华硕 ROG GX800 笔记本电脑简短评测
Asus GX800 Prototype (GX800 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-6820HK 4 x 2.7 - 3.6 GHz @ 4.4 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop) - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1328 MHz, RAM: 3700 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 362.34 (368.39 for Games)
Memory
64 GB
, 4x 16 GB DDR4-2400, 4/4插槽已占用, 双通道, 最大支持 64 GB
Display
18.40 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 120 PPI, Samsung 184HL (SDC4C48) , Super PLS, 全高清, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel CM236 (Skylake PCH-H)
Storage
3x Samsung SM951 512 GB NVMe M.2 (RAID 0), 1536 GB
Weight
5.69 kg, Power Supply: 2 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Asus GX700 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
| Asus GX800 Prototype | |
| MSI GT80S 6QF | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus GX700 | |
| Asus GX800 Prototype | |
| SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
| MSI GT80S 6QF | |
| Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus GX800 Prototype | |
| MSI GT80S 6QF | |
| Asus GX700 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 8047 points | |
Help | ||
| PCMark 7 - Score | |
| Asus GX800 Prototype | |
| Asus GX700 | |
| MSI GT80S 6QF | |
| SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
3x Samsung SM951 512 GB NVMe M.2 (RAID 0)
Sequential Read:
3041 MB/s
Sequential Write:
2646 MB/s
512K Read:
1803 MB/s
512K Write:
2438 MB/s
4K Read:
50.8 MB/s
4K Write:
142.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
879 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
761 MB/s
| Asus GX800 Prototype 3x Samsung SM951 512 GB NVMe M.2 (RAID 0) | MSI GT80S 6QF 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0) | Asus GX700 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0) | SCHENKER XMG U726 Samsung SM951 MZHPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -9% | -4% | -32% | |
| Seq Read | 2997 | 2892 -4% | 2964 -1% | 1943 -35% |
| Seq Write | 2371 | 2408 2% | 2525 6% | 1500 -37% |
| 4K Read | 47.23 | 44.96 -5% | 46.43 -2% | 40.45 -14% |
| 4K Write | 127.1 | 109.9 -14% | 119.6 -6% | 103.6 -18% |
| Score Total | 4312 | 3336 -23% | 3655 -15% | 1930 -55% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 22627 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 197819 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 35100 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 19513 points | |
Help | ||
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Score | |
| Asus GX800 Prototype | |
| MSI GT80S 6QF | |
| Asus GX700 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Asus GX800 Prototype | |
| MSI GT80S 6QF | |
| Asus GX700 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
Mirror's Edge Catalyst | Overwatch | Doom | Need for Speed 2016 | Hitman 2016 | The Division | Far Cry Primal | XCOM 2 | Rise of the Tomb Raider
| Mirror's Edge Catalyst | |
| 3840x2160 High Preset AF:16x | |
| Asus GX800 Prototype | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition | |
| Asus GX800 Prototype | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AF:16x | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition | |
| Asus GX800 Prototype | |
| Asus GX800 Prototype | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 107.3 | 95 | 94.7 | 94.4 | 60.9 |
| XCOM 2 (2016) | 129.6 | 109.5 | 108 | 59.9 | 39 |
| Far Cry Primal (2016) | 98 | 97 | 86 | 85 | 56 |
| The Division (2016) | 226 | 189.9 | 126.5 | 100.6 | 55.1 |
| Hitman 2016 (2016) | 84.8 | 79.7 | 72 | 70.6 | 54.6 |
| Need for Speed 2016 (2016) | 133.4 | 122.4 | 121.4 | 93.1 | 75.1 |
| Doom (2016) | 192.7 | 189.8 | 168.7 | 160.3 | 70.3 |
| Overwatch (2016) | 299.9 | 299.8 | 299.8 | 297.4 | 143 |
| Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 197.4 | 145.4 | 124.4 | 119.3 | 48.3 |
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   2.8 / 5.2 Watt |
| Idle |  58 / 68 / 74 Watt |
| Load |
200 / 590 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus GX800 Prototype GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop), 6820HK | MSI GT80S 6QF GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop), 6820HK | Asus GX700 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK | SCHENKER XMG U726 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 22% | 34% | 36% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 58 | 44 24% | 40 31% | 36 38% |
| Idle Average * | 68 | 53 22% | 45 34% | 45 34% |
| Idle Maximum * | 74 | 62 16% | 51 31% | 53 28% |
| Load Average * | 200 | 163 18% | 149 25% | 139 30% |
| Load Maximum * | 590 | 411 30% | 313 47% | 306 48% |
* ... smaller is better
Pros
+ 机械键盘支持丰富的背光功能
+ 可选的处理器和显卡超频
+ 最终产品将会搭配4K屏幕和G-Sync
+ 众多的接口（如Thunderbolt）
+ 三块NVMe固态硬盘，RAID 0设置
+ 出色的性能
+ 舒适的触控版
+ 64 GB DDR4内存
+ 大胆的概念
+ 美观的设计
+ 强大的工具软件
Cons
- 常见的双显卡问题（依赖驱动，微卡帧……）
- 使用水冷系统共需要两个电源适配器
- 高功耗
- 不易于维护
- 沉重的机身
- 便携性有限
这台来自华硕的笔记本电脑中的外置水冷系统可能是近几年来最有创意的设计之一。GX700是一台独特的产品，而现在它的GX800也走上了舞台。
它最主要的亮点在于性能和功能。不仅是固态硬盘的数量和容量，同时还有显卡的数量。延续“二大于一”的理念，这台笔记本电脑现在搭配了两块来自Nvidia的高端显卡。得力于超频的帮助，它们可以在4K分辨率下为用户带来流畅的体验。
不过，它的SLI显卡系统大幅提高了机身重量和功耗。支持G-Sync和UHD屏幕、丰富的接口（USB 3.1 C型，Thunderbolt 3，HDMI 2.0等）也都是它的优势。
GX800是统一搭配双显卡的微星 GT80S（或更准确的说，它的后续机型）的直接竞争对手，搭配传统风冷系统的这台设备也有自己的优势和缺陷。
在我们拿到最终上市机型后肯定还会有一篇“真正”的评测文章发表。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Price comparison
