谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro XL 评测--高端感更强的顶级智能手机，价格同样如此
价格为 XL。
谷歌对 Pixel 9 Pro XL 进行了常规调整，使其与最新技术保持同步。这包括整整七年的更新和出色的相机配置。价格再次大幅上涨，但我们的评测将揭示这是否合理。Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论：功能强大的智能手机，缺点不多
虽然谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro XL 可能没有它的名字所暗示的那么 XL，但它提供了一个伟大的整体包，不需要做出很多妥协。尤其是它的摄像头，描绘质量令人印象深刻，而且非常灵活--从微距到超广角和变焦。它的显示屏超亮且精确。此外，它还支持所有现代通信标准，包括 NFC、UWB、5G-Sub6 和 Wi-Fi 7。Pixel 9 Pro XL 拥有七年的升级服务。
它的一个小缺点是 SoC 处理速度相对较慢，此外，谷歌继续依赖于老式且速度明显较慢的 UFS 3.1 存储系统。我们认为，128 GB 版本不再适合 2024 年的高端智能手机，而且它还人为地压低了入门级手机的价格。显示屏的 PWM 频率也很低。虽然 Pixel 9 Pro XL 的视频录制功能非常出色，但只有在降低分辨率和/或帧速率的情况下才能使用 HDR 和动作图像防抖功能。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
您可以从亚马逊订购谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro XL，售价 1099 美元。
可能的替代品比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 86%  | Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Google Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB | 221 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.80" 2992x1344 482 PPI OLED | |
2. 91.1% v7 (old)  | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | 232 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.80" 3120x1440 505 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
3. 88.6%  | Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro ⎘ Apple A18 Pro GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe | 227 g | 256 GB NVMe | 6.90" 2868x1320 458 PPI Super Retina XDR OLED | |
4. 89.2% v7 (old)  | Xiaomi 14 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | 219.8 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.73" 3200x1440 521 PPI AMOLED |
规格
外壳和连接性 - 采用大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 的 Pixel 9 Pro XL
Pixel 9 Pro XL 并非更大的 Pro 版本，严格来说，它是 Pixel 8 Pro 的真正继任者。 像素 8 Pro.因此，就尺寸而言，谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro 是一款 像素 9的升级版。
Pixel 9 Pro XL 的制造质量非常出色。正面和背面都采用了康宁大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2，背面为磨砂表面。不过，在我们的黑色版本上，指纹仍然清晰可见。玻璃周围是抛光不锈钢边框。缝隙紧密均匀，扭动智能手机时几乎不会发出声音。尽管拥有强大的摄像头模块，Pixel 9 Pro XL 并没有头重脚轻的感觉。此外，它还符合 IP68 防尘防水标准。
从根本上说，它的功能并没有改变。Pixel 配备了蓝牙 5.3、NFC 和 UWB，还再次安装了红外测温仪，可以在短距离内测量物体表面温度。
安装的物理接口是 USB 3.2（Gen.1），它还支持有线图像输出，可以镜像显示内容。不过，在我们的测试中，这只能在缩放效果不佳的情况下工作。在复制测试中，它通过 USB 输出的能量不足以为我们必须使用的外置三星 980 Pro 供电，因此我们使用了更省钱的 三星 PSSD T7.在这里，Pixel 智能手机的传输速度达到了 209.41 MB/s。连接的数据载体可以用 FAT32 和 exFAT 格式化。
通信和软件 - Pixel 9 Pro XL 仍配备Android 14
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro XL 仍附带Android 14，并将在七年内接受更新。除了独家的 Pixel 功能外，用户还可以访问大量的 AI 功能，您可以在我们对 Pixel 9 Pro XL 的评测中了解到所有这些功能。 Pixel 9.
这款手机支持多种上网频率，因此谷歌智能手机应该能在全球各地建立连接。通过 Wi-Fi 7，该设备支持包括 6 GHz 频段在内的现代无线局域网。结合我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000（Wi-Fi 6E），我们测得了较高且稳定的数据传输速率。
Pixel 9 Pro XL 可容纳一张 nano SIM 卡，并可使用一张 eSIM 卡作为补充。您也可以使用两张 eSIM 卡。支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话。手机的通话质量非常自然，但在嘈杂的街道噪音中，环境噪声抑制功能达到了极限。
Pixel 9 Pro XL 的电容式触摸屏能快速、准确地响应输入，如果需要，线性振动电机还能提供清晰的触觉反馈。生物识别安全由超声波指纹传感器提供，它能快速、可靠地识别存储的指纹。此外，还可以通过前置摄像头设置安全性较低的面部识别功能，不过在黑暗环境中这一功能经常会达到极限。
| Networking | |
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi 14 Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
可持续性 - Pixel 9 Pro 使用回收铝材
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro XL 采用无塑料包装盒，包装中没有其他塑料。智能手机本身使用可回收铝材，由 18% 的可回收材料制成。谷歌提供了一份完整的可持续发展报告。.
摄像头 - Pixel 9 Pro XL 的强大四重奏
背面的摄像头设置熨平了 Pixel 9 最大的诟病点，同时还具有潜望镜变焦功能，可实现五倍光学放大，数字放大可达 30 倍。我们非常喜欢它的成像效果，另外两个镜头与 像素 9.
