Notebookcheck Logo

惠普 Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV 笔记本电脑简短评测

无边游戏。 Pavilion 15出色地整合了多媒体和游戏性能，采用了低调而便携的机身。不过它在连接性和升级维护方面略显不足。
Windows Skylake Geforce Laptop / Notebook
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV (Pavilion 15-cx Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1097 MHz, RAM: 5010 MHz, GDDR5, 359.37, Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, 1300 MHz, 15-15-15-36, 双通道, SK Hynix
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 271 PPI, SDC5958, IPS, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Storage
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, 128 GB 
, 第二块硬盘: HGST HTS721010A9E630
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合音频接口, Card Reader: SD 读卡器, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 24.4 x 382.5 x 252.4
Battery
61.5 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声 B&O, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 质保卡, Amazon, B&O Audio Controller, CyberLink Power Media Player 14, CyberLink PowerDirector, HP Smart Friend, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.164 kg, Power Supply: 530 g
Price
1050 USD
Links
HP homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

❌
383 mm 260 mm 29 mm 2.3 kg381.6 mm 259 mm 28.45 mm 2.4 kg382 mm 258 mm 25.5 mm 2.3 kg382 mm 253 mm 25 mm 2.2 kg385 mm 255 mm 22 mm 2.3 kg382.5 mm 252.4 mm 24.4 mm 2.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: SD reader, USB 3.0, HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, AC adapter
Right: SD reader, USB 3.0, HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, AC adapter
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: Kensington Lock, USB 2.0, USB 3.0, 3.5 mm headset
Left: Kensington Lock, USB 2.0, USB 3.0, 3.5 mm headset
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U)
 
135 MB/s +74%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
 
79 MB/s +2%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10
 
78 MB/s +1%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
 
77.6 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U)
 
210 MB/s +136%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
 
88.8 MB/s
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
 
85.6 MB/s -4%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Broadcom 802.11ac
570 MBit/s
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
802.11a/b/g/n
81.4 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Broadcom 802.11ac
397 MBit/s
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
802.11a/b/g/n
93.5 MBit/s
345.6
cd/m²		333.9
cd/m²		321.7
cd/m²
342.6
cd/m²		336.2
cd/m²		319.6
cd/m²
304.1
cd/m²		300.1
cd/m²		299.8
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
SDC5958 tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Maximum: 345.6 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 322.6 cd/m² Minimum: 14.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 336.2 cd/m²
Contrast: 534:1 (Black: 0.629 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.32 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.88 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
SDC5958, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160		HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng
Samsung SDC5544, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080		MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
CMN N156HGE-EAL (CMN15D2), TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080		Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T
IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160		HP Omen 15-ax007ng
LGD0519, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display
-27%
32%
6%
-16%
Display P3 Coverage
60
43.03
-28%
85.8
43%
64.3
7%
59.9
0%

40.34
-33%

sRGB Coverage
85.8
64.7
-25%
99.8
16%
89.9
5%
85.9
0%

60.3
-30%

AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
61.8
44.47
-28%
84.1
36%
65.4
6%
61.6
0%

