Notebookcheck Logo

惠普 Pavilion 17z-ak000 (A9-9420, Radeon 530) 笔记本电脑简短评测

龟速。 在速度方面Stoney Ridge落后于主流不少。这台AMD平台设备可以帮助用户节省一些预算,不过它缓慢的响应也是用户需要付出的巨大代价。
Bristol Ridge / Stoney Ridge Laptop / Notebook Windows
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Processor
AMD A9-9420 2 x 3 - 3.6 GHz, Stoney Ridge
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon 530 - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1021 MHz, RAM: 1000 MHz, DDR3, Radeon Software 17.4.4, 22.19.162.4
Memory
8 GB 
, 1066.7 MHz, 13-13-13-30, 单通道
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, ID: AUO109D, Name: AU Optronics B173HW01 V0, IPS, glossy: no
Mainboard
AMD CZ FCH
Storage
Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD, 1024 GB 
Soundcard
Realtek AMD Family 15h Models 60h-6fh - HD Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合音频接口, Card Reader: SD 读卡器
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek RTL8188E Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/)
Optical drive
Slimtype DVD A DA8AESH
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 24.6 x 415 x 278
Battery
41.6 Wh, 2850 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Additional features
Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, Radeon Settings, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.631 kg, Power Supply: 345 g
Price
500 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

423.3 mm 281.9 mm 31.9 mm 2.9 kg419 mm 287 mm 34 mm 3 kg418 mm 283 mm 25.1 mm 3 kg414 mm 283 mm 27 mm 2.8 kg415 mm 278 mm 24.6 mm 2.6 kg410 mm 280 mm 20 mm 3.6 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: SD reader, USB 2.0, Optical drive, Kensington Lock
Right: SD reader, USB 2.0, Optical drive, Kensington Lock
Rear: Removable battery
Rear: Removable battery
Left: AC adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, HDMI, 2x USB 3.0, 3.5 mm combo
Left: AC adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, HDMI, 2x USB 3.0, 3.5 mm combo
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000
 
