Notebookcheck Logo

华硕ROG G703GXR笔记本电脑评测:高端老派游戏本

大机身,高性能。

华硕ROG G703GXR是一款典型的台式机替代品游戏笔记本电脑,专注于性能和功能。 请继续阅读,以了解这17.3英寸的笔记本如何与更紧凑的竞争对手抗衡。
Coffee Lake Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook
Asus ROG G703GXR (G703 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1575 MHz, RAM: 7000 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 419.71, Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666,双通道,四个插槽,最高64GB
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, Full HD, 144 Hz, G-sync, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM370
Storage
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB 
, 希捷ST1000LX015-1U7172, 1 TB SSHD, 5400 rpm; 两个空闲M.2-2280 插槽
Soundcard
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH - cAVS
Connections
4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机,麦克风接口, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 48 x 425 x 319
Battery
96 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: 4个扬声器+低音炮, Keyboard: Chiclet RGB, Keyboard Light: yes, 2x 280瓦电源, various manufacturer tools, McAfee LiveSafe(测试版),XSplit Gamecaster试用版, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
4.65 kg, Power Supply: 1.686 kg
Price
3900 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
85.8 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2020
Asus ROG G703GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
4.7 kg48 mm17.30"1920x1080
82.5 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2020
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
4.8 kg42 mm17.30"1920x1080
85.1 %
v7 (old)
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
3.3 kg27 mm17.30"1920x1080
86.1 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2019
MSI GE75 9SG
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
2.7 kg27.5 mm17.30"1920x1080

Size Comparison

425 mm 319 mm 48 mm 4.7 kg430 mm 299 mm 42 mm 4.8 kg405 mm 295 mm 27 mm 3.3 kg397 mm 268.5 mm 27.5 mm 2.7 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ROG G703GXR
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
194 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)
95.5 MB/s -51%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s -61%
MSI GE75 9SG
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.14 MB/s -86%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG G703GXR
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
246 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)
119.3 MB/s -52%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81 MB/s -67%
MSI GE75 9SG
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33.17 MB/s -87%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
749 MBit/s +11%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
729 MBit/s +8%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
680 MBit/s 0%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
677 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
692 MBit/s +2%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
676 MBit/s
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
675 MBit/s 0%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
661 MBit/s -2%
288
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
292
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
266
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
267
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 293 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 281.4 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 290 cd/m²
Contrast: 1450:1 (Black: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.77 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.46
ΔE Greyscale 5.83 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.47
Asus ROG G703GXR
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
AU Optronics B173HAN03.1 (AUO319D), IPS, 1920x1080
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
CMN175D, IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GE75 9SG
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, AHVA, 1920x1080
Asus ROG G703GX
AU Optronics B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, 1920x1080
Display
1%
2%
-2%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
63.2
64.4
2%
63.7
1%
61.5
-3%
64.1
1%
sRGB Coverage
92
92.1
0%
96
4%
92
0%
93.3
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
64.7
65.5
1%
65.8
2%
63.5
-2%
65.6
1%
Response Times
-77%
-82%
18%
6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
6.4 ?(3.4, 3)
16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4)
-163%
17.6 ?(8.4, 9.2)
-175%
7.2 ?(3.8, 3.4)
-13%
7.2 ?(3.8, 3.4)
-13%
Response Time Black / White *
12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2)
11.6 ?(6, 5.6)
9%
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
12%
6.6 ?(3.2, 3.4)
48%
9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2)
25%
PWM Frequency
25510 ?(44)
26040 ?(10)
Screen
-10%
21%
18%
-4%
Brightness middle
290
288
-1%
360
24%
400.7
38%
296
2%
Brightness
281
271
-4%
342
22%
372
32%
279
-1%
Brightness Distribution
91
85
-7%
91
0%
89
-2%
85
-7%
Black Level *
0.2
0.2
-0%
0.26
-30%
0.34
-70%
0.25
-25%
Contrast
1450
1440
-1%
1385
-4%
1179
-19%
1184
-18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.77
5.79
-21%
1.91
60%
1.33
72%
4.77
-0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.08
11.89
-31%
4.08
55%
3.51
61%
9.08
-0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.46
1.89
-29%
0.78
47%
1.39
5%
1.46
-0%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.83
6.92
-19%
2.72
53%
1.3
78%
5.83
-0%
Gamma
2.47 89%
2.46 89%
2.37 93%
2.24 98%
2.47 89%
CCT
8076 80%
8433 77%
6692 97%
6735 97%
8076 80%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
60
2%
60
2%
58.2
-1%
60
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92
92
0%
96
4%
92.1
0%
93
1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-29% / -16%
-20% / 5%
11% / 14%
1% / -2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.4 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
075150225300375450525600675750825900975105011251200127513501425Tooltip
Asus ROG G703GXR Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1251 (1244.71-1256.04)
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1224 (1159.08-1279)
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H: Ø1291 (1278.24-1450)
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)
722 Points +71%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
Intel Core i9-9880H
467 Points +10%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
Intel Core i7-9750H
449 Points +6%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
441 Points +4%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
423 Points
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)
8240 Points +165%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
3712 Points +19%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
3110 Points
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
Intel Core i9-9880H
2953 Points -5%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
Intel Core i7-9750H
2896 Points -7%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)
276 Points +61%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
Intel Core i9-9880H
197 Points +15%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points +11%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
Intel Core i7-9750H
185 Points +8%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
171 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)
3394 Points +170%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points +37%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
Intel Core i9-9880H
1450 Points +15%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
Intel Core i7-9750H
1279 Points +2%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
1256 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
171 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1256 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3110 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
423 Points
Help
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)
7774 Points +34%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
6558 Points +13%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1014 (RAID 0)
6453 Points +12%
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6306 Points +9%
Asus ROG G703GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5780 Points
Asus ROG G703GXR
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1014 (RAID 0)
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
MSI GE75 9SG
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
28%
24%
5%
Write 4K
99.3
115.3
16%
103.8
5%
116.1
17%
Read 4K
40.25
41.79
4%
41.67
4%
44.98
12%
Write Seq
2001
2841
42%
2639
32%
2370
18%
Read Seq
2107
2547
21%
2702
28%
1465
-30%
Write 4K Q32T1
348.3
498.6
43%
487.3
40%
337.5
-3%
Read 4K Q32T1
391.5
555
42%
555
42%
453.6
16%
Write Seq Q32T1
2003
3123
56%
2967
48%
2399
20%
Read Seq Q32T1
3482
3476
0%
3102
-11%
3087
-11%
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3482 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2003 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 391.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 348.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2107 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2001 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 40.25 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 99.3 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
24850 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
38299 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
20164 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
9526 points
Help
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)
31245 Points +21%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
27319 Points +6%
Asus ROG G703GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
25727 Points
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
24623 Points -4%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
22820 Points -11%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)
13034 Points +28%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
10607 Points +4%
Asus ROG G703GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
10181 Points
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
9754 Points -4%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
9480 Points -7%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (371 - 14592, n=114, last 2 years)
8661 Points +56%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
5860 Points +6%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
5582 Points +1%
Asus ROG G703GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
5543 Points
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
5538 Points 0%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)
43521 Points +22%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
37768 Points +6%
Asus ROG G703GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
35754 Points
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
34050 Points -5%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
31826 Points -11%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110Tooltip
Asus ROG G703GXR GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø98.7 (92-103)
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1014 (RAID 0): Ø106.6 (99-112)
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0): Ø94 (88-99)
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø89.4 (84-96)
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)
126.9 fps +31%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-9750H
105 (86min) fps +8%
Asus ROG G703GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-9750H
97.1 (80min) fps
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
95.3 fps -2%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
91.7 (76min) fps -6%
lowmed.highultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 165 97.1
Fortnite (2018) 148 133
Hitman 2 (2018) 76 73.1
Anthem (2019) 96.9 91
The Division 2 (2019) 116 92
Anno 1800 (2019) 70 40.8
Rage 2 (2019) 110 108
F1 2019 (2019) 83 80
Control (2019) 91.7
Borderlands 3 (2019) 91.8 79.4
FIFA 20 (2019) 202 201

