华为 P9 智能手机简短评测
Huawei P9 (P9 Series)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 955 8 x 2.5 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53
Graphics adapter
Memory
3 GB
, LPDDR4
Display
5.20 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, 电容式，10点触控, IPS-NEO, JDI, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB
, 23.22 GB free
Weight
144 g, Power Supply: 64 g
Price
569 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 582 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 562.6 cd/m² Minimum: 7.89 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 582 cd/m²
Contrast: 1532:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.44% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
77.78% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
87.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
| Huawei P9 IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Huawei P8 IPS-NEO, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Apple iPhone 6S IPS, 1334x750, 4.7" | Samsung Galaxy S7 SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1" | Microsoft Lumia 950 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.2" | OnePlus 2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Sony Xperia Z5 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -4% | -1% | 15% | 1% | -3% | -44% | |
| Brightness middle | 582 | 453 -22% | 552 -5% | 350 -40% | 292 -50% | 451 -23% | 669 15% |
| Brightness | 563 | 439 -22% | 549 -2% | 351 -38% | 298 -47% | 446 -21% | 624 11% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 91 0% | 87 -4% | 98 8% | 92 1% | 90 -1% | 85 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.28 26% | 0.39 -3% | 0.3 21% | 0.68 -79% | ||
| Contrast | 1532 | 1618 6% | 1415 -8% | 1503 -2% | 984 -36% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 4.7 -7% | 3.4 23% | 2.04 54% | 2.48 44% | 3.84 13% | 7.96 -81% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.4 | 3.25 56% | |||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 5.03 -5% | 4.16 13% | 1.63 66% | 1.97 59% | 3.97 17% | 10.95 -128% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.27 97% | 2.21 100% | 2.07 106% | 2.06 107% | 2.46 89% | 2.61 84% |
| CCT | 6175 105% | 7439 87% | 7288 89% | 6391 102% | 6640 98% | 7283 89% | 7402 88% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 77.78 | 72.04 -7% | 62.18 -20% | 86.86 12% | 58.07 -25% | ||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.44 | 95.93 -4% | 99.35 0% | 90.14 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
PCMark for Android | AnTuTu v6 | Geekbench 3 | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | BaseMark OS II | Lightmark | Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
* ... smaller is better
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.02 / 0.38 Watt |
| Idle |  0.77 / 2.36 / 2.37 Watt |
| Load |
3.09 / 5.35 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 6S A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) | Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Microsoft Lumia 950 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -12% | -1% | -17% | -4% | 23% | 7% | -64% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.77 | 0.7 9% | 0.55 29% | 0.7 9% | 0.6 22% | 0.5 35% | 0.68 12% | 1.97 -156% |
| Idle Average * | 2.36 | 2 15% | 1.44 39% | 1.7 28% | 1.7 28% | 1.6 32% | 1.02 57% | 2.42 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.37 | 2.1 11% | 1.9 20% | 1.8 24% | 1.8 24% | 1.9 20% | 1.14 52% | 2.96 -25% |
| Load Average * | 3.09 | 4.9 -59% | 3.36 -9% | 5.6 -81% | 5.7 -84% | 2.5 19% | 4.73 -53% | 5.94 -92% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.35 | 7.4 -38% | 9.76 -82% | 8.7 -63% | 6 -12% | 4.8 10% | 7.16 -34% | 7.79 -46% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P9 11.46 Wh | Huawei P8 Wh | Apple iPhone 6S 7 Wh | Samsung Galaxy S7 11.55 Wh | Motorola Moto X Force Wh | Google Nexus 5X 10 Wh | Microsoft Lumia 950 12 Wh | Huawei Mate 8 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -16% | -6% | 19% | 17% | 2% | -17% | 43% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1514 | 826 -45% | 1510 0% | 1810 20% | 1610 6% | 1775 17% | 1500 -1% | 1872 24% |
| H.264 | 568 | 581 2% | 699 23% | 892 57% | 710 25% | 555 -2% | 570 0% | 963 70% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 569 | 434 -24% | 492 -14% | 456 -20% | 426 -25% | 412 -28% | 250 -56% | 865 52% |
| Load | 206 | 215 4% | 137 -33% | 242 17% | 330 60% | 245 19% | 187 -9% | 256 24% |
Pros
+ 高速处理器
+ 可扩展存储空间
+ 支持多种制式
+ 优秀的相机
+ 通话质量高
+ 附赠耳机
+ 快速充电
+ USB-C接口
+ 不错的电池续航
Cons
- 不支持App2SD
- 仅支持LTE Cat.6
- 不支持收音机
- 不支持红外传输
- 不支持MHL或SlimPort
- 仅支持USB 2.0
- DNG无法存储在SD卡中
- 处理器在负载下降频
这家中国生产商继续着P系列的成功，新的旗舰机型P9依然表现优异。它采用了出色的IPS屏幕，优秀的性能，拍摄品质和徕卡双相机，超长续航以及慷慨的质保时间都给了我们很深的印象。
华为在这台智能手机中采用的部件中规中矩，不都是顶级水平。例如，LTE Cat.9就没有得到支持，它所使用的较老的Cat.6制式。不过，它覆盖的频段很广。而我们也很欣慰它的通话音质没有降低。P9提供了非常优秀的语音通话体验，以及不错的降噪效果。
华为P9是一台强劲的高端智能手机，它并不需要最高端的部件，而靠合理平衡实现了优秀的整体表现。
结合EMUI 4.1，高速的处理器提供了优异的性能表现，不过它在负载下有降频问题。双相机在移动设备中并不算首创，但它的拍摄效果优秀，自成一家。另一方面，相机模组的视频功能则有些孱弱。它在60 FPS下拍摄的视频并不出色，同时没有支持UHD分辨率。
即使华为提高了P9的售价，这台智能手机仍然提供了优秀的性价比和平衡的整体表现。不过，这台设备可能无法满足VR以及视频爱好者的需要。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Huawei P9
- 04/28/2016 v5.1 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Price comparison
