Notebookcheck Logo

联想 P2 智能手机简短评测

P代表了“强大的电池”。 联想推出了一款强大的中端手机P2。它的亮点在于在相对紧凑的机身内装下了巨大的电池。事实上,它的电池续航能力是顶级的,但它在其他方面的表现如何呢?
Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone
Lenovo P2
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 506
Memory
4 GB 
Display
5.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, 电容触摸屏, AMOLED, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23.87 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm 音频接口, Card Reader: micro-SD 最大 128 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计, 陀螺仪, 距离传感器, 罗盘, USB OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40); Bandbreite (download/​upload): 300Mbps/​50Mbps (LTE), 42Mbps/​5.76Mbps (UMTS); SAR rates: 0.818 W/kg (head); 1.6, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 153 x 76
Battery
19.38 Wh, 5100 mAh Lithium-Ion, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 78 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 768 h
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 相位自动对焦, 双LED闪光灯, 录像 @1080p
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 底边扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, 充电器, USB 线缆, 耳机, USB-OTG 转接器, SIM 工具, Theme Center, Lenovo Companion, SHAREit, SYNCit, 24 Months Warranty, FM 收音机, fanless
Weight
177 g, Power Supply: 87 g
Price
349 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo P2
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
216 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, Exynos 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
167 MBit/s -23%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s -48%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 32 GB eMMC Flash
35.4 MBit/s -84%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31.2 MBit/s -86%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, Exynos 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s +141%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s +36%
Lenovo P2
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
88.8 MBit/s
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 32 GB eMMC Flash
35.8 MBit/s -60%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
32.9 MBit/s -63%
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
GPS Lenovo P2: Overview
GPS Lenovo P2: Overview
GPS Lenovo P2: Crossing
GPS Lenovo P2: Crossing
GPS Lenovo P2: Bridge
GPS Lenovo P2: Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
501
cd/m²
482
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
493
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
480
cd/m²
454
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 501 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 477.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4.33 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 610 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.28
Lenovo P2
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Lenovo Moto Z Play
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"
Screen
8%
27%
-34%
-46%
Brightness middle
479
509
6%
539
13%
658
37%
625
30%
Brightness
477
511
7%
542
14%
633
33%
639
34%
Brightness Distribution
91
93
2%
93
2%
93
2%
92
1%
Black Level *
0.66
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.4
2.2
8%
1.6
33%
4.9
-104%
5.9
-146%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.6
5.8
-4%
2.6
54%
9.1
-63%
14.6
-161%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.8
2
29%
1.5
46%
5.8
-107%
3.8
-36%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.25 98%
2.28 96%
2.26 97%
2.27 97%
CCT
6702 97%
6768 96%
6422 101%
7840 83%
7196 90%
Contrast
997

