华硕 ROG Strix GL502VS 笔记本电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 | |
SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 | |
SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T |
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 315 cd/m²
Contrast: 984:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.88 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.17 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
83% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.53
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), , 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 LG Philips LP156WF6-SPP1 (LGD04D5), , 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | -1% | 1% | 11% | 0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 64.5 | 64.6 0% | 63 -2% | 65.1 1% | 66.7 3% | 63 -2% |
sRGB Coverage | 83.1 | 84.6 2% | 82.2 -1% | 83.7 1% | 97.7 18% | 84.3 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 60.8 | 61.8 2% | 60.1 -1% | 61.2 1% | 68.4 13% | 61.6 1% |
Response Times | 8% | -9% | -3% | -65% | 3% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38 ? | 34 ? 11% | 43 ? -13% | 37 ? 3% | 56.4 ? -48% | 32 ? 16% |
Response Time Black / White * | 23 ? | 22 ? 4% | 24 ? -4% | 25 ? -9% | 41.6 ? -81% | 25.6 ? -11% |
PWM Frequency | 201.6 ? | |||||
Screen | 7% | -5% | 4% | -9% | 3% | |
Brightness middle | 315 | 273 -13% | 302 -4% | 312 -1% | 296.8 -6% | 347.2 10% |
Brightness | 290 | 278 -4% | 287 -1% | 293 1% | 282 -3% | 327 13% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 88 4% | 91 7% | 87 2% | 86 1% | 88 4% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.27 16% | 0.36 -13% | 0.32 -0% | 0.347 -8% | 0.348 -9% |
Contrast | 984 | 1011 3% | 839 -15% | 975 -1% | 855 -13% | 998 1% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.88 | 3.67 25% | 4.93 -1% | 4.45 9% | 5.24 -7% | 4.53 7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.88 | 8.33 6% | 12.34 -39% | 8.5 4% | 11.36 -28% | 11.01 -24% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.17 | 2.73 35% | 3.47 17% | 3.05 27% | 6.76 -62% | 2.84 32% |
Gamma | 2.53 87% | 2.49 88% | 2.16 102% | 2.58 85% | 2.24 98% | 2.05 107% |
CCT | 6683 97% | 7029 92% | 6622 98% | 6495 100% | 8467 77% | 6664 98% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 55 | 55 0% | 54 -2% | 55 0% | 62.8 14% | 54.7 -1% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 83 | 84 1% | 82 -1% | 84 1% | 98.1 18% | 84.1 1% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
6% | -5% /
-5% | 1% /
3% | -21% /
-13% | 2% /
3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise | |
↘ 22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 | |
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO | |
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4651 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5011 points | |
Help |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY | Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH | SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe | Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 Lite-On CV1-8B128 | Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 39% | 48% | 223% | 7% | 26% | |
Read Seq | 485.4 | 523 8% | 510 5% | 2249 363% | 494.5 2% | 496.8 2% |
Write Seq | 312.4 | 485.5 55% | 455.3 46% | 1331 326% | 184.1 -41% | 454.8 46% |
Read 512 | 294.8 | 444.7 51% | 415.9 41% | 972 230% | 318.6 8% | 281.1 -5% |
Write 512 | 287.8 | 471.2 64% | 422.3 47% | 732 154% | 182.6 -37% | 400 39% |
Read 4k | 21.44 | 21.86 2% | 32.46 51% | 54.6 155% | 30.04 40% | 26.43 23% |
Write 4k | 75.7 | 98.8 31% | 92.5 22% | 173 129% | 77.2 2% | 50.2 -34% |
Read 4k QD32 | 149.4 | 350.3 134% | 358.6 140% | 687 360% | 312.6 109% | 347.8 133% |
Write 4k QD32 | 256.3 | 162.2 -37% | 329.1 28% | 418.5 63% | 182.1 -29% | 263.1 3% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO | |
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 |
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO | |
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 15822 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22943 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 12909 points | |
Help |
Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 |
Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T |
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T |
Doom | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 |
Mirror's Edge Catalyst | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AF:16x | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
1920x1080 High Preset AF:16x | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 192.2 | 132.7 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 165.9 | 102.4 | 55.2 | |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 104 | 88.7 | ||
Doom (2016) | 130.1 | 125.1 | ||
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 99.6 | 92 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 32 / 33 / 34 dB(A) |
Load |
| 39 / 51 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.7 °C / -3.1 F).
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK | Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -9% | 19% | 4% | 25% | -4% | |
Idle Minimum * | 20 | 20 -0% | 12 40% | 15 25% | 11.1 44% | 20.6 -3% |
Idle Average * | 24 | 26 -8% | 16 33% | 20 17% | 14.1 41% | 22.1 8% |
Idle Maximum * | 29 | 32 -10% | 22 24% | 27 7% | 18.4 37% | 22.5 22% |
Load Average * | 86 | 100 -16% | 96 -12% | 98 -14% | 96.5 -12% | 130.6 -52% |
Load Maximum * | 183 | 202 -10% | 166 9% | 210 -15% | 159.5 13% | 177.2 3% |
* ... smaller is better
Off / Standby | 0.6 / 1.4 Watt |
Idle | 20 / 24 / 29 Watt |
Load |
86 / 183 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T 62 Wh | MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 75.24 Wh | Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 Wh | SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO 60 Wh | Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 64 Wh | Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 64 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | ||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 196 | 246 26% | 476 143% | 267 36% | 356 82% | 187 -5% |
Pros
Cons
华硕的最新机型ROG Strix GL502VS整体表现不俗。它的最大特点是英伟达GeForce GTX 1070带来的强大性能。不太在意风扇噪音的游戏玩家将会对这款设备十分满意。
我们已经在评测开头提到了它的一些缺点。它的机身略显脆弱,不过我们的测试机是第一批出场的机型,后续生产的设备有望得到加强。我们对它的触控版材质也有些不满,同时其他方面都很优秀的IPS屏幕在色域覆盖上略为不足。它的屏幕响应速度对于一些游戏玩家来说可能略慢。键盘按键的清晰度受到了设计的影响。它的32 GB DDR4内存罕见地安装于仅两个内存槽中,不过这并不会是太大的问题。作为15寸设备有如此强大的性能,较高的风扇噪音也是无可厚非,但是相比其他同类产品它的噪音还是显得有些过大了。
整体上它还是瑕不掩瑜:它相对轻盈的机身有着美观的设计,应该可以满足ROG爱好者的期待。华硕也应该为丰富而现代的接口配备得到我们的掌声。它的可维护性与升级空间更是无可挑剔。在性能上,它的表现和我们的预期相符,技术参数确实无误。优秀的整体印象加上优秀的键盘和令人满意的屏幕,让它成为我们愿意向用户推荐的一款设备,不过也请读者注意我们所提到的它的一些不足。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
-
08/21/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn