惠普 Pavilion 17t-ab200 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: HP Pavilion 17t-ab200
Brand: HP

Pascal构架下的Pavilion… 惠普更新了配备Kaby Lake处理器和Pascal的Pavilion 17，它能提供更好的性能，更长的电池续航和更多散热空间。Pavilion 17t-ab200一款值得考虑的实惠型游戏本吗？

Steve Schardein (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 03/04/2017 🇺🇸 🇳🇱 ...

Windows Kaby Lake Gaming

Test device courtesy of CUKUSA.com

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP 1JM53EA#ABD

Processor

Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1493 MHz, RAM: 7000 MHz, GDDR5, 21.21.13.7654 - nVIDIA ForceWare 376.54

Memory

16 GB

, DDR4-2400

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AUO109D, IPS, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Sunrise Point, Intel Kaby Lake-H

Storage

Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP, 128 GB

Soundcard

Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo headset, Card Reader: SD full-sized

Networking

Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Optical drive

HP DVDRW GUD1N

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 32 x 419 x 288

Battery

62 Wh Lithium-Ion, removeable

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p HD
Primary Camera: 1 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.954 kg, Power Supply: 428 g

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

MSI GE72 7RE-046 HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 Gigabyte P57X v7 HP Omen 17-w100ng Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte P57X v7	78.2 MB/s +32%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T	76.3 MB/s +29%
HP Omen 17-w100ng	73 MB/s +24%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV	66.1 MB/s +12%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200	59.1 MB/s
MSI GE72 7RE-046	26 MB/s -56%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200	91.2 MB/s
Gigabyte P57X v7	90.4 MB/s -1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng	87 MB/s -5%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T	85.8 MB/s -6%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV	74.3 MB/s -19%
MSI GE72 7RE-046	28 MB/s -69%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T Intel Wireless-AC 7265	543 MBit/s 0%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	541 MBit/s
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	524 MBit/s -3%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	294 MBit/s -46%
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	674 MBit/s +3%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T Intel Wireless-AC 7265	666 MBit/s +1%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	657 MBit/s
MSI GE72 7RE-046 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	345 MBit/s -47%


262.2 cd/m²	268.8 cd/m²	257.5 cd/m²
262.8 cd/m²	278.8 cd/m²	252.7 cd/m²
271 cd/m²	267.4 cd/m²	263.5 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AUO109D tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Maximum: 278.8 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 265 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 278.8 cd/m²
Contrast: 996:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 8.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2)

	HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 AUO109D, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080	HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080	Gigabyte P57X v7 SHP145E, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160	HP Omen 17-w100ng LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080	MSI GE72 7RE-046 N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN LED, 17.3", 1920x1080
Display		0%	34%	0%	29%
Display P3 Coverage	65.2	64.3 -1%	87.8 35%	67.2 3%	90.7 39%
sRGB Coverage	87.6	88.1 1%	100 14%	86.6 -1%	99.9 14%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	64.1	64.4 0%	98.9 54%	63.3 -1%	85.2 33%
Response Times		6%	-59%	8%	48%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	36.8	31.2 ?(15.2, 16) 15%	55.6 ?(18.4, 37.2) -51%	35 ?(14, 21) 5%	27 ?(13, 14) 27%
Response Time Black / White *	28	29.2 ?(6, 23.2) -4%	46.8 ?(10.4, 36.4) -67%	25 ?(4, 21) 11%	9 ?(6, 3) 68%
PWM Frequency			1000 ?(29)
Screen		20%	19%	13%	7%
Brightness middle	278.8	327.2 17%	441.3 58%	342 23%	253 -9%
Brightness	265	297 12%	408 54%	331 25%	230 -13%
Brightness Distribution	91	86 -5%	86 -5%	84 -8%	86 -5%
Black Level *	0.28	0.29 -4%	0.44 -57%	0.32 -14%	0.24 14%
Contrast	996	1128 13%	1003 1%	1069 7%	1054 6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.8	3.03 48%	5.1 12%	4.35 25%	5.01 14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.6	6.87 35%	9.8 8%	9.24 13%	10.4 2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	8.3	1.8 78%	4.3 48%	3.73 55%	7.26 13%
Gamma	2.1 ^105%	2.17 ^101%	2.08 ^106%	2.23 ^99%	2.09 ^105%
CCT	5723 ^114%	6633 ^98%	7345 ^88%	6801 ^96%	6329 ^103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	57	57.2 0%	87 53%	57 0%	76 33%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	87	87.6 1%	100 15%	86 -1%	100 15%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		9% / 14%	-2% / 11%	7% / 9%	28% / 17%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ ms rise
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ ms rise
36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R15 | wPrime 2.10