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
63522 Points
Lenovo Moto Z Play
61345 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
60603 Points -5%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
62484 Points -2%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
83564 Points +32%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
818 Points
Lenovo Moto Z Play
795 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
775 Points -5%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
820 Points 0%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
1475 Points +80%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
2875 Points
Lenovo Moto Z Play
2525 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
4098 Points +43%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
4042 Points +41%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
3427 Points +19%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
13808 Points
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13920 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13256 Points -4%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13955 Points +1%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
17695 Points +28%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
13398 Points
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13437 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13314 Points -1%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13466 Points +1%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
21398 Points +60%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
15462 Points
Lenovo Moto Z Play
15923 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13057 Points -16%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
15984 Points +3%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
11020 Points -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
831 Points
Lenovo Moto Z Play
827 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1155 Points +39%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
842 Points +1%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
1363 Points +64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
726 Points
Lenovo Moto Z Play
725 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1053 Points +45%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
719 Points -1%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
1275 Points +76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
1682 Points
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1631 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1752 Points +4%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2112 Points +26%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
1800 Points +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
459 Points
Lenovo Moto Z Play
461 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
816 Points +78%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
465 Points +1%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
870 Points +90%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
380 Points
Lenovo Moto Z Play
382 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
710 Points +87%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
380 Points 0%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
759 Points +100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
1673 Points
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1636 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1713 Points +2%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2109 Points +26%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
1788 Points +7%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
23 fps
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
33 fps +43%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
21 fps -9%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
22 fps -4%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
23 fps
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
34 fps +48%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
23 fps 0%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
31 fps +35%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
10 fps
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps +50%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.7 fps -3%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
9.3 fps -7%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
10 fps
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps +50%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.9 fps -1%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
15 fps +50%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
6.7 fps
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.7 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9 fps +34%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.1 fps -9%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
4.7 fps -30%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
6.2 fps
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.2 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9.1 fps +47%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.2 fps 0%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
9.4 fps +52%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
4810 Points
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6767 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5035 Points +5%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6785 Points +41%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
4852 Points +1%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
1226 Points
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1019 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1408 Points +15%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1215 Points -1%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
1623 Points +32%
System (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
1960 Points
Lenovo Moto Z Play
2069 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
2593 Points +32%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2923 Points +49%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
2338 Points +19%
Memory (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
1451 Points
Lenovo Moto Z Play
795 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1508 Points +4%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1042 Points -28%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
1861 Points +28%
Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
1016 Points
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1013 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1528 Points +50%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1019 Points 0%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
1581 Points +56%
Web (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
783 Points
Lenovo Moto Z Play
649 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
659 Points -16%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
702 Points -10%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
1009 Points +29%

Legend

 
Lenovo P2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Samsung Exynos 7880, ARM Mali-T830 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976, Qualcomm Adreno 510, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
8463 ms *
Lenovo Moto Z Play
8169 ms * +3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
6442 ms * +24%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
8041 ms * +5%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
3402 ms * +60%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
4435 Points
Lenovo Moto Z Play
4979 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5256 Points +19%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
4905 Points +11%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
9005 Points +103%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
28.88 Points
Lenovo Moto Z Play
31.8 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
32.22 Points +12%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
31.12 Points +8%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
52 Points +80%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
84 Points
Lenovo Moto Z Play
83 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
89 Points +6%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
84 Points 0%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
270.1 MB/s
Lenovo Moto Z Play
254.8 MB/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
182 MB/s -33%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
282 MB/s +4%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
231.9 MB/s -14%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
76.7 MB/s
Lenovo Moto Z Play
73.1 MB/s -5%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
77.1 MB/s +1%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
188 MB/s +145%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
80.8 MB/s +5%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
38.2 MB/s
Lenovo Moto Z Play
38.78 MB/s +2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
22.41 MB/s -41%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
74 MB/s +94%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
36.53 MB/s -4%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
44.4 MB/s
Lenovo Moto Z Play
45.58 MB/s +3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
12.13 MB/s -73%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
7.4 MB/s -83%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
14.45 MB/s -67%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
79.3 MB/s
Lenovo Moto Z Play
74.6 MB/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
73.7 MB/s -7%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
79.2 MB/s 0%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
74.6 MB/s -6%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
59.4 MB/s
Lenovo Moto Z Play
50.6 MB/s -15%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
56 MB/s -6%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
50.1 MB/s -16%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
56.3 MB/s -5%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high55 fps
Max. Load
 30.8 °C28.1 °C28 °C 
 32 °C29.3 °C27.8 °C 
 31.2 °C28 °C27.9 °C 
Maximum: 32 °C
Average: 29.2 °C
28.5 °C29.5 °C29.3 °C
28.6 °C29.5 °C29.2 °C
28.1 °C28.9 °C28.5 °C
Maximum: 29.5 °C
Average: 28.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  27.8 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.642.42525.436.13125.333.74032.926.15033.629.46331.634.38028.429.11002728.412520.829.71602246.220021.359.125020.866.931521.26640019.469.550019.566.263017.762.880017.967.8100017.870125017.372160017.476.6200016.779.3250017.277.7315018.275.7400017.971.8500017.666.7630017.758.2800017.860.51000017.959.91250018.165.61600018.262.1SPL3085.7N1.358.8median 17.9median 66.2Delta1.45.531.641.125.44025.336.732.93633.635.631.630.628.432.92733.820.841.72244.421.348.420.850.521.256.619.462.519.566.217.766.117.974.217.877.317.374.317.473.816.771.817.269.318.269.517.966.517.661.417.755.817.854.517.959.918.152.218.249.530831.350.1median 17.9median 61.41.410.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo P2Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Lenovo P2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.23 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.54 / 1.01 / 1.03 Watt
Load midlight 1.78 / 3.98 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo P2
5100 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3510 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
7%
-25%
-80%
-70%
Idle Minimum *
0.54
0.51
6%
0.64
-19%
0.83
-54%
0.76
-41%
Idle Average *
1.01
0.87
14%
1.36
-35%
2.11
-109%
1.02
-1%
Idle Maximum *
1.03
0.9
13%
1.4
-36%
2.12
-106%
1.04
-1%
Load Average *
1.78
1.69
5%
2.53
-42%
3.41
-92%
4.4
-147%
Load Maximum *
3.98
4
-1%
3.63
9%
5.46
-37%
10.4
-161%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
47h 21min
WiFi Websurfing
16h 18min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 59min
Load (maximum brightness)
8h 48min
Lenovo P2
5100 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3510 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-1%
-15%
-31%
-58%
Reader / Idle
2841
2540
-11%
2418
-15%
1502
-47%
H.264
1199
1190
-1%
984
-18%
905
-25%
WiFi v1.3
978
824
-16%
843
-14%
797
-19%
415
-58%
Load
528
652
23%
467
-12%
352
-33%

