Notebookcheck Logo

黑莓 Priv 智能手机简短评测

烫手智能机。与触控逆向而驰,黑莓依然为它的旗舰机型Priv配备了滑出式的实体键盘。我们的测试将会考量它是否在传统和现代间找到了合理的平衡,同时还带来了其他什么功能。
Android Smartphone Touchscreen ARM
BlackBerry Priv (Blackberry Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 6 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A53/A57
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 418
Memory
3 GB 
Display
5.40 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 544 PPI, 电容式触控屏幕, AMOLED, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23.6 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: micro-SD 最大支持 2 TB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 运动监控仪, 高度计, 加速感应器, 飞行时间计, 陀螺仪, 磁感仪, 近距感应器, Miracast, USB OTG, nano-SIM
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (频段 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 13, 17, 20, 28, 41), 身体辐射值: 0.432 W/kg, 头部辐射值: 0.471 W/kg, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.4 x 147 x 77.2
Battery
12.9 Wh, 3410 mAh, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 23.9 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 422 h
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 18 MPix (自动对焦 f/2.2, 2160p 视频拍摄 @ 30 FPS)
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix (定焦 f/2.8, 720p 视频拍摄 @ 30 FPS)
Additional features
Speakers: 前置单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控和实体, 电源适配器,USB数据线,耳机, Blackberry Messenger, Blackberry Hub, DTEK, Password Keeper, WatchDox, Yahoo Finances, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
188 g, Power Supply: 53 g
Price
729 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Blackberry Priv - front
Blackberry Priv - front
Blackberry Priv - front with physical keyboard
Blackberry Priv - physical keyboard
Blackberry Priv - rear
Blackberry Priv - rear
Blackberry Priv - camera module
Blackberry Priv - headset
Blackberry Priv - charger
Blackberry Priv - box

Size Comparison

158.2 mm 77.9 mm 7.3 mm 192 g151.9 mm 78.4 mm 8.3 mm 165 g152.3 mm 75.3 mm 6.98 mm 162 g150.9 mm 72.6 mm 7.7 mm 157 g149.4 mm 73.9 mm 7.7 mm 159 g147 mm 77.2 mm 9.4 mm 188 g147 mm 72.6 mm 8 mm 136 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
BlackBerry Priv
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
336 MBit/s
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
303 MBit/s -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
303 MBit/s -10%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
249 MBit/s -26%
Sony Xperia XA
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
92.5 MBit/s -72%
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.8 MBit/s -85%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
290 MBit/s +16%
BlackBerry Priv
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
250 MBit/s
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
205 MBit/s -18%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
151 MBit/s -40%
Sony Xperia XA
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
83.6 MBit/s -67%
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
58.3 MBit/s -77%
Garmin Edge 500 - route
Garmin Edge 500 - route
Garmin Edge 500 - underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point
Blackberry Priv - route
Blackberry Priv - route
Blackberry Priv - underpass
Blackberry Priv - underpass
Blackberry Priv - turning point
Blackberry Priv - turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
432
cd/m²
413
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 432 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 363 cd/m² Minimum: 5.99 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 70 %
Center on Battery: 327 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.01
BlackBerry Priv
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.4"
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"
LG G5
IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.3"
Huawei P9 Plus
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Google Nexus 5X
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7"
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Screen
51%
-9%
-24%
38%
13%
23%
Brightness middle
327
554
69%
784
140%
361
10%
503
54%
297
-9%
583
78%
Brightness
363
552
52%
774
113%
366
1%
498
37%
297
-18%
560
54%
Brightness Distribution
70
96
37%
91
30%
87
24%
97
39%
93
33%
91
30%
Black Level *
0.43
0.38
0.46
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.1
1.59
61%
6.5
-59%
5.1
-24%
2.09
49%
2.67
35%
3.55
13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.1
2.56
68%
11.7
-44%
10
-23%
3.98
51%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.4
2.01
16%
8
-233%
5.5
-129%
2.12
12%
2.81
-17%
3.88
-62%
Gamma
2.01 109%
2.01 109%
2.22 99%
2.24 98%
2.27 97%
2.08 106%
2.2 100%
CCT
6436 101%
6321 103%
8699 75%
7388 88%
6621 98%
6379 102%
7280 89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.12
68.08
66.31
59.05
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.98
97.46
99.79
92.8
Contrast
1823
1324
1267

