惠普 Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 (i7-7700HQ, Radeon RX 550) 笔记本电脑简短测评
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV |
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 256 cd/m²
Contrast: 1219:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.28% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 AUO41ED , IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV ID: AU Optronics AUO41ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Omen 15-ax213ng AU Optronics AUO41ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Omen 17-w206ng Chi Mei CMN1738, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US ID: BOE06E8, Name: BOE HF NV150FHB-N31, IPS, 15", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | -2% | 65% | 66% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 39.28 | 38.81 -1% | 38.59 -2% | 67.2 71% | 65.2 66% |
sRGB Coverage | 58.9 | 57.9 -2% | 58 -2% | 93.1 58% | 97.7 66% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.59 | 40.03 -1% | 39.87 -2% | 67.4 66% | 67.2 66% |
Response Times | 15% | 12% | 19% | 5% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 51.6 ? | 38.8 ? 25% | 42 ? 19% | 38 ? 26% | 40.8 ? 21% |
Response Time Black / White * | 29.2 ? | 28 ? 4% | 28 ? 4% | 26 ? 11% | 32.4 ? -11% |
PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 208.3 ? | |||
Screen | 3% | 7% | 17% | 40% | |
Brightness middle | 256 | 256.6 0% | 230 -10% | 318 24% | 565.6 121% |
Brightness | 241 | 243 1% | 228 -5% | 295 22% | 524 117% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 81 -8% | 88 0% | 79 -10% | 88 0% |
Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.19 10% | 0.21 -0% | 0.25 -19% | 0.49 -133% |
Contrast | 1219 | 1351 11% | 1095 -10% | 1272 4% | 1154 -5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 5 4% | 4.01 23% | 4.7 10% | 2 62% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.3 | 20.1 -4% | 7.26 62% | 8.8 54% | 5 74% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 2.7 23% | 3.18 9% | 5 -43% | 2.5 29% |
Gamma | 2.35 94% | 2.32 95% | 2.52 87% | 2.28 96% | 2.21 100% |
CCT | 6576 99% | 6599 98% | 6814 95% | 7374 88% | 6896 94% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 36.7 -1% | 37 0% | 61 65% | 61.2 65% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59 | 57.7 -2% | 58 -2% | 93 58% | 97.5 65% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
4% | 6% /
6% | 34% /
26% | 37% /
40% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.8 ms rise | |
↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
51.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26.4 ms rise | |
↘ 25.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4499 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5151 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4627 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3802 points | |
Help |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 | HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | HP Omen 15-ax213ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Omen 17-w206ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 8924% | 24609% | 22337% | 19660% | |
Read Seq | 105.9 | 491.6 364% | 1657 1465% | 1606 1417% | 1447 1266% |
Write Seq | 104.7 | 141.7 35% | 1208 1054% | 1176 1023% | 1281 1123% |
Read 512 | 36.71 | 345.6 841% | 806 2096% | 846 2205% | 651 1673% |
Write 512 | 49.86 | 142.6 186% | 807 1519% | 805 1515% | 765 1434% |
Read 4k | 0.473 | 18.83 3881% | 62.6 13135% | 59.9 12564% | 58.3 12226% |
Write 4k | 0.547 | 76.3 13849% | 176.9 32240% | 155.6 28346% | 131.9 24013% |
Read 4k QD32 | 0.903 | 348.5 38494% | 650 71882% | 588 65016% | 545 60254% |
Write 4k QD32 | 0.757 | 104.8 13744% | 557 73480% | 505 66611% | 419.3 55290% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 23308 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 5704 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 92226 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 15004 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3738 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 1775 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1302 points | |
Help |
Metro: Last Light | |
1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
1366x768 High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
HP 15-bw077ax | |
1366x768 Medium (DX10) AF:4x (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP 15-bw077ax | |
1024x768 Low (DX10) AF:4x (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP 15-bw077ax |
Thief | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
1366x768 High Preset AA:FXAA & Low SS AF:4x (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
1024x768 Very Low Preset (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 |
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing (sort by value) | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
HP 15-bw077ax | |
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV |
Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
HP 15-bw077ax | |
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
1024x768 Lowest Preset (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
HP 15-bw077ax | |
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV | |
Asus X555DA-BB11 |
Batman: Arkham Knight | |
1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
1920x1080 High / On (Interactive Smoke & Paper Debris Off) AA:SM AF:8x (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
1366x768 Normal / Off AF:4x (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
HP 15-bw077ax | |
1280x720 Low / Off AF:Trilinear (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
HP 15-bw077ax | |
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV |
Ashes of the Singularity | |
1280x768 low (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
HP 15-bw077ax | |
1920x1080 Standard (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
1920x1080 high (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV |
Doom | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
1280x720 Low Preset (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tomb Raider (2013) | 289.8 | 149.5 | 114.9 | 51.2 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 183 | 133 | 117 | 67 |
Metro: Last Light (2013) | 90 | 85.4 | 59.5 | 28.4 |
Thief (2014) | 65.2 | 58.3 | 55.1 | 29 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 24 | |||
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 82 | 71 | 39 | 27 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 91 | 54 | 27 | 21 |
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 41.9 | 25.4 | 22 | |
Doom (2016) | 56 | 37 | 22 | 21 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 30.8 / 30.9 / 31.1 dB(A) |
Load |
| 50.2 / 50.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.4 dB(A) |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 | HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | HP Omen 15-ax213ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Omen 17-w206ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 2% | -5% | -6% | 12% | |
off / environment * | 28.4 | 27.8 2% | 30 -6% | 30 -6% | 28.3 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 30.8 | 32.1 -4% | 32 -4% | 34 -10% | 28.3 8% |
Idle Average * | 30.9 | 32.2 -4% | 34 -10% | 35 -13% | 28.3 8% |
Idle Maximum * | 31.1 | 32.2 -4% | 36 -16% | 36 -16% | 28.3 9% |
Load Average * | 50.2 | 43.3 14% | 48 4% | 47 6% | 38.3 24% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 50.2 | 45 10% | 49 2% | 48 4% | |
Load Maximum * | 50.2 | 49.6 1% | 51 -2% | 52 -4% | 38.3 24% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.8 °C / 100 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-9 °C / -16.2 F).
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.1 Watt |
Idle | 18.7 / 19.6 / 21.7 Watt |
Load |
60.1 / 80.6 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 i7-7700HQ, Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 15-ax213ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 17-w206ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 10% | 0% | -18% | 41% | |
Idle Minimum * | 18.7 | 9.4 50% | 6 68% | 11 41% | 5 73% |
Idle Average * | 19.6 | 9.7 51% | 11 44% | 18 8% | 11.6 41% |
Idle Maximum * | 21.7 | 16.8 23% | 18 17% | 24 -11% | 12.2 44% |
Load Average * | 60.1 | 76.5 -27% | 81 -35% | 84 -40% | 47.8 20% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 80.5 | 86.5 -7% | 90 -12% | 101 -25% | 51.9 36% |
Load Maximum * | 80.6 | 105.6 -31% | 146 -81% | 146 -81% | 55.7 31% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 i7-7700HQ, Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), 70 Wh | HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 70 Wh | HP Omen 15-ax213ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 63.3 Wh | HP Omen 17-w206ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 66 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 30% | 11% | 7% | 79% | |
Reader / Idle | 629 | 971 54% | 765 22% | 795 26% | 1642 161% |
WiFi v1.3 | 341 | 481 41% | 428 26% | 380 11% | 604 77% |
Load | 116 | 110 -5% | 97 -16% | 96 -17% | 116 0% |
Pros
Cons
处于880美元的价格,Pavilion Power 15的配置在很多方面都达到了中端水准。除了 Core i7-7700HQ,该机还包括8GB的运行内存,经济实惠的专用显卡,以及相当不错防眩光高清屏幕。 它还有相当坚固的构建和健全的港口选择(尽管缺失Thunderbolt 3)。作为入门级游戏本,它的效果很好,当用户不能期望未来的新游戏游戏可以像现在这样运行。
Pavilion Power 15t 配备了 AMD RX 550显卡,它的水准达到了入门级游戏本的性能,但是我们不能推荐这台机器。有一个备选方案——我们一周前评测的带 NVIDIA GTX 1050的机器。后者的价格高大约120美元。(配有固态硬盘)。
尽管它是可以改进的,但存储空间—— 一个1 TB 7200 RPM驱动器 —— 将会成为日常操作的瓶颈,而 RX 550 图形适配器 (无论是从表现还是效率上来说)都没办法比得上NVIDIA Pascal 显卡,比如说 GTX 1050。最糟糕的是,我们不能肯定地说出机器在理想情况下会如何表现,因为我们的测试机的冷却系统似乎存在问题。处理器性能明显受到该原因引起的热量的影响,压力测试期间,温度到达90s C,基准值从降低5%到极端情况下的降低57%。
假设这些问题仅仅存在于我们的机器上,然而该RX 550配置,还是不能和我们两个星期前评测的NVIDIA GTX 1050 (配备着固态硬盘),而这个选择也至少多了120美元。如果我们有机会获取功能完备的测试机,我们将与经销商联系并更新我们的评论。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000
-
07/14/2017 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein