Notebookcheck Logo

华为 P9 智能手机简短评测

莱卡风。 华为的这台P8后续机型押宝在相机之上,同时延续了优异的整体表现。这台吸引眼球的智能手机在机身工艺和电池容量上都更进了一步。不过,它还有一些值得改善的地方。
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen
Huawei P9 (P9 Series)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 955 8 x 2.5 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53
Graphics adapter
Memory
3 GB 
, LPDDR4
Display
5.20 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, 电容式,10点触控, IPS-NEO, JDI, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23.22 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合耳机和麦克风接口, Card Reader: Micro-SD 最大支持 128 GB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 近距传感器,旋转传感器,加速传感器和重力传感器,数字指南针, Wifi Direct, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800 和 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (频段 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8 和 19), LTE Cat. 6 (频段 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39 和 40), LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.95 x 145 x 70.9
Battery
11.46 Wh, 3000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 3.82 伏, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 33 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 18 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 526 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 566 h
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (莱卡双相机, Summarit-H 27毫米 f/2.2 ASPH, BSI CMOS传感器, 双色LED闪光灯, 全高清视频拍摄)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.4)
Additional features
Speakers: 单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器,USB数据线,SIM卡工具,耳机, EMUI 4.1, 通讯簿, HiCare, 健康, 设计, 镜子, 指南针, 录音机, 记事簿, 36 Months Warranty, USB Type-C, fanless
Weight
144 g, Power Supply: 64 g
Price
569 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

149.8 mm 78 mm 9.2 mm 169 g149.4 mm 73.9 mm 7.7 mm 159 g145.9 mm 71.9 mm 9 mm 161 g146 mm 72 mm 7.3 mm 154 g145 mm 73.2 mm 8.2 mm 150 g145 mm 70.9 mm 6.95 mm 144 g144.9 mm 71.8 mm 6.4 mm 147 g142.4 mm 69.6 mm 7.9 mm 152 g138.3 mm 67.1 mm 7.1 mm 143 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Huawei P9
Huawei P9
Huawei P9
Huawei P9
Huawei P9
Huawei P9
Photo with black/white sensor
Photo with black/white sensor
Photo with black/white sensor
Photo with black/white sensor
Photo using automatic (no HDR)
Photo using automatic (no HDR)
Edited DNG photo
Edited DNG photo
Photo using automatic (no HDR)
Photo using automatic (no HDR)
Edited DNG photo
Edited DNG photo

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
Color sensor
Black/white
531
cd/m²
548
cd/m²
572
cd/m²
553
cd/m²
582
cd/m²
578
cd/m²
556
cd/m²
573
cd/m²
570
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 582 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 562.6 cd/m² Minimum: 7.89 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 582 cd/m²
Contrast: 1532:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.44% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
77.78% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
87.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Huawei P9
IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Huawei P8
IPS-NEO, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Apple iPhone 6S
IPS, 1334x750, 4.7"
Samsung Galaxy S7
SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1"
Microsoft Lumia 950
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.2"
OnePlus 2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Sony Xperia Z5
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Screen
-4%
-1%
15%
1%
-3%
-44%
Brightness middle
582
453
-22%
552
-5%
350
-40%
292
-50%
451
-23%
669
15%
Brightness
563
439
-22%
549
-2%
351
-38%
298
-47%
446
-21%
624
11%
Brightness Distribution
91
91
0%
87
-4%
98
8%
92
1%
90
-1%
85
-7%
Black Level *
0.38
0.28
26%
0.39
-3%
0.3
21%
0.68
-79%
Contrast
1532
1618
6%
1415
-8%
1503
-2%
984
-36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.4
4.7
-7%
3.4
23%
2.04
54%
2.48
44%
3.84
13%
7.96
-81%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.4
3.25
56%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.8
5.03
-5%
4.16
13%
1.63
66%
1.97
59%
3.97
17%
10.95
-128%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.27 97%
2.21 100%
2.07 106%
2.06 107%
2.46 89%
2.61 84%
CCT
6175 105%
7439 87%
7288 89%
6391 102%
6640 98%
7283 89%
7402 88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
77.78
72.04
-7%
62.18
-20%
86.86
12%
58.07
-25%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.44
95.93
-4%
99.35
0%
90.14
-9%

* ... smaller is better

sRGB color space coverage: 99.44%
sRGB color space coverage: 99.44%
AdobeRGB color space coverage: 77.78%
AdobeRGB color space coverage: 77.78%
ProPhoto RGB color space coverage: 40.62%
ProPhoto RGB color space coverage: 40.62%

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 30 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P9
7058 Points
Huawei P8
4479 Points -37%
Huawei Mate 8
7344 Points +4%
Google Nexus 5X
4324 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4826 Points -32%
Motorola Moto X Force
5365 Points -24%
Sony Xperia Z5
5184 Points -27%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9
95743 Points
Huawei Mate 8
93767 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7
127902 Points +34%
Motorola Moto X Force
89911 Points -6%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9
1767 Points
Huawei P8
864 Points -51%
Huawei Mate 8
1721 Points -3%
Google Nexus 5X
1246 Points -29%
Apple iPhone 6S
2539 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2199 Points +24%
Motorola Moto X Force
1262 Points -29%
Sony Xperia Z5
1325 Points -25%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9
6522 Points
Huawei P8
3458 Points -47%
Huawei Mate 8
6265 Points -4%
Google Nexus 5X
3530 Points -46%
Apple iPhone 6S
4422 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S7
6401 Points -2%
Motorola Moto X Force
4791 Points -27%
Sony Xperia Z5
4414 Points -32%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9
19854 Points
Huawei P8
9080 Points -54%
Huawei Mate 8
19179 Points -3%
Google Nexus 5X
18898 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 6S
28419 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy S7
29015 Points +46%
Motorola Moto X Force
25751 Points +30%
Sony Xperia Z5
24980 Points +26%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9
21577 Points
Huawei P8
8743 Points -59%
Huawei Mate 8
20537 Points -5%
Google Nexus 5X
22180 Points +3%
Apple iPhone 6S
42686 Points +98%
Samsung Galaxy S7
33348 Points +55%
Motorola Moto X Force
38394 Points +78%
Sony Xperia Z5
37738 Points +75%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P9
15517 Points
Huawei P8
10494 Points -32%
Huawei Mate 8
15575 Points 0%
Google Nexus 5X
12451 Points -20%
Apple iPhone 6S
13097 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S7
19944 Points +29%
Motorola Moto X Force
11963 Points -23%
Sony Xperia Z5
11442 Points -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P9
1237 Points
Huawei Mate 8
1244 Points +1%
Google Nexus 5X
1497 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2715 Points +119%
Motorola Moto X Force
2413 Points +95%
Sony Xperia Z5
1613 Points +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P9
1080 Points
Huawei Mate 8
1092 Points +1%
Google Nexus 5X
1942 Points +80%
Samsung Galaxy S7
3018 Points +179%
Motorola Moto X Force
3226 Points +199%
Sony Xperia Z5
2246 Points +108%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P9
2510 Points
Huawei Mate 8
2432 Points -3%
Google Nexus 5X
831 Points -67%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2010 Points -20%
Motorola Moto X Force
1282 Points -49%
Sony Xperia Z5
812 Points -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P9
974 Points
Huawei Mate 8
945 Points -3%
Google Nexus 5X
1096 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2170 Points +123%
Motorola Moto X Force
1849 Points +90%
Sony Xperia Z5
1084 Points +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P9
829 Points
Huawei Mate 8
801 Points -3%
Google Nexus 5X
1127 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2216 Points +167%
Motorola Moto X Force
2067 Points +149%
Sony Xperia Z5
1103 Points +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P9
2503 Points
Huawei Mate 8
2552 Points +2%
Google Nexus 5X
