微星Pulse GL66评论。i9-12900H是在改进RTX-3060游戏笔记本，还是只让它更贵？
去年，Pulse游戏系列新推出了GL66和GL76两款产品，今年又更新到了Alder Lake。由于我们去年没有测试这些设备，所以对这个系列的测试对我们来说是新的。我们审查了15英寸GL66的第二次迭代，它配备了一个RTX 3060和 酷睿i9-12900H这款产品售价约为1900欧元（约2057美元）。
我们已经在Alder Lake和RTX 3060的组合中测试了 Alienware x14(14英寸)和 华硕TUF游戏机F15作为额外的比较设备，我们使用其他15英寸的游戏笔记本电脑与相同的GPU，如 申克XMG Apex 15，以及联想Legion S7，以及 Alienware m15 R5.
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK (Pulse GL66 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 100 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 1425 MHz, 105 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), Geforce 511.79, Optimus
Memory
16 GB
, 2x 8 GB DDR4-3200 (1,600 MHz), up to 64 GB
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN08.4 (AUOAF90), IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK, 512 GB
, 385 GB free
Weight
2.301 kg, Power Supply: 745 g
Price
1 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80.7 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 25 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.2 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 24.95 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.7 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 14.5 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.4 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 29 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.9 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 84.7 % v7 (old) | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 22.85 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
案例
只有Pulse的显示盖子是由金属制成的，而笔记本的其他部分是由塑料制成的。这使得盖子相当耐翘。它的最大打开角度几乎为180度。侧面的两个铰链做得很好，但由于其金属结构，盖子不是特别轻，当你移动笔记本电脑时，它可能会意外地完全打开，特别是当它被打开超过三分之二的时候。
底座上的一个凹槽可以让你用一只手轻松打开笔记本电脑。虽然底座也相当稳定，但试图翘起它有时也会产生一些吱吱嘎嘎的声音。
键盘略微凹陷，所以掌托被抬高的幅度很小。机箱底部由薄塑料制成，并由许多大的、类似蜂窝的结构覆盖，其中一些是风扇通风口。排气口在背面和左侧向后方排出。
该设计针对的是游戏玩家，没有过多的装饰。银灰色的顶部突出显示了类似于保时捷的盾牌标志与龙，底部与底部则保持了深黑色。做工似乎不错，我们没有发现任何不均匀的缝隙。
除了较大的Alienware m5，我们测试领域中的大多数笔记本电脑的长度和宽度大致相同。微星的厚度使其处于该领域的中间位置。然而，微星指定的23.4毫米（约0.92英寸）的厚度更有可能是指最薄的地方，而该笔记本向后的尺寸更像是25毫米（约0.98英寸）。
Legion S7和Alienware x14表明，游戏笔记本电脑也可以更薄，但XMG Apex和TUG Gaming F15都比较厚。在重量方面，微星是较重的机型之一，只有Alienware m5更重。
装备
只有最必要的连接是存在的，但没有别的。总共有四个USB端口，其中一个是USB-C格式。不幸的是，这也只是3.2 Gen 1，几乎与USB 3.0（5Gb/s）相同。Thunderbolt是缺乏的，只是作为一个SD卡读卡器。三个USB-A端口中的一个甚至只支持2.0的速度，这已经不符合当前的标准。
但更糟糕的是，USB-C端口没有正常工作。我们装在M.2盒子里的外部固态硬盘不断地在USB-C端口上重新公布自己的信息。虽然固态硬盘的灯一直亮着，但操作系统却一直在注册和取消注册它。重启也无济于事，我们不得不改用USB-C转A的适配器。之后，这个问题就不再发生了。我们在微星Katana上遇到了同样的问题，但我们同时测试的华硕TUF Gaming F17或ROG Strix Scar却没有出现这个问题。也许我们的USB-C插头不能插入微星的端口足够深。
端口的分布也不是很理想。大多数端口都在右侧，包括HDMI端口，其潜在的大插头和僵硬的电缆。这对右撇子用户来说是个烦恼。此外，端口之间的距离相当近，特别是左侧的两个USB-A端口，否则就没有任何连接。
我们还应该提到，电源插头不是很紧。在我们的测试中，有好几次，它在我们没有注意到的情况下滑出了一半。
沟通
Pulse通过英特尔AX201模块连接到WLAN。它的潜力没有得到充分利用，在我们的比较中，传输率处于底端。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø677 (588-717)
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø679 (352-713)
网络摄像头
使用了一个标准的720p网络摄像头。多年来，许多笔记本电脑在这方面没有真正的重大升级，不管这是否与科罗纳的短缺有关。但至少颜色偏差仍在限制范围内。
4.2 ∆E
5 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
5 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
6 ∆E
2 ∆E
安全问题
对于安全纯粹主义者来说，Pulse并没有什么可提供的，既没有指纹传感器，也没有Kensington连接。不过，当然也包括TPM 2.0。
配件和保修
除了一些 "酷 "的贴纸和240瓦的电源外，微星没有包括任何其他值得一提的笔记本电脑。保修期包括24个月的提货和退货服务。
维护
微星将其中一颗螺丝藏在贴纸后面。我们的测试设备是由数码港商店提供的借用设备，所以我们不想破坏贴纸的密封性来打开设备。然而，根据微星公司的说法，客户也可以打开设备进行维护工作。只要这样做是 "专业的"，设备的保修应该不会受到影响。
输入设备
键盘
键盘显示出与其他微星笔记本电脑（如Katana系列）的极大相似性。它的布局看起来很合理，但是由于它的按键紧挨着，而且有些按键还非常小，看起来有点拥挤。特别是F键和挤在它们旁边的数字键盘，都显得非常小。
作为微星的典型，Fn键被放在右边而不是左边，但它可以与左边的Windows键切换功能。方向键还容纳了一些特殊的功能，如打开风扇助推器，关闭显示器，或叠加十字线等。
键的标签很容易阅读，并使用了未来主义的字体风格，可能是为了吸引游戏玩家。
虽然有一个短的行程，但反馈还可以，让你轻松快速地打字。键盘在压力下不会出现恼人的弯曲，而且打字的噪音也适中。
虽然有键盘照明，但它只有一个区域。你可以在微星中心调整颜色和许多其他设置。
触摸板
触摸板看起来不是很大，约10.5 x 6.5厘米（约4.1 x 2.6英寸）。虽然表面很光滑，但手指只是稍微湿润就已经有点粘连了。多点触摸输入仍然工作得非常好。
集成的鼠标键有一个清晰的、非常短的、清晰的压力点。它们比键盘的声音略大，但没有达到特别令人讨厌的程度。
显示
微星使用了来自友达光电的144赫兹的哑光全高清IPS显示屏。微星去年已经使用了这种模式，例如在 GF65 Thin.该面板的一个很大的缺点是它的亮度很弱，不到250尼特。亮度分布仍在可接受的范围内，为86%。
至少黑值很低，对比度很高，但只有58%的sRGB，色彩空间覆盖率变弱。对于一台游戏笔记本电脑来说，响应时间也相当弱。
不幸的是，看起来没有任何其他显示选项。至少17英寸的Pulse提供了一个360赫兹的面板，希望它也能更亮。
虽然在左边的顶部边缘有一些屏幕渗漏，但几乎不明显。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B156HAN08.4 (AUOAF90) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 260 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 244.8 cd/m² Minimum: 6 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 247 cd/m²
Contrast: 1908:1 (Black: 0.13 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.14 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.14
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
40.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK AU Optronics B156HAN08.4 (AUOAF90), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM TL156VDXP0101, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 SHP154D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS LG Philips LGD0625 (LP156WFG-SPB3), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE CSOT T3 MNF601EA1-6, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 69% | 114% | 64% | 110% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 39 | 66.4 70% | 99.6 155% | 64.5 65% | 85.2 118% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 58.4 | 97 66% | 100 71% | 95.9 64% | 98.8 69% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.3 | 68.5 70% | 87.6 117% | 65.8 63% | 98.2 144% | |
| Response Times | 70% | 74% | 60% | 31% | 80% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38.8 ? | 5.6 ? 86% | 9.6 ? 75% | 15 61% | 31.6 ? 19% | 4 ? 90% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 12.8 ? 54% | 7.6 ? 73% | 11.6 59% | 16 ? 43% | 8.4 ? 70% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | -3% | -24% | -40% | 30% | -12% | |
| Brightness middle | 248 | 353.7 43% | 434 75% | 393 58% | 607 145% | 329 33% |
| Brightness | 245 | 340 39% | 411 68% | 353 44% | 605 147% | 321 31% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 89 3% | 89 3% | 83 -3% | 93 8% | 92 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.13 | 0.34 -162% | 0.25 -92% | 0.47 -262% | 0.41 -215% | 0.27 -108% |
| Contrast | 1908 | 1040 -45% | 1736 -9% | 836 -56% | 1480 -22% | 1219 -36% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.14 | 1.74 45% | 3 4% | 2.84 10% | 0.84 73% | 2.78 11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.82 | 3.63 38% | 7.1 -22% | 7.15 -23% | 3.02 48% | 4.88 16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.14 | 0.5 84% | 0.7 78% | 0.67 79% | 0.69 78% | 1.63 48% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 2.1 -75% | 5.1 -325% | 3.73 -211% | 1.1 8% | 2.5 -108% |
| Gamma | 2.49 88% | 2.3 96% | 2.19 100% | 2.53 87% | 2.131 103% | 2.106 104% |
| CCT | 6468 100% | 6257 104% | 6204 105% | 7312 89% | 6648 98% | 6201 105% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 76 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 45% /
23% | 55% /
19% | 28% /
-4% | 57% /
47% | 34% /
5% |
* ... smaller is better
至少在交付状态下，面板已经被很好地校准了。灰度的偏差只有1.2。因此，你很难再通过手动校准获得任何改进。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在户外，特别是低亮度会使事情变得困难，因此，寻找不那么明亮的环境就成为必须的。
即使IPS显示屏通常具有相当稳定的视角，当从极端的视角看我们的测试设备时，你仍然可以注意到亮度的明显下降。
业绩
由于它结合了英特尔酷睿i9-12900H和 RTX 3060，Pulse显然是针对游戏玩家的。此外，还有16GB的内存，微星在这里仍然使用DDR4-RAM。虽然价格约为1900欧元（约2057美元），但该设备仍属于较低的中档产品。
测试条件
为了获得最佳的基准测试结果，我们在微星软件中选择 "极限性能 "模式。在 "高级设置 "中，我们使用 "标准"。
用户应该熟悉微星中心，因为除了设置风扇配置文件之外，你还可以在这里检查系统的更新，配置键盘照明，调整一般设置等等。 当然，制造商也在这里收集一些用户数据。
处理器
这款酷睿i9-12900H该CPU结合了6个性能核心和8个效率核心，能够同时运行多达20个线程。涡轮增压时钟速度高达5GHz。
在Cinebench循环中的表现很好，而且该CPU能够毫无问题地击败带有AMD处理器的前一代产品。然而，Pulse中的i9并没有明显快于 i7-12700H在一些竞争性笔记本电脑中的速度。特别是 华硕TUF F15的表现至少在眼睛的水平上，在某些方面甚至略快。微星本可以为自己和客户节省额外的溢价，购买明显更昂贵的i9-12900H。另一方面，超薄的 纤薄的Alienware x14配有i7-12700H的Alienware x14则慢了大约6%到7%。
