Notebookcheck Logo

技嘉 P55W v7 笔记本简短评测

标准v7。 技嘉新游戏本的目标用户是那些追求极致性价比而愿意在其余配置上做出让步的玩家。比起上一代来说，P55W v7提供了稍强的整体性能，噪音温度稍低的系统。
Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows
Gigabyte P55W v7 (P55 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 1405 MHz, RAM: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 378.49, Nvidia Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, SO-DIMM DDR4, 2400 MHz, 单通道, 两条插槽中一条被占用, 最大 32 GB
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 全高清, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM175
Storage
Liteonit CV3-8D256, 256 GB 
, SATA-3-SSD + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD @ 7200 rpm. 插槽: 1x M.2 type 2280 (支持 PCIe/NVMe) & 1x 2.5 inch
Soundcard
Realtek ALC255 @ High Definition Audio-Controller
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机 (音频输出) + 麦克风 (音频输入), 都是 3.5-mm 接口, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Optical drive
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 34 x 380 x 269
Battery
63 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 6 芯
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声扬声器, 2 x 2瓦, Keyboard: 巧克力, Keyboard Light: yes, 180瓦电源适配器, Adobe Reader XI, CyberLink PowerDVD 12, MS Office 365 trial, 多种厂商工具, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.628 kg, Power Supply: 646 g
Price
1700 EUR
Links
Gigabyte homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Left: Kensington, vent, mini-DisplayPort, Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C, USB 3.0
Left: Kensington, vent, mini-DisplayPort, Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C, USB 3.0
Right: audio-in (mic), audio-out (headset), 2x USB 3.0, DVD burner, power
Right: audio-in (mic), audio-out (headset), 2x USB 3.0, DVD burner, power
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
SCHENKER XMG P507
 
