惠普 Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
Brand: HP

无边游戏。 Pavilion 15出色地整合了多媒体和游戏性能，采用了低调而便携的机身。不过它在连接性和升级维护方面略显不足。

Allen Ngo (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 08/12/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Windows Skylake Geforce Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of CUKUSA.com

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV (Pavilion 15-cx Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1097 MHz, RAM: 5010 MHz, GDDR5, 359.37, Optimus

Memory

16 GB

, 1300 MHz, 15-15-15-36, 双通道, SK Hynix

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 271 PPI, SDC5958, IPS, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)

Storage

SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, 128 GB

, 第二块硬盘: HGST HTS721010A9E630

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合音频接口, Card Reader: SD 读卡器, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 24.4 x 382.5 x 252.4

Battery

61.5 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声 B&O, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 质保卡, Amazon, B&O Audio Controller, CyberLink Power Media Player 14, CyberLink PowerDirector, HP Smart Friend, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.164 kg, Power Supply: 530 g

Price

1050 USD

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T HP Omen 15-ax007ng Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV DIN A4 ❌

Right: SD reader, USB 3.0, HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, AC adapter

Left: Kensington Lock, USB 2.0, USB 3.0, 3.5 mm headset

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U)	135 MB/s +74%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360	79 MB/s +2%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10	78 MB/s +1%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV	77.6 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U)	210 MB/s +136%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV	88.8 MB/s
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360	85.6 MB/s -4%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	570 MBit/s
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A 802.11a/b/g/n	81.4 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	397 MBit/s
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A 802.11a/b/g/n	93.5 MBit/s


345.6 cd/m²	333.9 cd/m²	321.7 cd/m²
342.6 cd/m²	336.2 cd/m²	319.6 cd/m²
304.1 cd/m²	300.1 cd/m²	299.8 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

SDC5958 tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Maximum: 345.6 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 322.6 cd/m² Minimum: 14.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 336.2 cd/m²
Contrast: 534:1 (Black: 0.629 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.32 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.88 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.34

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV SDC5958, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160	HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng Samsung SDC5544, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 CMN N156HGE-EAL (CMN15D2), TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080	Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160	HP Omen 15-ax007ng LGD0519, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display		-27%	32%	6%	-16%
Display P3 Coverage	60	43.03 -28%	85.8 43%	64.3 7%	59.9 0% 40.34 -33%
sRGB Coverage	85.8	64.7 -25%	99.8 16%	89.9 5%	85.9 0% 60.3 -30%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	61.8	44.47 -28%	84.1 36%	65.4 6%	61.6 0% 41.73 -32%
Response Times		-12%	-5%	-5%	-27%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	39.6 ?(18.4, 21.2)	48 ?(16, 32) -21%	43 ?(21, 22) -9%	43.2 ?(18, 25.2) -9%	55 ?(22, 33) -39%
Response Time Black / White *	27.2 ?(7.6, 19.6)	28 ?(6, 22) -3%	23 ?(7, 16) 15%	27.2 ?(7.6, 19.6) -0%	31 ?(8, 23) -14%
PWM Frequency	1282 ?(59)		1000 ?(80) -22%
Screen		4%	-63%	-22%	-29%
Brightness middle	336.2	254 -24%	216 -36%	252.9 -25%	214 -36%
Brightness	323	241 -25%	202 -37%	250 -23%	203 -37%
Brightness Distribution	87	78 -10%	83 -5%	89 2%	79 -9%
Black Level *	0.629	0.27 57%	0.48 24%	0.5 21%	0.28 55%
Contrast	534	941 76%	450 -16%	506 -5%	764 43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.32	3.54 -7%	9.98 -201%	5.22 -57%	6.04 -82%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.4		17.12 -131%	8.33 -13%	12 -62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.88	2.29 20%	10.91 -279%	6.74 -134%	5.91 -105%
Gamma	2.34 ^94%	2.5 ^88%	2.31 ^95%	2.45 ^90%	2.44 ^90%
CCT	6279 ^104%	6698 ^97%	13185 ^49%	6026 ^108%	7362 ^88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	55.3	41 -26%	75 36%	58.4 6%	38 -31%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	85.5	64 -25%	100 17%	89.7 5%	60 -30%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-12% / -5%	-12% / -34%	-7% / -14%	-24% / -25%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.6 ms rise
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.4 ms rise
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

