Notebookcheck Logo

惠普 Pavilion 14-al103ng 笔记本电脑简短评测

Kaby Lake处理器的升级。惠普的14英寸笔记本电脑具有强大的处理器。低系统噪声,发热少,拥有IPS屏幕。听起来不错。 然而,Pavilion有一些缺点。
Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng (Pavilion 14-bf Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 620, Core: 1000 MHz, 单声道, 21.20.16.4542
Memory
8 GB 
, DDR4-2400, 单声道, 两个插槽(一个被占)
Display
14.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, AU Optronics, IPS, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Storage
Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0, 500 GB 
, 5400 rpm, 420 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 音响结合, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0
Networking
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8101/2/3 Family Fast Ethernet NIC (10/100MBit/s), Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.5 x 338.6 x 224.3
Battery
41 Wh Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 9 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: no, Cyberlink Power Media Player 14, Cyberlink PowerDirector 14, McAfee LiveSafe (试用版), MS Office 365 (试用版), 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.58 kg, Power Supply: 283 g
Price
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)
563 MBit/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
268 MBit/s
Dell Latitude 14 3470
Atheros AR5BWB222 Wireless Network Adapter
165 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)
547 MBit/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
291 MBit/s
Dell Latitude 14 3470
Atheros AR5BWB222 Wireless Network Adapter
143 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
51 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
46 MBit/s
197
cd/m²
182
cd/m²
192
cd/m²
202
cd/m²
200
cd/m²
192
cd/m²
192
cd/m²
183
cd/m²
181
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 202 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 191.2 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 200 cd/m²
Contrast: 1429:1 (Black: 0.14 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.06 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.94 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
55% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.79% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
54.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
36.58% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng
IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
LED IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Dell Latitude 14 3470
TN LED, 1366x768, 14"
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
a-Si TFT-LCD, IPS, LED, 1920x1080, 14"
Medion Akoya S4219
IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Display
1%
10%
17%
62%
Display P3 Coverage
36.58
36.97
1%
40.21
10%
42.88
17%
61.7
69%
sRGB Coverage
54.9
55.6
1%
60.5
10%
64.1
17%
84.8
54%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
37.79
38.2
1%
41.55
10%
44.3
17%
62
64%
Response Times
19%
9%
8%
10%
38%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
53 ?(18, 35)
36.4 ?(18, 18.4)
31%
42 ?(15, 27)
21%
47 ?(25, 22)
11%
45 ?(17, 28)
15%
33 ?(11, 22)
38%
Response Time Black / White *
27 ?(8, 19)
25.2 ?(14, 11.2)
7%
28 ?(8, 20)
-4%
26 ?(18, 8)
4%
26 ?(7, 19)
4%
17 ?(7, 10)
37%
PWM Frequency
50 ?(60)
50 ?(40)
Screen
-9%
-2%
-68%
-1%
14%
Brightness middle
200
220
10%
230
15%
206
3%
257
29%
216
8%
Brightness
191
209
9%
226
18%
193
1%
263
38%
211
10%
Brightness Distribution
90
88
-2%
86
-4%
87
-3%
90
0%
65
-28%
Black Level *
0.14
0.28
-100%
0.2
-43%
0.48
-243%
0.24
-71%
0.2
-43%
Contrast
1429
786
-45%
1150
-20%
429
-70%
1071
-25%
1080
-24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.06
4.58
9%
5.07
-0%
11
-117%
5.44
-8%
3.7
27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.91
11.47
-5%
10.07
8%
19.57
-79%
10.93
-0%
5.88
46%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.94
2.34
41%
3.64
8%
11.51
-192%
3.95
-0%
2.67
32%
Gamma
2.41 91%
2.26 97%
2.46 89%
2.23 99%
2.29 96%
2.65 83%
CCT
6159 106%
6661 98%
6521 100%
13671 48%
6896 94%
6418 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
35
34.6
-1%
35
0%
38.46
10%
40
14%
55
57%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
55
54.2
-1%
55
0%
60.61
10%
64
16%
85
55%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
5% / -4%
3% / 0%
-17% / -42%
9% / 4%
38% / 27%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - Grayscale
CalMAN - Grayscale
CalMAN - Saturation Sweeps
CalMAN - Saturation Sweeps

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 35 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5010
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
11407
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
7778
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
129 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
330 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
38.23 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Help
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel Core i7-6500U
130 Points +1%
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U
123 Points -5%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Intel Core i5-6200U
115 Points -11%
Dell Latitude 14 3470
Intel Core i3-6100U
97 Points -25%
Medion Akoya S4219
Intel Pentium N3700
37 Points -71%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
330 Points
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel Core i7-6500U
324 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U
314 Points -5%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Intel Core i5-6200U
270 Points -18%
Dell Latitude 14 3470
Intel Core i3-6100U
250 Points -24%
Medion Akoya S4219
Intel Pentium N3700
141 Points -57%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
11407 Points
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel Core i7-6500U
11042 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U
10595 Points -7%
Medion Akoya S4219
Intel Pentium N3700
4375 Points -62%
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
5010 Points
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel Core i7-6500U
4911 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U
4903 Points -2%
Medion Akoya S4219
Intel Pentium N3700
1200 Points -76%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel Core i7-6500U
3191 Points +10%
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
2890 Points
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel Core i7-6500U
6723 Points +4%
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
6436 Points
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel Core i7-6500U
3906 Points +7%
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
3637 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel Core i7-6500U
7303 Points +7%
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
6830 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
219 Points
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel Core i7-6500U
213.8 Points -2%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Intel Core i5-6200U
194.5 Points -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6267U
130.9 Points -40%
Medion Akoya S4219
Intel Pentium N3700
59.3 Points -73%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3040 points
Help
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
3710 Points +22%
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Liteonit CV3-8D512
3545 Points +17%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280
3238 Points +7%
Dell Latitude 14 3470
HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Toshiba MQ01ACF050
3074 Points +1%
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0
3040 Points
Medion Akoya S4219
HD Graphics (Braswell), N3700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1645 Points -46%
Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0
Transfer Rate Minimum: 47 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 115.6 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 85.7 MB/s
Access Time: 18.4 ms
Burst Rate: 202 MB/s
CPU Usage: 9.8 %
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng
Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Liteonit CV3-8D512
Dell Latitude 14 3470
Toshiba MQ01ACF050
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
Medion Akoya S4219
128 GB eMMC Flash
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
12166%
-3%
12735%
1396%
8742%
Read Seq
113.3
484.1
327%
108.9
-4%
510
350%
151.2
33%
469.3
314%
Write Seq
110.2
449.8
308%
103.2
-6%
458.8
316%
55.7
-49%
309.1
180%
Read 512
30.83
399.1
1195%
399.7
1196%
156.6
408%
Write 512
47.13
355.1
653%
299.3
535%
46.9
0%
Read 4k
0.34
33.44
9735%
0.362
6%
35.27
10274%
16.29
4691%
14
4018%
Write 4k
0.981
67.5
6781%
0.946
-4%
90.2
9095%
16.5
1582%
73.9
7433%
Read 4k QD32
0.72
368.5
51081%
0.721
0%
397.7
55136%
20.62
2764%
149.5
20664%
Write 4k QD32
1.026
280.6
27249%
0.901
-12%
257.3
24978%
18.86
1738%
204.6
19842%
3DMark 11 Performance
1538 points
Help
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2508 Points +77%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
1782 Points +26%
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1481 Points +5%
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1414 Points
Dell Latitude 14 3470
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U
1063 Points -25%
Medion Akoya S4219
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3700
468 Points -67%
lowmed.highultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 43.5 25 20.6 7.1
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.232.930.731.634.22532.832.131.130.732.83133.131.833.331.833.1403029.829.730.7305028.327.928.629.628.36327.728.528.527.527.78026.427.226.426.526.410026.326.425.725.926.312525.426.125.924.825.416024.523.824.623.724.520022.823.323.422.822.825021.922.822.522.321.931521.222.721.421.121.240020.421.12120.420.450020.92119.919.720.963019.920.619.21919.980022.523.621.118.822.5100023.525.421.618.423.512502225.418.917.522160020.42419.117.620.4200019.222.218.417.519.2250019.92318.617.719.9315019.121.718.217.919.1400018.720.4181818.750001919.118.518.319630018.518.818.518.218.5800018.518.618.618.318.51000018.518.618.518.318.51250018.618.818.318.218.61600018.918.518.218.218.9SPL32.434.431.430.532.4N1.721.61.41.7median 20.4median 22.2median 19.1median 18.3median 20.4Delta2.121.61.32.134.632.631.130.534.630.731.833.932.230.731.331.634.532.531.328.729.430.730.828.729.531.529.834.329.528.629.628.629.228.627.326.831.127.427.32626.130.925.92625.4252526.125.424.923.724.324.424.923.523.923.723.223.522.722.922.822.822.722.622.123.421.822.620.921.322.721.420.920.220.721.820.220.220.220.22119.620.219.319.12119.119.319.719.226.118.419.719.720.123.518.319.719.419.722.818.619.419.519.323.418.519.518.818.821.618.518.818.81921.518.418.818.919.520.918.818.91919.120.218.8191919.119.6191919.21919.319.119.219.219.119.219.119.219.120.119.218.919.119.322.119.61919.331.631.734.131.231.61.61.62.11.61.6median 19.5median 20.1median 21.8median 19.1median 19.5111.71.51hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Pavilion 14-al103ngAcer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261

