惠普 Pavilion 14-al103ng 笔记本电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Medion Akoya S4219 | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Medion Akoya S4219 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 (jseb) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 (jseb) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng |
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 200 cd/m²
Contrast: 1429:1 (Black: 0.14 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.06 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.94 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
55% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.79% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
54.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
36.58% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Pavilion 14-al003ng LED IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 14 3470 TN LED, 1366x768, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK a-Si TFT-LCD, IPS, LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Medion Akoya S4219 IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 10% | 17% | 62% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 36.58 | 36.97 1% | 40.21 10% | 42.88 17% | 61.7 69% | |
sRGB Coverage | 54.9 | 55.6 1% | 60.5 10% | 64.1 17% | 84.8 54% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 37.79 | 38.2 1% | 41.55 10% | 44.3 17% | 62 64% | |
Response Times | 19% | 9% | 8% | 10% | 38% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 53 ? | 36.4 ? 31% | 42 ? 21% | 47 ? 11% | 45 ? 15% | 33 ? 38% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27 ? | 25.2 ? 7% | 28 ? -4% | 26 ? 4% | 26 ? 4% | 17 ? 37% |
PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 50 ? | ||||
Screen | -9% | -2% | -68% | -1% | 14% | |
Brightness middle | 200 | 220 10% | 230 15% | 206 3% | 257 29% | 216 8% |
Brightness | 191 | 209 9% | 226 18% | 193 1% | 263 38% | 211 10% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 88 -2% | 86 -4% | 87 -3% | 90 0% | 65 -28% |
Black Level * | 0.14 | 0.28 -100% | 0.2 -43% | 0.48 -243% | 0.24 -71% | 0.2 -43% |
Contrast | 1429 | 786 -45% | 1150 -20% | 429 -70% | 1071 -25% | 1080 -24% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.06 | 4.58 9% | 5.07 -0% | 11 -117% | 5.44 -8% | 3.7 27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.91 | 11.47 -5% | 10.07 8% | 19.57 -79% | 10.93 -0% | 5.88 46% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.94 | 2.34 41% | 3.64 8% | 11.51 -192% | 3.95 -0% | 2.67 32% |
Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.26 97% | 2.46 89% | 2.23 99% | 2.29 96% | 2.65 83% |
CCT | 6159 106% | 6661 98% | 6521 100% | 13671 48% | 6896 94% | 6418 101% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 35 | 34.6 -1% | 35 0% | 38.46 10% | 40 14% | 55 57% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 55 | 54.2 -1% | 55 0% | 60.61 10% | 64 16% | 85 55% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
-4% | 3% /
0% | -17% /
-42% | 9% /
4% | 38% /
27% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise | |
↘ 19 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 35 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
Medion Akoya S4219 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
Medion Akoya S4219 |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Medion Akoya S4219 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Medion Akoya S4219 |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Medion Akoya S4219 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3040 points | |
Help |
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Medion Akoya S4219 |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0 | Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Liteonit CV3-8D512 | Dell Latitude 14 3470 Toshiba MQ01ACF050 | Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | Medion Akoya S4219 128 GB eMMC Flash | HP Pavilion 14-al003ng SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 12166% | -3% | 12735% | 1396% | 8742% | |
Read Seq | 113.3 | 484.1 327% | 108.9 -4% | 510 350% | 151.2 33% | 469.3 314% |
Write Seq | 110.2 | 449.8 308% | 103.2 -6% | 458.8 316% | 55.7 -49% | 309.1 180% |
Read 512 | 30.83 | 399.1 1195% | 399.7 1196% | 156.6 408% | ||
Write 512 | 47.13 | 355.1 653% | 299.3 535% | 46.9 0% | ||
Read 4k | 0.34 | 33.44 9735% | 0.362 6% | 35.27 10274% | 16.29 4691% | 14 4018% |
Write 4k | 0.981 | 67.5 6781% | 0.946 -4% | 90.2 9095% | 16.5 1582% | 73.9 7433% |
Read 4k QD32 | 0.72 | 368.5 51081% | 0.721 0% | 397.7 55136% | 20.62 2764% | 149.5 20664% |
Write 4k QD32 | 1.026 | 280.6 27249% | 0.901 -12% | 257.3 24978% | 18.86 1738% | 204.6 19842% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1538 points | |
Help |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
Medion Akoya S4219 |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 43.5 | 25 | 20.6 | 7.1 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 31.2 / 31.3 / 31.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 32.4 / 34.3 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.1 °C / 89.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-4.5 °C / -8.1 F).
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.36 / 0.46 Watt |
Idle | 5.5 / 8.2 / 8.9 Watt |
Load |
29.1 / 29.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng | |
Medion Akoya S4219 | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 |
Pros
Cons
Pavilion与Skylake model的不同,仅仅存在于处理器和硬盘驱动器方面。惠普的14英寸机型配备了Kaby Lake一代的Core i5处理器,它可以满足大多数用户的需求。当BIOS中风扇选项始终禁用时,笔记本电脑运行安静。 此外,它几乎不发烫。笔记本电脑内部有一个500GB的硬盘驱动器。替换为固态硬盘时,需要打开外壳。 惠普的Pavilion在这方面不是特别方便。
正在寻找一个安静的14英寸的、拥有一个强大处理器的设备,以此作为家庭使用的用户,将会对Pavilion感到满意。
我们不能提供更多的购买理由。惠普对所有组件进行了过度削减。虽然,搭载的是视角稳定的IPS屏幕,但是它亮度过低而且表面反光。14英寸的笔记本电脑是为移动使用而制造的。但是,Pavilion的电池续航能力不支持这一点。除此之外,惠普仅安装快速以太网端口。千兆以太网是当前的标准。该笔记本电脑内部还有一个慢速Wi-Fi模块。在接近600欧元(〜635美元)的价位,买家可以预期获得一个搭载固态硬盘而不是机械硬盘的设备。最后一点,HP仅提供一年保修。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng
- 12/30/2016 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck