惠普 Pavilion 15 Power (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1050) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Brand: HP

集中攻势。惠普正在刷新Pavilion系列笔记本的性能，并且不将它称为是游戏本。Pavilion 15 Power是该系列中最好的，也有可能是最昂贵的电脑。

Allen Ngo (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 07/18/2017 🇺🇸 🇳🇱 ...

Gaming Kaby Lake Windows Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of CUKUSA.com

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV (Pavilion 15-cx Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1354 MHz, RAM: 7008 MHz, GDDR5, 382.53, Optimus

Memory

16 GB

, DDR4, 1300 MHz, Dual-Channel, 15-15-15-36

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, ID: AU Optronics AUO41ED, IPS, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel HM175

Storage

SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, 256 GB

, Secondary: 1 TB HGST HTS721010A9E630

Soundcard

Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: SD 读卡器

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 24.1 x 378 x 252.2

Battery

70 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Additional features

Speakers: B&O stereo, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, HP CoolSense, 3D DriveGuard, B&O Play Audio control, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.358 kg, Power Supply: 431 g

Price

1000 USD

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S HP Pavilion 15t-bc200 X7P44AV Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 DIN A4 ❌

Left: 2x USB 3.0, 3.5 mm combo audio, Kensington Lock

Right: SD reader, USB Type-C Gen. 1, USB 3.0, HDMI-out, Gigabit Ethernet, AC adapter

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV	81.3 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS	74.7 MB/s -8%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US	21.2 MB/s -74%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS	89.7 MB/s +4%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV	86.4 MB/s
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US	17.9 MB/s -79%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter	512 MBit/s +10%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	465 MBit/s
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	341 MBit/s -27%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter	662 MBit/s +3%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	645 MBit/s
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	343 MBit/s -47%


238.2 cd/m²	228.5 cd/m²	219.5 cd/m²
240.8 cd/m²	256.6 cd/m²	226.5 cd/m²
249.3 cd/m²	270.5 cd/m²	253 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

ID: AU Optronics AUO41ED tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Maximum: 270.5 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 242.5 cd/m² Minimum: 17.58 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 256.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 1351:1 (Black: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57.7% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.03% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.81% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2)

	HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV ID: AU Optronics AUO41ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 Chi Mei CMN N156HCE-EN1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S BOE CQ NV156HFM-N42, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV AU Optronics AUO41ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display		63%		4%	22%	-2%
Display P3 Coverage	38.81	65 67%		40.56 5%	47.11 21%	38.03 -2%
sRGB Coverage	57.9	90.8 57%		59.4 3%	70.4 22%	56.5 -2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	40.03	65.8 64%		41.9 5%	48.71 22%	39.29 -2%
Response Times		15%	-41%	-20%	-10%	-6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	38.8 ?(20, 18.8)	29.6 ?(15.6, 14) 24%	58.8 ?(33.6, 25.2) -52%	46 ?(25, 21) -19%	38.8 ?(20.8, 18) -0%	44.4 ?(15.2, 29.2) -14%
Response Time Black / White *	28 ?(16.4, 11.6)	26.4 ?(15.6, 10.8) 6%	36 ?(23.6, 12.4) -29%	34 ?(20, 14) -21%	33.6 ?(18.8, 14.8) -20%	27.2 ?(6.8, 20.4) 3%
PWM Frequency		25510 ?(69)	21550 ?(99)	20000 ?(90)	19230 ?(99)
Screen		2%	-29%	2%	-28%	-31%
Brightness middle	256.6	300.9 17%	239 -7%	277 8%	255.9 0%	209.7 -18%
Brightness	243	285 17%	244 0%	268 10%	249 2%	193 -21%
Brightness Distribution	81	92 14%	88 9%	91 12%	90 11%	75 -7%
Black Level *	0.19	0.24 -26%	0.35 -84%	0.26 -37%	0.48 -153%	0.19 -0%
Contrast	1351	1254 -7%	683 -49%	1065 -21%	533 -61%	1104 -18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5	5 -0%	7.3 -46%	5.05 -1%	5.9 -18%	7.8 -56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	20.1	10.2 49%	24.7 -23%	8.93 56%	18.9 6%	24.1 -20%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.7	7 -159%	4.9 -81%	2.97 -10%	5.6 -107%	7.3 -170%
Gamma	2.32 ^95%	2.34 ^94%	2.19 ^100%	2.39 ^92%	2.21 ^100%	2.39 ^92%
CCT	6599 ^98%	6578 ^99%	7332 ^89%	6466 ^101%	7250 ^90%	5771 ^113%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	36.7	59 61%	35 -5%	38 4%	44.8 22%	39.3 7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	57.7	90 56%	55 -5%	59 2%	70.1 21%	56.5 -2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		27% / 16%	-35% / -31%	-5% / -0%	-5% / -15%	-13% / -21%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16.4 ms rise
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20 ms rise
38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5 Intel Core i7-7700K	190 Points +26%
Asus G752VS-BA338T Intel Core i7-7700HQ	161 Points +7%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV Intel Core i7-7700HQ	151 Points
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD Intel Core i7-5700HQ	143 Points -5%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	134 Points -11%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	133 Points -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	125 Points -17%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5 Intel Core i7-7700K	897 Points +21%
Asus G752VS-BA338T Intel Core i7-7700HQ	742 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV Intel Core i7-7700HQ	740 Points
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD Intel Core i7-5700HQ	682 Points -8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	678 Points -8%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	503 Points -32%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	490 Points -34%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5 Intel Core i7-7700K	2.19 Points +19%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.84 Points
Asus G752VS-BA338T Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.83 Points -1%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD Intel Core i7-5700HQ	1.66 Points -10%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	1.51 Points -18%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.5 Points -18%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	1.46 Points -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5 Intel Core i7-7700K	9.78 Points +20%
Asus G752VS-BA338T Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.19 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.15 Points
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD Intel Core i7-5700HQ	7.53 Points -8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.47 Points -8%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	5.81 Points -29%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	5.29 Points -35%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5 Intel Core i7-7700K	28189 Points +28%
Asus G752VS-BA338T Intel Core i7-7700HQ	22434 Points +2%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV Intel Core i7-7700HQ	22053 Points
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20111 Points -9%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD Intel Core i7-5700HQ	18785 Points -15%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	17618 Points -20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	14329 Points -35%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5 Intel Core i7-7700K	7222 Points +22%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV Intel Core i7-7700HQ	5933 Points
Asus G752VS-BA338T Intel Core i7-7700HQ	5923 Points 0%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD Intel Core i7-5700HQ	5449 Points -8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	5126 Points -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	4999 Points -16%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	4920 Points -17%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	323 s * -52%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV Intel Core i7-7700HQ	211.9 s *
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD Intel Core i7-5700HQ	210.1 s * +1%
Eurocom Tornado F5 Intel Core i7-7700K	176.3 s * +17%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6839

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

22053

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5933

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

66.8 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

8.15 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.84 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

102.4 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

740 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

151 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	4042 Points
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR	4001 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3670 Points -9%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR	5305 Points +7%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	4964 Points
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4771 Points -4%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR	5362 Points +1%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	5328 Points
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4698 Points -12%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4042 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		5328 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4964 points
Help

	HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S Hynix HFS128G39TND	Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
AS SSD		-103%	289%	1%	145%
Copy Game MB/s	204.3		1115 446%	157.6 -23%	240.5 18%
Copy Program MB/s	176.6		502 184%	111.1 -37%	299.5 70%
Copy ISO MB/s	297.3		1912 543%	195 -34%	1560 425%
Score Total	828	942 14%	2617 216%	882 7%	1592 92%
Score Write	210	48 -77%	807 284%	218 4%	376 79%
Score Read	416	646 55%	1232 196%	444 7%	852 105%
Access Time Write *	0.252	4.15 -1547%	0.027 89%	0.261 -4%	0.031 88%
Access Time Read *	0.12	0.08 33%	0.065 46%	0.077 36%	0.066 45%
4K-64 Write	130.7	15.3 -88%	529 305%	113.9 -13%	176.4 35%
4K-64 Read	338.8	371.6 10%	919 171%	361.4 7%	564 66%
4K Write	66.5	1.2 -98%	139.4 110%	90.8 37%	124.1 87%
4K Read	25.83	47.1 82%	48.57 88%	32.29 25%	44.75 73%
Seq Write	132.3	311.7 136%	1392 952%	130.2 -2%	752 468%
Seq Read	509	2277 347%	2649 420%	507 0%	2433 378%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A

Sequential Read: 491.6 MB/s

Sequential Write: 141.7 MB/s

512K Read: 345.6 MB/s

512K Write: 142.6 MB/s

4K Read: 18.83 MB/s

4K Write: 76.3 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 348.5 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 104.8 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK	18373 Points +206%
Aorus x3 Plus v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7820HK	12298 Points +105%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7682 Points +28%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	7321 Points +22%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	6002 Points
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	5990 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	4133 Points -31%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U	3574 Points -40%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK	8626 Points +228%
Aorus x3 Plus v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7820HK	5862 Points +123%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	3662 Points +39%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	3517 Points +34%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	2685 Points +2%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	2629 Points
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	1988 Points -24%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U	1657 Points -37%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK	23170 Points +207%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	9824 Points +30%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7760 Points +3%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7537 Points
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	4826 Points -36%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U	4251 Points -44%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK	10081 Points +37%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	7952 Points +8%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7440 Points +1%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7371 Points
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	4466 Points -39%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U	4113 Points -44%

3DMark 11 Performance		7467 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		114747 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		20367 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		5451 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		2630 points
Help

... in comparison

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Aorus x3 Plus v7 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	65 fps +98%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	42.8 fps +30%
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000	40.7 (37^min - 45^max) fps +24%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1050 2GB GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000	36.9 (34^min - 40^max) fps +12%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	32.9 fps
HP Omen 15-ax007ng GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	30.6 fps -7%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	24.2 fps -26%
Asus N752VX-GC131T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256	16.32 (14^min - 19^max) fps -50%

	low	med.	high	ultra
Guild Wars 2 (2012)				43.3
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013)				114
BioShock Infinite (2013)				63.1
Metro: Last Light (2013)			78.9	43.6
Thief (2014)			73.8	41.4
The Witcher 3 (2015)		69	40.2	21
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)	89	78		44
Metal Gear Solid V (2015)	60	60	60	48.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)				94.9
Fallout 4 (2015)			41.8	33.7
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)			38.4	32.9
Ashes of the Singularity (2016)	54.3	38.7	33.8
Doom (2016)	103.6	81.5	38.4	35.3
Overwatch (2016)			92.2	55.5
Mafia 3 (2016)	40.6	27.8
Prey (2017)	144	83.3	60.7	49.9

The Witcher 3 high

Noise Level

Idle		32.1 / 32.2 / 32.2 dB(A)
Load		43.3 / 49.6 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance) environment noise: 27.8 dB(A)

	HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR	HP Pavilion 15t-bc200 X7P44AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
Noise		9%	7%	3%	1%
off / environment *	27.8	28.2 -1%	27.7 -0%	28.1 -1%	28.9 -4%
Idle Minimum *	32.1	28.2 12%	30.5 5%	28.1 12%	32.3 -1%
Idle Average *	32.2	28.2 12%	30.5 5%	29.1 10%	32.3 -0%
Idle Maximum *	32.2	28.2 12%	30.6 5%	29.1 10%	32.3 -0%
Load Average *	43.3	39 10%	40 8%	49.2 -14%	43.2 -0%
Witcher 3 ultra *	45		40 11%
Load Maximum *	49.6	46.3 7%	42.6 14%	49.2 1%	45.2 9%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


30 °C	44 °C	44.2 °C
28 °C	34.2 °C	44.6 °C
26 °C	26.4 °C	41 °C

Maximum: 44.6 °C
Average: 35.4 °C


47 °C	60 °C	37 °C
48.6 °C	45.8 °C	32.8 °C
50.6 °C	31.4 °C	28.2 °C

Maximum: 60 °C
Average: 42.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 50 °C | Room Temperature 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


26.4 °C	26.2 °C	26.4 °C
26.2 °C	26 °C	27.2 °C
25.4 °C	25 °C	27.2 °C

Maximum: 27.2 °C
Average: 26.2 °C


28 °C	29.4 °C	30.2 °C
31.2 °C	28.6 °C	30 °C
30.6 °C	27.2 °C	27.2 °C

Maximum: 31.2 °C
Average: 29.2 °C

Room Temperature 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


31 °C	38.6 °C	42 °C
28.6 °C	33.4 °C	42.4 °C
27.2 °C	27.2 °C	38.8 °C

Maximum: 42.4 °C
Average: 34.4 °C


42.2 °C	54.2 °C	35 °C
42.6 °C	42.4 °C	31.8 °C
43.4 °C	29.4 °C	27.8 °C

Maximum: 54.2 °C
Average: 38.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45 °C | Room Temperature 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-12.2 °C / -22 F).

HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.05 / 0.54 Watt
Idle	9.4 / 9.7 / 16.8 Watt
Load	76.5 / 105.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, Lite-On CV1-8B128, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Power Consumption		7%	4%	-30%	12%
Idle Minimum *	9.4	6.7 29%	8.5 10%	11.1 -18%	5.3 44%
Idle Average *	9.7	8.9 8%	9.1 6%	14.1 -45%	10.6 -9%
Idle Maximum *	16.8	10.8 36%	9.7 42%	18.4 -10%	11.8 30%
Load Average *	76.5	81.8 -7%	79.9 -4%	96.5 -26%	70.9 7%
Witcher 3 ultra *	86.5	92.2 -7%	97.7 -13%
Load Maximum *	105.6	122.7 -16%	121.5 -15%	159.5 -51%	119.8 -13%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		16h 11min
WiFi Websurfing		8h 01min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 50min

	HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 70 Wh	Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 72 Wh	Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 45 Wh	Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 52.5 Wh	Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 43 Wh	HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 63.3 Wh
Battery Runtime		-1%	-52%	-31%	-38%	-5%
Reader / Idle	971	1066 10%	509 -48%		612 -37%	961 -1%
WiFi v1.3	481	484 1%	240 -50%	330 -31%	263 -45%	389 -19%
Load	110	96 -13%	46 -58%		76 -31%	115 5%

Pros

+ 可选AMD RX 550和GTX 1050显卡

+ 双内部存储隔间；支持NVMe

+ 可选1080p触摸屏和4K 超高清屏

+ 更强的机身；设计改进

+ 强大的游戏性能

+ 没有处理器节流

+ 可观的电池续航

Cons

- 表面温度不均匀；掌托微热

- 盖子可能更坚固；稍微地摇晃

- 系统风扇始终活跃；下载时有噪声

- 没有雷电3或DisplayPort 接口

- 不起眼的内部扬声器

- 难以维护

- 有限的颜色空间

- 过软的触控板

In review: HP Pavilion 15 Power (15t-cb000). Test model provided by CUKUSA.com

与标准版Pavilion 15相比，Pavilion 15 Power是更强大，更易于被推荐的笔记本电脑。前提是选配HQ级处理器和Pascal图形处理器。机身外壳是一个重要的更新点，打字感觉更舒适。屏幕背光更亮方便获得更好的体验。买家也应该意识到平庸的显示能力，更低的可维护性和有限的sRGB覆盖率，使该设备不利于图形编辑工作。

Pavilion 15 Power的主要问题在于售价。作为15寸笔记本电脑的XPS 15 9560仍然会是它的竞争对手，假如它们都有着类似的配置（7700HQ, GTX 1050, FHD. 1 TB 机械硬盘, 8 GB 运行内存），XPS 15的售价会是1200美元，Pavilion 在 HP.com上的售价则是1040美元（或者920美元；Cukusa.com）。而这200到300美元的差价，使得，戴尔的XPS更具便携性，拓展性，显示质量，可维护性和外壳坚硬度。平时，Pavilion运行起来会有点烫、有点吵。但瑕不掩瑜。如果您的预算有限，那么毫无疑问，旧版本的 Pavilion 15t 会是更好的选择。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。