在第一次运行开始时，TDP在100瓦左右，然后开始下降，最后在85瓦左右趋于平稳。然而，它很少下降到标称的45瓦。
在电池操作中，极限性能模式不再可用，它变为平衡模式。在Cinebench中，性能下降了整整45%，只达到了1388分！这说明了什么？
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2587 (2493.77-2729.26)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2656 (2614.89-2735.42)
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2143 (2058.57-2194.11)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (7359 - 19648, n=28) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1634 - 1930, n=28) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2681 - 7471, n=28) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (624 - 738, n=28) | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1395 - 3077, n=28) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (235 - 277, n=29) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (160 - 451, n=28) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34684 - 76677, n=28) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5302 - 6289, n=28) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8519 - 14376, n=31) | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1631 - 1897, n=31) | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8.05 - 22.5, n=28) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36.8 - 59.8, n=28) | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (0.4218 - 0.506, n=28) | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (4074 - 18289, n=28) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (22307 - 93236, n=28) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1378 - 4215, n=28) | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (78172 - 111241, n=28) | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5709 - 10410, n=28) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (11257 - 45581, n=28) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (31935 - 151546, n=28) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (449 - 1193, n=28) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2235 - 10511, n=28) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (20960 - 48269, n=29) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
系统性能
在PCMark 10生产力基准测试中，Pulse排名第一，但在其他领域，它被华硕TUF Gaming 15略微超过，有时也被Alienware X14超越。另一方面，在CrossMark中，我们的测试设备也在X14之前完成了。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (7135 - 7861, n=4) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (10380 - 11198, n=4) | |
| Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (9751 - 10486, n=4) | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Gaming (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (9741 - 11226, n=4) | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1789 - 2096, n=4) | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1677 - 2062, n=4) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (2032 - 2125, n=4) | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1486 - 2230, n=4) | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 7135 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34438 - 74264, n=28) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36365 - 74642, n=28) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (32276 - 67858, n=28) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (74.7 - 118.1, n=27) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
不幸的是，LatencyMon在打开浏览器时已经显示出一些小问题。打开几个标签并没有显示任何进一步的影响。在播放我们的4K/60帧的YouTube视频时，有五个丢帧。紧接着的10秒Prime95会进一步增加延迟值。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
微星使用的是美光的512-GB NVMe固态硬盘。它的恒定性能仍然非常均匀，在连续读写中达到3000MB/s左右，这还算可以。
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3691 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
3355 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
887 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
632 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
