黑莓 Priv 智能手机简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
LG G5 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Huawei P9 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Honor 5C | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Huawei P9 | |
LG G5 | |
Sony Xperia XA | |
Honor 5C |
|
Brightness Distribution: 70 %
Center on Battery: 327 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.01
BlackBerry Priv AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.4" | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | LG G5 IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.3" | Huawei P9 Plus AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Google Nexus 5X IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7" | Apple iPhone 6S Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 51% | -9% | -24% | 38% | 13% | 23% | |
Brightness middle | 327 | 554 69% | 784 140% | 361 10% | 503 54% | 297 -9% | 583 78% |
Brightness | 363 | 552 52% | 774 113% | 366 1% | 498 37% | 297 -18% | 560 54% |
Brightness Distribution | 70 | 96 37% | 91 30% | 87 24% | 97 39% | 93 33% | 91 30% |
Black Level * | 0.43 | 0.38 | 0.46 | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 1.59 61% | 6.5 -59% | 5.1 -24% | 2.09 49% | 2.67 35% | 3.55 13% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.1 | 2.56 68% | 11.7 -44% | 10 -23% | 3.98 51% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 2.01 16% | 8 -233% | 5.5 -129% | 2.12 12% | 2.81 -17% | 3.88 -62% |
Gamma | 2.01 109% | 2.01 109% | 2.22 99% | 2.24 98% | 2.27 97% | 2.08 106% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6436 101% | 6321 103% | 8699 75% | 7388 88% | 6621 98% | 6379 102% | 7280 89% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 82.12 | 68.08 | 66.31 | 59.05 | |||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.98 | 97.46 | 99.79 | 92.8 | |||
Contrast | 1823 | 1324 | 1267 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 235.8 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 235.8 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 235.8 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise | |
↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.4 ms rise | |
↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Geekbench 3 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Google Nexus 5X |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus |
GFXBench | |
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus |
3DMark | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus |
* ... smaller is better
AndroBench 3-5 | |
Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus |
BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value) | |
BlackBerry Priv | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Settings | Value | ||
high | 24 fps | ||
very low | 28 fps |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Settings | Value | ||
high | 47 fps |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.4 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
BlackBerry Priv audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.01 / 0.31 Watt |
Idle | 0.85 / 1.46 / 1.47 Watt |
Load |
6.53 / 9.42 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy |
BlackBerry Priv 3410 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | LG G5 2800 mAh | Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh | Google Nexus 5X mAh | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 3340 mAh | Apple iPhone 6S Plus 2750 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 17% | -1% | 20% | 10% | -99% | 9% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.85 | 0.63 26% | 0.55 35% | 0.87 -2% | 0.55 35% | 2.85 -235% | 0.5 41% |
Idle Average * | 1.46 | 1.1 25% | 1.37 6% | 1.2 18% | 1.44 1% | 2.95 -102% | 1.9 -30% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.47 | 1.56 -6% | 2.25 -53% | 1.27 14% | 1.9 -29% | 3.26 -122% | 2.2 -50% |
Load Average * | 6.53 | 5.95 9% | 6.24 4% | 4.69 28% | 3.36 49% | 8.92 -37% | 3.2 51% |
Load Maximum * | 9.42 | 6.7 29% | 9.12 3% | 5.63 40% | 9.76 -4% | 9.39 -0% | 6.4 32% |
* ... smaller is better
BlackBerry Priv 3410 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | LG G5 2800 mAh | Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh | Google Nexus 5X mAh | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 3340 mAh | Apple iPhone 6S Plus 2750 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 42% | 2% | 10% | -1% | -20% | 5% | |
Reader / Idle | 1366 | 1663 22% | 1833 34% | 1446 6% | 1775 30% | 1078 -21% | 1655 21% |
H.264 | 656 | 914 39% | 600 -9% | 776 18% | 555 -15% | 611 -7% | 714 9% |
WiFi v1.3 | 416 | 732 76% | 387 -7% | 530 27% | 412 -1% | 369 -11% | 513 23% |
Load | 304 | 392 29% | 267 -12% | 263 -13% | 245 -19% | 179 -41% | 197 -35% |
Pros
Cons
黑莓Priv尽管配置过硬却没能为生产商带来成功。准确的触控屏幕,防滑材质和高分辨率屏幕在日常使用中都是一种享受。多种独特软件和不错的主相机也都十分方便。虽然骁龙808很难与最新竞争机型相抗衡,但为用户提供流畅的使用体验则绰绰有余。采用滑出设计而仍然保证纤薄体型的代价就是较差的散热。另外,这台设备没有像其他旗舰机一样搭配指纹识别器或更好的前置相机。
用户对于物理键盘可能会各执己见。初次接触的用户可能很难相比触控键盘获得更快的输入速度,可能会觉得它有些多余。不过在一段时间之后,在打字时将可以不用一直寻找背光按键的位置,而屏幕也可以省出不小的空间用于显示其他内容。
黑莓的旗舰机Priv不是单纯依赖于最强劲硬件,而是在为日常使用寻找巧妙的解决方案。
尽管这台测试机因为独特的物理键盘没有直接竞争对手,但一些高端智能手机在许多方面(例如性能)都明显优于Priv,它们大多处于650欧元(约4844人民币)的价位上下。特别是三星 Galaxy S7 Edge,将会是最值得考虑的备选方案。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
BlackBerry Priv
- 08/19/2016 v5.1 (old)
Andreas Kilian