惠普 Pavilion 15t-au100 (W0P31AV) 笔记本电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE | |
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE |
Networking | |
WiFi Speed Client 1m 512KB | |
WiFi Speed Server 1m 512KB |
|
Brightness Distribution: 69 %
Center on Battery: 186.5 cd/m²
Contrast: 1036:1 (Black: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
64.95% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44.71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44.71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
43.27% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) BOE0693, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE BOE HF NV156FHM-N42, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Chi Mei CMN15C4, TN, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV SDC5958, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 33% | -1% | -11% | 36% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 43.27 | 61.5 42% | 42.66 -1% | 38.57 -11% | 60 39% |
sRGB Coverage | 64.9 | 80.4 24% | 64.1 -1% | 57.4 -12% | 85.8 32% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 44.71 | 58.8 32% | 44.08 -1% | 39.89 -11% | 61.8 38% |
Response Times | 14% | -36% | 18% | 190% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 40 ? 5% | 51 ? -21% | 39 ? 7% | 39.6 ? 6% |
Response Time Black / White * | 33.6 ? | 26 ? 23% | 38 ? -13% | 24 ? 29% | 27.2 ? 19% |
PWM Frequency | 198.4 | 50 ? -75% | 1282 ? 546% | ||
Screen | 16% | 21% | -35% | 10% | |
Brightness middle | 186.5 | 326 75% | 291 56% | 176 -6% | 336.2 80% |
Brightness | 174 | 316 82% | 265 52% | 169 -3% | 323 86% |
Brightness Distribution | 69 | 80 16% | 86 25% | 91 32% | 87 26% |
Black Level * | 0.18 | 0.35 -94% | 0.23 -28% | 0.47 -161% | 0.629 -249% |
Contrast | 1036 | 931 -10% | 1265 22% | 374 -64% | 534 -48% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.7 | 5.49 4% | 4.78 16% | 8.83 -55% | 3.32 42% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 22.5 | 11.36 50% | 9.51 58% | 14.01 38% | 7.4 67% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 4.84 -10% | 3.49 21% | 8.97 -104% | 2.88 35% |
Gamma | 2.35 94% | 2.23 99% | 2.58 85% | 2.43 91% | 2.34 94% |
CCT | 6963 93% | 5971 109% | 6013 108% | 10234 64% | 6279 104% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 44.71 | 53 19% | 40 -11% | 36.8 -18% | 55.3 24% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 64.95 | 80 23% | 64 -1% | 57.3 -12% | 85.5 32% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 21% /
19% | -5% /
6% | -9% /
-23% | 79% /
48% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise | |
↘ 26 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise | |
↘ 28.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 198.4 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 198.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 198.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD | |
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV |
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M | |
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD | |
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3424 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4089 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4340 points | |
Help |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Liteonit CV3-DE256 | Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB | HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -20% | 10956% | 7338% | 16558% | 6457% | |
Read Seq | 109.5 | 95.3 -13% | 469.2 328% | 459.3 319% | 1291 1079% | 484.6 343% |
Write Seq | 105.2 | 85.6 -19% | 431.5 310% | 325.5 209% | 590 461% | 185.2 76% |
Read 512 | 34.08 | 29.32 -14% | 338.3 893% | 279.2 719% | 632 1754% | 307.6 803% |
Write 512 | 40.02 | 25.93 -35% | 297.9 644% | 280.1 600% | 588 1369% | 180 350% |
Read 4k | 0.429 | 0.366 -15% | 28.68 6585% | 22.43 5128% | 41.4 9550% | 22.08 5047% |
Write 4k | 1.008 | 0.726 -28% | 66.8 6527% | 74.9 7331% | 132.4 13035% | 77.7 7608% |
Read 4k QD32 | 0.81 | 0.647 -20% | 364.7 44925% | 149 18295% | 542 66814% | 143.7 17641% |
Write 4k QD32 | 0.893 | 0.722 -19% | 245.9 27436% | 234 26104% | 343.8 38399% | 177.6 19788% |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD | |
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV | |
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV |
3DMark 11 Performance | 2622 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7017 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1538 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 777 points | |
Help |
Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
1024x768 Lowest Preset (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD | |
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD | |
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV |
GRID 2 | |
1024x768 Ultra Low Preset (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
1366x768 High Preset AA:2xMS (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) |
Metro: Last Light | |
1024x768 Low (DX10) AF:4x (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
1366x768 Medium (DX10) AF:4x (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
1366x768 High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD | |
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV | |
1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD | |
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV |
Tomb Raider | |
1024x768 Low Preset (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
1366x768 High Preset AA:FX AF:8x (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD |
Company of Heroes 2 | |
1024x768 Minimum / Low / Off AA:Off (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
1366x768 Medium AA:Off (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
1366x768 High AA:Medium (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
1920x1080 Maximum / Higher / High AA:High (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) |
Sleeping Dogs | |
1024x768 Low Preset AA:Normal (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
1366x768 Medium Preset AA:Normal (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
1366x768 High Preset AA:High (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD | |
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV | |
1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD | |
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dirt 3 (2011) | 67.8 | 48.7 | 41.6 | 28.9 |
Anno 2070 (2011) | 130.4 | 66.8 | 42.5 | 21 |
Sleeping Dogs (2012) | 92.9 | 69.9 | 34 | 9 |
Hitman: Absolution (2012) | 61.3 | 38.3 | 17.8 | 6.6 |
Tomb Raider (2013) | 137 | 66.4 | 37.4 | 18.3 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 90.3 | 62.4 | 42.7 | 14.6 |
Metro: Last Light (2013) | 49.3 | 38.4 | 23.5 | 11.6 |
GRID 2 (2013) | 125.4 | 89.8 | 60.3 | 21.2 |
Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 36.1 | 29.5 | 21 | 7.2 |
F1 2013 (2013) | 120 | 81 | 41 | 31 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 34.7 | 22.1 | 13.2 | 10.1 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 32.2 / 32.2 / 33.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 39.4 / 42.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1 (15 cm distance) |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Liteonit CV3-DE256 | Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB | HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -1% | 5% | 7% | 5% | -4% | |
Idle Minimum * | 32.2 | 31.6 2% | 32.6 -1% | 30.8 4% | 29.2 9% | 32.3 -0% |
Idle Average * | 32.2 | 31.6 2% | 32.6 -1% | 30.8 4% | 29.3 9% | 32.4 -1% |
Idle Maximum * | 33.7 | 33.4 1% | 32.6 3% | 30.8 9% | 29.5 12% | 32.4 4% |
Load Average * | 39.4 | 41.7 -6% | 35.3 10% | 33.4 15% | 36.5 7% | 40.5 -3% |
Load Maximum * | 42.2 | 44.8 -6% | 37.1 12% | 40.1 5% | 47.7 -13% | 50.3 -19% |
off / environment * | 31.6 | 31.6 | 28.9 | 29.5 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1.6 °C / 2.8 F).
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (58 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | / 0.38 Watt |
Idle | 6.16 / 8.48 / 9.62 Watt |
Load |
41.63 / 63.22 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T 6500U, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Liteonit CV3-DE256, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -18% | 15% | -10% | -69% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6.16 | 5 19% | 3.9 37% | 6 3% | 8.3 -35% |
Idle Average * | 8.48 | 8.9 -5% | 7.4 13% | 8.1 4% | 14.8 -75% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.62 | 11.8 -23% | 9.5 1% | 9.8 -2% | 16.8 -75% |
Load Average * | 41.63 | 55 -32% | 41 2% | 52.5 -26% | 71 -71% |
Load Maximum * | 63.22 | 93 -47% | 48 24% | 81.6 -29% | 119.2 -89% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T 6500U, GeForce GTX 960M, 48 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 30 Wh | Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 84 Wh | HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 61.5 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 57% | 25% | 50% | 90% | 8% | |
Reader / Idle | 438 | 816 86% | 767 75% | 979 124% | 510 16% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 220 | 430 95% | 275 25% | 451 105% | 544 147% | 264 20% |
Load | 106 | 95 -10% | 75 -29% | 106 0% | 93 -12% |
Pros
Cons
惠普Pavilion 15t-au100是一款富有吸引力的15.6英寸笔记本电脑,具有足够的性能来应对日常工作。配备了新一代双核i7处理器,8GB内存和专用的中端显卡GeForce 940MX,即使是轻量级到中等的游戏也不在话下。虽然整体性能非常体面,但该机型的瓶颈毫无疑问是在机械硬盘驱动器上,它的转速在5400RPM。该笔记本电脑没有使用固态驱动器的竞争对手那么快。幸运的是,该系列的一些型号配备了PCIe NVMe M.2固态硬盘,甚至可以配备固态硬盘和常规SATA驱动器,以提高性能,同时保持存储成本的低廉。
另一个缺点在于屏幕,它非常昏暗还带有眩光问题。这两个问题使得,在户外或是明亮的环境中工作成为一个挑战。最后,电池续航时间也有限。有些竞争对手甚至拥有它两倍的续航时间。
惠普Pavilion 15t提供了不错的性能,但仍然受制于机械硬盘驱动器,屏幕以及短暂的电池续航。除非惠普提高全高清机型的亮度,否则我们宁愿选择带有固态硬盘驱动器和更强的图形的超高清机型。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
-
01/07/2017 v6 (old)
Bernhard Pechlaner