74.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
313.4 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
2320 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:
1065 MB/s
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Average Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
* ... smaller is better
Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK: Ø3596 (3284.77-3609.62)
图形性能
Nvidia Geforce RTX 3060有6GB的VRAM，被用作GPU。然而，它的最大功率不是可能的140瓦，而是只能使用高达105瓦，包括动态提升。这可能会导致一些在纯3D性能方面更快的竞争对手。
在合成3DMark测试中，Pulse能够在Time Spy 和Fire Strike 测试中达到普通RTX 3060的预期水平。几个竞争对手的速度更快，包括华硕TUF Gaming F15，但有些也略微慢一些，如Alienware X4。然而，与表现最好的人的距离要大于与表现最差的人的距离。
另一方面，笔记本电脑在3DMark 11中的表现非常令人失望。即使经过4次以上的运行，包括中间的一些重启，奇怪的、底层的结果还是重复出现。来自HWinfo的日志显示，CPU的时钟速度奇怪地很低（见右边的图表）。我们在Cloud-Gate基准测试中观察到类似的行为。
在电池运行中，帧率从75帧下降到相当稳定的30帧，在
"TheWitcher 3。"此外，冷却系统很晚才被激活。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 -1! | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE -1! | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (13799 - 30772, n=43) | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (33126 - 136826, n=38) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (16354 - 23109, n=49) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (6285 - 9235, n=49) | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 14164 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 28859 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 19015 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 8222 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
"Witcher 3"在原生分辨率和Ultra设置下运行，速度约为75 fps。这符合预期水平，但以华硕TUF为首的几个竞争对手仍然更快。在"赛博朋克2077 1.5"中，该系统在相同设置下仅达到约40 fps。虽然这仍然可以流畅地玩，但对于光线追踪效果来说是不够的。
在"Far Cry 5"和"X-Plane 11.11"中，Pulse甚至能够在华硕TUF之后取得第二名。尽管TGP相对较低，否则你可以在原生分辨率和高细节水平下流畅地玩几乎任何游戏。
The Witcher 3 | Far Cry 5 | Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (40.1 - 449, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (81 - 186.8, n=41) | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (58.2 - 91.5, n=48) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Far Cry 5 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (38 - 248, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (88 - 135, n=25) | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (35 - 232, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (85 - 129, n=29) | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (80 - 120, n=31) | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (15 - 178.6, n=44, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (68 - 118, n=14) | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.2 - 205, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (42.2 - 87.7, n=14) | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (16.7 - 159.7, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (40 - 78.8, n=16) | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| 1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19.1 - 74, n=25, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (12.6 - 28.9, n=7) | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| GTA V | |
| 1920x1080 Normal/Off AF:4x | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Average of class Gaming (101.7 - 187.7, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (146 - 183.7, n=33) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| 1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
| Average of class Gaming (24.2 - 187.1, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (120 - 179.4, n=42) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (69.2 - 109.8, n=46) | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Dota 2 Reborn | |
| 1920x1080 high (2/3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (69.3 - 244, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (98.9 - 169.2, n=49) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 220, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (90.7 - 154.8, n=49) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| X-Plane 11.11 | |
| 1280x720 low (fps_test=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (39 - 221, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (83.6 - 157.1, n=48) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| 1920x1080 med (fps_test=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 193.1, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (73 - 138.3, n=48) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (61.9 - 109.3, n=48) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
| 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.6 - 234, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (122.5 - 214, n=33) | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| 1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
| Average of class Gaming (33.5 - 230, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (70.4 - 133.5, n=37) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (55 - 100.9, n=42) | |
| Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE | |
| Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
脉冲没有先进的擎天柱，机上也没有MUX开关。然而，"TheWitcher 3" 的帧率在一个小时内仍然相当稳定。
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø74.9 (71-79)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 368.5 | 247.2 | 139.6 | 78 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 179 | 161 | 151 | 144 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 142 | 123 | 100 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 168 | 128 | 120 | 112 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 88.1 | 87.1 | 42.2 | 40.7 |
排放
噪声排放
虽然我们在极限性能模式下运行大多数基准测试，但微星推荐使用平衡模式。在极限模式下，风扇甚至在空闲运行时短暂启动，但在平衡模式下，它们甚至在电池运行期间经过5分钟的"TheWitcher 3"后保持沉默。
即使在平衡模式下，风扇也可以在常规工作任务（如写这篇评论）中打开，但这时它们会悄悄地呼啸而过，几乎看不出来。
在极端模式下，只有Schenker Core在负载下会变得更响亮。速度更快的华硕TUF产生类似的噪音水平。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23 / 27 / 27 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 48.2 / 56.94 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) | ||
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N | Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB | SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW) | Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 6% | 2% | 6% | -5% | 1% | |
| off / environment * | 23 | 23.2 -1% | 24.7 -7% | 23 -0% | 25 -9% | 24 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23 | 23.6 -3% | 24.7 -7% | 23 -0% | 25 -9% | 24 -4% |
| Idle Average * | 27 | 23.6 13% | 24.7 9% | 23 15% | 30 -11% | 25 7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 27 | 25.4 6% | 30.9 -14% | 26.4 2% | 36 -33% | 35 -30% |
| Load Average * | 48.2 | 38 21% | 40 17% | 34.25 29% | 42 13% | 44 9% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 56.9 | 54.1 5% | 51.5 9% | 58.4 -3% | 53 7% | 48 16% |
| Load Maximum * | 56.94 | 57.2 -0% | 51.5 10% | 58.42 -3% | 54 5% | 50 12% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在空闲运行期间，约37°C（99°F），笔记本电脑的温度比竞争对手略高。只有华硕TUF在这里得到类似的温度。在负载情况下，这种情况持续到50°C（122°F），几个竞争对手达到了类似的温度（联想Legion S7）或变得更热（Alienware m5）。
幸运的是，掌托始终保持凉爽。热点在中心或更接近显示屏的地方。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2.9 °C / 5.2 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2.9 °C / 5.2 F).
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -1% | 14% | 19% | 9% | -10% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 50 | 44.4 11% | 51.3 -3% | 36 28% | 49 2% | 62 -24% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 47 | 48.8 -4% | 44.4 6% | 38 19% | 50 -6% | 61 -30% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 36 | 37.8 -5% | 27.2 24% | 31 14% | 29 19% | 36 -0% |