1002 Points -60%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2022 Points -19%
Motorola Moto X Force
1351 Points -46%
Sony Xperia Z5
1024 Points -59%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P9
43 fps
Huawei P8
11 fps -74%
Huawei Mate 8
44 fps +2%
Google Nexus 5X
38 fps -12%
Microsoft Lumia 950
13.73 fps -68%
Apple iPhone 6S
59.1 fps +37%
Samsung Galaxy S7
53 fps +23%
Motorola Moto X Force
42 fps -2%
Sony Xperia Z5
49 fps +14%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P9
40 fps
Huawei P8
10 fps -75%
Huawei Mate 8
41 fps +3%
Google Nexus 5X
37 fps -7%
Microsoft Lumia 950
21.82 fps -45%
Apple iPhone 6S
79.6 fps +99%
Samsung Galaxy S7
84 fps +110%
Motorola Moto X Force
58 fps +45%
Sony Xperia Z5
49 fps +23%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P9
19 fps
Huawei P8
5.8 fps -69%
Huawei Mate 8
19 fps 0%
Google Nexus 5X
17 fps -11%
Microsoft Lumia 950
6.76 fps -64%
Apple iPhone 6S
56 fps +195%
Samsung Galaxy S7
27 fps +42%
Motorola Moto X Force
17 fps -11%
Sony Xperia Z5
26 fps +37%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P9
18 fps
Huawei P8
5.5 fps -69%
Huawei Mate 8
18 fps 0%
Google Nexus 5X
16 fps -11%
Microsoft Lumia 950
12.3 fps -32%
Apple iPhone 6S
39.5 fps +119%
Samsung Galaxy S7
40 fps +122%
Motorola Moto X Force
27 fps +50%
Sony Xperia Z5
24 fps +33%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P9
11 fps
Huawei Mate 8
11 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7
15 fps +36%
Motorola Moto X Force
12 fps +9%
Sony Xperia Z5
18 fps +64%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P9
10 fps
Huawei Mate 8
10 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7
28 fps +180%
Motorola Moto X Force
20 fps +100%
Sony Xperia Z5
16 fps +60%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P9
2025 Points
Huawei P8
1085 Points -46%
Huawei Mate 8
2046 Points +1%
Google Nexus 5X
1318 Points -35%
Microsoft Lumia 950
1140 Points -44%
Apple iPhone 6S
2194 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1987 Points -2%
Motorola Moto X Force
1774 Points -12%
Sony Xperia Z5
1437 Points -29%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P9
3930 Points
Huawei P8
1860 Points -53%
Huawei Mate 8
4064 Points +3%
Google Nexus 5X
1730 Points -56%
Microsoft Lumia 950
1096 Points -72%
Apple iPhone 6S
3466 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4217 Points +7%
Motorola Moto X Force
2878 Points -27%
Sony Xperia Z5
2360 Points -40%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P9
2627 Points
Huawei P8
1216 Points -54%
Huawei Mate 8
2339 Points -11%
Google Nexus 5X
1115 Points -58%
Microsoft Lumia 950
1640 Points -38%
Apple iPhone 6S
1281 Points -51%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2244 Points -15%
Motorola Moto X Force
1085 Points -59%
Sony Xperia Z5
865 Points -67%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P9
1583 Points
Huawei P8
882 Points -44%
Huawei Mate 8
1636 Points +3%
Google Nexus 5X
2038 Points +29%
Microsoft Lumia 950
1437 Points -9%
Apple iPhone 6S
4323 Points +173%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1723 Points +9%
Motorola Moto X Force
3376 Points +113%
Sony Xperia Z5
3095 Points +96%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P9
1029 Points
Huawei P8
694 Points -33%
Huawei Mate 8
1127 Points +10%
Google Nexus 5X
769 Points -25%
Microsoft Lumia 950
655 Points -36%
Apple iPhone 6S
1207 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S7
957 Points -7%
Motorola Moto X Force
939 Points -9%
Sony Xperia Z5
675 Points -34%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Huawei P9
7.9 fps
Huawei Mate 8
7.9 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7
13.86 fps +75%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9
328 Points
Huawei Mate 8
347 Points +6%
Apple iPhone 6S
887 Points +170%
Samsung Galaxy S7
732 Points +123%