Noise Level

Idle
33 / 34 / 35 dB(A)
Load
38 / 54 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Asus ROG G703GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
MSI GE75 9SG
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-7%
-4%
3%
11%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.2
6%
Idle Minimum *
33
30
9%
34
-3%
30.4
8%
Idle Average *
34
34
-0%
35
-3%
30.4
11%
Idle Maximum *
35
45
-29%
36
-3%
33.4
5%
Load Average *
38
40
-5%
51
-34%
37.1
2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50
57
-14%
47
6%
54.2
-8%
Load Maximum *
54
60
-11%
51
6%
56.4
-4%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 39 °C44 °C46 °C 
 38 °C40 °C37 °C 
 26 °C27 °C27 °C 
Maximum: 46 °C
Average: 36 °C
49 °C44 °C47 °C
43 °C40 °C46 °C
28 °C28 °C28 °C
Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 39.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  46 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.9 °C / 3.4 F).
Asus ROG G703GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
MSI GE75 9SG
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
4%
-2%
-17%
-1%
Maximum Upper Side *
46
37
20%
47
-2%
48.8
-6%
Maximum Bottom *
49
40
18%
54
-10%
52
-6%
Idle Upper Side *
31
34
-10%
32
-3%
36.2
-17%
Idle Bottom *
32
36
-13%
30
6%
44.4
-39%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.837.42541.542.83132.539.94031.839.1502838.16327.641.38034.645.510024.651.712525.960.316024.165.720021.463.625020.770.231519.97340018.777.350018.680.263018.180.880017.482.1100017.479.6125018.581.7160018.280.8200017.880.6250017.581.7315017.582.1400017.582.7500017.476.5630017.672.6800017.669.71000017.667.21250017.660.81600017.351.7SPL30.192.1N1.498median 17.8median 77.3Delta1.56.736.336.238.942.13231.829.529.828.730.127.532.626.731.925.636.324.248.328.257.624.654.823.560.92262.420.767.519.265.818.570.617.973.217.868.819.171.718.170.417.471.117.469.217.369.717.573.217.467.517.270.717.373.217.470.117.265.517.256.330.482.61.459median 17.9median 68.81.75.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG G703GXRAcer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG G703GXR audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 27 / 32 / 39 Watt
Load midlight 124 / 338 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ROG G703GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
MSI GE75 9SG
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
2%
11%
28%
33%
Idle Minimum *
27
28
-4%
26
4%
13.9
49%
Idle Average *
32
34
-6%
29
9%
18.8
41%
Idle Maximum *
39
45
-15%
38
3%
23.1
41%
Load Average *
124
98
21%
106
15%
112.3
9%
Witcher 3 ultra *
274
263
4%
228
17%
231
16%
Load Maximum *
338
307
9%
287
15%
291.5
14%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
8h 04min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 07min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 01min
Asus ROG G703GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 96 Wh
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 72 Wh
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 70 Wh
MSI GE75 9SG
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 65 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-36%
-31%
-20%
20%
Reader / Idle
484
213
-56%
250
-48%
WiFi v1.3
367
168
-54%
196
-47%
294
-20%
Load
61
63
3%
63
3%

Pros

+ G-Sync和NVIDIA Optimus可切换
+ 四个驱动器托架
+ 持续的高性能输出
+ 144 Hz刷新率的IPS面板观感也很不错
+ 优秀的输入设备
+ 高速读卡器
+ 许多接口
+ 强大的扬声器
+ 续航时间长

Cons

- 可维护选项少
-
- 需要两块电源
The ASUS ROG G703GXR laptop review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.
The ASUS ROG G703GXR laptop review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

华硕ROG G703GXR专为主要在家玩游戏的玩家而设计。

ROG G703GXR的尺寸和重量不适合随身携带和用作移动游戏笔记本电脑。 但是,如果您对庞大的机箱没有任何意见,那么ROG G703GXR将成为出色的游戏伴侣,并且没有重大缺陷。 例如,在我们看来,它的维护选项可以做得更好,但我们遇到的任何缺陷都很小。

华硕还为该设备配备了出色的输入设备和多种端口选择,包括Thunderbolt3。此外,ROG G703GXR还具有高对比度和反应灵敏的IPS显示屏。 在G-Sync(更好的图像质量)和Optimus(更好的续航时间)之间的选择也值得赞扬。 此外,我们希望笔记本电脑可以在负载下保持最高的CPU和GPU性能。华硕在功率,温度和体积之间也取得了不错的折衷。 总体而言,ROG G703GXR是一款出色的经典游戏笔记本电脑。

Asus ROG G703GXR - 05/14/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser

Chassis
78 / 98 → 79%
Keyboard
89%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
69 / 80 → 86%
Weight
42 / 10-66 → 57%
Battery
69 / 95 → 73%
Display
82%
Games Performance
97%
Application Performance
92%
Temperature
87 / 95 → 91%
Noise
71 / 90 → 79%
Audio
84%
Camera
48 / 85 → 56%
Average
76%
86%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

ASUS ROG G703GXR
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕ROG G703GXR笔记本电脑评测:高端老派游戏本
Florian Glaser, 2020-01- 5 (Update: 2020-01- 5)