Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

Qualcomm SD X Plus X1P-42-100

Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100是一款价格相对低廉的ARM架构处理器（SoC），用于Windows笔记本电脑，将于2024年5月20日亮相。据认为，X1P-42-100 有 8 个 Oryon CPU 内核（8 个 P 核，0 个 E 核），运行时钟频率至少为 3.0 GHz，目前尚不清楚。至于其他主要功能，X Plus 可能配备了与其更大、更智能的兄弟 X1P-64-100 相同的 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno GPU、45 TOPS Hexagon NPU 和 LPDDR5x-8448 内存控制器。 X1P-64-100所拥有的。

架构和功能

据称，高通 Oryon 内核基于 ARM v8.7 微体系结构。与现代 AMD 和英特尔处理器一样，骁龙芯片兼容 USB 4，因此也兼容 Thunderbolt 4；X Plus 是否兼容GeForce 或 Radeon 独立显卡还有待观察。

据说高通 SoC 有 8 个 PCIe 4 和 4 个 PCIe 3 通道，可连接各种设备。支持 NVMe SSD，吞吐量高达 7.9 GB/s；RAM 控制器可能兼容快至 8448 MT/s 的 RAM，也可能不兼容。很可能包含一个用于加速人工智能工作负载的 45 TOPS NPU。

这款 X Plus 芯片与 X1P-64-100 和 X1P-64-100 所使用的芯片不同。 X1P-64-100, X1E-78-100, X1E-80-100, X1E-84-100基于。

性能

如果从官方性能数据来看，X Plus 应该比 9 核Apple M4在多线程工作负载中要慢得多，同时功耗也要高得多。一旦获得内部测试结果，我们将确保及时更新本节内容。

与其他基于 ARM 的 Windows 平台一样，骁龙 X 芯片在使用专为 ARM 处理器编译的应用程序和游戏时效果最佳，但目前这样的应用程序和游戏还不多。

图形

集成的 Adreno GPU应该与 DirectX 12 兼容（不是与 DirectX 12 Ultimate 兼容；正如传言所说，这里没有任何光线追踪功能）。预计它还能提供高达 3.8 TFLOPS 的性能。作为参考，最慢的 Nvidia Ada 代笔记本电脑专业显卡为 RTX 500 Ada可提供高达 9.2 TFLOPS 的性能。

高通 iGPU 可让您同时使用多达 3 台 UHD 2160p 显示器。支持 2160p120 集成显示器，以及流行的 AV1、HEVC 和 AVC 视频编解码器（包括解码和编码）。

功耗

X1P-42-100 的功耗很可能低于其功能更强大的 X Elite 兄弟。在长期工作负载下，预计功耗在 10 W 到 35 W 之间，因为这就是 Ryzen U 芯片的正常功耗。

该 SoC 采用 4 纳米台积电工艺制造，节能效果不错（截至 2024 年上半年）。

CodenameOryon
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon X

Series: Snapdragon X Oryon

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-1003.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 « - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Oryon
Clock Rate <=3400 MHz
Number of Cores / Threads8 / 8
8 x 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)30 Watt
Manufacturing Technology4 nm
GPUQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
64 Bit64 Bit support
ArchitectureARM
Announcement Date08/28/2024
Product Link (external)www.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
30.3 pt (50%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -92%
...
Intel Core i7-1180G7
29.8 -2%
Intel Core i5-10400H
29.8 -2%
Intel Core i7-9750H
29.9 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
29.9 -1%
Intel Core i5-1250P
29.9 -1%
Intel Core i7-1160G7
30.1 -1%
Intel Core i5-10500H
30.2 0%
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
30.2 0%
Intel Core i7-9850H
30.3 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
30.3
AMD Ryzen 7 4980U
30.4 0%
Intel Core i5-1135G7
30.4 0%
Intel Core i7-8559U
30.4 0%
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
30.7 1%
Intel Core i5-11300H
30.8 2%
Intel Core i5-1145G7
30.8 2%
Intel Core i9-9880H
30.9 2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100
30.9 2%
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
31 2%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
47.4 56%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 98%
0%
100%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 107     avg: 108     median: 108 (61%)     max: 109 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 556     avg: 684     median: 704 (13%)     max: 759 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 6442     avg: 7404     median: 7445 (7%)     max: 8284 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD E1-2100
202 -97%
...
Intel Core i7-11375H
6663 -10%
Intel Xeon W-10885M
6893 -7%
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U
7073 -4%
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
7102 -4%
Intel Core i5-10500H
7104 -4%
Intel Core i7-10750H
7129 -4%
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
7209 -3%
Intel Core i7-1250U
7275 -2%
Intel Core i5-1250P
7282 -2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
7404
Intel Core i7-1265U
7486 1%
AMD Ryzen 5 5560U
7667 4%
Apple M1
7728 4%
Intel Core 5 120U
7862 6%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
7867 6%
Intel Core i5-1240U
7902 7%
Intel Core i7-1260U
7913 7%
AMD Ryzen 5 5600U
7929 7%
Intel Core i7-1255U
7996 8%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
32782 343%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
107681 1354%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1104     avg: 1113     median: 1109 (47%)     max: 1128 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A10-5745M
74.4 -93%
...
Intel Core i5-8265U
1008 -9%
Intel Core i5-1035G1
1016 -9%
Intel Core i7-8550U
1021 -8%
Intel Core i3-10110U
1033 -7%
Intel Core i5-10310U
1051 -6%
Intel Core i3-1005G1
1055 -5%
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
1074 -4%
Intel Core i5-10200H
1089 -2%
Intel Core i7-8850H
1096 -2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
1113
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
1115 0%
Intel Core i7-10810U
1119 1%
Intel Core i5-1035G4
1119 1%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
1124 1%
Intel Core i5-10300H
1126 1%
Intel Core i5-8400H
1128 1%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100
1129 1%
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1131 2%
Intel Core i7-10510U
1142 3%
...
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
2270 104%
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
2348 111%
0%
100%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 406     avg: 418.8     median: 422 (47%)     max: 425 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2361     avg: 2809     median: 2889 (7%)     max: 3097 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1383     avg: 1478     median: 1486.5 (9%)     max: 1556 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
31 -98%
...
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1428 -3%
Intel Core 5 120U
1432 -3%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
1443 -2%
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
1444 -2%
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U
1447 -2%
Intel Core i7-1355U
1448 -2%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U
1464 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1469 -1%
Intel Core i7-1365U
1471 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
1478
AMD Ryzen 5 6600U
1493 1%
Apple M3
1499 1%
Intel Core i9-10885H
1502 2%
Intel Core i9-9880H
1506 2%
Intel Xeon W-10885M
1509 2%
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
1510 2%
Intel Core i5-1250P
1528 3%
Intel Core i5-1240P
1547 5%
Intel Core i7-10875H
1554 5%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
5600 279%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
15842 972%
0%
100%
0801602403204004805606407208008809601040112012001280136014401520Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 207     avg: 210.5     median: 210 (59%)     max: 215 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
19 -91%
...
Intel Core i7-10875H
203.6 -3%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
205.1 -3%
Intel Core i9-10885H
206.7 -2%
Intel Core i9-10980HK
206.7 -2%
Apple M1
207.3 -2%
Apple M1 Pro
209 -1%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100
209 -1%
Intel Xeon W-10885M
209.8 0%
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
210 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
210.5
Intel Core i5-1155G7
210.7 0%
Intel Core i5-1240P
211.4 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
211.7 1%
Intel Core i7-1165G7
212.1 1%
Intel Core i5-1235U
213.2 1%
Intel Core i5-11320H
213.8 2%
Intel Core i5-11400H
214.3 2%
Intel Core i7-1185G7
215.4 2%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
215.5 2%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
311 48%
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
355.5 69%
0%
100%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 29238     avg: 30937     median: 30849.5 (18%)     max: 32811 MIPS
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4087     avg: 4455     median: 4529.5 (53%)     max: 4675 MIPS
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.6     avg: 5.2     median: 5.1 (9%)     max: 6.02 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01234567Tooltip
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 711     avg: 835     median: 787 (10%)     max: 1055 Seconds
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 399     avg: 465.5     median: 446 (3%)     max: 571 Seconds
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.728     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.774 sec
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12475     avg: 12539     median: 12561 (32%)     max: 12580 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 8996     avg: 9010     median: 9010 (23%)     max: 9024 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 13729     avg: 13758     median: 13764 (25%)     max: 13780 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3282     avg: 3292     median: 3288 (14%)     max: 3306 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 2255     avg: 2362     median: 2378.5 (61%)     max: 2437 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 6604     avg: 10332     median: 11384 (44%)     max: 11438 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1486     avg: 1531     median: 1531 (60%)     max: 1576 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4457     avg: 5351     median: 5350.5 (10%)     max: 6244 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 467.8     avg: 793     median: 780 (1%)     max: 1145 ms
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 79431     avg: 79536     median: 79536 (66%)     max: 79641 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 130.3     avg: 240.8     median: 275 (77%)     max: 283 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 129.9     avg: 335.7     median: 403 (74%)     max: 407 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1154     avg: 1240     median: 1171.5 (45%)     max: 1463 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
58.5 Watt (10%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 50.3     avg: 54.4     median: 52.8 (10%)     max: 60.1 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.48     avg: 6.9     median: 5.8 (4%)     max: 9.3 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345678910Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.9     avg: 5.4     median: 5.5 (6%)     max: 5.7 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0123456789Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 25.9     avg: 26.8     median: 26.9 (20%)     max: 27.5 Points per Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 20. 16:01:02

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:30:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.02s ... 0.022s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.022s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.022s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.023s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.023s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.023s

#10 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.024s

#11 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 17591 +0.021s ... 0.045s

#13 got single benchmarks 17591 +0.017s ... 0.062s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.062s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.686s ... 0.748s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.748s

#17 return log +0s ... 0.748s

Reviews for the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 processor

宏碁 Swift Go 14 AI 笔记本电脑评测：搭载骁龙处理器的 MacBook Air 竞争对手的 24 小时运行时间

宏碁 Swift Go 14 AI 笔记本电脑评测：搭载骁龙处理器的 MacBook Air 竞争对手的 24 小时运行时间

适用于 Windows 笔记本电脑的 ARM 处理器已是第三次出现。在新款宏碁 Swift Go 14 AI 中，ARM CPU 为大容量电池腾出了空间，从而带来了出色的运行时间。但骁龙笔记本电脑的性能又如何呢？我们来仔细看看！...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 14.50" | 1.3 kg
华硕 ProArt PZ13 评测--配备骁龙 X Plus 的耐用 OLED 可折叠手机

华硕 ProArt PZ13 评测--配备骁龙 X Plus 的耐用 OLED 可折叠手机

华硕新推出的 ProArt PZ13 是一款相对坚固的可转换设备，适合希望在恶劣条件下完成工作的创意用户。该设备采用高通公司最新的 8 核 Snapdragon X Plus 处理器，可确保较长的运行时间。不过，与其他 ProArt 机型一样，它的 OLED 触摸屏也被限制在 60 Hz。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 13.30" | 874 g
华硕 VivoBook S 15 OLED Snapdragon 8 核笔记本电脑评测--搭载 Snapdragon X Plus，几乎无声的日常伴侣

华硕 VivoBook S 15 OLED Snapdragon 8 核笔记本电脑评测--搭载 Snapdragon X Plus，几乎无声的日常伴侣

Vivobook S 15 OLED 是首批搭载新型骁龙 X Elite 的笔记本电脑之一，现在华硕也推出了搭载新型骁龙 X Plus 8 核的廉价版。不过，包括 120 Hz OLED 在内的其余规格完全相同。不过，与速度更快的 X Elite 型号相比，价格差距太小。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 15.60" | 1.4 kg
高通骁龙 X Plus 8 核分析 - X1P-42-100 更小、更便宜，但效率不高

高通骁龙 X Plus 8 核分析 - X1P-42-100 更小、更便宜，但效率不高

在推出骁龙 X Elite 处理器和 10 核骁龙 X Plus 仅仅两个多月后，高通公司又发布了面向笔记本电脑的 ARM 处理器，包括配备较慢 GPU 的骁龙 X Plus 8 核变体。我们测试了更便宜的 X1P-42-100。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 13.30" | 874 g
高通骁龙 X Plus 8 核分析 - X1P-42-100 更小、更便宜，但效率不高

高通骁龙 X Plus 8 核分析 - X1P-42-100 更小、更便宜，但效率不高

在推出骁龙 X Elite 处理器和 10 核骁龙 X Plus 仅仅两个多月后，高通公司又发布了面向笔记本电脑的 ARM 处理器，包括配备较慢 GPU 的骁龙 X Plus 8 核变体。我们测试了更便宜的 X1P-42-100。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 15.60" | 1.4 kg

Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core: Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
  Review » 高通骁龙 X Plus 8 核分析 - X1P-42-100 更小、更便宜，但效率不高

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY: Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in1 14Q8X9: Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in1 14Q8X9

Dell Inspiron 14 5441: Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 14 5441

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, 13.30", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Snapdragon X

» Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE
   12x 3.8 GHz - 4.3 GHz
» Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100
   12x 3.8 GHz - 4.2 GHz
» Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-66-100
   10x 3.4 GHz - 4 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
   8x 3.3 GHz - 4.4 GHz
+ Intel Core i9-10980HK
   8x 2.4 GHz - 5.3 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS
   8x 2.8 GHz - 4.4 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
   8x 3 GHz - 4.3 GHz
+ Intel Core i7-11600H
   6x 2.9 GHz - 4.6 GHz
- Intel Xeon W-10885M
   8x 2.4 GHz - 5.3 GHz
- Intel Core i9-10885H
   8x 2.4 GHz - 5.3 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
   8x 2.7 GHz - 4.7 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
   8x 2 GHz - 4.5 GHz
- Intel Core i7-1265U
   10x 1.3 GHz - 4.8 GHz
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动处理器 —— 基准测试成绩列表 > Qualcomm Snapdragon X Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 笔记本处理器
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-08-30)