联想 P2 智能手机简短评测
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 610 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.28
| Lenovo P2 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Lenovo Moto Z Play AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 8% | 27% | -34% | -46% | |
| Brightness middle | 479 | 509 6% | 539 13% | 658 37% | 625 30% |
| Brightness | 477 | 511 7% | 542 14% | 633 33% | 639 34% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 93 2% | 93 2% | 93 2% | 92 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.66 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 2.2 8% | 1.6 33% | 4.9 -104% | 5.9 -146% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.6 | 5.8 -4% | 2.6 54% | 9.1 -63% | 14.6 -161% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 2 29% | 1.5 46% | 5.8 -107% | 3.8 -36% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.25 98% | 2.28 96% | 2.26 97% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 6702 97% | 6768 96% | 6422 101% | 7840 83% | 7196 90% |
| Contrast | 997 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.4 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
* ... smaller is better
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 55 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Lenovo P2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0 / 0.23 Watt |
| Idle |  0.54 / 1.01 / 1.03 Watt |
| Load |
1.78 / 3.98 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo P2 5100 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 7% | -25% | -80% | -70% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.54 | 0.51 6% | 0.64 -19% | 0.83 -54% | 0.76 -41% |
| Idle Average * | 1.01 | 0.87 14% | 1.36 -35% | 2.11 -109% | 1.02 -1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.03 | 0.9 13% | 1.4 -36% | 2.12 -106% | 1.04 -1% |
| Load Average * | 1.78 | 1.69 5% | 2.53 -42% | 3.41 -92% | 4.4 -147% |
| Load Maximum * | 3.98 | 4 -1% | 3.63 9% | 5.46 -37% | 10.4 -161% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo P2 5100 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -1% | -15% | -31% | -58% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2841 | 2540 -11% | 2418 -15% | 1502 -47% | |
| H.264 | 1199 | 1190 -1% | 984 -18% | 905 -25% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 978 | 824 -16% | 843 -14% | 797 -19% | 415 -58% |
| Load | 528 | 652 23% | 467 -12% | 352 -33% |
Pros
Cons
我们已经在介绍中提到联想P2的电池续航是极其优秀的。然而，我们真正惊叹的是联想创造了这样一台全面的手机。优雅坚实的机身，合适的性能，较为锐利的相机成像，为适应用户控制习惯提供多种选项，颜色精准的AMOLED显示屏，卓越的外放扬声器，以及较低的机身温度使我们对P2的初见无法有太多苛求。
若仔细观察，可以发现一些缺点。例如，有时软件的翻译很糟糕，屏幕轻度偏蓝且亮度相对偏低。麦克风并不完美，相机在某些地方拍照可能会出现无法对焦的问题。总体上来说，这些都是小问题，其中有些可以通过软件更新解决。但不幸的是，就是这些问题让联想P2无法获得“十分出色”的评价。
联想 P2是一台几乎没有缺点的优秀中端设备，在电池续航以及扬声器方面有耀眼的表现。
但是，联想P2是对于所有想要购买中端智能手机的用户来说都值得考虑的出色手机。特别是那些看重电池续航时间的用户，P2能令他们满意。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Lenovo P2
- 02/24/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