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte P57X v7 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.71 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.71 Points
MSI GE72 7RE-046 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.65 Points -4%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.61 Points -6%
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Core i5-6300HQ	1.49 Points -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.15 Points
MSI GE72 7RE-046 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.1 Points -1%
Gigabyte P57X v7 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.04 Points -1%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.48 Points -8%
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Core i5-6300HQ	5.32 Points -35%

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte P57X v7 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	152 Points +1%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	151 Points
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV Intel Core i7-6700HQ	149 Points -1%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L Intel Core i7-7700HQ	149 Points -1%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	145 Points -4%
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Core i5-6300HQ	132 Points -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	740 Points
Gigabyte P57X v7 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	736 Points -1%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	732 Points -1%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L Intel Core i7-7700HQ	686 Points -7%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV Intel Core i7-6700HQ	679 Points -8%
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Core i5-6300HQ	464 Points -37%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Gigabyte P57X v7 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	340.3 s * -3%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	329 s *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.71 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

8.15 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

0.96 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

151 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

740 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w100ng GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	4711 Points +12%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	4212 Points
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	4088 Points -3%
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	3569 Points -15%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	3133 Points -26%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w100ng GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	5252 Points +1%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	5214 Points
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	4604 Points -12%
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	4218 Points -19%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w100ng GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	6858 Points +29%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	5310 Points
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	5161 Points -3%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	3658 Points -31%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4212 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		5310 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5214 points
Help

	HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	Gigabyte P57X v7 Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	HP Omen 17-w100ng SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	MSI GE72 7RE-046 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-13%	25%	-14%	53%
Read Seq	520	517 -1%	517 -1%	495 -5%	540 4%
Write Seq	353.6	185.1 -48%	305.7 -14%	180.2 -49%	495.7 40%
Read 512	376.2	319.3 -15%	315 -16%	315.5 -16%	455.1 21%
Write 512	118.5	179.5 51%	306.1 158%	172.4 45%	481.4 306%
Read 4k	32.7	20.99 -36%	26.04 -20%	20.25 -38%	22.7 -31%
Write 4k	85.3	68.3 -20%	82.3 -4%	76.1 -11%	112.9 32%
Read 4k QD32	399	144.6 -64%	281.3 -29%	141.6 -65%	372.5 -7%
Write 4k QD32	132.5	169.8 28%	296 123%	170.8 29%	212.9 61%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP

Transfer Rate Minimum: 312.4 MB/s

Transfer Rate Maximum: 421.8 MB/s

Transfer Rate Average: 406.8 MB/s

Access Time: 0.1 ms

Burst Rate: 107.3 MB/s

CPU Usage: 2.8 %

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	23243 Points +204%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	15256 Points +99%
HP Omen 17-w100ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ	14642 Points +91%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	10186 Points +33%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7649 Points
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7360 Points -4%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	5289 Points -31%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	9116 Points +23%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7440 Points
MSI GE72 7RE-046 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7216 Points -3%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7059 Points -5%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	6319 Points -15%
HP Omen 17-w100ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ	6017 Points -19%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	5515 Points -26%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	75190 Points +100%
HP Omen 17-w100ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ	74982 Points +100%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	49223 Points +31%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	37573 Points
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	35884 Points -4%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	31060 Points -17%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	26770 Points -29%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	17170 Points +188%
HP Omen 17-w100ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ	11326 Points +90%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	11160 Points +87%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	8086 Points +36%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	5961 Points
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	5784 Points -3%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	5421 Points -9%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	4361 Points -27%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
HP Omen 17-w100ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ	185637 Points
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	116033 Points
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	110806 Points

