华硕ROG G703GXR笔记本电脑评测:高端老派游戏本
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.8 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2020 | Asus ROG G703GXR i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | 4.7 kg | 48 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
82.5 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2020 | Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | 4.8 kg | 42 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
85.1 % v7 (old) | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | 3.3 kg | 27 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | ||
86.1 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2019 | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | 2.7 kg | 27.5 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Asus ROG G703GXR (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GE75 9SG (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ROG G703GXR (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GE75 9SG (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Asus ROG G703GXR | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M | |
Asus ROG G703GXR | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
MSI GE75 9SG |
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 290 cd/m²
Contrast: 1450:1 (Black: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.77 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.46
ΔE Greyscale 5.83 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.47
Asus ROG G703GXR AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M AU Optronics B173HAN03.1 (AUO319D), IPS, 1920x1080 | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng CMN175D, IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GE75 9SG Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, AHVA, 1920x1080 | Asus ROG G703GX AU Optronics B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 2% | -2% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 63.2 | 64.4 2% | 63.7 1% | 61.5 -3% | 64.1 1% |
sRGB Coverage | 92 | 92.1 0% | 96 4% | 92 0% | 93.3 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.7 | 65.5 1% | 65.8 2% | 63.5 -2% | 65.6 1% |
Response Times | -77% | -82% | 18% | 6% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 6.4 ? | 16.8 ? -163% | 17.6 ? -175% | 7.2 ? -13% | 7.2 ? -13% |
Response Time Black / White * | 12.8 ? | 11.6 ? 9% | 11.2 ? 12% | 6.6 ? 48% | 9.6 ? 25% |
PWM Frequency | 25510 ? | 26040 ? | |||
Screen | -10% | 21% | 18% | -4% | |
Brightness middle | 290 | 288 -1% | 360 24% | 400.7 38% | 296 2% |
Brightness | 281 | 271 -4% | 342 22% | 372 32% | 279 -1% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 85 -7% | 91 0% | 89 -2% | 85 -7% |
Black Level * | 0.2 | 0.2 -0% | 0.26 -30% | 0.34 -70% | 0.25 -25% |
Contrast | 1450 | 1440 -1% | 1385 -4% | 1179 -19% | 1184 -18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.77 | 5.79 -21% | 1.91 60% | 1.33 72% | 4.77 -0% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.08 | 11.89 -31% | 4.08 55% | 3.51 61% | 9.08 -0% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.46 | 1.89 -29% | 0.78 47% | 1.39 5% | 1.46 -0% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.83 | 6.92 -19% | 2.72 53% | 1.3 78% | 5.83 -0% |
Gamma | 2.47 89% | 2.46 89% | 2.37 93% | 2.24 98% | 2.47 89% |
CCT | 8076 80% | 8433 77% | 6692 97% | 6735 97% | 8076 80% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 60 2% | 60 2% | 58.2 -1% | 60 2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 92 0% | 96 4% | 92.1 0% | 93 1% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -29% /
-16% | -20% /
5% | 11% /
14% | 1% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
12.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise | |
↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
6.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.4 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=192, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Asus ROG G703GXR | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=192, last 2 years) | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Asus ROG G703GXR | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=196, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M | |
Asus ROG G703GXR | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=199, last 2 years) | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M | |
Asus ROG G703GXR |
PCMark 10 - Score | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=169, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Asus ROG G703GXR |
Asus ROG G703GXR Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1014 (RAID 0) | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0) | MSI GE75 9SG Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 28% | 24% | 5% | |