41.73
-32%

Response Times
-12%
-5%
-5%
-27%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39.6 ?(18.4, 21.2)
48 ?(16, 32)
-21%
43 ?(21, 22)
-9%
43.2 ?(18, 25.2)
-9%
55 ?(22, 33)
-39%
Response Time Black / White *
27.2 ?(7.6, 19.6)
28 ?(6, 22)
-3%
23 ?(7, 16)
15%
27.2 ?(7.6, 19.6)
-0%
31 ?(8, 23)
-14%
PWM Frequency
1282 ?(59)
1000 ?(80)
-22%
Screen
4%
-63%
-22%
-29%
Brightness middle
336.2
254
-24%
216
-36%
252.9
-25%
214
-36%
Brightness
323
241
-25%
202
-37%
250
-23%
203
-37%
Brightness Distribution
87
78
-10%
83
-5%
89
2%
79
-9%
Black Level *
0.629
0.27
57%
0.48
24%
0.5
21%
0.28
55%
Contrast
534
941
76%
450
-16%
506
-5%
764
43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.32
3.54
-7%
9.98
-201%
5.22
-57%
6.04
-82%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.4
17.12
-131%
8.33
-13%
12
-62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.88
2.29
20%
10.91
-279%
6.74
-134%
5.91
-105%
Gamma
2.34 94%
2.5 88%
2.31 95%
2.45 90%
2.44 90%
CCT
6279 104%
6698 97%
13185 49%
6026 108%
7362 88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
55.3
41
-26%
75
36%
58.4
6%
38
-31%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
85.5
64
-25%
100
17%
89.7
5%
60
-30%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-12% / -5%
-12% / -34%
-7% / -14%
-24% / -25%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.4 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1282 Hz ≤ 59 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1282 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 59 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1282 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
166 Points +19%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
149 Points +6%
MSI PX60 QD-034US
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
144 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
125 Points -11%
HP Spectre 13
Intel Core i7-6500U
125 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
676 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
865 Points +28%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
707 Points +5%
MSI PX60 QD-034US
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
723 Points +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
490 Points -28%
HP Spectre 13
Intel Core i7-6500U
266 Points -61%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.68 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
1.91 Points +14%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.7 Points +1%
MSI PX60 QD-034US
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
1.67 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
1.46 Points -13%
HP Spectre 13
Intel Core i7-6500U
1.37 Points -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.48 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
9.56 Points +28%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
7.76 Points +4%
MSI PX60 QD-034US
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
7.86 Points +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
5.29 Points -29%
HP Spectre 13
Intel Core i7-6500U
3.2 Points -57%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20090 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
26150 Points +30%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
21022 Points +5%
MSI PX60 QD-034US
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
21568 Points +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
14329 Points -29%
HP Spectre 13
Intel Core i7-6500U
9677 Points -52%
Rendering Single 32Bit (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5451 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
6487 Points +19%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
5671 Points +4%
MSI PX60 QD-034US
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
5539 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
4999 Points -8%
HP Spectre 13
Intel Core i7-6500U
4901 Points -10%
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
232.4 s *
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
178.5 s * +23%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
224.6 s * +3%
MSI PX60 QD-034US
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
205.8 s * +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
323 s * -39%
HP Spectre 13
Intel Core i7-6500U
525 s * -126%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
555 s *
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
498.3 s * +10%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
559 s * -1%
MSI PX60 QD-034US
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
570 s * -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
569 s * -3%
HP Spectre 13
Intel Core i7-6500U
685 s * -23%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6442
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
20090
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5451
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
46.58 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.48 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.68 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
29.29 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
676 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
140 Points
Help
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
3101 Points
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
3946 Points +27%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY
3603 Points +16%
HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
3665 Points +18%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
3077 Points -1%
Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
3717 Points
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
5003 Points +35%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY
4951 Points +33%
HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
4823 Points +30%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
3867 Points +4%
Creative Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
4648 Points
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
4992 Points +7%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY
4375 Points -6%
HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
4551 Points -2%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4357 Points -6%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3101 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4648 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3717 points
Help
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G		HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng
Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP		MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY		Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e		HP Omen 15-ax007ng
Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-38%