3DMark 06 Standard Score		27027 points
3DMark 11 Performance		7794 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		82555 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		19749 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		5415 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		2675 points
Help

... in comparison

BioShock Infinite | Mafia 2 | Batman: Arkham Knight | Fallout 4 | Rise of the Tomb Raider

BioShock Infinite
1280x720 Very Low Preset (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	207 fps
HP Omen 17-w100ng GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	197.8 fps -4%
1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	155 fps
HP Omen 17-w100ng GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	176.2 fps +14%
1366x768 High Preset (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	143 fps
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	117.9 fps -18%
HP Omen 17-w100ng GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	164.8 fps +15%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	59 fps
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	45 fps -24%
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	130 fps +120%
HP Omen 17-w100ng GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	99.1 fps +68%

Mafia 2 - 1920x1080 high AA:0x AF:16x (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	66.1 fps
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	156.3 fps +136%

Batman: Arkham Knight
1920x1080 High / On (Interactive Smoke & Paper Debris Off) AA:SM AF:8x (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	45 fps
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	34 fps -24%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	60 fps +33%
1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	42 fps
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	23 fps -45%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	41 fps -2%

Fallout 4
1280x720 Low Preset AA:FX (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	108 fps
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	116.6 fps +8%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	102 fps -6%
1366x768 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	70 fps
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	74.6 fps +7%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	100 fps +43%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	38 fps
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	30.6 fps -19%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	56 fps +47%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	41.2 fps +8%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	77.4 fps +104%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	31 fps
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	24.5 fps -21%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	46.2 fps +49%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	33.9 fps +9%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	66.8 fps +115%

Rise of the Tomb Raider
1024x768 Lowest Preset (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	105 fps
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	110.1 fps +5%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	105.7 fps +1%
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	62 fps
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	63.2 fps +2%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	105.4 fps +70%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	34 fps
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	30.2 fps -11%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	47.4 fps +39%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	37.1 fps +9%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	73.7 fps +117%
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	27 fps
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	24.2 fps -10%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	39.7 fps +47%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	31.2 fps +16%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	62.8 fps +133%

	low	med.	high	ultra
Mafia 2 (2010)		152	152	66.1
BioShock Infinite (2013)	207	155	143	59
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)	90	78	45	42
Fallout 4 (2015)	108	70	38	31
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	105	62	34	27

Noise Level

Idle		35.3 / 35.4 / 35.4 dB(A)
Load		48.6 / 49.8 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.8 dB(A)

	HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	HP Omen 17-w100ng GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	MSI GE72 7RE-046 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
Noise		2%	7%	-1%	4%
off / environment *	30.8	29 6%	29 6%	31 -1%	30 3%
Idle Minimum *	35.3	34.6 2%	30.4 14%	35 1%	34 4%
Idle Average *	35.4	34.8 2%	32.1 9%	36 -2%	35 1%
Idle Maximum *	35.4	35.5 -0%	32.1 9%	37 -5%	36 -2%
Load Average *	48.6	45.4 7%	45.6 6%	44 9%	41 16%
Load Maximum *	49.8	52.3 -5%	51.5 -3%	54 -8%	49 2%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


22 °C	45.8 °C	32 °C
23.4 °C	42 °C	30.8 °C
22 °C	30 °C	23.8 °C

Maximum: 45.8 °C
Average: 30.2 °C


37 °C	27.8 °C	22 °C
28.8 °C	33 °C	23 °C
24.2 °C	30 °C	24 °C

Maximum: 37 °C
Average: 27.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 48.2 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.8 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F).

HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Omen 17-w100ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.3 / 0.6 Watt
Idle	8.2 / 11 / 11.1 Watt
Load	77 / 116.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Gigabyte P57X v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"	HP Omen 17-w100ng 6300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	MSI GE72 7RE-046 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Power Consumption		8%	-111%	-77%	-60%
Idle Minimum *	8.2	5.3 35%	15.7 -91%	17 -107%	14 -71%
Idle Average *	11	10.6 4%	23.4 -113%	22 -100%	20 -82%
Idle Maximum *	11.1	11.8 -6%	23.5 -112%	29 -161%	25 -125%
Load Average *	77	70.9 8%	184.6 -140%	72 6%	82 -6%
Load Maximum *	116.9	119.8 -2%	233.1 -99%	141 -21%	135 -15%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		11h 31min
WiFi Websurfing		6h 49min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 42min

	HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 62 Wh	HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 62 Wh	Gigabyte P57X v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.81 Wh	HP Omen 17-w100ng 6300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 95.8 Wh	MSI GE72 7RE-046 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 51.4 Wh	Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 48 Wh
Battery Runtime		-2%	-43%	3%	-55%	-39%
Reader / Idle	691	751 9%	256 -63%	543 -21%		515 -25%
WiFi v1.3	409	356 -13%	155 -62%	363 -11%	184 -55%	261 -36%
Load	102	99 -3%	98 -4%	145 42%		45 -56%

Pros

+ 明亮多彩的IPS雾面屏

+ 优秀的处理器和显卡性能

+ 运行快速

+ 相对便携的尺寸

+ 合理的温度

+ 电池续航长

Cons

- 塑料外壳有廉价感

- 触摸板差，键盘只是可以接受的水平

- 可以避免的维护困难

- 端口选择不多

- 一定的运行噪声

- 在测试时，出现怪异的周期性卡顿

In review: HP Pavilion 17t-ab200. Test model courtesy of Computer Upgrade King

Pavilion 17t与我们6个月前评测的一台机器非常相似，正因为如此，它保留了其前代大部分的优点和缺点。它仍然是一个台优秀的低到中档游戏本，它现在可以用更高的设置——原始分辨率（1080），处理最新的游戏。这要归功于其显卡（可敬低调的 GTX 1050)。此外，对比许多其他拥有同样屏幕尺寸的竞争对手，它更加便携......而它的屏幕，真的是相当不错。运行快速和整体优秀，特别是当设备处于高负荷时；它几乎没有卡顿，尽管它的冷却系统很简单。

如果价格和性能是最重要因素，而耐用性、人体工程学、以及维护/升级并不重要，那么Pavilion 17t-ab200还是不错的。

除此之外，它并没有真正的大作为。塑料外壳是重量轻的一个原因，但由于同样的原因，A面比我们预想的要脆弱。整体给人一种廉价感。输入设备处于中低档。同时，维护起来会遇到本可以避免的困难——有拆卸风险的塑料外壳和复杂装配方式的结合。端口选择仍然不多（仅仅带有HDMI视频输出，没有USB Type-C，和缺乏用来连接高端固态硬盘的NVMe）。它可能不能作为专业商务人士一个可行的选择。最后，在轻度使用情况下，它依然有响声。因为配备了比前代更高效的处理器和显卡，它的温度不会上升太多。

鉴于这些缺点，可能真的只有一种类型的用户才能使这台机器变得有意义——预算低的移动游戏玩家。如果价格和性能是至关重要的因素，并且耐用性、人体工程学和维护/升级可行性不重要，那么Pavilion 17t-ab200还不错。否则，当预算可以更多些时，我们很难推荐它。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 - 2017-02-21 02/21/2017 v6 ^(old)
Steve Schardein

Chassis

56 / 98 → 57%

Keyboard

71%

Pointing Device

61%

Connectivity

50 / 81 → 62%

Weight

57 / 20-67 → 79%

Battery

89%

Display

85%

Games Performance

85 / 85 → 100%

Application Performance

92 / 92 → 100%

Workstation

54%

Temperature

91%

Noise

64 / 95 → 67%

Audio

50%

Camera

50 / 85 → 59%

Average

68%

79%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Steve Schardein - Tech Writer - 98 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012

contact me via: @othersteve, LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普 Pavilion 17t-ab200 笔记本电脑简短评测

Steve Schardein, 2017-03- 4 (Update: 2017-03-19)