Noise Level

Idle
31.2 / 31.3 / 31.3 dB(A)
Load
32.4 / 34.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
Max. Load
 24.3 °C33 °C35.2 °C 
 23.6 °C31.7 °C37.6 °C 
 23 °C24.9 °C32.1 °C 
Maximum: 37.6 °C
Average: 29.5 °C
31.5 °C31.7 °C25.4 °C
36.8 °C31.3 °C24.6 °C
32.1 °C26.4 °C25.3 °C
Maximum: 36.8 °C
Average: 29.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.1 °C / 89.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-4.5 °C / -8.1 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.631.634.62533.530.733.53134.331.834.34029.930.729.95030.429.630.46328.427.528.48027.726.527.710027.625.927.612528.824.828.816032.723.732.720037.522.837.525042.522.342.53155021.15040063.720.463.750063.619.763.663065.71965.780065.818.865.8100069.718.469.7125069.917.569.9160069.717.669.7200066.617.566.6250072.817.772.8315072.917.972.9400068.61868.6500069.118.369.163007318.27380007118.3711000061.918.361.91250052.418.252.41600048.618.248.6SPL81.930.581.9N51.91.451.9median 65.7median 18.3median 65.7Delta10.71.310.735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion 14-al103ngApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.36 / 0.46 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5.5 / 8.2 / 8.9 Watt
Load midlight 29.1 / 29.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)
5h 30min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 48.9 Wh
392 min +19%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 30 Wh
384 min +16%
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh
330 min
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
6200U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh
329 min 0%
Medion Akoya S4219
N3700, HD Graphics (Braswell), 35 Wh
318 min -4%
Dell Latitude 14 3470
6100U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh
278 min -16%

Pros

+ IPS面板
+ 全高清分辨率
+ 运行安静
+ 低温

Cons

- 屏幕反光
- 平庸的电池续航
- 仅限快速以太网
- 无ac Wi-Fi
- 仅一年保修
In review: HP Pavilion 14-al103ng. Test model courtesy of Cyberport.de
In review: HP Pavilion 14-al103ng. Test model courtesy of Cyberport.de

Pavilion与Skylake model的不同,仅仅存在于处理器和硬盘驱动器方面。惠普的14英寸机型配备了Kaby Lake一代的Core i5处理器,它可以满足大多数用户的需求。当BIOS中风扇选项始终禁用时,笔记本电脑运行安静。 此外,它几乎不发烫。笔记本电脑内部有一个500GB的硬盘驱动器。替换为固态硬盘时,需要打开外壳。 惠普的Pavilion在这方面不是特别方便。

正在寻找一个安静的14英寸的、拥有一个强大处理器的设备,以此作为家庭使用的用户,将会对Pavilion感到满意。

我们不能提供更多的购买理由。惠普对所有组件进行了过度削减。虽然,搭载的是视角稳定的IPS屏幕,但是它亮度过低而且表面反光。14英寸的笔记本电脑是为移动使用而制造的。但是,Pavilion的电池续航能力不支持这一点。除此之外,惠普仅安装快速以太网端口。千兆以太网是当前的标准。该笔记本电脑内部还有一个慢速Wi-Fi模块。在接近600欧元(〜635美元)的价位,买家可以预期获得一个搭载固态硬盘而不是机械硬盘的设备。最后一点,HP仅提供一年保修。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

HP Pavilion 14-al103ng - 12/30/2016 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
70 / 98 → 71%
Keyboard
70%
Pointing Device
67%
Connectivity
36 / 80 → 45%
Weight
68 / 20-67 → 100%
Battery
85%
Display
79%
Games Performance
55 / 68 → 80%
Application Performance
75 / 92 → 82%
Temperature
94%
Noise
92%
Audio
50%
Camera
49 / 85 → 58%
Average
68%
77%
Office - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 惠普 Pavilion 14-al103ng 笔记本电脑简短评测
Sascha Mölck, 2017-01-13 (Update: 2017-01-14)