华硕 ROG Strix GL502VS 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
Brand: Asus

让游戏开始吧。华硕为我们送来了搭配Pascal架构GeForce GTX 1070极速显卡的最早15寸笔记本电脑之一。期待超高性能的用户应该不会失望。生产商注重于保持系统在其他方面的兼容和连贯性，这通常是个明智的选择。

Sven Kloevekorn (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 08/30/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

Test device courtesy of Asus Taiwan

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T (Strix GL502VS Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1443 MHz, RAM: 4000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 372.53, kein Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, DDR4, 2133 MHz, 双通道, 两个内存槽均已占用

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), IPS, 全高清，G-Sync, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)

Storage

SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, 256 GB

, m.2固态硬盘+ HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1000 GB @ 7200 rpm, 2,5寸传统硬盘

Soundcard

Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合音频接口, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 30 x 390 x 266

Battery

62 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4 芯

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 高清 (1280 x 720P @ 30fps)

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声 (3 W), Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 绑线带, ROG Gaming Center, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.6 kg, Power Supply: 570 g

Price

2000 EUR

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 DIN A4 ❌

Left side: AC power, Ethernet (fold-out), DisplayPort, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.0, USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C

Right side: Audio in/out, 2x USB 3.0, SD-card, Kensington

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21	140 MB/s +89%
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925	78 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO	76 MB/s +3%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T	74 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21	190 MB/s +126%
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925	88 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO	86 MB/s +2%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T	84 MB/s

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	648 MBit/s
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter	630 MBit/s -3%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter	559 MBit/s +19%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	468 MBit/s


290 cd/m²	291 cd/m²	277 cd/m²
310 cd/m²	315 cd/m²	296 cd/m²
279 cd/m²	282 cd/m²	269 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 315 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 289.9 cd/m² Minimum: 35 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 315 cd/m²
Contrast: 984:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.88 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.17 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
83% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.53

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), , 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 LG Philips LP156WF6-SPP1 (LGD04D5), , 1920x1080, 15.6"	SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		1%	-1%	1%	11%	0%
Display P3 Coverage	64.5	64.6 0%	63 -2%	65.1 1%	66.7 3%	63 -2%
sRGB Coverage	83.1	84.6 2%	82.2 -1%	83.7 1%	97.7 18%	84.3 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	60.8	61.8 2%	60.1 -1%	61.2 1%	68.4 13%	61.6 1%
Response Times		8%	-9%	-3%	-65%	3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	38 ?(16, 22)	34 ?(14, 20) 11%	43 ?(18, 25) -13%	37 ?(15, 22) 3%	56.4 ?(22.4, 34) -48%	32 ?(12.4, 19.6) 16%
Response Time Black / White *	23 ?(5, 18)	22 ?(5, 17) 4%	24 ?(4, 20) -4%	25 ?(5, 20) -9%	41.6 ?(6.8, 34.8) -81%	25.6 ?(5.2, 20.4) -11%
PWM Frequency					201.6 ?(99)
Screen		7%	-5%	4%	-9%	3%
Brightness middle	315	273 -13%	302 -4%	312 -1%	296.8 -6%	347.2 10%
Brightness	290	278 -4%	287 -1%	293 1%	282 -3%	327 13%
Brightness Distribution	85	88 4%	91 7%	87 2%	86 1%	88 4%
Black Level *	0.32	0.27 16%	0.36 -13%	0.32 -0%	0.347 -8%	0.348 -9%
Contrast	984	1011 3%	839 -15%	975 -1%	855 -13%	998 1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.88	3.67 25%	4.93 -1%	4.45 9%	5.24 -7%	4.53 7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.88	8.33 6%	12.34 -39%	8.5 4%	11.36 -28%	11.01 -24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.17	2.73 35%	3.47 17%	3.05 27%	6.76 -62%	2.84 32%
Gamma	2.53 ^87%	2.49 ^88%	2.16 ^102%	2.58 ^85%	2.24 ^98%	2.05 ^107%
CCT	6683 ^97%	7029 ^92%	6622 ^98%	6495 ^100%	8467 ^77%	6664 ^98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	55	55 0%	54 -2%	55 0%	62.8 14%	54.7 -1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	83	84 1%	82 -1%	84 1%	98.1 18%	84.1 1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		5% / 6%	-5% / -5%	1% / 3%	-21% / -13%	2% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16 ms rise
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO Intel Core i7-6820HK	150 Points +2%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	147 Points
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	145 Points -1%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	145 Points -1%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	143 Points -3%
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	142 Points -3%
CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO Intel Core i7-6820HK	707 Points +5%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	677 Points 0%
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	676 Points 0%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	676 Points
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	673 Points 0%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	670 Points -1%

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.56 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

7.3 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

676 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

147 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	4651 Points
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	4541 Points -2%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4413 Points -5%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	3700 Points -20%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	5011 Points
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	4924 Points -2%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4766 Points -5%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	4716 Points -6%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4651 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5011 points
Help

	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH	SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 Lite-On CV1-8B128	Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		39%	48%	223%	7%	26%
Read Seq	485.4	523 8%	510 5%	2249 363%	494.5 2%	496.8 2%
Write Seq	312.4	485.5 55%	455.3 46%	1331 326%	184.1 -41%	454.8 46%
Read 512	294.8	444.7 51%	415.9 41%	972 230%	318.6 8%	281.1 -5%
Write 512	287.8	471.2 64%	422.3 47%	732 154%	182.6 -37%	400 39%
Read 4k	21.44	21.86 2%	32.46 51%	54.6 155%	30.04 40%	26.43 23%
Write 4k	75.7	98.8 31%	92.5 22%	173 129%	77.2 2%	50.2 -34%
Read 4k QD32	149.4	350.3 134%	358.6 140%	687 360%	312.6 109%	347.8 133%
Write 4k QD32	256.3	162.2 -37%	329.1 28%	418.5 63%	182.1 -29%	263.1 3%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002

Sequential Read: 485.4 MB/s

Sequential Write: 312.4 MB/s

512K Read: 294.8 MB/s

512K Write: 287.8 MB/s

4K Read: 21.44 MB/s

4K Write: 75.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 149.4 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 256.3 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	22195 Points +1%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	22022 Points
SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, Intel Core i7-6820HK	12517 Points -43%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	12472 Points -43%
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	9845 Points -55%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	9824 Points -55%

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	17066 Points +3%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	16525 Points
SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, Intel Core i7-6820HK	9671 Points -41%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	9608 Points -42%
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7624 Points -54%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7321 Points -56%

3DMark 11 Performance		15822 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		22943 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		12909 points
Help

... in comparison

Rise of the Tomb Raider | Battlefield 4 | The Witcher 3 | Doom | Mirror's Edge Catalyst

Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	88.7 fps
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	84.6 fps -5%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	55 fps -38%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	42.8 fps -52%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	104 fps
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	102 fps -2%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	59.6 fps -43%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	48.5 fps -53%

Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	138 fps +4%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	132.7 fps

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	58 fps +5%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	55.2 fps
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	103 fps +1%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	102.4 fps

Doom
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	125.1 fps
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	117 fps -6%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	56 fps -55%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	130.1 fps
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	123 fps -5%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	57 fps -56%

Mirror's Edge Catalyst
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AF:16x
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	92.4 fps 0%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	92 fps
1920x1080 High Preset AF:16x
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	101 fps +1%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	99.6 fps

	med.	high	ultra
Battlefield 4 (2013)		192.2	132.7
The Witcher 3 (2015)	165.9	102.4	55.2
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)		104	88.7
Doom (2016)		130.1	125.1
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016)		99.6	92

Noise Level

Idle		32 / 33 / 34 dB(A)
Load		39 / 51 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


48 °C	46.3 °C	46.1 °C
35.9 °C	46.2 °C	40 °C
29.4 °C	30.6 °C	29 °C

Maximum: 48 °C
Average: 39.1 °C


46.1 °C	44.4 °C	46.8 °C
37.3 °C	39.3 °C	38.1 °C
32.2 °C	30.8 °C	26.7 °C

Maximum: 46.8 °C
Average: 38 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45.5 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.7 °C / -3.1 F).

Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
Power Consumption		-9%	19%	4%	25%	-4%
Idle Minimum *	20	20 -0%	12 40%	15 25%	11.1 44%	20.6 -3%
Idle Average *	24	26 -8%	16 33%	20 17%	14.1 41%	22.1 8%
Idle Maximum *	29	32 -10%	22 24%	27 7%	18.4 37%	22.5 22%
Load Average *	86	100 -16%	96 -12%	98 -14%	96.5 -12%	130.6 -52%
Load Maximum *	183	202 -10%	166 9%	210 -15%	159.5 13%	177.2 3%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.6 / 1.4 Watt
Idle	20 / 24 / 29 Watt
Load	86 / 183 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T 62 Wh	MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 75.24 Wh	Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 Wh	SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO 60 Wh	Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 64 Wh	Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 64 Wh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	196	246 26%	476 143%	267 36%	356 82%	187 -5%

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		4h 03min
WiFi Websurfing		3h 16min
Load (maximum brightness)		0h 58min

Pros

+ 完备现代的接口配备

+ 考虑到性能水平十分节能

+ 出色的可维护性

+ 优质美观的机身

+ 非常优秀的3D性能

+ 整体优秀的输入设备

+ 高对比度IPS屏幕

+ 不错的无线网络性能

+ 额外1 TB硬盘

+ 8 GB GDDR5显存

+ 32 GB DDR4内存

+ 相对轻盈

Cons

- 对于骨灰级玩家来说屏幕响应速度略慢

- 机身后部在压力下会有嘎吱声

- 触控版的滑动功能不够流畅

- 尽管售价很高但配件很少

- 相对一般的固态硬盘性能

- 仅两个内存槽

- 在最高负载下十分吵

In review: Asus ROG Strix GL502VS. Test model courtesy of Asus Taiwan.

华硕的最新机型ROG Strix GL502VS整体表现不俗。它的最大特点是英伟达GeForce GTX 1070带来的强大性能。不太在意风扇噪音的游戏玩家将会对这款设备十分满意。

我们已经在评测开头提到了它的一些缺点。它的机身略显脆弱，不过我们的测试机是第一批出场的机型，后续生产的设备有望得到加强。我们对它的触控版材质也有些不满，同时其他方面都很优秀的IPS屏幕在色域覆盖上略为不足。它的屏幕响应速度对于一些游戏玩家来说可能略慢。键盘按键的清晰度受到了设计的影响。它的32 GB DDR4内存罕见地安装于仅两个内存槽中，不过这并不会是太大的问题。作为15寸设备有如此强大的性能，较高的风扇噪音也是无可厚非，但是相比其他同类产品它的噪音还是显得有些过大了。

整体上它还是瑕不掩瑜：它相对轻盈的机身有着美观的设计，应该可以满足ROG爱好者的期待。华硕也应该为丰富而现代的接口配备得到我们的掌声。它的可维护性与升级空间更是无可挑剔。在性能上，它的表现和我们的预期相符，技术参数确实无误。优秀的整体印象加上优秀的键盘和令人满意的屏幕，让它成为我们愿意向用户推荐的一款设备，不过也请读者注意我们所提到的它的一些不足。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T - 08/21/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Chassis

80 / 98 → 82%

Keyboard

84%

Pointing Device

75%

Connectivity

64 / 81 → 79%

Weight

59 / 10-66 → 88%