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 235.8 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 235.8 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 235.8 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.4 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
Grayscale (default settings, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (default settings, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (default settings, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (default settings, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (default settings, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (default settings, target color space: sRGB)
Colorspace (default settings, target color space: sRGB)
Colorspace (default settings, target color space: sRGB)
Colorspace (default settings, target color space: AdobeRGB)
Colorspace (default settings, target color space: AdobeRGB)
Grayscale (default settings, target color space: AdobeRGB)
Grayscale (default settings, target color space: AdobeRGB)
ColorChecker (adapted settings, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (adapted settings, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (adapted settings, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (adapted settings, target color space: sRGB)
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
3097 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
6480 (6415min) Points +109%
LG G5
5507 Points +78%
Huawei P9 Plus
6556 Points +112%
Google Nexus 5X
3530 Points +14%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4429 Points +43%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
1143 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2170 (2120min) Points +90%
LG G5
2396 Points +110%
Huawei P9 Plus
1929 Points +69%
Google Nexus 5X
1246 Points +9%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2538 Points +122%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
60465 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points +113%
LG G5
124244 Points +105%
Huawei P9 Plus
98413 Points +63%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
94122 Points +56%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
133626 Points +121%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
5334 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points -13%
LG G5
5581 Points +5%
Huawei P9 Plus
7159 Points +34%
Google Nexus 5X
4324 Points -19%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
779 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points +28%
LG G5
900 Points +16%
Huawei P9 Plus
1049 Points +35%
Google Nexus 5X
769 Points -1%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
837 Points +7%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1199 Points +54%
Graphics (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
2285 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points -4%
LG G5
4807 Points +110%
Huawei P9 Plus
1512 Points -34%
Google Nexus 5X
2038 Points -11%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
2040 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4299 Points +88%
System (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
1984 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points +106%
LG G5
2925 Points +47%
Huawei P9 Plus
3932 Points +98%
Google Nexus 5X
1730 Points -13%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1386 Points -30%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
3925 Points +98%
Overall (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
1385 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points +50%
LG G5
2079 Points +50%
Huawei P9 Plus
2019 Points +46%
Google Nexus 5X
1318 Points -5%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1465 Points +6%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2206 Points +59%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
26 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
51 fps +96%
LG G5
47 fps +81%
Huawei P9 Plus
43 fps +65%
Google Nexus 5X
38 fps +46%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
18.75 fps -28%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
59 fps +127%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
38 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
81 fps +113%
LG G5
74 fps +95%
Huawei P9 Plus
41 fps +8%
Google Nexus 5X
37 fps -3%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
27.11 fps -29%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
78.9 fps +108%
GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
16 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
38 fps +138%
LG G5
42 fps +163%
Huawei P9 Plus
18 fps +13%
Google Nexus 5X
16 fps 0%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
17.54 fps +10%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
38.4 fps +140%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
10 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
27 fps +170%
LG G5
30 fps +200%
Huawei P9 Plus
19 fps +90%
Google Nexus 5X
17 fps +70%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
11.81 fps +18%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
38.4 fps +284%
GFXBench 3.1
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
11 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps +155%
LG G5
31 fps +182%
Huawei P9 Plus
10 fps -9%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
28 fps +155%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
6.3 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps +138%
LG G5
17 fps +170%
Huawei P9 Plus
11 fps +75%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
28 fps +344%
GFXBench
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
7.2 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps +108%
LG G5
18 fps +150%
Huawei P9 Plus
6.2 fps -14%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
4.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
7.9 fps +80%
LG G5
11 fps +150%
Huawei P9 Plus
6.8 fps +55%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
19878 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28671 Points +44%
LG G5
28730 Points +45%
Huawei P9 Plus
19936 Points 0%
Google Nexus 5X
18898 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
27795 Points +40%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
24864 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
33031 Points +33%
LG G5
32109 Points +29%
Huawei P9 Plus
21807 Points -12%
Google Nexus 5X
22180 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
41615 Points +67%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
11680 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
19610 Points +68%
LG G5
20997 Points +80%
Huawei P9 Plus
15331 Points +31%
Google Nexus 5X
12451 Points +7%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
12854 Points +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
1041 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (1539min) Points +92%
LG G5
1695 Points +63%
Huawei P9 Plus
2336 Points +124%
Google Nexus 5X
831 Points -20%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1697 Points +63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
1841 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (2895min) Points +64%
LG G5
4468 Points +143%
Huawei P9 Plus
1042 Points -43%
Google Nexus 5X
1942 Points +5%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4557 Points +148%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
1572 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (2421min) Points +72%
LG G5
3277 Points +108%
Huawei P9 Plus
1188 Points -24%
Google Nexus 5X
1497 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
3316 Points +111%

Legend

 
BlackBerry Priv Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
LG G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 Plus HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Google Nexus 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 6S Plus Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
4481 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2564 ms * +43%
LG G5
3461 ms * +23%
Huawei P9 Plus
2792 ms * +38%
Google Nexus 5X
4734 ms * -6%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
5553 ms * -24%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1743 ms * +61%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
7638 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13191 Points +73%
LG G5
9731 Points +27%
Huawei P9 Plus
12058 Points +58%
Google Nexus 5X
8202 Points +7%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
8059 Points +6%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
15967 Points +109%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
95 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
163 Points +72%
LG G5
108 Points +14%
Huawei P9 Plus
130 Points +37%
Google Nexus 5X
107 Points +13%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
113 Points +19%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
190 Points +100%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
42.7 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
75.1 Points +76%
LG G5
49.7 Points +16%
Huawei P9 Plus
70 Points +64%
Google Nexus 5X
45 Points +5%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
46 Points +8%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
118.7 Points +178%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
20.98 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
86.7 MB/s +313%
LG G5
89.3 MB/s +326%
Huawei P9 Plus
39.33 MB/s +87%
Google Nexus 5X
24.8 MB/s +18%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
14.6 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15.79 MB/s +8%
LG G5
16.22 MB/s +11%
Huawei P9 Plus
51.2 MB/s +251%
Google Nexus 5X
12.21 MB/s -16%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
125 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
145.1 MB/s +16%
LG G5
141.3 MB/s +13%
Huawei P9 Plus
140.4 MB/s +12%
Google Nexus 5X
98.6 MB/s -21%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
221.1 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
487.3 MB/s +120%
LG G5
427.6 MB/s +93%
Huawei P9 Plus
284.3 MB/s +29%
Google Nexus 5X
245.2 MB/s +11%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
51.4 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
50.4 MB/s -2%
LG G5
45.53 MB/s -11%
Huawei P9 Plus
24.95 MB/s -51%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
78.4 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
76.4 MB/s -3%
LG G5
78.5 MB/s 0%
Huawei P9 Plus
62.5 MB/s -20%
BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv
1042 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points +99%
LG G5
1478 Points +42%
Huawei P9 Plus
2667 Points +156%
Google Nexus 5X
1115 Points +7%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1945 Points +87%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1124 Points +8%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high24 fps
 very low28 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high47 fps
GFXBench T-Rex: Performance
GFXBench T-Rex: Performance
GFXBench T-Rex: Frame times
GFXBench T-Rex: Frame times
GFXBench T-Rex: Battery consumption
GFXBench T-Rex: Battery consumption
GFXBench Manhattan: Performance
GFXBench Manhattan: Performance
GFXBench Manhattan: Frame times
GFXBench Manhattan: Frame times
GFXBench Manhattan: Battery consumption
GFXBench Manhattan: Battery consumption
Max. Load
 40.1 °C40.7 °C39.6 °C 
 41.4 °C40.3 °C38.7 °C 
 40 °C38.7 °C39.1 °C 
Maximum: 41.4 °C
Average: 39.8 °C
41 °C47.4 °C47.4 °C
40.4 °C44.3 °C43.5 °C
40.2 °C41.9 °C42.8 °C
Maximum: 47.4 °C
Average: 43.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  45.8 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.4 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.932.435.92536.231.336.23134.531.734.54033.52633.55042.539.442.56330.436.230.4803028.63010027.225.427.212523.421.323.416036.223.336.220042.722.542.725047.122.447.13155421.35440058.518.458.550064.717.564.763070.817.570.88007517.275100073.216.873.2125073.217.373.2160071.817.471.820007416.674250072.817.372.8315071.117.671.1400072.717.672.7500075.717.775.7630076.417.476.4800075.117.775.11000074.617.974.61250070.218.170.21600055.918.155.9SPL85.429.885.4N64.51.364.5median 71.1median 17.7median 71.1Delta10.21.710.240.632.932.440.641.629.831.341.634.532.131.734.538.140.92638.134.437.839.434.425.627.836.225.629.727.928.629.733.127.525.433.134.924.821.334.941.320.623.341.34526.122.54552.531.322.452.557.837.821.357.859.639.918.459.663.445.417.563.469.950.817.569.971.553.117.271.572.255.216.872.274.757.817.374.774.957.717.474.977.959.416.677.980.361.817.380.380.760.817.680.776.154.717.676.175.954.617.775.979.760.517.479.773.354.317.773.367.849.717.967.866.847.718.166.858.133.518.158.188.769.729.888.773.823.11.373.8median 71.5median 50.8median 17.7median 71.58.911.81.78.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseBlackBerry PrivSamsung Galaxy S7 Edge
BlackBerry Priv audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.31 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.85 / 1.46 / 1.47 Watt
Load midlight 6.53 / 9.42 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
BlackBerry Priv
3410 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
LG G5
2800 mAh
Huawei P9 Plus
3400 mAh
Google Nexus 5X
 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
3340 mAh
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2750 mAh
Power Consumption
17%
-1%
20%
10%
-99%
9%
Idle Minimum *
0.85
0.63
26%
0.55
35%
0.87
-2%
0.55
35%
2.85
-235%
0.5
41%
Idle Average *
1.46
1.1
25%
1.37
6%
1.2
18%
1.44
1%
2.95
-102%
1.9
-30%
Idle Maximum *
1.47
1.56
-6%
2.25
-53%
1.27
14%
1.9
-29%
3.26
-122%
2.2
-50%
Load Average *
6.53
5.95
9%
6.24
4%
4.69
28%
3.36
49%
8.92
-37%
3.2
51%
Load Maximum *
9.42
6.7
29%
9.12
3%
5.63
40%
9.76
-4%
9.39
-0%
6.4
32%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
22h 46min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 56min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 56min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 04min
BlackBerry Priv
3410 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
LG G5
2800 mAh
Huawei P9 Plus
3400 mAh
Google Nexus 5X
 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
3340 mAh
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2750 mAh
Battery Runtime
42%
2%
10%
-1%
-20%
5%
Reader / Idle
1366
1663
22%
1833
34%
1446
6%
1775
30%
1078
-21%
1655
21%
H.264
656
914
39%
600
-9%
776
18%
555
-15%
611
-7%
714
9%
WiFi v1.3
416
732
76%
387
-7%
530
27%
412
-1%
369
-11%
513
23%
Load
304
392
29%
267
-12%
263
-13%
245
-19%
179
-41%
197
-35%

Pros

+ 实体键盘结合滑出设计
+ 坚固,不滑手的机身
+ 最新安卓棉花糖系统
+ 实用的软件
+ 支持USB OTG,NFC,Slimport和Miracast
+ Micro-SD卡可以作为内部存储
+ 高速无线ac
+ 非常优秀的通话功能
+ 不错的主相机
+ 准确的触控屏幕
+ 高分辨率屏幕
+ 附带高品质耳机

Cons

- 无指纹识别器
- 较差的前置相机
- 不可拆卸电池
- 高发热量,特定情况下会自动降频
- 低于高端设备一般水平的性能
- 敲击机身正面背面时声音空洞
- 仅支持USB 2.0
In review: Blackberry Priv (STV100-4). Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Blackberry Priv (STV100-4). Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

黑莓Priv尽管配置过硬却没能为生产商带来成功。准确的触控屏幕,防滑材质和高分辨率屏幕在日常使用中都是一种享受。多种独特软件和不错的主相机也都十分方便。虽然骁龙808很难与最新竞争机型相抗衡,但为用户提供流畅的使用体验则绰绰有余。采用滑出设计而仍然保证纤薄体型的代价就是较差的散热。另外,这台设备没有像其他旗舰机一样搭配指纹识别器或更好的前置相机。

用户对于物理键盘可能会各执己见。初次接触的用户可能很难相比触控键盘获得更快的输入速度,可能会觉得它有些多余。不过在一段时间之后,在打字时将可以不用一直寻找背光按键的位置,而屏幕也可以省出不小的空间用于显示其他内容。

黑莓的旗舰机Priv不是单纯依赖于最强劲硬件,而是在为日常使用寻找巧妙的解决方案。

尽管这台测试机因为独特的物理键盘没有直接竞争对手,但一些高端智能手机在许多方面(例如性能)都明显优于Priv,它们大多处于650欧元(约4844人民币)的价位上下。特别是三星 Galaxy S7 Edge,将会是最值得考虑的备选方案。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

BlackBerry Priv - 08/19/2016 v5.1 (old)
Andreas Kilian

Chassis
87%
Keyboard
83 / 75 → 100%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
52 / 60 → 86%
Weight
89%
Battery
91%
Display
85%
Games Performance
49 / 63 → 78%
Application Performance
53 / 70 → 75%
Temperature
83%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 84%
Camera
77%
Average
78%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 黑莓 Priv 智能手机简短评测
Andreas Kilian, 2016-08-30 (Update: 2016-09- 3)