51%
321%
17%
Read Seq
484.6
465.8
-4%
530
9%
1633
237%
475.7
-2%
Write Seq
185.2
120.2
-35%
442.7
139%
1579
753%
169.2
-9%
Read 512
307.6
314.1
2%
409.1
33%
1068
247%
327.6
7%
Write 512
180
75.9
-58%
417.3
132%
1570
772%
169.6
-6%
Read 4k
22.08
18.49
-16%
21.81
-1%
50.4
128%
33.14
50%
Write 4k
77.7
21.18
-73%
93
20%
128.6
66%
81.4
5%
Read 4k QD32
143.7
94.8
-34%
257
79%
534
272%
276.8
93%
Write 4k QD32
177.6
21.66
-88%
168.3
-5%
344
94%
168
-5%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
AS SSD
hddimg
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
Sequential Read: 484.6 MB/s
Sequential Write: 185.2 MB/s
512K Read: 307.6 MB/s
512K Write: 180 MB/s
4K Read: 22.08 MB/s
4K Write: 77.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 143.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 177.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
5452 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
12472 Points +129%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
9824 Points +80%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
7919 Points +45%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
4938 Points -9%
HP Envy 17-n107ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ
4444 Points -18%
Dell Inspiron 17 7778
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 6500U
2734 Points -50%
1280x720 Performance Combined (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
5472 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
8343 Points +52%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
7952 Points +45%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
7134 Points +30%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
5417 Points -1%
HP Envy 17-n107ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ
3499 Points -36%
Dell Inspiron 17 7778
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 6500U
2405 Points -56%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
27162 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
64343 Points +137%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
50205 Points +85%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
36659 Points +35%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
29742 Points +9%
HP Envy 17-n107ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ
20707 Points -24%
Dell Inspiron 17 7778
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 6500U
11713 Points -57%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
4249 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
9608 Points +126%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
7321 Points +72%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
5904 Points +39%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
4239 Points 0%
HP Envy 17-n107ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ
3093 Points -27%
Dell Inspiron 17 7778
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 6500U
1889 Points -56%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
2004 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
4623 Points +131%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
3517 Points +75%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
942 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
2299 Points +144%
3DMark 11 Performance
5775 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
37758 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
16612 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3954 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
1990 points
Help
lowmed.highultra4K
Sleeping Dogs (2012) 91.2 24.1
BioShock Infinite (2013) 110 45.8
Metro: Last Light (2013) 58.4 31.4
Thief (2014) 55 28.2
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 34 22
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 45.9 32.1 14.5
Fallout 4 (2015) 29.9 24.1
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 29.6 23.5
Overwatch (2016) 66.8 40.2 19.8
Rise of the Tomb Raider | BioShock Infinite | Sleeping Dogs | Metro: Last Light | Thief | Batman: Arkham Knight | Metal Gear Solid V | Fallout 4 | Overwatch
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
55 fps +134%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
42.8 fps +82%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
30.6 fps +30%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
23.5 fps
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
21.2 fps -10%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
15.3 (14min - 18max) fps -35%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
86.4 fps +89%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
69.5 fps +52%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
45.8 fps
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
44.1 fps -4%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
24 (5.7min - 45.5max) fps -48%
Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
57.5 fps +139%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
44.9 fps +86%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
24.1 fps
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
23.4 fps -3%
Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
50.5 fps +61%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
31.4 fps
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
30.9 fps -2%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
20.1 (8.1min - 34max) fps -36%
Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
58.6 fps +108%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
47.5 fps +68%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
28.2 fps
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
26.6 fps -6%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
18.3 (14.2min - 25max) fps -35%
Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
36 fps +64%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
22 (15min - 30max) fps 0%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
22 fps
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
19 fps -14%
Metal Gear Solid V - 1920x1080 Extra High / On
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
60 fps +87%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
60 fps +87%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
37.5 fps +17%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
32.1 fps
Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
57.9 fps +140%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
43.5 fps +80%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
24.2 fps 0%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
24.1 fps
Overwatch - 1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
87.3 fps +117%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
49.6 fps +23%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
40.2 fps