1282 Hz

≤ 59 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1282 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 59 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1282 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV Intel Core i7-6700HQ	140 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	166 Points +19%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	149 Points +6%
MSI PX60 QD-034US Intel Core i7-5700HQ	144 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	125 Points -11%
HP Spectre 13 Intel Core i7-6500U	125 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV Intel Core i7-6700HQ	676 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	865 Points +28%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	707 Points +5%
MSI PX60 QD-034US Intel Core i7-5700HQ	723 Points +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	490 Points -28%
HP Spectre 13 Intel Core i7-6500U	266 Points -61%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.68 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	1.91 Points +14%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.7 Points +1%
MSI PX60 QD-034US Intel Core i7-5700HQ	1.67 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	1.46 Points -13%
HP Spectre 13 Intel Core i7-6500U	1.37 Points -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.48 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	9.56 Points +28%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	7.76 Points +4%
MSI PX60 QD-034US Intel Core i7-5700HQ	7.86 Points +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	5.29 Points -29%
HP Spectre 13 Intel Core i7-6500U	3.2 Points -57%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20090 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	26150 Points +30%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	21022 Points +5%
MSI PX60 QD-034US Intel Core i7-5700HQ	21568 Points +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	14329 Points -29%
HP Spectre 13 Intel Core i7-6500U	9677 Points -52%
Rendering Single 32Bit (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV Intel Core i7-6700HQ	5451 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	6487 Points +19%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	5671 Points +4%
MSI PX60 QD-034US Intel Core i7-5700HQ	5539 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	4999 Points -8%
HP Spectre 13 Intel Core i7-6500U	4901 Points -10%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV Intel Core i7-6700HQ	232.4 s *
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	178.5 s * +23%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	224.6 s * +3%
MSI PX60 QD-034US Intel Core i7-5700HQ	205.8 s * +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	323 s * -39%
HP Spectre 13 Intel Core i7-6500U	525 s * -126%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV Intel Core i7-6700HQ	555 s *
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	498.3 s * +10%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	559 s * -1%
MSI PX60 QD-034US Intel Core i7-5700HQ	570 s * -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	569 s * -3%
HP Spectre 13 Intel Core i7-6500U	685 s * -23%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6442

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

20090

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5451

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

46.58 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

7.48 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.68 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

29.29 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

676 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

140 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	3101 Points
HP Omen 15-ax007ng GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	3946 Points +27%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY	3603 Points +16%
HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	3665 Points +18%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	3077 Points -1%
Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	3717 Points
HP Omen 15-ax007ng GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	5003 Points +35%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY	4951 Points +33%
HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	4823 Points +30%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	3867 Points +4%
Creative Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	4648 Points
HP Omen 15-ax007ng GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	4992 Points +7%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY	4375 Points -6%
HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	4551 Points -2%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4357 Points -6%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3101 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4648 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		3717 points
Help

	HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY	Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	HP Omen 15-ax007ng Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-38%	51%	321%	17%
Read Seq	484.6	465.8 -4%	530 9%	1633 237%	475.7 -2%
Write Seq	185.2	120.2 -35%	442.7 139%	1579 753%	169.2 -9%
Read 512	307.6	314.1 2%	409.1 33%	1068 247%	327.6 7%
Write 512	180	75.9 -58%	417.3 132%	1570 772%	169.6 -6%
Read 4k	22.08	18.49 -16%	21.81 -1%	50.4 128%	33.14 50%
Write 4k	77.7	21.18 -73%	93 20%	128.6 66%	81.4 5%
Read 4k QD32	143.7	94.8 -34%	257 79%	534 272%	276.8 93%
Write 4k QD32	177.6	21.66 -88%	168.3 -5%	344 94%	168 -5%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G

Sequential Read: 484.6 MB/s

Sequential Write: 185.2 MB/s

512K Read: 307.6 MB/s

512K Write: 180 MB/s

4K Read: 22.08 MB/s

4K Write: 77.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 143.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 177.6 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	5452 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	12472 Points +129%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	9824 Points +80%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ	7919 Points +45%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	4938 Points -9%
HP Envy 17-n107ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ	4444 Points -18%
Dell Inspiron 17 7778 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 6500U	2734 Points -50%
1280x720 Performance Combined (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	5472 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	8343 Points +52%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	7952 Points +45%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ	7134 Points +30%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	5417 Points -1%
HP Envy 17-n107ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ	3499 Points -36%
Dell Inspiron 17 7778 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 6500U	2405 Points -56%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	27162 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	64343 Points +137%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	50205 Points +85%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ	36659 Points +35%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	29742 Points +9%
HP Envy 17-n107ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ	20707 Points -24%
Dell Inspiron 17 7778 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 6500U	11713 Points -57%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	4249 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	9608 Points +126%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	7321 Points +72%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ	5904 Points +39%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	4239 Points 0%
HP Envy 17-n107ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ	3093 Points -27%
Dell Inspiron 17 7778 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 6500U	1889 Points -56%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	2004 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	4623 Points +131%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	3517 Points +75%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	942 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	2299 Points +144%

3DMark 11 Performance		5775 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		37758 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		16612 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		3954 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		1990 points
Help

... in comparison

	high	ultra	4K
Sleeping Dogs (2012)	91.2	24.1
BioShock Infinite (2013)	110	45.8
Metro: Last Light (2013)	58.4	31.4
Thief (2014)	55	28.2
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)	34	22
Metal Gear Solid V (2015)	45.9	32.1	14.5
Fallout 4 (2015)	29.9	24.1
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	29.6	23.5
Overwatch (2016)	66.8	40.2	19.8

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	55 fps +134%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	42.8 fps +82%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	30.6 fps +30%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	23.5 fps
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB	21.2 fps -10%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	15.3 (14^min - 18^max) fps -35%

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	86.4 fps +89%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	69.5 fps +52%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	45.8 fps
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB	44.1 fps -4%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	24 (5.7^min - 45.5^max) fps -48%

Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	57.5 fps +139%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	44.9 fps +86%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	24.1 fps
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB	23.4 fps -3%

Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	50.5 fps +61%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	31.4 fps
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB	30.9 fps -2%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	20.1 (8.1^min - 34^max) fps -36%

Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	58.6 fps +108%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	47.5 fps +68%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	28.2 fps
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB	26.6 fps -6%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	18.3 (14.2^min - 25^max) fps -35%

Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	36 fps +64%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	22 (15^min - 30^max) fps 0%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	22 fps
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB	19 fps -14%

Metal Gear Solid V - 1920x1080 Extra High / On
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	60 fps +87%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	60 fps +87%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB	37.5 fps +17%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	32.1 fps

Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	57.9 fps +140%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	43.5 fps +80%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB	24.2 fps 0%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	24.1 fps

Overwatch - 1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	87.3 fps +117%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	49.6 fps +23%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	40.2 fps

Noise Level

Idle		32.3 / 32.4 / 32.4 dB(A)
Load		40.5 / 50.3 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance) environment noise: 29.5 dB(A)

	HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY	Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	HP Omen 15-ax007ng GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
Noise		-7%	-5%	8%	-3%
off / environment *	29.5		30 -2%		30 -2%
Idle Minimum *	32.3	34 -5%	35 -8%	28.9 11%	32 1%
Idle Average *	32.4	35 -8%	36 -11%	28.9 11%	33 -2%
Idle Maximum *	32.4	36 -11%	37 -14%	30.2 7%	36 -11%
Load Average *	40.5	44 -9%	41 -1%	41.8 -3%	43 -6%
Load Maximum *	50.3	51 -1%	46 9%	43.9 13%	49 3%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


24 °C	31 °C	38.2 °C
23.8 °C	29 °C	41 °C
23.8 °C	24.2 °C	37.2 °C

Maximum: 41 °C
Average: 30.2 °C


42.6 °C	31.2 °C	25.4 °C
33.8 °C	26.6 °C	24.8 °C
37.6 °C	26.6 °C	25.6 °C

Maximum: 42.6 °C
Average: 30.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 49 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.3 °C / -15 F).

HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER F516 Flex audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.24 / 0.78 Watt
Idle	8.3 / 14.8 / 16.8 Watt
Load	71 / 119.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"	HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H 4720HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk SD7SN3Q128G1002, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"	HP Omen 15-ax007ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption		14%	-8%	-24%	4%
Idle Minimum *	8.3	7 16%	10 -20%	15.6 -88%	7 16%
Idle Average *	14.8	11 26%	14 5%	20.5 -39%	11 26%
Idle Maximum *	16.8	17 -1%	19 -13%	21.2 -26%	19 -13%
Load Average *	71	69 3%	82 -15%	75.8 -7%	79 -11%
Load Maximum *	119.2	89 25%	118 1%	72.9 39%	119 -0%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		8h 30min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 24min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 33min

	HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 61.5 Wh	HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, 48 Wh	MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 41.4 Wh	Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 96 Wh	HP Omen 15-ax007ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M, 61.5 Wh
Battery Runtime		-2%	-33%	35%	-2%
Reader / Idle	510	572 12%	339 -34%	689 35%	467 -8%
WiFi v1.3	264	304 15%	158 -40%	379 44%	272 3%
Load	93	62 -33%	71 -24%	117 26%	93 0%

Pros

+ 优秀的主硬盘和第二块硬盘选项

+ 对于它尺寸来说非常优秀的游戏性能

+ 优秀的色彩和灰阶

+ 非常明亮的屏幕背光

+ 轻盈诱人的设计

Cons

- 系统在极端负载下降频

- 不均匀的机身表面温度

- 不支持USB-C接口，不支持mDP

- 塑料掌托质感廉价

- 游戏时风扇噪音大

- 触控版较软；反馈弱

- 不支持NVMe或RAID 0选项

- 系统风扇始终开启

- 难以维护更新

- 一般的电池续航

- 一般的对比度

In review: HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV. Test model provided by CUKUSA.com

新的Pavilion 15配置介于搭配GTX 950M的2015年Pavilion 15机型和几周前发布的搭配GTX 965M的Omen 15之间。因此，它的定价也比显卡性能更强的Omen 15低几百美元。因为除此之外这两个机型几乎相同，Pavilion 15对于预算在1000美元左右希望得到出色1080p游戏体验的用户是一个更有吸引力更实惠的选择。实际上它也是一台同时可以适合工作与娱乐的机型。

尽管性能不弱，最新Pavilion 15机身相比前代机型变化很小，没有什么出众的特点。如果不是因为华硕 UX501或戴尔 XPS 15，这也不会是个问题，它们都搭配了更坚固的机身和性能更高的GTX 960M显卡。XPS 15明显更轻更便携，它的强大存在让我们很难向读者推荐惠普的这台新机型。在这个层面上，Pavilion 15的最大优势是较低的售价和搭配显卡性能放弃超高清搭配全高清屏幕的选择。