.28028.429.41002725.412520.823.31602225.720021.324.425020.833.331521.24440019.452.950019.559.163017.764.580017.968.7100017.870.4125017.372.8160017.472.9200016.772250017.270.7315018.271.4400017.975.8500017.670.7630017.762.5800017.857.11000017.952.61250018.142.61600018.234SPL3082.8N1.349median 17.9median 59.1Delta1.415.726.428.426.42826.72825.828.725.829.133.229.126.12626.123.925.523.927.724.727.733.426.933.441.53741.540.320.240.343.720.243.745.521.845.547224752.822.252.860.121.860.166.517.266.569.217.869.271.619.871.669.919.169.96815.46869.515.669.56614.96671.514.771.571.214.271.272.21472.271.213.971.26713.86758.913.958.952.413.952.454.713.754.781.529.581.549.91.349.9median 66median 17.2median 6610.13.810.120.622.921.920.620.721.720.320.722.32123.622.322.626.934.422.621.222.321.921.217.820.318.917.817.918.118.617.922.522.823.922.534.733.236.134.716.72617.216.716.433.215.816.419.438.919.119.422.345.519.122.327.552.717.927.533.658.319.133.639.163.216.139.143.466.515.543.442.764.716.442.739.26213.739.236.8601336.834.857.913.934.834.558.911.434.537.861.110.737.839.16310.339.141.464.29.841.442.7689.442.748.271.69.548.240.764.99.440.730.755.79.630.726.850.39.426.852.876.426.652.88.337.30.98.3median 34.8median 58.9median 13.9median 34.87.710.24.17.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOukitel U16 MaxApple iPhone 7 PlusUlefone Metal
Oukitel U16 Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Ulefone Metal audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.08 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.93 / 2.23 / 2.31 Watt
Load midlight 5.61 / 8.26 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
26h 13min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 11min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 46min
Oukitel U16 Max
4000 mAh
Ulefone Metal
3050 mAh
Elephone P8000
 mAh
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
4080 mAh
LG Stylus 2
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-45%
-36%
25%
-19%
Reader / Idle
1573
1225
-22%
WiFi v1.3
731
403
-45%
637
-13%
1087
49%
663
-9%
Load
346
146
-58%
351
1%
258
-25%
H.264
697

Pros

+ 实惠的价位
+ 指纹感应器
+ 大尺寸屏幕
+ 坚固的金属机身
+ 非常优秀的电池续航
+ 双SIM卡
+ 存储空间可扩展到最大128GB
+ 3GB内存
+ 低发热量
+ 最新安卓系统
+ 优秀的通话音质
+ 充足的存储空间

Cons

- 相机品质一般
- 重量高
- 功耗高
- 一般的处理器
Oukitel U16 Max - provided by Oukitel.
Oukitel U16 Max - provided by Oukitel.

如果我们想象有这样一个用户群体,他们希望得到一台大屏幕设备,而不在意较高的机身重量,同时相对较低的价位则会平衡其他方面的弱点。从这个角度来看,我们必须承认Oukitel设计了一台十分引人注目的设备。

这是一台优秀而平衡的设备,可惜相机品质有待改进。

这款智能手机整体表现优秀,搭配了大尺寸屏幕和大容量电池。它的运行速度并不算出色,不过在这个价位上我们也无法要求太高。屏幕的分辨率也有些过时,不过如果不仔细看配置表的话,也不容易察觉到太大的区别。而它的相机中存在的问题则相对较大。很遗憾,它们只能够满足在光线较好的环境下拍摄的需要。如果它们能够有更好的成像质量,而不仅是高分辨率的话,这台设备应该可以更值得推荐。不过作为一台低价位设备,这台设备仍然值得考虑。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Oukitel U16 Max - 05/26/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Schaar

Chassis
74%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
87%
Connectivity
33 / 60 → 54%
Weight
88%
Battery
100%
Display
79%
Games Performance
21 / 63 → 33%
Application Performance
34 / 70 → 49%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 61%
Camera
51%
Average
68%
78%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Oukitel U16 Max 智能手机简短评测
Florian Schaar, 2017-06-10 (Update: 2024-11- 4)