Noise Level

Idle
32.3 / 32.4 / 32.4 dB(A)
Load
40.5 / 50.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 29.5 dB(A)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G		HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP		MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY		Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e		HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
Noise
-7%
-5%
8%
-3%
off / environment *
29.5
30
-2%
30
-2%
Idle Minimum *
32.3
34
-5%
35
-8%
28.9
11%
32
1%
Idle Average *
32.4
35
-8%
36
-11%
28.9
11%
33
-2%
Idle Maximum *
32.4
36
-11%
37
-14%
30.2
7%
36
-11%
Load Average *
40.5
44
-9%
41
-1%
41.8
-3%
43
-6%
Load Maximum *
50.3
51
-1%
46
9%
43.9
13%
49
3%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 24 °C31 °C38.2 °C 
 23.8 °C29 °C41 °C 
 23.8 °C24.2 °C37.2 °C 
Maximum: 41 °C
Average: 30.2 °C
42.6 °C31.2 °C25.4 °C
33.8 °C26.6 °C24.8 °C
37.6 °C26.6 °C25.6 °C
Maximum: 42.6 °C
Average: 30.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  49 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.3 °C / -15 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.134.82534.734.53134.235.14033.734.85033.734.46333.935.58032.33610031.632.512530.731.316040.433.62004941.22505143.631552.24440054.147.450058.352.463059.453.880062.758.5100059.857.7125063.761.1160063.562.5200059.158.2250061.862.9315060.361.8400060.162.250006165.1630059.66480005863.61000050.5571250047.354.61600041.249.9SPL72.873.6N30.930.8median 58.3median 57Delta6.39.235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.445.635.736.945.643.135.635.343.143.441.140.543.442.141.139.142.138.236.435.638.232.93230.432.92827.328.42827.827.927.427.828.428.330.828.427.63135.227.629.134.43829.140.946.150.340.944.550.554.644.547.453.557.647.448.454.558.648.454.260.864.554.26267.871.76258.563.968.258.550.256.160.250.252.858.562.552.855.761.565.555.752.258.16252.255.761.565.255.755.961.865.555.947.453.25747.452.258.462.952.254.760.66554.755.962.166.255.955.661.665.155.652.558.36152.567.373.177.167.321.831.440.121.8median 52.2median 58.3median 62median 52.27.68.58.17.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AVApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzSCHENKER F516 Flex
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER F516 Flex audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.24 / 0.78 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 8.3 / 14.8 / 16.8 Watt
Load midlight 71 / 119.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"		HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H
4720HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk SD7SN3Q128G1002, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"		HP Omen 15-ax007ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption
14%
-8%
-24%
4%
Idle Minimum *
8.3
7
16%
10
-20%
15.6
-88%
7
16%
Idle Average *
14.8
11
26%
14
5%
20.5
-39%
11
26%
Idle Maximum *
16.8
17
-1%
19
-13%
21.2
-26%
19
-13%
Load Average *
71
69
3%
82
-15%
75.8
-7%
79
-11%
Load Maximum *
119.2
89
25%
118
1%
72.9
39%
119
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
8h 30min
WiFi Websurfing
4h 24min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 33min
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 61.5 Wh		HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, 48 Wh		MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 41.4 Wh		Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 96 Wh		HP Omen 15-ax007ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M, 61.5 Wh
Battery Runtime
-2%
-33%
35%
-2%
Reader / Idle
510
572
12%
339
-34%
689
35%
467
-8%
WiFi v1.3
264
304
15%
158
-40%
379
44%
272
3%
Load
93
62
-33%
71
-24%
117
26%
93
0%

Pros

+ 优秀的主硬盘和第二块硬盘选项
+ 对于它尺寸来说非常优秀的游戏性能
+ 优秀的色彩和灰阶
+ 非常明亮的屏幕背光
+ 轻盈诱人的设计

Cons

- 系统在极端负载下降频
- 不均匀的机身表面温度
- 不支持USB-C接口，不支持mDP
- 塑料掌托质感廉价
- 游戏时风扇噪音大
- 触控版较软；反馈弱
- 不支持NVMe或RAID 0选项
- 系统风扇始终开启
- 难以维护更新
- 一般的电池续航
- 一般的对比度
In review: HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV. Test model provided by CUKUSA.com
In review: HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV. Test model provided by CUKUSA.com

新的Pavilion 15配置介于搭配GTX 950M的2015年Pavilion 15机型和几周前发布的搭配GTX 965M的Omen 15之间。因此，它的定价也比显卡性能更强的Omen 15低几百美元。因为除此之外这两个机型几乎相同，Pavilion 15对于预算在1000美元左右希望得到出色1080p游戏体验的用户是一个更有吸引力更实惠的选择。实际上它也是一台同时可以适合工作与娱乐的机型。

尽管性能不弱，最新Pavilion 15机身相比前代机型变化很小，没有什么出众的特点。如果不是因为华硕 UX501或戴尔 XPS 15，这也不会是个问题，它们都搭配了更坚固的机身和性能更高的GTX 960M显卡。XPS 15明显更轻更便携，它的强大存在让我们很难向读者推荐惠普的这台新机型。在这个层面上，Pavilion 15的最大优势是较低的售价和搭配显卡性能放弃超高清搭配全高清屏幕的选择。

 

它是一台比同类产品更实惠的多媒体游戏准系统。它的硬件配置和功能相比竞争对手都较为单薄，不过在核心性能上可以吸引预算有限的游戏玩家或其他需要全能型产品的用户。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。 

HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV - 08/05/2016 v5.1 (old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis
75 / 98 → 77%
Keyboard
77%
Pointing Device
64%
Connectivity
53 / 81 → 65%
Weight
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Battery
78%
Display
85%
Games Performance
83%
Application Performance
82%
Temperature
86 / 95 → 91%
Noise
76 / 90 → 84%
Audio
65%
Camera
42 / 85 → 50%
Average
71%
80%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普 Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV 笔记本电脑简短评测
Allen Ngo, 2016-08-12 (Update: 2020-06- 8)