Pros

+ 出色的扬声器
+ 低温
+ 坚固的金属外壳
+ 超长电池续航时间
+ 低功耗
+ 多使用选项
+ 出色的软件
+ 出色的性能
+ 广视角且色彩准确的屏幕
+ 双SIM卡,支持USB-OTG及NFC
+ 出色的成像质量
+ 有用的性能
+ 高存储访问速度
+ 高速LTE网络

Cons

- 略微不准的GPS
- 软件翻译有时不到位
- 麦克风失真
- 糟糕的低亮度成像
- 相对来说屏幕亮度偏低
In review: Lenovo P2. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Lenovo P2. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

我们已经在介绍中提到联想P2的电池续航是极其优秀的。然而,我们真正惊叹的是联想创造了这样一台全面的手机。优雅坚实的机身,合适的性能,较为锐利的相机成像,为适应用户控制习惯提供多种选项,颜色精准的AMOLED显示屏,卓越的外放扬声器,以及较低的机身温度使我们对P2的初见无法有太多苛求。

若仔细观察,可以发现一些缺点。例如,有时软件的翻译很糟糕,屏幕轻度偏蓝且亮度相对偏低。麦克风并不完美,相机在某些地方拍照可能会出现无法对焦的问题。总体上来说,这些都是小问题,其中有些可以通过软件更新解决。但不幸的是,就是这些问题让联想P2无法获得“十分出色”的评价。

联想 P2是一台几乎没有缺点的优秀中端设备,在电池续航以及扬声器方面有耀眼的表现。

但是,联想P2是对于所有想要购买中端智能手机的用户来说都值得考虑的出色手机。特别是那些看重电池续航时间的用户,P2能令他们满意。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Lenovo P2 - 02/24/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 91%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
50 / 60 → 83%
Weight
90%
Battery
100%
Display
89%
Games Performance
28 / 63 → 44%
Application Performance
49 / 70 → 70%
Temperature
95%
Noise
100%
Audio
65 / 91 → 71%
Camera
77%
Average
76%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想 P2 智能手机简短评测
Florian Wimmer, 2017-03-14 (Update: 2017-03-14)