惠普 Pavilion x2 12 变形本简短评测

Name: HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Brand: HP

实惠，但并不完美。 新推出的惠普Windows可分离式变形本售价不足700欧元（约5204人民币），它搭配了酷睿m处理器，一支手写笔和一个键盘底座。它的表现相比更贵的微软Surface Pro 4又如何呢？

Till Schönborn, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 08/30/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Convertible / 2-in-1 Laptop / Notebook Skylake Touchscreen Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng (Pavilion x2 Series)

Processor

Intel Core m3-6Y30 2 x 0.9 - 2.2 GHz, Skylake

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 515, Core: 850 MHz, RAM: 1866 MHz, 20.19.15.4377

Memory

4 GB

, 双通道 LPDDR3-1866, 板载

Display

12.00 inch 3:2, 1920 x 1280 pixel 192 PPI, 电容式, native pen support, LG Philips LGD04A5, IPS, LED-背光, glossy: yes, detachable screen

Mainboard

Intel Skylake-Y Premium PCH

Storage

SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, 128 GB

Soundcard

Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: microSD

Networking

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 19 x 300 x 220

Battery

33 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 200万像素

Additional features

Speakers: B&O 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, 45瓦电源适配器，主动式手写笔, HP Support Assistant, HP Recovery Manager, 12 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

1.47 kg, Power Supply: 315 g

Price

700 Euro

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 DIN A4 ❌

Left side: USB 2.0, headset, volume rocker

Right side: microSD reader, micro-HDMI, USB 3.0 Type-C/AC power

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	570 MBit/s
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR Realtek RTL8723BS	34.95 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	397 MBit/s
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR Realtek RTL8723BS	37.44 MBit/s


317 cd/m²	311 cd/m²	307 cd/m²
309 cd/m²	314 cd/m²	303 cd/m²
306 cd/m²	307 cd/m²	295 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LG Philips LGD04A5 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 317 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 307.7 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 314 cd/m²
Contrast: 654:1 (Black: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.12 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71.74% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
46.81% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
52.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
53.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng LG Philips LGD04A5, IPS, 1920x1280, 12"	Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung SDC3853, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3"	Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Panasonic VVX12T041N00, IPS, 2160x1440, 12"	Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Samsung L_QLLTN120QL01L01, IPS, 2160x1440, 12"	Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N Digital Flat Panel (NoName), sAMOLED, 2160x1440, 12.1"
Display		30%	27%	32%
Display P3 Coverage	53.2	67.5 27%	65.5 23%	68.1 28%
sRGB Coverage	72.4	96.6 33%	96.1 33%	97.4 35%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	52.9	69 30%	66.9 26%	70.2 33%
Response Times		-18%	11%	31%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	38 ?(17, 21)	46 ?(17.2, 28.8) -21%	20 ?(5, 15, detail 5 schraffiert) 47%	30 ?(11, 19) 21%
Response Time Black / White *	27 ?(14, 13)	31 ?(6, 25.2) -15%	34 ?(15, 19, PWM@100% mit/ohne PSU) -26%	16 ?(4.4, 11.6) 41%
PWM Frequency		50 ?(50)	1000 ?(100)	200 ?(18)
Screen		40%	10%	13%	224%
Brightness middle	314	389.2 24%	345 10%	341 9%	363 16%
Brightness	308	392 27%	328 6%	318 3%	378 23%
Brightness Distribution	93	92 -1%	91 -2%	87 -6%	90 -3%
Black Level *	0.48	0.27 44%	0.38 21%	0.36 25%	0.03 94%
Contrast	654	1441 120%	908 39%	947 45%	12100 1750%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.12	3.61 41%	8.4 -37%	6 2%	4.8 22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.92		11.9 -9%		6.91 37%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.1	3.8 38%	4.3 30%	8.12 -33%	5.04 17%
Gamma	2.35 ^94%	2.16 ^102%	2.63 ^84%	2.23 ^99%	2.57 ^86%
CCT	7391 ^88%	5969 ^109%	7368 ^88%	7011 ^93%	7255 ^90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	46.81	63 35%	62 32%	63.4 35%	73 56%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	71.74	97 35%		97.4 36%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		17% / 30%	16% / 14%	25% / 20%	224% / 224%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17 ms rise
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | X264 HD Benchmark 4.0

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Intel Core i5-6200U	114 Points +24%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Intel Core m5-6Y54	99 Points +8%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng Intel Core m3-6Y30	92 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	91 Points -1%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	90 Points -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	88 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N Intel Core m3-6Y30	86 Points -7%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Intel Core i5-6200U	289 Points +34%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	218 Points +1%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng Intel Core m3-6Y30	216 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	206 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N Intel Core m3-6Y30	204 Points -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Intel Core m5-6Y54	200 Points -7%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Intel Core m5-6Y54	1.06 Points +2%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng Intel Core m3-6Y30	1.04 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	1 Points -4%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	0.95 Points -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	0.98 Points -6%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng Intel Core m3-6Y30	2.4 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	2.35 Points -2%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	2.29 Points -5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	2.27 Points -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Intel Core m5-6Y54	2.08 Points -13%

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 1
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng Intel Core m3-6Y30	77 fps
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	76.8 fps 0%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	69 (61.3^min - 76.8^max) fps -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Intel Core m5-6Y54	67.5 fps -12%
Pass 2
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng Intel Core m3-6Y30	14.26 fps
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	14.15 fps -1%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	13 (11.7^min - 14.2^max) fps -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Intel Core m5-6Y54	12.3 fps -14%

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6088

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

7321

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

3477

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

27.26 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

2.4 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.04 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

33.03 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

216 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

92 Points

Help

... in comparison

	HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2	Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Apple SSD AP0256
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		22%	35%	45%	123%
Read Seq	477.3	663 39%	518 9%	497.9 4%	754 58%
Write Seq	184.3	158.2 -14%	199.9 8%	153.5 -17%	638 246%
Read 512	226.2	313.1 38%	374.9 66%	401.2 77%	616 172%
Write 512	176.2	158.2 -10%	201 14%	154.5 -12%	678 285%
Read 4k	21.12	30.14 43%	29.3 39%	36.2 71%	14.6 -31%
Write 4k	57.9	68 17%	76.8 33%	95.5 65%	20.5 -65%
Read 4k QD32	136.4	243.7 79%	272 99%	389.5 186%	464 240%
Write 4k QD32	173.2	149.2 -14%	197.1 14%	154 -11%	315 82%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G

Transfer Rate Minimum: 180.8 MB/s

Transfer Rate Maximum: 393.6 MB/s

Transfer Rate Average: 382.9 MB/s

Access Time: 0.1 ms

Burst Rate: 37.9 MB/s

CPU Usage: 7.7 %

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2	3281 Points +16%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	2831 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	2733 Points -3%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256	2550 Points -10%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	2426 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128	2217 Points -22%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2	3996 Points +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	3837 Points +2%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	3773 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256	3550 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128	3311 Points -12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	3186 Points -16%

PCMark 7 Score		4275 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		2831 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		3198 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		3773 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1428 Points +26%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	1206 Points +6%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	1133 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	1014 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	980 Points -14%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	7307 Points +18%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	6597 Points +7%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	6178 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	5259 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	4760 Points -23%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	810 Points +9%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	740 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	697 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	589 Points -20%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		7530 points
3DMark 11 Performance		1260 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		41366 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		4330 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		671 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high
BioShock Infinite (2013)	48	23.8	21.9
Battlefield 4 (2013)	34.3	23.2	15.2
Dirt Rally (2015)	57.8	16	12.5

Max. Load

Idle


30.8 °C	35.3 °C	44.8 °C
30.8 °C	35.5 °C	49.6 °C
34.6 °C	39.1 °C	44.1 °C

Maximum: 49.6 °C
Average: 38.3 °C


44.3 °C	37 °C	30.8 °C
46.5 °C	36.6 °C	31.5 °C
44.1 °C	37.7 °C	31.7 °C

Maximum: 46.5 °C
Average: 37.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.2 °C | Room Temperature 23.1 °C | Fluke 62 Max

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.6 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-16 °C / -28.8 F).

HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.45 / 0.52 Watt
Idle	5.3 / 8.2 / 9 Watt
Load	20.7 / 21.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12"	Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2, IPS, 2160x1440, 12"	Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2, IPS, 2160x1440, 12"	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2304x1440, 12"	Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Lite-On CV1-8B128, sAMOLED, 2160x1440, 12.1"
Power Consumption		-26%	-9%	27%	21%
Idle Minimum *	5.3	7.3 -38%	4 25%	2.7 49%	3.4 36%
Idle Average *	8.2	10 -22%	8.6 -5%	2.7 67%	8 2%
Idle Maximum *	9	10.15 -13%	9.3 -3%	7.2 20%	9 -0%
Load Average *	20.7	25.2 -22%	18.6 10%	22 -6%	12 42%
Load Maximum *	21.4	29.3 -37%	36.3 -70%	20.5 4%	16.1 25%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		7h 54min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		5h 11min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 49min

	HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 33 Wh	Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh	Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 41 Wh	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 41.4 Wh	Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 39.5 Wh
Battery Runtime		55%	25%	56%	84%	95%
Reader / Idle	474	791 67%	640 35%	861 82%		1110 134%
H.264	311		468 50%	450 45%	512 65%	515 66%
WiFi v1.3	285	488 71%	321 13%	440 54%	501 76%	525 84%
Load	109	138 27%	112 3%	157 44%	231 112%

Pros

+ 高速无线网络（802.11ac）

+ 稳定的键盘

+ 主动式手写笔

+ 明亮的IPS屏幕

+ 不错的应用程序性能

+ 无风扇

+ 合理的价位

Cons

- 有限的接口配备

- 触控版按键僵硬

- 有限的内存容量

- 一般的电池续航

- 不支持移动网络

In review: HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

惠普Pavilion x2 12-b000ng是一款相对实惠的二合一笔记本电脑，它在许多方面都可以和更昂贵的机型相竞争。这台变形本的亮点在于屏幕转轴，稳定的键盘和近乎完美的酷睿m处理器加速利用率。它的屏幕表现也不错，不过一些竞争机型采用了更高的分辨率。它也是目前同价位产品中不多的几台没有屏幕闪烁的机型之一。

我们在测试中发现了它的一些问题，这也略微影响了它的整体印象。虽然你可能不会对有限的内存以及缺少LTE模组有太大的怨言，但较少的接口——它甚至连一个USB 3.0 A型接口都没有提供——则会是个让人难以忍受的设计缺陷。更大的电池容量，在键盘底座中提供第二块电池，也都会为它带来更好的表现。

整体上，售价700欧元（约5217人民币）的Pavilion x2依然是一台高性价比设备，不过它的性能很难与更贵的微软Surface Pro 4抗衡。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng - 2016-08-20 08/20/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Till Schönborn

Chassis

82 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard

86%

Pointing Device

81%

Connectivity

39 / 80 → 49%

Weight

69 / 35-78 → 79%

Battery

80%

Display

81%

Games Performance

54 / 68 → 79%

Application Performance

72 / 87 → 83%

Temperature

85%

Noise

100%

Audio

63 / 91 → 69%

Camera

61 / 85 → 71%

Average

73%

81%

Convertible - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1692 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普 Pavilion x2 12 变形本简短评测

Till Schönborn, 2016-08-30 (Update: 2016-09- 3)