68.3 MB/s +133%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
 
29.26 MB/s
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
 
28.1 MB/s -4%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000
 
131.7 MB/s +252%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
 
37.44 MB/s
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
 
32.7 MB/s -13%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
517 MBit/s +1021%
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
415 MBit/s +800%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Realtek RTL8188E Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
46.1 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
658 MBit/s +1321%
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
627 MBit/s +1254%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Realtek RTL8188E Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
46.3 MBit/s
337.8
cd/m²
371.1
cd/m²
352.1
cd/m²
338.5
cd/m²
363.6
cd/m²
339.1
cd/m²
360.3
cd/m²
335.7
cd/m²
347.1
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
ID: AUO109D, Name: AU Optronics B173HW01 V0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Maximum: 371.1 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 349.5 cd/m² Minimum: 15.57 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 363.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 983:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 8.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
ID: AUO109D, Name: AU Optronics B173HW01 V0, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
ID: AUO109D, Name: AU Optronics B173HW01 V0, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000
AUO41ED , IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Asus X555DA-BB11
TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display
0%
-36%
-37%
-43%
Display P3 Coverage
64.8
64.3
-1%
39.28
-39%
38.8
-40%
35.12
-46%
sRGB Coverage
87.5
88.5
1%
58.9
-33%
58.1
-34%
52.7
-40%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
64
64.6
1%
40.59
-37%
40.12
-37%
36.29
-43%
Response Times
-9%
-30%
-13%
-3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
34 ?(15.6, 18.4)
40.8 ?(22, 18.8)
-20%
51.6 ?(26.4, 25.2)
-52%
39 ?(20, 19)
-15%
42 ?(23.6, 18.4)
-24%
Response Time Black / White *
27.2 ?(16.4, 10.8)
26.4 ?(14, 12.4)
3%
29.2 ?(16.8, 12.4)
-7%
30 ?(19, 11)
-10%
22.4 ?(14.4, 8)
18%
PWM Frequency
20000 ?(90)
Screen
12%
-9%
-7%
-26%
Brightness middle
363.6
333.5
-8%
256
-30%
256
-30%
242.7
-33%
Brightness
349
323
-7%
241
-31%
252
-28%
232
-34%
Brightness Distribution
90
91
1%
88
-2%
87
-3%
88
-2%
Black Level *
0.37
0.32
14%
0.21
43%
0.3
19%
0.52
-41%
Contrast
983
1042
6%
1219
24%
853
-13%
467
-52%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.8
4
31%
5.2
10%
5.4
7%
4.9
16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10
6.9
31%
19.3
-93%
9.36
6%
20.3
-103%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
8.8
4.5
49%
3.5
60%
5.37
39%
2.7
69%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.19 100%
2.35 94%
2.58 85%
2.34 94%
CCT
5900 110%
6386 102%
6576 99%
6795 96%
6876 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57.2
57.5
1%
37
-35%
37
-35%
33.5
-41%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
87.3
88.1
1%
59
-32%
58
-34%
52.5
-40%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
1% / 7%
-25% / -17%
-19% / -14%
-24% / -26%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.6 ms rise
↘ 18.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8734 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Intel Core m3-7Y32
120 Points +41%
HP Pavilion 14t-ab000 K9E07AV
Intel Core i3-5010U
87 Points +2%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
86 Points +1%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD A9-9420
85 Points
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
77 Points -9%
HP 15-bw077ax
AMD A9-9420
75 Points -12%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD A10-9620P
72 Points -15%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD A12-9720P
69 Points -19%
Asus X555LD-XX283H
Intel Core i3-4010U
65 Points -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Intel Core m3-7Y32
265 Points +92%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
256 Points +86%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD A10-9620P
230 Points +67%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
229 Points +66%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD A12-9720P
229 Points +66%
HP Pavilion 14t-ab000 K9E07AV
Intel Core i3-5010U
219 Points +59%
Asus X555LD-XX283H
Intel Core i3-4010U
163 Points +18%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD A9-9420
138 Points
HP 15-bw077ax
AMD A9-9420
124 Points -10%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
1.03 Points +3%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD A9-9420
1 Points
HP 15-bw077ax
AMD A9-9420
0.96 Points -4%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD A12-9720P
0.94 Points -6%
HP Pavilion 14t-ab000 K9E07AV
Intel Core i3-5010U
0.92 Points -8%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
0.86 Points -14%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD A10-9620P
0.81 Points -19%
Asus X555LD-XX283H
Intel Core i3-4010U
0.69 Points -31%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
2.85 Points +73%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD A12-9720P
2.7 Points +64%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD A10-9620P
2.66 Points +61%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
2.47 Points +50%
HP Pavilion 14t-ab000 K9E07AV
Intel Core i3-5010U
2.4 Points +45%
Asus X555LD-XX283H
Intel Core i3-4010U
1.76 Points +7%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD A9-9420
1.65 Points
HP 15-bw077ax
AMD A9-9420
1.56 Points -5%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
8718 Points +80%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD A10-9620P
7420 Points +53%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD A12-9720P
7200 Points +49%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
6854 Points +42%
Asus X555LD-XX283H
Intel Core i3-4010U
5194 Points +7%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD A9-9420
4841 Points
HP 15-bw077ax
AMD A9-9420
4627 Points -4%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
3871 Points +30%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD A9-9420
2969 Points
HP 15-bw077ax
AMD A9-9420
2761 Points -7%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD A12-9720P
2640 Points -11%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
2621 Points -12%
Asus X555LD-XX283H
Intel Core i3-4010U
2345 Points -21%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD A10-9620P
2277 Points -23%
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
HP 15-bw077ax
AMD A9-9420
747 s * -11%
HP Pavilion 14t-ab000 K9E07AV
Intel Core i3-5010U
730 s * -8%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD A9-9420
673 s *
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
645 s * +4%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
475.7 s * +29%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD A10-9620P
470.9 s * +30%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD A12-9720P
415.5 s * +38%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
5166
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
4841
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
2969
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
1.65 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
25.48 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
85 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
32.06 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
138 Points
Help
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4499 Points +55%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
HD Graphics 520, 6006U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075
2937 Points +1%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Radeon 530, A9-9420, Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD
2897 Points
Asus X555DA-BB11
Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
2335 Points -19%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4627 Points +16%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Radeon 530, A9-9420, Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD
3976 Points
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
HD Graphics 520, 6006U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075
3707 Points -7%
Asus X555DA-BB11
Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
3246 Points -18%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
5151 Points +62%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
HD Graphics 520, 6006U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075
3234 Points +2%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Radeon 530, A9-9420, Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD
3174 Points
Asus X555DA-BB11
Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
2856 Points -10%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2897 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3174 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3976 points
PCMark 10 Score
2046 points
Help
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD
Asus X555DA-BB11
Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075
Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE
Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-2%
-15%
13527%
2%
Read Seq
90
106.9
19%
96.5
7%
532
491%
90
0%
Write Seq
93.4
97.5
4%
77.9
-17%
511
447%
90.3
-3%
Read 512
28.71
32.28
12%
20.82
-27%
414.8
1345%
28.47
-1%
Write 512
44.35
35.39
-20%
19.83
-55%
307.7
594%
47.07
6%
Read 4k
0.316
0.373
18%
0.342
8%
39.51
12403%
0.31
-2%
Write 4k
0.813
0.636
-22%
0.836
3%
108.1
13196%
0.3997
-51%
Read 4k QD32
0.711
0.694
-2%
0.595
-16%
361.6
50758%
1.021
44%
Write 4k QD32
0.87
0.682
-22%
0.706
-19%
253
28980%
1.076
24%
Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD
Sequential Read: 90 MB/s
Sequential Write: 93.4 MB/s
512K Read: 28.71 MB/s
512K Write: 44.35 MB/s
4K Read: 0.316 MB/s
4K Write: 0.813 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 0.711 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 0.87 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD Radeon R7 M340, A12-9720P
3597 Points +55%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
2696 Points +16%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U
2493 Points +7%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD Radeon 530, A9-9420
2327 Points
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U
2230 Points -4%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B
2210 Points -5%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B
1829 Points -21%
HP Envy x360 15t-w200
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, i7-7500U
2160 Points -7%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, 6200U
1747 Points -25%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
1467 Points -37%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P
1288 Points -45%
HP 15-bw077ax
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), A9-9420
1096 Points -53%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
2597 Points +68%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U
2184 Points +41%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U
1770 Points +14%
HP Envy x360 15t-w200
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, i7-7500U
1750 Points +13%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, 6200U
1572 Points +1%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD Radeon 530, A9-9420
1549 Points
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B
1454 Points -6%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B
1060 Points -32%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD Radeon R7 M340, A12-9720P
1337 Points -14%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
1215 Points -22%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P
861 Points -44%
HP 15-bw077ax
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), A9-9420
790 Points -49%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
13172 Points +107%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U
11264 Points +77%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD Radeon R7 M340, A12-9720P
10116 Points +59%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U
8385 Points +31%
HP Envy x360 15t-w200
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, i7-7500U
8187 Points +28%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, 6200U
7733 Points +21%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
6539 Points +3%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD Radeon 530, A9-9420
6377 Points
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel HD Graphics 620, i3-7100U
5854 Points -8%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B
5311 Points -17%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P
4033 Points -37%
HP 15-bw077ax
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), A9-9420
3661 Points -43%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD Radeon R7 M340, A12-9720P
1926 Points +57%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
1657 Points +35%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U
1593 Points +30%
HP Envy x360 15t-w200
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, i7-7500U
1502 Points +23%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B
1466 Points +20%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B
1013 Points -17%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U
1418 Points +16%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, 6200U
1282 Points +5%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD Radeon 530, A9-9420
1224 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
789 Points -36%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P
764 Points -38%
HP 15-bw077ax
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), A9-9420
642 Points -48%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Asus X302UV-FN016T
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, 6200U
49876 Points +7%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD Radeon 530, A9-9420
46594 Points
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U
42314 Points -9%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD Radeon R7 M340, A12-9720P
41700 Points -11%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
33260 Points -29%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B
32389 Points -30%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel HD Graphics 620, i3-7100U
28425 Points -39%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P
26331 Points -43%
3DMark 11 Performance
2121 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
40215 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
3749 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1062 points
Help
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
45.2 fps +73%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
37.4 fps +43%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Radeon R7 M340, A12-9720P, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1
28.2 fps +8%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Radeon 530, A9-9420, Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD
26.1 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Iris Graphics 540, 6360U, Apple SSD AP0256
24.9 (23min - 27max) fps -5%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
23.5 (21min - 26max) fps -10%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
GeForce 920MX, 6200U, Hynix HFS128G3MND
23.2 fps -11%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
Radeon R5 (Carrizo), A10-9620P, Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD
19 fps -27%
HP 15-bw075ax
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9720P, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1
18 fps -31%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), A9-9410
16.1 fps -38%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
14.7 fps -44%
BioShock Infinite
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
126.8 fps +106%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
89.8 fps +46%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
GeForce 920MX, 6200U, Hynix HFS128G3MND
77.4 fps +25%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Radeon R7 M340, A12-9720P, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1
74.5 fps +21%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Radeon 530, A9-9420, Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD
61.7 fps
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
Radeon R5 (Carrizo), A10-9620P, Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD
45.9 fps -26%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03
Iris Graphics 6100, 5257U, Apple SSD SM0128G
44.5 fps -28%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), A9-9410
43.5 fps -29%
HP 15-bw075ax
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9720P, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1
43 fps -30%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
42.9 fps -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
42 fps -32%
1366x768 Medium Preset
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
96.8 fps +132%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
48.7 fps +17%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Radeon R7 M340, A12-9720P, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1
43.5 fps +4%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
GeForce 920MX, 6200U, Hynix HFS128G3MND
43.1 fps +3%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Radeon 530, A9-9420, Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD
41.7 fps
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
32.15 fps -23%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
Radeon R5 (Carrizo), A10-9620P, Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD
28.7 fps -31%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03
Iris Graphics 6100, 5257U, Apple SSD SM0128G
28.6 fps -31%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), A9-9410
26.9 fps -35%
HP 15-bw075ax
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9720P, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1
26 fps -38%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
21 fps -50%
1366x768 High Preset
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
86.7 fps +157%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Iris Graphics 540, 6360U, Apple SSD AP0256
40.3 fps +19%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
39.3 fps +16%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
GeForce 920MX, 6200U, Hynix HFS128G3MND
35.7 fps +6%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Radeon R7 M340, A12-9720P, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1
34.1 fps +1%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Radeon 530, A9-9420, Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD
33.8 fps
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
28.3 fps -16%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03
Iris Graphics 6100, 5257U, Apple SSD SM0128G
23.3 fps -31%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), A9-9410
22.2 fps -34%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
Radeon R5 (Carrizo), A10-9620P, Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD
21.8 fps -36%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
19 fps -44%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
35 fps +194%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
13.5 fps +13%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
GeForce 920MX, 6200U, Hynix HFS128G3MND
12.1 fps +2%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Radeon 530, A9-9420, Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD
11.9 fps
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Radeon R7 M340, A12-9720P, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1
11.8 fps -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Iris Graphics 540, 6360U, Apple SSD AP0256
11.6 fps -3%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03
Iris Graphics 6100, 5257U, Apple SSD SM0128G
7.7 fps -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6 fps -50%
Doom - 1280x720 Low Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Iris Graphics 540, 6360U, Apple SSD AP0256
31.5 (25min - 39max) fps +88%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Radeon R7 M340, A12-9720P, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1
20.2 fps +20%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Radeon 530, A9-9420, Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD
16.8 fps
Overwatch - 1280x720 Low (Render Scale 100 %) AA:FX AF:1x
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
152.7 fps +327%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Iris Graphics 540, 6360U, Apple SSD AP0256
68 (52min - 82max) fps +90%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
65.2 fps +82%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
63.3 (46min - 81max) fps +77%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Radeon R7 M340, A12-9720P, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1
54.8 fps +53%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Radeon 530, A9-9420, Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD
35.8 fps
lowmed.highultra
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013) 71.5 43.4 35.2 21.9
BioShock Infinite (2013) 61.7 41.7 33.8 11.9
The Witcher 3 (2015) 24
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 13
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 26.1 14.7
Doom (2016) 16.8
Overwatch (2016) 35.8 30.4
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526Tooltip
The Witcher 3 low

Noise Level

Idle
30.5 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB(A)
Load
41.6 / 48 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 28 dB(A)
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Radeon 530, A9-9420, Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Radeon R7 M340, A12-9720P, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1
Asus X555DA-BB11
Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
HD Graphics 520, 6006U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075
Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
Noise
2%
5%
6%
6%
2%
off / environment *
28
28
-0%
28.9
-3%
30.4
-9%
30.2
-8%
28.8
-3%
Idle Minimum *
30.5
30.4
-0%
31.6
-4%
31.8
-4%
30.2
1%
31
-2%
Idle Average *
30.6
30.5
-0%
32
-5%
31.8
-4%
30.2
1%
31
-1%
Idle Maximum *
30.6
30.5
-0%
32.4
-6%
31.8
-4%
32
-5%
31
-1%
Load Average *
41.6
41.5
-0%
33.3
20%
31.9
23%
34.7
17%
39.1
6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
41.8
13%
Load Maximum *
48
48.2
-0%
35.5
26%
31.8
34%
33.9
29%
41
15%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 37.6 °C40.4 °C24.6 °C 
 35.2 °C36.2 °C24.8 °C 
 26.8 °C30.8 °C26.4 °C 
Maximum: 40.4 °C
Average: 31.4 °C
25.2 °C28.8 °C43.6 °C
26 °C32.2 °C45 °C
29.2 °C31.69 °C26.8 °C
Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 32.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  49.4 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.8 °C / 87.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2 °C / -3.6 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.238.92533.833.63133.331.34032.433.5503131.76331.429.98030.630.810030.229.112529.228.416027.230.620027.242.125026.35431525.155.240025.248.850024.647.663023.955.880024.757.8100023.753.9125023.656.1160023.454.4200022.554.6250022.558.431502255.2400022.246.9500022.253.5630021.961.5800021.861.31000021.858.51250021.752.41600021.858.4SPL35.168.8N2.424.5median 23.6median 54.4Delta25.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AVApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (61.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(-) | highs are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.18 / 0.44 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 8.4 / 11.7 / 24.1 Watt
Load midlight 50.4 / 62.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
A9-9420, Radeon 530, Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
HP 17-x066ng
6006U, HD Graphics 520, WDC WD10JPVX-08JC3T5, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Asus X555DA-BB11
A10-8700P, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD
i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, TN, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Power Consumption
39%
28%
43%
14%
Idle Minimum *
8.4
5.5
35%
8.3
1%
4
52%
6.9
18%
Idle Average *
11.7
9.9
15%
8.6
26%
9.6
18%
13.6
-16%
Idle Maximum *
24.1
14.6
39%
13.1
46%
9.7
60%
14.8
39%
Load Average *
50.4
28
44%
31.2
38%
27.7
45%
41
19%
Witcher 3 ultra *
58
33
43%
Load Maximum *
62.8
24.6
61%
43.9
30%
38.4
39%
75
-19%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
7h 46min
WiFi Websurfing
4h 35min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 28min
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
A9-9420, Radeon 530, 41.6 Wh
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000
i7-7700HQ, Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), 70 Wh
Asus X555DA-BB11
A10-8700P, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), 37 Wh
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
6006U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh
Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 32 Wh
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 63.3 Wh
Battery Runtime
30%
-20%
29%
-18%
43%
Reader / Idle
466
629
35%
435
-7%
765
64%
WiFi v1.3
275
341
24%
176
-36%
356
29%
225
-18%
428
56%
Load
88
116
32%
72
-18%
97
10%

Pros

+ 使用电池可以发挥全部性能
+ 可更换电池
+ 无处理器降频
+ 色域覆盖广
+ 不错的扬声器
+ 光驱
+ 低售价

Cons

- 迟缓的机械硬盘;非常慢的系统性能
- 低于平均水平的电池续航;电池容量小
- 不如最新英特尔平台节能
- 在游戏中的性能表现时高时低
- 负载下风扇噪音大
- 处理器性能弱
In review: HP Pavilion 17z ak000. Test model provided by CUKUSA.com
In review: HP Pavilion 17z ak000. Test model provided by CUKUSA.com

这款基于AMD平台的Pavilion笔记本电脑是对我们耐心的一次极大考验。不仅它的速度迟缓,应用程序每一次也都需要很长时间才能打开。没有人希望等待6秒以上打开一个Word文档,再等6秒打开文件浏览器,或是为了打开浏览器或iTunes等待更长的时间。从这个方面来看,我们并不推荐任何一款搭配机械硬盘的AMD平台Pavilion,不管它的机身品质或屏幕素质。

除此之外,Stoney Ridge A9处理器和Radeon 530显卡的搭配也并不相称。类似于我们之前测试的A12-9720P Pavilion 17z机型,我们的A9机型的整体性能受到了缓慢的处理器的拖累。根据游戏不同,运行的帧率可以时而超出高清显卡620达80%,或时而低达只有它的五分之一,而高功耗、短电池续航和很吵的风扇都是需要付出的代价。一台功耗高达GeForce GTX 950M水平的显卡,却只能提供较老的英特尔Iris或高清显卡水平的性能,让人十分难以接受。

Pavilion 17z的机身品质与其他实惠型设备相当,但也有独特亮点。它的内置扬声器效果很不错,而屏幕亮度和色域覆盖也都超出了我们的预料。除了少数几项优势外,我们希望它在未来更新中可以改进颗粒感很强的雾面屏幕面板,解决屏幕漏光和难以维护升级(特别是对于希望自行安装固态硬盘的用户)的问题。

这台搭载AMD硬件的Pavilion设备让我们很难理解它究竟是希望成为一台实惠低端游戏笔记本电脑还是一台高性能低价办公设备。不过不论从哪个方面来看,它的表现都只算平平。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV - 07/18/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis
73 / 98 → 75%
Keyboard
80%
Pointing Device
77%
Connectivity
43 / 81 → 53%
Weight
59 / 20-67 → 83%
Battery
79%
Display
84%
Games Performance
59 / 85 → 70%
Application Performance
63 / 92 → 69%
Temperature
92%
Noise
82 / 95 → 87%
Audio
59%
Camera
42 / 85 → 50%
Average
69%
76%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 惠普 Pavilion 17z-ak000 (A9-9420, Radeon 530) 笔记本电脑简短评测
Allen Ngo, 2017-07-22 (Update: 2017-07-22)