Legend

 
Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P8 HiSilicon Kirin 930, ARM Mali-T628 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Mate 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Google Nexus 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Microsoft Lumia 950 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 6S Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Motorola Moto X Force Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia Z5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11783 Points
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4084 Points -65%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11329 Points -4%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8202 Points -30%
Microsoft Lumia 950
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6990 Points -41%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
16200 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
13161 Points +12%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8699 Points -26%
Sony Xperia Z5
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8627 Points -27%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
68.4 Points
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
65 Points -5%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
45 Points -34%
Microsoft Lumia 950
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
24.52 Points -64%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
118.6 Points +73%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
74 Points +8%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.37 Points -28%
Sony Xperia Z5
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
37 Points -46%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2923 ms *
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11808 ms * -304%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3643 ms * -25%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4734 ms * -62%
Microsoft Lumia 950
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6914 ms * -137%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
1715 ms * +41%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2562 ms * +12%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4080 ms * -40%
Sony Xperia Z5
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5693 ms * -95%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
128 Points
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
70 Points -45%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
139 Points +9%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
107 Points -16%
Microsoft Lumia 950
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
64 Points -50%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
187 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
166 Points +30%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
103 Points -20%
Sony Xperia Z5
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
73 Points -43%
Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6580 (6523min) Points
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2756 (2248min) Points -58%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7008 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
7570 Points +15%
BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1029 Points
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
694 Points -33%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1127 Points +10%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
769 Points -25%
Microsoft Lumia 950
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
655 Points -36%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
1207 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
957 Points -7%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
939 Points -9%
Sony Xperia Z5
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
675 Points -34%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
281.3 MB/s
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
139.9 MB/s -50%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
238.3 MB/s -15%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
245.2 MB/s -13%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
483.8 MB/s +72%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
252 MB/s -10%
Sony Xperia Z5
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
219.8 MB/s -22%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
72.2 MB/s
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
39.58 MB/s -45%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
124.8 MB/s +73%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
98.6 MB/s +37%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
145.7 MB/s +102%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.99 MB/s -34%
Sony Xperia Z5
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
115.5 MB/s +60%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39 MB/s
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
22.46 MB/s -42%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
24.98 MB/s -36%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
24.8 MB/s -36%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
85.9 MB/s +120%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
22.55 MB/s -42%
Sony Xperia Z5
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3.59 MB/s -91%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.45 MB/s
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
10.04 MB/s -79%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15.74 MB/s -67%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
12.21 MB/s -74%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
16.01 MB/s -66%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
19.78 MB/s -58%
Sony Xperia Z5
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11.46 MB/s -76%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
72.3 MB/s +31%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
79 MB/s +44%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
24.83 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
53.6 MB/s +116%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46.96 MB/s +89%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high60 fps
Max. Load
 41.9 °C38.8 °C40.2 °C 
 42.1 °C39.6 °C39.4 °C 
 41.1 °C38 °C38.6 °C 
Maximum: 42.1 °C
Average: 40 °C
36.2 °C38.5 °C38.8 °C
35.6 °C38.6 °C38.1 °C
35.9 °C38.1 °C38.2 °C
Maximum: 38.8 °C
Average: 37.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  33.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.38 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.77 / 2.36 / 2.37 Watt
Load midlight 3.09 / 5.35 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Sony Xperia Z5
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPhone 6S
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Microsoft Lumia 950
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Power Consumption
-12%
-1%
-17%
-4%
23%
7%
-64%
Idle Minimum *
0.77
0.7
9%
0.55
29%
0.7
9%
0.6
22%
0.5
35%
0.68
12%
1.97
-156%
Idle Average *
2.36
2
15%
1.44
39%
1.7
28%
1.7
28%
1.6
32%
1.02
57%
2.42
-3%
Idle Maximum *
2.37
2.1
11%
1.9
20%
1.8
24%
1.8
24%
1.9
20%
1.14
52%
2.96
-25%
Load Average *
3.09
4.9
-59%
3.36
-9%
5.6
-81%
5.7
-84%
2.5
19%
4.73
-53%
5.94
-92%
Load Maximum *
5.35
7.4
-38%
9.76
-82%
8.7
-63%
6
-12%
4.8
10%
7.16
-34%
7.79
-46%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
25h 14min
WiFi Websurfing
9h 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 28min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 26min
Huawei P9
11.46 Wh
Huawei P8
 Wh
Apple iPhone 6S
7 Wh
Samsung Galaxy S7
11.55 Wh
Motorola Moto X Force
 Wh
Google Nexus 5X
10 Wh
Microsoft Lumia 950
12 Wh
Huawei Mate 8
 Wh
Battery Runtime
-16%
-6%
19%
17%
2%
-17%
43%
Reader / Idle
1514
826
-45%
1510
0%
1810
20%
1610
6%
1775
17%
1500
-1%
1872
24%
H.264
568
581
2%
699
23%
892
57%
710
25%
555
-2%
570
0%
963
70%
WiFi v1.3
569
434
-24%
492
-14%
456
-20%
426
-25%
412
-28%
250
-56%
865
52%
Load
206
215
4%
137
-33%
242
17%
330
60%
245
19%
187
-9%
256
24%

Pros

+ 高速处理器
+ 可扩展存储空间
+ 支持多种制式
+ 优秀的相机
+ 通话质量高
+ 附赠耳机
+ 快速充电
+ USB-C接口
+ 不错的电池续航

Cons

- 不支持App2SD
- 仅支持LTE Cat.6
- 不支持收音机
- 不支持红外传输
- 不支持MHL或SlimPort
- 仅支持USB 2.0
- DNG无法存储在SD卡中
- 处理器在负载下降频
In review: Huawei P9. Review sample courtesy of Huawei.
In review: Huawei P9. Review sample courtesy of Huawei.

这家中国生产商继续着P系列的成功,新的旗舰机型P9依然表现优异。它采用了出色的IPS屏幕,优秀的性能,拍摄品质和徕卡双相机,超长续航以及慷慨的质保时间都给了我们很深的印象。

华为在这台智能手机中采用的部件中规中矩,不都是顶级水平。例如,LTE Cat.9就没有得到支持,它所使用的较老的Cat.6制式。不过,它覆盖的频段很广。而我们也很欣慰它的通话音质没有降低。P9提供了非常优秀的语音通话体验,以及不错的降噪效果。

华为P9是一台强劲的高端智能手机,它并不需要最高端的部件,而靠合理平衡实现了优秀的整体表现。

结合EMUI 4.1,高速的处理器提供了优异的性能表现,不过它在负载下有降频问题。双相机在移动设备中并不算首创,但它的拍摄效果优秀,自成一家。另一方面,相机模组的视频功能则有些孱弱。它在60 FPS下拍摄的视频并不出色,同时没有支持UHD分辨率。

即使华为提高了P9的售价,这台智能手机仍然提供了优秀的性价比和平衡的整体表现。不过,这台设备可能无法满足VR以及视频爱好者的需要。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Huawei P9 - 04/28/2016 v5.1 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
93%
Keyboard
70 / 75 → 93%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
55 / 60 → 92%
Weight
93%
Battery
91%
Display
88%
Games Performance
50 / 63 → 80%
Application Performance
59 / 70 → 84%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
81%
Average
79%
90%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华为 P9 智能手机简短评测
Daniel Schmidt, 2016-05- 7 (Update: 2024-11- 4)