华为 P9 Lite 智能手机简短评测
Huawei P9 Lite (P9 Series)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 650 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Memory
3 GB
Display
5.20 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, 电容式, FHD, 10 Multitouchpunkte, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB
, 9.51 GB free
Weight
147 g, Power Supply: 30 g
Price
299 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHD, 10 Multitouchpunkte tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 505 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 468.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.68 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 505 cd/m²
Contrast: 682:1 (Black: 0.74 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.5
| Huawei P9 Lite Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Honor 5X Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei P8 lite Mali-450 MP4, Kirin 620, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 3% | 8% | -3% | 22% | -12% | 25% | |
| Brightness middle | 505 | 392 -22% | 535 6% | 365 -28% | 582 15% | 289 -43% | 386 -24% |
| Brightness | 468 | 382 -18% | 521 11% | 353 -25% | 563 20% | 291 -38% | 394 -16% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 93 6% | 85 -3% | 93 6% | 91 3% | 96 9% | 88 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.74 | 0.41 45% | 0.43 42% | 0.42 43% | 0.38 49% | ||
| Contrast | 682 | 956 40% | 1244 82% | 869 27% | 1532 125% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 5.55 -35% | 4.88 -19% | 5.2 -27% | 4.4 -7% | 4.7 -15% | 1.11 73% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.8 | 8.66 -49% | 7.4 -28% | 7.3 -26% | 3.35 42% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 4.7 4% | 5.2 -6% | 5.85 -19% | 4.8 2% | 3 39% | 1.34 73% |
| Gamma | 2.5 88% | 2.7 81% | 2.26 97% | 2.17 101% | 2.2 100% | 2.03 108% | 2.12 104% |
| CCT | 7116 91% | 7270 89% | 7766 84% | 7252 90% | 6175 105% | 6291 103% | 6441 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 70.86 | 77.78 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91.25 | 99.44 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
AnTuTu v6 | Geekbench 3 | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | AndroBench 3-5
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Huawei P8 lite | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Huawei P8 lite | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Huawei P8 lite | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Huawei P8 lite | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Huawei P8 lite | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Huawei P8 lite | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Huawei P8 lite | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.08 / 0.3 Watt |
| Idle |  0.73 / 2.09 / 2.11 Watt |
| Load |
4.15 / 5.05 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei P9 Lite Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Asus ZenFone Selfie ZD551KL Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Honor 5X Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei P8 lite Mali-450 MP4, Kirin 620, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -11% | -15% | -39% | -6% | 21% | 34% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1404 | 1008 -28% | 1053 -25% | 715 -49% | 1514 8% | 1599 14% | 1978 41% |
| H.264 | 568 | 530 -7% | 602 6% | 369 -35% | 568 0% | 658 16% | 863 52% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 604 | 516 -15% | 643 6% | 351 -42% | 569 -6% | 643 6% | 628 4% |
| Load | 272 | 293 8% | 144 -47% | 194 -29% | 206 -24% | 402 48% | 376 38% |
Pros
+ 明亮的全高清屏幕
+ 高品质机身
+ 八核处理器和3 GB内存
+ 支持LTE和双SIM卡
+ 安卓6.0
+ 不错的相机
+ 电池续航长
Cons
- 机背很滑
- 不支持App2SD
- 屏幕色彩不够准确
- 近一个单声道扬声器
华为的P9 Lite是一台强劲的中端智能手机，在很多方面都超越了前作P8 Lite。它并不是华为旗舰机型P9的对手，后者搭配了更好的指纹识别器，更快的LTE模组，支持最新的蓝牙标准和双频无线网络，USB C型接口，以及更快的处理器与更高对比度的屏幕。这两款智能手机看起来几乎相同，不过P9 Lite的金属塑料混合材质很难与P9的铝合金一体机身相抗衡。但是，这并不是我们对P9 Lite不满：P9的这位师弟搭配了非常明亮的全高清屏幕，搭载最新的安卓6.0.1系统。快速的HiSilicon Kirin 650八核处理器和3 GB工作内存共同保证了优秀的性能。它的连接性也无可挑剔，支持LTE，802.11n无线网络和双SIM卡。非常优秀的电池续航让它更加全面。
华为给价位更高的P9带来了一个强劲的竞争对手，P9 Lite。
华为优秀的P9 Lite只有不多的几个小缺点。它的塑料后盖略滑不易握持，而相机的表现还有待提高。但是，它完全可以满足日常的拍照和摄像需要。同样屏幕的色彩准确度也有改进的空间，不过这在实际使用中很难察觉到。单声道的扬声器并不能算是个缺点，P9也是搭配了这个类型的扬声器。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Huawei P9 Lite
- 05/23/2016 v5.1 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Price comparison