在正面，谷歌为 Pixel 9 Pro XL 配备了更多的百万像素--现在它拥有 4200 万像素，包括自动对焦。像素分档将四个像素组合成一个超级像素，这就是成品图像大小为 10 MPix 的原因。这些照片具有温暖的白平衡，同时显得非常和谐和细腻。
Pixel 智能手机的视频效果也非常出色。在前置摄像头上，你最多可以录制 4k/60fps 的视频，但它的防抖功能还有待改进，而且 HDR 录像也仅限于 30fps。主摄像头则更进一步，可进行带 HDR 的 4k/60fps 或不带 HDR 的 8k/30fps。遗憾的是，最强的图像防抖功能只能在 30fps 的全高清条件下使用（不带视频优化，带 HDR）。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow light
显示屏 - 低 PWM 频率的超亮 OLED 显示屏
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro XL 的 6.8 英寸 OLED 显示屏可在 1 到 120 Hz 之间动态调节刷新率，像素密度高，显示效果清晰。
在显示纯白画面时，面板的亮度已经非常高，而当减少白色区域时，亮度会变得更高（APL18：2,944 cd/m²）。在播放 HDR 视频时，我们测得的亮度为 2,875 cd/m²。
虽然 OLED 闪烁非常稳定和均匀，但 240 Hz 的频率较低，这意味着敏感人群可能会感到不适。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 2148 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 0.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL OLED, 2992x1344, 6.8" | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.8" | Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Super Retina XDR OLED, 2868x1320, 6.9" | Xiaomi 14 Ultra AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 6% | 8% | -14% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 3.08 ? | 3.8 ? -23% | 1.78 ? 42% | 1.55 ? 50% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 0.88 ? | 1.41 ? -60% | 1.03 ? -17% | 1.26 ? -43% |
| PWM Frequency | 240 | 480 100% | 240 0% | 120 -50% |
| Screen | -192% | -119% | -96% | |
| Brightness middle | 2148 | 1317 -39% | 1055 -51% | 997 -54% |
| Brightness | 2050 | 1365 -33% | 1061 -48% | 1002 -51% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 94 9% | 93 8% | 96 12% |
| Black Level * | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.5 | 3.4 -580% | 1.5 -200% | 1.6 -220% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.4 | 5 -257% | 4.7 -236% | 3.3 -136% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.8 | 2.8 -250% | 2.3 -188% | 1.8 -125% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2 110% | 2.21 100% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 6582 99% | 6458 101% | 6625 98% | 6493 100% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -93% /
-126% | -56% /
-77% | -55% /
-69% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.88 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4135 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.466 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 3.08 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.544 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.538 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 22.9 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。
性能、排放和电池寿命 - Tensor G4 的速度比竞争对手慢
Pixel 9 Pro XL 由 谷歌张量 G4支持，内存容量为 16GB。这使得系统性能更加流畅，但即使是两年前的 骁龙 8 代 2也能提供更强的 CPU 性能。对于一款更新时间如此之长的智能手机来说，我们本希望看到更强的性能。集成的 Mali-G715 MP7图形处理器也不支持基于硬件的光线追踪。
Pixel 9 Pro XL 的表面温度一直保持良好，但在 3DMark 压力测试以及现在相对容易的 Wild Life 压力测试中，SoC 的运行速度明显下降。
谷歌智能手机的两个扬声器能够发出动听的音效，并通过蓝牙提供了一系列不错的编解码器。不过，Pixel 还不支持 Auracast。
事实证明，Pixel 9 Pro XL 的续航时间令人印象深刻，在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，在调整显示屏亮度（150 cd/m²）的情况下，它的续航时间超过了 16.5 小时。Pixel 9 Pro XL 可以使用至少 7.5 瓦的电源适配器（USB PD）充电，最大支持 37 瓦。在我们的测试中，使用摩托罗拉电源（125 瓦，USB PD 3.0）充满一次电需要一个半小时。27 分钟后达到 50%，44 分钟后达到 80%。
| PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi 14 Ultra | |
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years) | |
| Average Google Tensor G4 (11823 - 13948, n=4) | |
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (122 - 4619, n=42, last 2 years) | |
| Average Google Tensor G4 (376 - 771, n=4) | |
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | |
| Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1 | |
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | |
| Average Google Tensor G4 (4176 - 4754, n=4) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (122 - 32432, n=42, last 2 years) | |
| Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1 | |
| Average Google Tensor G4 (6269 - 6451, n=4) | |
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | |
| Average of class Smartphone (118 - 44657, n=42, last 2 years) | |
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | Xiaomi 14 Ultra | Honor Magic6 Pro | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 33% | 78% | 101% | -11% | -4% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1850.5 | 3610.25 95% | 4102.56 122% | 3923.31 112% | 1742 ? -6% | 1894 ? 2% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 1280.56 | 1893.63 48% | 3095.36 142% | 3678.35 187% | 1160 ? -9% | 1476 ? 15% |
| Random Read 4KB | 310.88 | 437.12 41% | 362.88 17% | 415.68 34% | 286 ? -8% | 278 ? -11% |
| Random Write 4KB | 398.27 | 181.55 -54% | 527.15 32% | 678.39 70% | 319 ? -20% | 312 ? -22% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark stress test
发言人
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
运行时间
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=208, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi 14 Ultra | |
Notebookcheck 总评分
谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro XL 拥有出色的摄像头和明亮准确的显示屏，整体性能强劲。它支持现代通信标准，并将获得七年的更新。缺点是 SoC 运行速度较慢、UFS 3.1 存储系统较老以及显示屏的 PWM 频率较低。它的视频录制功能不错，但 HDR 和动作防抖功能有限。
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
- 10/30/2024 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
