Notebookcheck Logo

技嘉 P57X v6 笔记本电脑简短评测

简洁,依然搭载帕斯卡。 技嘉没有为它的P57游戏本系列新机型带来太多改变,不过这里的主角当然会是最新英伟达帕斯卡架构的横空出世。搭配GTX 1070的P57X v6有足够的吸引力让你驻足回首吗?
Gaming Skylake Windows
Gigabyte P57X v6 (P57 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1645 MHz, RAM: 8000 MHz, 10.18.13.6871, Yes; Intel HD Graphics 530
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR4 2133 MHz
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, 非触控, LGD0469, IPS, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Sunrise Point HM170
Storage
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), 256 GB 
, + 第二块硬盘 HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
Soundcard
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机和麦克风接口, Card Reader: SD
Networking
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1 + LE
Optical drive
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 31 x 418 x 296
Battery
75.81 Wh, 6830 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 高清
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 2 瓦 x 2, 位于机身前方/底部, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
3.246 kg, Power Supply: 938 g
Price
1999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

428 mm 333 mm 51 mm 4.5 kg428 mm 294 mm 48 mm 3.8 kg427 mm 318 mm 36 mm 4.4 kg423 mm 322 mm 40 mm 4.2 kg423 mm 305 mm 27.95 mm 3.6 kg418 mm 296 mm 31 mm 3.2 kg408 mm 295.5 mm 26.6 mm 4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
 
136.5 MB/s +79%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
 
78 MB/s +2%
Gigabyte P57X v6
 
76.4 MB/s
Asus G752VS-XB78K
 
76 MB/s -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
 
75.3 MB/s -1%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
 
195.2 MB/s +117%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
 
93.8 MB/s +4%
Gigabyte P57X v6
 
89.9 MB/s
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
 
88 MB/s -2%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
 
86 MB/s -4%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m 512KB
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
518 MBit/s +2%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
507 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 512KB
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
532 MBit/s +7%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
497 MBit/s
311.3
cd/m²
322.4
cd/m²
331.9
cd/m²
312.5
cd/m²
329.2
cd/m²
332
cd/m²
309.4
cd/m²
317.5
cd/m²
321.5
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LGD0469 tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Maximum: 332 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 320.9 cd/m² Minimum: 9.74 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 329.2 cd/m²
Contrast: 1233:1 (Black: 0.267 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.93 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.72 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Gigabyte P57X v6
LGD0469, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
17.3", 1920x1080
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160
EVGA SC17
IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160
Asus G752VS-XB78K
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Gigabyte P57W
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF1 (LGD0469), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Display
-1%
-1%
32%
33%
-3%
-3%
Display P3 Coverage
68
67.4
-1%
67.6
-1%
86.9
28%
87.6
29%
66.9
-2%
66.5
-2%
sRGB Coverage
87.5
86.3
-1%
86.2
-1%
100
14%
100
14%
85.2
-3%
84.4
-4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
64
63.2
-1%
63
-2%
99.4
55%
99
55%
62.3
-3%
61.7
-4%
Response Times
-2%
-3%
-2%
-82%
1%
-2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
33.6 ?(14, 19.6)
34.8 ?(14, 20.8)
-4%
34.4 ?(14.8, 19.6)
-2%
37 ?(13, 24)
-10%
69.6 ?(28.4, 41.2)
-107%
38 ?(14, 24)
-13%
37 ?(13, 24)
-10%
Response Time Black / White *
25.6 ?(5.2, 20.4)
25.6 ?(4.8, 20.8)
-0%
26.4 ?(4.4, 22)
-3%
24 ?(5, 19)
6%
40 ?(10, 30)
-56%
22 ?(4, 18)
14%
24 ?(5, 19)
6%
PWM Frequency
1000 ?(29)
Screen
2%
7%
20%
6%
8%
0%
Brightness middle
329.2
344.9
5%
351.7
7%
336
2%
394.1
20%
328
0%
286
-13%
Brightness
321
329
2%
339
6%
320
0%
368
15%
317
-1%
274
-15%
Brightness Distribution
93
86
-8%
91
-2%
88
-5%
83
-11%
88
-5%
87
-6%
Black Level *
0.267
0.349
-31%
0.37
-39%
0.25
6%
0.439
-64%
0.3
-12%
0.31
-16%
Contrast
1233
988
-20%
951
-23%
1344
9%
898
-27%
1093
-11%
923
-25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.93
4.49
24%
3.71
37%
3.61
39%
5.79
2%
3.74
37%
4.49
24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.07
8.72
21%
8.48
23%
6.02
46%
8.44
24%
8.97
19%
7.83
29%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.72
4.63
31%
2.46
63%
4.78
29%
4.23
37%
2.67
60%
4.76
29%
Gamma
2.12 104%
2.11 104%
2.29 96%
2.32 95%
2.11 104%
2.41 91%
2.47 89%
CCT
7611 85%
6905 94%
6849 95%
6185 105%
7479 87%
6861 95%
6843 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
56.7
-1%
56.6
-1%
88
54%
86.6
52%
56
-2%
55
-4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
87
86.4
-1%
86.1
-1%
100
15%
100
15%
85
-2%
84
-3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-0% / 1%
1% / 4%
17% / 19%
-14% / -0%
2% / 5%
-2% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z RAM SPD
CPU-Z RAM SPD
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
ComputeMark
ComputeMark
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.77 Points +18%
EVGA SC17
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.75 Points +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.67 Points +11%
Gigabyte P57W
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.67 Points +11%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.59 Points +6%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
8.63 Points +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
7.73 Points +4%
EVGA SC17
Intel Core i7-6820HK
7.72 Points +4%
Gigabyte P57W
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.46 Points 0%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.44 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.4 Points -1%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
160 Points +14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
152 Points +9%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
141 Points +1%
Gigabyte P57W
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points 0%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
139 Points -1%
EVGA SC17
Intel Core i7-6820HK
136 Points -3%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
789 Points +24%
EVGA SC17
Intel Core i7-6820HK
710 Points +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
707 Points +11%
Gigabyte P57W
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
675 Points +6%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
669 Points +5%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
656 Points +3%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
635 Points
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
374.4 s *
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
233.1 s * +38%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
229.2 s * +39%
EVGA SC17
Intel Core i7-6820HK
224.8 s * +40%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
636 s * -15%
EVGA SC17
Intel Core i7-6820HK
569 s * -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
556 s * -1%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
553 s *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.44 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
67.1 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
140 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
635 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
102 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5575 Points +33%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4952 Points +18%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4551 Points +8%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
4206 Points
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
4060 Points -3%
Gigabyte P57W
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
3946 Points -6%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
3441 Points -18%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5778 Points +15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
5533 Points +10%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
5014 Points
Gigabyte P57W
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
4935 Points -2%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4906 Points -2%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
4129 Points -18%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
8531 Points +64%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
6871 Points +32%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
6609 Points +27%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
5192 Points
Gigabyte P57W
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
4754 Points -8%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
4740 Points -9%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
2303 Points -56%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4206 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5192 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5014 points
Help
Gigabyte P57X v6
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
EVGA SC17
Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Gigabyte P57W
Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
159%
220%
210%
6%
Read Seq
481.7
1559
224%
2247
366%
1718
257%
491.6
2%
Write Seq
315.4
1254
298%
1534
386%
1305
314%
391.1
24%
Read 512
303.1
850
180%
1113
267%
1250
312%
352.8
16%
Write 512
314.4
1228
291%
1490
374%
1438
357%
371.7
18%
Read 4k
25.93
49.32
90%
52.1
101%
44.42
71%
29.89
15%
Write 4k
84.6
140.3
66%
149.2
76%
154.4
83%
37.75
-55%
Read 4k QD32
273.9
539
97%
635
132%
744
172%
338.7
24%
Write 4k QD32
274.9
345.3
26%
422
54%
578
110%
278
1%
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
Sequential Read: 481.7 MB/s
Sequential Write: 315.4 MB/s
512K Read: 303.1 MB/s
512K Write: 314.4 MB/s
4K Read: 25.93 MB/s
4K Write: 84.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 273.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 274.9 MB/s
3DMark
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
8357 Points
Asus G752VS-XB78K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
8104 Points -3%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
5541 Points -34%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
4663 Points -44%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
4650 Points -44%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus G752VS-XB78K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
16757 Points
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
15718 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
11957 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9888 Points
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9820 Points
Gigabyte P57W
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
7489 Points
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
23356 Points
Asus G752VS-XB78K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
22282 Points -5%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
21228 Points -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
13168 Points -44%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
12890 Points -45%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
12731 Points -45%
Gigabyte P57W
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
9713 Points -58%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Asus G752VS-XB78K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
9914 Points +19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9842 Points +18%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9256 Points +11%
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
8366 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
8338 Points 0%
Gigabyte P57W
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
8175 Points -2%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
7795 Points -7%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
25589 points
3DMark 11 Performance
16231 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
85198 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
23781 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
7559 points
Help
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
123.8 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
90.2 fps -27%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
105.5 fps -15%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
90.2 fps -27%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
137.1 (34.5min - 271.3max) fps +11%
Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
99 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
66.8 fps -33%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
82.1 fps -17%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
69.7 fps -30%
Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
88.5 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
62.1 fps -30%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
72.4 fps -18%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
63.7 fps -28%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
101.6 (73.9min - 128.7max) fps +15%
Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
78 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
51 fps -35%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
62 fps -21%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
50 fps -36%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
117 fps +50%
Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
96 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
57.4 fps -40%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
71.6 fps -25%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
55.5 fps -42%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
90 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
50.6 fps -44%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
63.5 fps -29%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
85.5 fps -5%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
54.7 fps -39%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
92.8 (80min - 103max) fps +3%
Gigabyte P57W
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
37.6 fps -58%
Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
104 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
82.3 fps -21%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
96.5 fps -7%
lowmed.highultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 123.8
Metro: Last Light (2013) 99
Thief (2014) 88.5
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 78
Fallout 4 (2015) 96
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 90
Doom (2016) 104

Noise Level

Idle
33.2 / 33.2 / 33.2 dB(A)
Load
47.5 / 52.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 29.7 dB(A)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Gigabyte P57W
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
Noise
-2%
-2%
6%
4%
off / environment *
29.7
28.8
3%
31
-4%
30
-1%
30
-1%
Idle Minimum *
33.2
29.4
11%
33
1%
31
7%
32
4%
Idle Average *
33.2
32.4
2%
34
-2%
32
4%
33
1%
Idle Maximum *
33.2
48
-45%
40
-20%
33
1%
37
-11%
Load Average *
47.5
42.5
11%
44
7%
40
16%
37
22%
Load Maximum *
52.5
48.5
8%
50
5%
47
10%
47
10%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 32.6 °C59 °C50 °C 
 30.9 °C44.4 °C48.6 °C 
 25.8 °C26.2 °C23.6 °C 
Maximum: 59 °C
Average: 37.9 °C
44.2 °C66 °C37.2 °C
39.2 °C37.6 °C26.8 °C
25 °C27.6 °C27.2 °C
Maximum: 66 °C
Average: 36.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  48 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 66 °C / 151 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.7 °C / 3 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.1362536.4373134.735.74034.5345033.633.8633234.18030.53410032.332.412530.233.616029.838.420030.14325028.245.131527.747.840026.651.550026.552.163025.753.480026.254.3100024.957.8125024.757160025.555.7200024.15525002460.8315023.761.9400023.663.3500023.658.9630023.563.6800023.4651000023.564.71250023.764.41600023.655.5SPL36.872.7N2.829.4median 24.9median 55.5Delta1.5835.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGigabyte P57X v6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Gigabyte P57X v6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 4.5 / 4.6 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 18.4 / 22.8 / 24 Watt
Load midlight 175.5 / 229.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, , 1920x1080, 17.3"
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Asus G752VS-XB78K
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Gigabyte P57W
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Power Consumption
-5%
-28%
-12%
29%
Idle Minimum *
18.4
24.3
-32%
25
-36%
24
-30%
11
40%
Idle Average *
22.8
29.6
-30%
35
-54%
31
-36%
17
25%
Idle Maximum *
24
29.9
-25%
46
-92%
36
-50%
22
8%
Load Average *
175.5
110.1
37%
103
41%
94
46%
85
52%
Load Maximum *
229.5
171.4
25%
223
3%
204
11%
178
22%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
6h 58min
WiFi Websurfing
3h 21min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 43min
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.81 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, 90 Wh
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 83 Wh
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 88 Wh
EVGA SC17
6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, 74.48 Wh
Asus G752VS-XB78K
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 90 Wh
Gigabyte P57W
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 75.81 Wh
Battery Runtime
13%
-8%
-16%
-17%
-13%
24%
Reader / Idle
418
349
-17%
323
-23%
278
-33%
310
-26%
311
-26%
460
10%
WiFi v1.3
201
248
23%
221
10%
200
0%
206
2%
210
4%
334
66%
Load
103
136
32%
93
-10%
89
-14%
76
-26%
84
-18%
99
-4%

Pros

+ 让人目瞪口呆的显卡性能
+ 优秀的整体系统性能
+ 考虑到它的全面功能售价相当实惠
+ 屏幕提供了优秀的对比度和亮度
+ 实用的系统管理软件
+ 相比同类机型更轻更小巧
+ 易于添加第三块硬盘的设计

Cons

- 在中度负载下的发热量较大
- 触控版按键不实用
- 全塑料机身
- 屏幕仅1080p分辨率
- 噪音相对较大
The Gigabyte P57X v6
The Gigabyte P57X v6

尽管它和前代机型P57W如出一辙,技嘉的P57X v6仍然凭借强劲的英伟达 GeForce GTX 1070给游戏本排行榜带来了不小的冲击。在合理的1999美元(约13300人民币)价位上,它是目前最快的游戏本,可以在全高清分辨率最高设置下流畅运行最新游戏,同时通过HDMI 2.0接口可以在外接显示器上提供不错的4K游戏性能表现。

除了最新显卡之外,它的配置也同样强劲,这包括英特尔i7-6700HQ四核处理器,16GB DDR4-2133内存,256GB M.2固态硬盘和1TB 7200转传统硬盘以及1080p分辨率IPS防反光屏幕。技嘉也为它提供了易用的维护升级设计,几乎所有部件都可以打开底盖而更换。需要更高速度的用户可以自行升级NVMe固态硬盘,或者通过随机附带的转换器,取下光驱添加第三块硬盘。

P57X在控制软件上也提供了丰富的功能,如机身散热系统和显卡超频,驱动更新,以及一些其他小工具(屏幕色温控制,USB恢复盘创建工具等)。

很明显,如果你希望让一台如此强大的游戏笔记本电脑可以贴上不足2000美元的价钱,就不得不做出一些妥协。对P57X来说,这包括塑料材质的机身和较高的发热量,键盘右半部分在游戏中不管如何调整散热风扇速度都会变的很热。它的噪音也相对较大,尽管两个散热风扇都安排在了机身后部(虽然也有一些帮助)。它的功耗相比P57W更高,而电池续航(虽然对于游戏本来说重要性不大)也相对的受到了影响。最后,它的触控版十分不好用,对它感兴趣的用户请一定提前准备好外置鼠标。一些用户可能也会对它没有4K屏幕的选项感到不解,不过这并不会影响它的超高性价比。如果它可以轻松用原生分辨率应对用户交给它的所有任务的话,这当然会是个不错的事情,不过目前看来它仍然对4K分辨率有些力不从心。当然用户仍然可以外接显示器实现4K游戏。

整体上,P57X是个设计还算合理,性能强劲的游戏笔记本电脑,设计重点在功能性,便携型和高性价比。如果你的预算充足,也不怕更高的重量的话,最好还是选择其他的机型。如果不是的话,除了较差的输入设备,散热系统和缺少4K屏幕等缺点,P57X明显是一个怪兽——它将可以在原生分辨率和最高设定下轻松应对甚至是不久未来的大部分游戏。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Gigabyte P57X v6 - 10/03/2016 v5.1 (old)
Steve Schardein

Chassis
74 / 98 → 76%
Keyboard
79%
Pointing Device
67%
Connectivity
68 / 81 → 84%
Weight
55 / 10-66 → 80%
Battery
73%
Display
86%
Games Performance
96%
Application Performance
91%
Temperature
81 / 95 → 85%
Noise
69 / 90 → 77%
Audio
60%
Camera
69 / 85 → 81%
Average
75%
83%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 技嘉 P57X v6 笔记本电脑简短评测
Steve Schardein, 2016-09-29 (Update: 2020-06- 8)