| Idle Bottom * | 38 | 39.6 -4% | 26.6 30% | 33 13% | 30 21% | 33 13% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在我们的压力测试开始时，核心最初加速到3.6GHz，这与可能的最高5GHz相差甚远。在最初的一分钟后，时钟速度不断下降。我们在10分钟后只测到2.9GHz，1小时后约为2.3GHz。这意味着，尽管有极限性能模式，但CPU在这里被节流了。一小时后，核心温度约为80℃（176°F）。在测试过程中，最高温度上升到97°C（207°F），这就是时钟速度被节流的原因。
我们看到在第12分钟和第20分钟之间出现了奇怪的性能下降，也许有一些其他进程在这里干扰了。
GPU的时钟速度变化很大，一小时内大约在1.6和1.2GHz之间，温度在70 °C（158 °F）左右。在GPU时钟速度方面有一些较大的性能下降，在存储速度方面也是如此。至少后者应该保持相当稳定，但根据GPU-Z的日志，在测试过程中，这两个值都下降到了200MHz。
| CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
| Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 2,5 | 1.360 | 81 | 69 |
发言人
扬声器的声音可以更大，而且明显缺乏一些低音。但至少中音和高音是相当平衡的。有一个组合音频端口，可以连接模拟外部音频设备。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
消耗功率
在空闲运行时，特别是在平均负载下（3DMark06），功耗非常低。在游戏时，功耗位于该领域的中间位置，但至少它也是最快的设备之一。在我们的压力测试中，消耗量是最高的，达到了与华硕TUF相同的水平，它确实更快。然而，总体而言，消耗量是低的或适当的。
Power Consumption
| Idle | 7 / 13 / 13.7 Watt |
| Load |
48.4 / 244 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -33% | -7% | -36% | -43% | -52% | -45% | -72% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7 | 6.3 10% | 7.9 -13% | 10.5 -50% | 13 -86% | 11 -57% | 10.4 ? -49% | 13.6 ? -94% |
| Idle Average * | 13 | 9.8 25% | 11.1 15% | 15 -15% | 16 -23% | 14 -8% | 14.5 ? -12% | 19 ? -46% |
| Idle Maximum * | 13.7 | 26.5 -93% | 11.8 14% | 17 -24% | 23 -68% | 25 -82% | 21.4 ? -56% | 26.8 ? -96% |
| Load Average * | 48.4 | 103.8 -114% | 107.4 -122% | 109 -125% | 95 -96% | 123 -154% | 109.3 ? -126% | 106.3 ? -120% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 148 | 189 -28% | 111 25% | 186 -26% | 156 -5% | 176 -19% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 244 | 241.9 1% | 140.4 42% | 186 24% | 191 22% | 226 7% | 206 ? 16% | 249 ? -2% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø147.9 (75.43-204.43)
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø158.9 (115.38-245.29)
Power Consumption With External Monitor
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø126.1 (122.59-129.73)
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø141.4 (131.92-159.28)
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø145.3 (142.74-149.58)
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø147.4 (140.96-153.45)
电池寿命
微星使用了相当小的电池，容量只有53-Wh，游戏笔记本的电池寿命也相应较低。 只有申克有类似的小电池，但其他竞争对手都有80（Alienware）甚至90-Wh（华硕TUF）的容量。
这意味着，在全亮度（即相当平庸）的情况下，勉强够看4小时的视频或4.5小时的冲浪。
| MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 49 Wh | Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 71 Wh | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -43% | 38% | -7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | |
| H.264 | 237 | 561 137% | 277 17% | 449 89% | 525 122% | 413 ? 74% | |
| Load | 116 | 66 -43% | 45 -61% | 81 -30% | 69 -41% | 55 -53% | 85.7 ? -26% |
| Reader / Idle | 947 | 841 | 881 | 567 ? | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 285 | 535 | 389 | 421 | 306 | 376 ? | |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 45 | 96 | 78.3 ? |
Pros
+ 铝制盖子
+ 180度的开启角度
+ 良好的游戏性能
+ 相对较低的功率消耗
Cons
- 没有Thunderbolt
- 1个旧的USB2.0
- 出厂封条破损后，保修情况不清楚
- 黑暗的显示屏，响应时间短
- 电池模式下CPU性能严重下降
- 平庸的电池寿命
评语 - 有很大的改进潜力
虽然RTX 3060只能使用105瓦，但我们仍然喜欢其游戏性能，特别是这也使Pulse的效率舒适，但无论如何也不会慢。
无论是响应时间蹩脚的暗色显示屏，还是USB 2.0或缺乏Thunderbolt，都不会让真正的游戏玩家满意。使用贴纸的工厂封条，至少是有问题的，也不会激发任何热情。
很明显，这款笔记本确实是为价格敏感的游戏玩家设计的，尽管目前约1900欧元（约2057美元）的价格并没有真正使其成为一种偷窃。如果制造商像大多数竞争对手一样使用i7-12700H或i7-12800H处理器，而不是昂贵的i9-12900H，微星可以毫无问题地降低价格。在Pulse中，性能差异并不明显，并不能证明额外的价格溢价是合理的。
通过Pulse GL66，微星相当新的游戏系列仍然暴露出一些调整问题。昂贵的CPU并没有发挥出它的全部水平，一个更实惠的型号会将系统的价格降低到一个更合适的水平。
从性能上看，华硕TUF游戏机F15推荐自己作为替代品。它速度更快，提供更好的屏幕，而且价格更实惠，约为1,600欧元（约1,732美元）。联想Legion S7的价格与Pulse差不多，它也能以良好的显示屏而大放异彩。
价格和可用性
在美国，配备i7-12700H的Pulse GL66 12UEK的各种配置可从亚马逊起价1549美元。.
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK
- 04/11/2022 v7 (old)
Christian Hintze
Gaming - Weighted Average
Price comparison