77 MB/s +1%
Gigabyte P55W v7
 
76 MB/s
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
 
75 MB/s -1%
Gigabyte P55W v6
 
73 MB/s -4%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
 
23.4 MB/s -69%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte P55W v7
 
88 MB/s
Gigabyte P55W v6
 
87 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG P507
 
86 MB/s -2%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
 
85 MB/s -3%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
 
23.5 MB/s -73%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
507 MBit/s +8%
Gigabyte P55W v6
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
492 MBit/s +5%
Gigabyte P55W v7
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
470 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
677 MBit/s +2%
Gigabyte P55W v7
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
663 MBit/s
Gigabyte P55W v6
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
660 MBit/s 0%
270
cd/m²		271
cd/m²		283
cd/m²
280
cd/m²		287
cd/m²		299
cd/m²
295
cd/m²		304
cd/m²		309
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 309 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 288.7 cd/m² Minimum: 9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 287 cd/m²
Contrast: 990:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.66 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
82% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32
Gigabyte P55W v7
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6"		Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6"		MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
1920x1080, 15.6"		SCHENKER XMG P507
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6"		Gigabyte P55W v6
LG Philips LP156WF4 (LGD040E), 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
2%
3%
2%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
63.5
64.5
2%
65.6
3%
64.5
2%
63.2
0%
sRGB Coverage
82
83.4
2%
84.3
3%
83.4
2%
80.6
-2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
59.9
60.9
2%
61.7
3%
61
2%
59
-2%
Response Times
-4%
-3%
6%
-38%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
37 ?(15, 22)
40 ?(15, 25)
-8%
36.8 ?(16.4, 20.4)
1%
36 ?(12, 24)
3%
56 ?(23, 33)
-51%
Response Time Black / White *
25 ?(5, 20)
25 ?(5, 20)
-0%
26.4 ?(5.2, 21.2)
-6%
23 ?(5, 18)
8%
31 ?(8, 23)
-24%
PWM Frequency
Screen
3%
16%
-1%
-6%
Brightness middle
287
321
12%
302
5%
288
0%
280
-2%
Brightness
289
296
2%
303
5%
292
1%
294
2%
Brightness Distribution
87
88
1%
87
0%
87
0%
82
-6%
Black Level *
0.29
0.33
-14%
0.169
42%
0.3
-3%
0.46
-59%
Contrast
990
973
-2%
1787
81%
960
-3%
609
-38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.92
4.42
10%
4.61
6%
5.1
-4%
4.48
9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11
9.78
11%
9.98
9%
9.44
14%
10.16
8%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.66
3.34
9%
3.32
9%
4.43
-21%
2.69
27%
Gamma
2.32 95%
2.4 92%
2.24 98%
2.46 89%
2.37 93%
CCT
6482 100%
6213 105%
6358 102%
6687 97%
6455 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
54
55
2%
55.4
3%
55
2%
53
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
82
83
1%
84.4
3%
83
1%
80
-2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
0% / 2%
5% / 11%
2% / 0%
-15% / -9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte P55W v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
156 Points
SCHENKER XMG P507
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points -5%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points -5%
Gigabyte P55W v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
143 Points -8%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
138 Points -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte P55W v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points
SCHENKER XMG P507
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
682 Points -7%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
680 Points -7%
Gigabyte P55W v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
673 Points -8%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
658 Points -10%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
156 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
733 Points
Help
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
4741 Points +18%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4059 Points +1%
Gigabyte P55W v6
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800)
4014 Points 0%
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D256
4013 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D256
5317 Points
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
5109 Points -4%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5046 Points -5%
Gigabyte P55W v6
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800)
4784 Points -10%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4013 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5317 points
Help
Gigabyte P55W v7
Liteonit CV3-8D256		Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)		MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e		SCHENKER XMG P507
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e		Gigabyte P55W v6
Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
28%
249%
227%
-6%
Read Seq
466.2
462.5
-1%
1696
264%
1857
298%
511
10%
Write Seq
261.9
462.7
77%
1584
505%
1240
373%
161.1
-38%
Read 512
252.5
335
33%
1044
313%
971
285%
338
34%
Write 512
254.8
407.1
60%
1562
513%
1239
386%
160.8
-37%
Read 4k
25.4
25.61
1%
50.8
100%
54.1
113%
26.2
3%
Write 4k
55
86.3
57%
139.2
153%
167.4
204%
76.7
39%
Read 4k QD32
358.5
246.7
-31%
591
65%
695
94%
264.7
-26%
Write 4k QD32
240.1
301.5
26%
422.8
76%
386.8
61%
160.3
-33%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
AS SSD
hddimg
Liteonit CV3-8D256
Sequential Read: 466.2 MB/s
Sequential Write: 261.9 MB/s
512K Read: 252.5 MB/s
512K Write: 254.8 MB/s
4K Read: 25.4 MB/s
4K Write: 55 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 358.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 240.1 MB/s
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11872 Points +4%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11622 Points +2%
Gigabyte P55W v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11426 Points
Gigabyte P55W v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11422 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG P507
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11045 Points -3%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
15466 Points +5%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
15387 Points +5%
Gigabyte P55W v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14792 Points +1%
Gigabyte P55W v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14693 Points
SCHENKER XMG P507
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14222 Points -3%
3DMark 11 Performance
11778 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
21839 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9669 points
Help
lowmed.highultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 70.4 38.4
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 72.6 61.8
Battlefield 1 (2016) 77.6 73.6
Dishonored 2 (2016) 80.2 60.2 46.5
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 98.5 83

Noise Level

Idle
33 / 34 / 35 dB(A)
HDD
34 dB(A)
DVD
37 / dB(A)
Load
39 / 50 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Max. Load
 49.6 °C43.6 °C31.1 °C 
 49 °C45.4 °C31.8 °C 
 45.1 °C44.3 °C28.3 °C 
Maximum: 49.6 °C
Average: 40.9 °C
26.3 °C38.7 °C47.7 °C
29.7 °C44.7 °C47.1 °C
28.5 °C44.5 °C46.3 °C
Maximum: 47.7 °C
Average: 39.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.1 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.6 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.7 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-16.2 °C / -29.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.548.72535.843.33131.330.44036.537.65033.133.46334.729.88034.234.3100323212526.432.116022.739.820021.852.525022.857.731520.558.640019.958.250019.261.463019.163.580018.558.2100018.665.212501872.4160017.769.6200017.567.3250017.662.9315017.861.540001860.5500018.265.6630018.468.7800018.472.71000018.761.41250018.963.71600019.355.2SPL30.679.2N1.544.6median 18.7median 61.4Delta1.86.238.135.744.241.14038.832.337.229.334.231.429.93134.524.335.423.525.626.634.822.343.522.851.721.260.720.36119.260.618.764.818.464.618.667.519.465.818.662.718.863.518.864.718.764.618.863.418.966.918.965.918.953.71949.718.849.318.745.431.276.31.538.8median 18.9median 611.38.740.442.437.538.237.935.934.834.934.334.632.83331.434.330.235.530.440.628.349.128.35328.358.327.2612763.426.665.32663.625.65625.46325.765.625.162.424.153.124.156.523.762.923.964.923.767.123.664.823.371.723.368.723.462.623.458.336.876.92.840.9median 25.4median 62.61.65.937.230.229.929.329.2293328.729.228.126.826.825.928.624.928.324.329.622.437.722.447.120.347.820.750.719.261.718.666.318.965.418.461.618.760.417.863.51862.417.862.818.164.818.164.91858.417.857.71862.518.161.718.160.918.158.8185730.474.71.435.4median 18.1median 60.916.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGigabyte P55W v7Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039TMSI GE62VR 6RF-001USSCHENKER XMG P507
Gigabyte P55W v7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG P507 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 0.8 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 8 / 13 / 18 Watt
Load midlight 76 / 143 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigabyte P55W v7
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		SCHENKER XMG P507
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		Gigabyte P55W v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Power Consumption
-35%
-97%
-21%
-0%
Idle Minimum *
8
16
-100%
25.4
-218%
11
-38%
8
-0%
Idle Average *
13
19
-46%
30.3
-133%
16
-23%
13
-0%
Idle Maximum *
18
23
-28%
31.5
-75%
21
-17%
17
6%
Load Average *
76
68
11%
111.8
-47%
80
-5%
71
7%
Load Maximum *
143
157
-10%
163.2
-14%
174
-22%
165
-15%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
13h 9min
WiFi Websurfing
5h 46min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 38min
Gigabyte P55W v7
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 63 Wh		Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh		MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 51 Wh		SCHENKER XMG P507
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 60 Wh		Gigabyte P55W v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 63 Wh
Battery Runtime
-36%
-73%
-14%
-8%
Reader / Idle
789
315
-60%
137
-83%
409
-48%
610
-23%
WiFi v1.3
346
220
-36%
101
-71%
274
-21%
352
2%
Load
98
87
-11%
35
-64%
123
26%
95
-3%
H.264
235
338

Pros

+ 无可挑剔的制造工艺，看起来很坚固的外壳
+ 相对较长的电池续航时间
+ 强大游戏性能（考虑价格因素）
+ 出色的输入设备
+ USB 3.1 Gen.2 Type-C
+ IPS屏幕
+ 无 PWM

Cons

- 在高转速下风扇有时啸叫
- 塑料易划伤外壳
- 接口位置排布不方便使用
- 相对速度较低的固态硬盘
- 响应时间不理想
- 无Thunderbolt 3
Gigabyte P55W v7. Test model courtesy of Gigabyte Germany
Gigabyte P55W v7. Test model courtesy of Gigabyte Germany

技嘉又一次在合适的地方做了一些缩减，让P55W v7这台总体上来说不错的笔记本电脑与其他游戏本相争。通过省去的特性诸如Thunderbolt 3与G-Sync让用户生下数百欧元----这些妥协无关性能。

仅考虑相对较低的价格，我们对它的输入设备以及IPS屏幕十分满意，但后者有一些限制。同样对坚固的塑料外壳及易于移除的底壳我们也很满意。但接口的排布，相对较慢的屏幕响应时间以及和原来一样无法令人完全满意的SSD并不让人喜欢。高负载下的高频噪音是技嘉P55W v7的唯一真正缺点。但这个可能是特殊情况。因此，它值得推荐但需要注意噪声。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Gigabyte P55W v7 - 02/28/2017 v6 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Chassis
79 / 98 → 81%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
78%
Connectivity
60 / 81 → 74%
Weight
59 / 10-66 → 87%
Battery
87%
Display
86%
Games Performance
92%
Application Performance
91%
Temperature
86 / 95 → 90%
Noise
71 / 90 → 79%
Audio
68%
Camera
71 / 85 → 84%
Average
78%
84%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 技嘉 P55W v7 笔记本简短评测
Sven Kloevekorn, 2017-03-14 (Update: 2017-03-14)