Write 4K | 99.3 | 115.3 16% | 103.8 5% | 116.1 17% |
Read 4K | 40.25 | 41.79 4% | 41.67 4% | 44.98 12% |
Write Seq | 2001 | 2841 42% | 2639 32% | 2370 18% |
Read Seq | 2107 | 2547 21% | 2702 28% | 1465 -30% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 348.3 | 498.6 43% | 487.3 40% | 337.5 -3% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 391.5 | 555 42% | 555 42% | 453.6 16% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2003 | 3123 56% | 2967 48% | 2399 20% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3482 | 3476 0% | 3102 -11% | 3087 -11% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 24850 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 38299 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 20164 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 9526 points | |
Help |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M | |
Asus ROG G703GXR | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=192, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M | |
Asus ROG G703GXR | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (371 - 14592, n=115, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
Asus ROG G703GXR | |
MSI GE75 9SG |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M | |
Asus ROG G703GXR | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M | |
Asus ROG G703GXR | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 165 | 97.1 | ||
Fortnite (2018) | 148 | 133 | ||
Hitman 2 (2018) | 76 | 73.1 | ||
Anthem (2019) | 96.9 | 91 | ||
The Division 2 (2019) | 116 | 92 | ||
Anno 1800 (2019) | 70 | 40.8 | ||
Rage 2 (2019) | 110 | 108 | ||
F1 2019 (2019) | 83 | 80 | ||
Control (2019) | 91.7 | |||
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 91.8 | 79.4 | ||
FIFA 20 (2019) | 202 | 201 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 33 / 34 / 35 dB(A) |
Load |
| 38 / 54 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30 dB(A) |
Asus ROG G703GXR i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -7% | -4% | 3% | 11% | |
off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 28.2 6% | 24 ? 20% |
Idle Minimum * | 33 | 30 9% | 34 -3% | 30.4 8% | 25.5 ? 23% |
Idle Average * | 34 | 34 -0% | 35 -3% | 30.4 11% | 27.2 ? 20% |
Idle Maximum * | 35 | 45 -29% | 36 -3% | 33.4 5% | 30.2 ? 14% |
Load Average * | 38 | 40 -5% | 51 -34% | 37.1 2% | 42.4 ? -12% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 50 | 57 -14% | 47 6% | 54.2 -8% | |
Load Maximum * | 54 | 60 -11% | 51 6% | 56.4 -4% | 53.4 ? 1% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.9 °C / 3.4 F).
Asus ROG G703GXR i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 4% | -2% | -17% | -1% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 46 | 37 20% | 47 -2% | 48.8 -6% | 46.2 ? -0% |
Maximum Bottom * | 49 | 40 18% | 54 -10% | 52 -6% | 49.2 ? -0% |
Idle Upper Side * | 31 | 34 -10% | 32 -3% | 36.2 -17% | 31.2 ? -1% |
Idle Bottom * | 32 | 36 -13% | 30 6% | 44.4 -39% | 32.2 ? -1% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ROG G703GXR audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
Idle | 27 / 32 / 39 Watt |
Load |
124 / 338 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ROG G703GXR i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 2% | 11% | 28% | 32% | |
Idle Minimum * | 27 | 28 -4% | 26 4% | 13.9 49% | 13.6 ? 50% |
Idle Average * | 32 | 34 -6% | 29 9% | 18.8 41% | 19 ? 41% |
Idle Maximum * | 39 | 45 -15% | 38 3% | 23.1 41% | 26.8 ? 31% |
Load Average * | 124 | 98 21% | 106 15% | 112.3 9% | 106.9 ? 14% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 274 | 263 4% | 228 17% | 231 16% | |
Load Maximum * | 338 | 307 9% | 287 15% | 291.5 14% | 251 ? 26% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ROG G703GXR i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 96 Wh | Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 72 Wh | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 70 Wh | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 65 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -36% | -31% | -20% | 20% | |
Reader / Idle | 484 | 213 -56% | 250 -48% | 565 ? 17% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 367 | 168 -54% | 196 -47% | 294 -20% | 375 ? 2% |
Load | 61 | 63 3% | 63 3% | 85.3 ? 40% |
Pros
Cons
华硕ROG G703GXR专为主要在家玩游戏的玩家而设计。
ROG G703GXR的尺寸和重量不适合随身携带和用作移动游戏笔记本电脑。 但是,如果您对庞大的机箱没有任何意见,那么ROG G703GXR将成为出色的游戏伴侣,并且没有重大缺陷。 例如,在我们看来,它的维护选项可以做得更好,但我们遇到的任何缺陷都很小。
华硕还为该设备配备了出色的输入设备和多种端口选择,包括Thunderbolt3。此外,ROG G703GXR还具有高对比度和反应灵敏的IPS显示屏。 在G-Sync(更好的图像质量)和Optimus(更好的续航时间)之间的选择也值得赞扬。 此外,我们希望笔记本电脑可以在负载下保持最高的CPU和GPU性能。华硕在功率,温度和体积之间也取得了不错的折衷。 总体而言,ROG G703GXR是一款出色的经典游戏笔记本电脑。
Asus ROG G703GXR
-
05/14/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser