华硕ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW (i9-9880H, RTX 2070) 笔记本电脑评测

Name: Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Brand: Asus

RGB的灵感。

华硕ROG Strix Scar III不仅专注于RGB，制造商还提供一个很好用的安全功能，称为Keystone，以及大量强大的硬件。 G531GW看起来非常强劲，但是可以满足期望吗？

Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 12/14/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Strix Scar III G531GW (G531 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i9-9880H 8 x 2.3 - 4.8 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1215 MHz, RAM: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, TU106, FoceWare 419.71, Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, DDR4-2666,双通道

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, Full-HD, 240 Hz, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel HM370

Storage

Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, 1024 GB

, PCIe. 1 x M.2 2280 slot, 1 x 2.5-inch drive bay, 890 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC294 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm二合一接口

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 25 x 360 x 275

Battery

66 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 4 cells

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Additional features

Speakers: 两个3.5瓦扬声器, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, Keystone chip with carry strap, McAfee Security, various manufacturer tools, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.324 kg, Power Supply: 844 g

Price

2600 EUR

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

MSI GE75 Raider 8SF-033XES SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Aorus 15 X9 Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 DIN A4 ❌

Rear: Gigabit LAN, HDMI, 1 x USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C, power connector

Left-hand side: 3 x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A, combined headphone and microphone jack

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI GE75 8SF Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	686 MBit/s +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	680 MBit/s +1%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Intel Wireless-AC 9560	675 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	674 MBit/s 0%
Aorus 15 X9 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	622 MBit/s -8%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Intel Wireless-AC 9560	680 MBit/s
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	678 MBit/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	663 MBit/s -2%
MSI GE75 8SF Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	658 MBit/s -3%
Aorus 15 X9 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	645 MBit/s -5%


245 cd/m²	258 cd/m²	255 cd/m²
252 cd/m²	266 cd/m²	261 cd/m²
233 cd/m²	247 cd/m²	253 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 266 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 252.2 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Contrast: 985:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.81 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.03
ΔE Greyscale 2.44 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Aorus 15 X9 LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 BOEhydis NV173FHM-N44 (BOE07B6), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	MSI GE75 8SF Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display		-2%	-4%	-2%	-3%
Display P3 Coverage	66.2	64.9 -2%	63.5 -4%	65.2 -2%	63.1 -5%
sRGB Coverage	96.5	95.6 -1%	93.1 -4%	92.2 -4%	94.4 -2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	67.5	66.3 -2%	64.5 -4%	66.5 -1%	65.2 -3%
Response Times		1%	-8%	-37%	19%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	17.2 ?(9.2, 8)	15.2 ?(8.4, 6.8) 12%	16.4 ?(8.8, 7.6) 5%	18.8 ?(9.6, 9.2) -9%	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) 44%
Response Time Black / White *	11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4)	12.4 ?(7.6, 4.8) -11%	13.6 ?(8.4, 5.2) -21%	12 ?(6.8, 5.2) -7%	10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2) 7%
PWM Frequency	24040 ?(29)			971 ?(99) -96%	25770 ?(17) 7%
Screen		-14%	5%	-13%	14%
Brightness middle	266	305.1 15%	250 -6%	304 14%	370.4 39%
Brightness	252	295 17%	235 -7%	289 15%	348 38%
Brightness Distribution	88	78 -11%	85 -3%	90 2%	89 1%
Black Level *	0.27	0.33 -22%	0.29 -7%	0.26 4%	0.29 -7%
Contrast	985	925 -6%	862 -12%	1169 19%	1277 30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.81	2.58 -43%	1.46 19%	2.65 -46%	1.26 30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.23	4.32 -34%	2.47 24%	6.11 -89%	3.02 7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.03	1.33 -29%		1.5 -46%	1.21 -17%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.44	3.4 -39%	1.27 48%	2.75 -13%	1.4 43%
Gamma	2.42 ^91%	2.28 ^96%	2.4 ^92%	2.46 ^89%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	7005 ^93%	6374 ^102%	6749 ^96%	6763 ^96%	6747 ^96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	62	60.7 -2%	60 -3%	60 -3%	59.7 -4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	97	95.2 -2%	93 -4%	92 -5%	94.4 -3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-5% / -10%	-2% / 1%	-17% / -16%	10% / 12%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.8 ms rise
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9.2 ms rise
17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

24040 Hz

≤ 29 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 24040 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 29 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 24040 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H: Ø1267 (1239.62-1311.65)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø969 (904.79-1042.12)

MSI GE75 8SF Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø918 (910.89-1045.5)

MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H: Ø1439 (1417.84-1545.36)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)	278 Points +52%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 Intel Core i9-9880H	196 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H (181 - 198, n=11)	190.1 Points +4%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Intel Core i9-9880H	183 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Intel Core i7-8750H	174 Points -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H	166 Points -9%
MSI GE75 8SF Intel Core i7-8750H	166 Points -9%
Aorus 15 X9 Intel Core i7-8750H	166 Points -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)	3421 Points +144%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 Intel Core i9-9880H	1545 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H (1317 - 1721, n=11)	1506 Points +7%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Intel Core i9-9880H	1401 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H	1156 Points -17%
MSI GE75 8SF Intel Core i7-8750H	1066 Points -24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Intel Core i7-8750H	1042 Points -26%
Aorus 15 X9 Intel Core i7-8750H	1022 Points -27%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

183 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1401 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

129.2 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)	7791 Points +34%
Aorus 15 X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	5870 Points +1%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	5826 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	5411 Points -7%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8	5353 Points -8%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i9-9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)	5211 Points -11%
MSI GE75 8SF GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1	5138 Points -12%
Essentials
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years)	10841 Points +19%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	9146 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	8980 Points -2%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i9-9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)	8961 Points -2%
Aorus 15 X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	8943 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8	8600 Points -6%
MSI GE75 8SF GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1	8277 Points -10%
Productivity
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years)	9900 Points +23%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	8025 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8	7315 Points -9%
Aorus 15 X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	7299 Points -9%
MSI GE75 8SF GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1	7218 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	7113 Points -11%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i9-9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)	5986 Points -25%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years)	12077 Points +65%
Aorus 15 X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	8408 Points +15%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	7311 Points
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i9-9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)	7161 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	6734 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8	6618 Points -9%
MSI GE75 8SF GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1	6161 Points -16%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)	5223 Points +14%
Aorus 15 X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	4843 Points +6%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	4578 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8	4338 Points -5%
MSI GE75 8SF GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1	3662 Points -20%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i9-9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)	3505 Points -23%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)	6102 Points +3%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	5919 Points
Aorus 15 X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	5828 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8	5645 Points -5%
MSI GE75 8SF GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1	5338 Points -10%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i9-9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)	4482 Points -24%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4578 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5919 points
PCMark 10 Score		5826 points
Help

	Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	MSI GE75 8SF Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1	Aorus 15 X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		1%	-40%	21%	-9%
Write 4K	135	92.7 -31%	73.3 -46%	147.2 9%	97.1 -28%
Read 4K	54.9	41.4 -25%	33.35 -39%	63.7 16%	53.7 -2%
Write Seq	1649	1363 -17%	849 -49%	1573 -5%	1526 -7%
Read Seq	1449	1259 -13%	964 -33%	2602 80%	2020 39%
Write 4K Q32T1	508	289.7 -43%	236.2 -54%	531 5%	285.6 -44%
Read 4K Q32T1	559	337.5 -40%	384.7 -31%	598 7%	321.8 -42%
Write Seq Q32T1	1759	3332 89%	867 -51%	1592 -9%	1533 -13%
Read Seq Q32T1	1826	3477 90%	1586 -13%	2981 63%	2351 29%
AS SSD		109%	-14%	32%	31%
Seq Read	1574	2359 50%	949 -40%	1912 21%	2113 34%
Seq Write	1591	2469 55%	823 -48%	1553 -2%	1471 -8%
4K Read	26.79	53.5 100%	25.36 -5%	56.5 111%	55 105%
4K Write	105.1	117.6 12%	67.1 -36%	119.6 14%	107.1 2%
4K-64 Read	583	1579 171%	748 28%	869 49%	914 57%
4K-64 Write	603	2048 240%	650 8%	584 -3%	703 17%
Access Time Read *	0.128	0.048 62%	0.173 -35%	0.049 62%	0.114 11%
Access Time Write *	0.043	0.03 30%	0.059 -37%	0.031 28%	0.034 21%
Score Read	768	1869 143%	869 13%	1116 45%	1180 54%
Score Write	867	2413 178%	799 -8%	859 -1%	957 10%
Score Total	2033	5248 158%	2109 4%	2544 25%	2722 34%
Copy ISO MB/s			1121	1329	1864
Copy Program MB/s			532	404.3	362.6
Copy Game MB/s			380.5	1071	936
Total Average (Program / Settings)		55% / 64%	-27% / -25%	27% / 27%	11% / 14%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8

Sequential Read: 1326 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1519 MB/s

512K Read: 820 MB/s

512K Write: 1370 MB/s

4K Read: 29.57 MB/s

4K Write: 117.6 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 563 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 530 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=192, last 2 years)	31443 Points +73%
MSI GE75 8SF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	20236 Points +11%
Aorus 15 X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	20227 Points +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (18169 - 21138, n=19)	20123 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	19800 Points +9%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	18169 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	17598 Points -3%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	16100 Points -11%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=187, last 2 years)	13142 Points +88%
MSI GE75 8SF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	7789 Points +11%
Aorus 15 X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	7754 Points +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (7006 - 8028, n=18)	7651 Points +9%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	7006 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	6562 Points -6%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=181, last 2 years)	43915 Points +88%
Aorus 15 X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	26645 Points +14%
MSI GE75 8SF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	26097 Points +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (23335 - 27298, n=21)	25775 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	25248 Points +8%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	23335 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	22089 Points -5%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	20837 Points -11%

3DMark 11 Performance		19674 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		37721 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		16068 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		6909 points
Help

... in comparison

The Witcher 3 | BioShock Infinite | Dota 2 Reborn

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)	128.3 fps +91%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (64 - 82.1, n=21)	74.3 fps +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H	73 fps +9%
Aorus 15 X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H	71.8 fps +7%
MSI GE75 8SF GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H	70.9 fps +6%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H	67 (55^min) fps
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	58.3 (48^min) fps -13%

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H	167.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (136.9 - 187.8, n=9)	166.5 fps -1%
Aorus 15 X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H	154.3 fps -8%
MSI GE75 8SF GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H	136.9 fps -18%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	127.7 fps -24%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming (33.2 - 220, n=185, last 2 years)	150.6 fps +29%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H	117.1 (100.9^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (98.4 - 124, n=9)	115.9 fps -1%

Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8: Ø66.4 (62-71)

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	362.2	305.4	291.9	167.4
The Witcher 3 (2015)				67
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	137.4	126.5	122.1	117.1

Noise Level

Idle		30 / 37 / 39 dB(A)
Load		54 / 54 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


42 °C	42 °C	51 °C
37 °C	41 °C	50 °C
32 °C	32 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 39.8 °C


45 °C	47 °C	49 °C
42 °C	46 °C	43 °C
32 °C	33 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 40.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


29 °C	30 °C	29 °C
30 °C	30 °C	29 °C
29 °C	28 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 30 °C
Average: 28.9 °C


31 °C	32 °C	34 °C
31 °C	35 °C	31 °C
27 °C	28 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 35 °C
Average: 30.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 37 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


43 °C	44 °C	52 °C
38 °C	41 °C	50 °C
33 °C	32 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 52 °C
Average: 40.4 °C


46 °C	46 °C	49 °C
44 °C	44 °C	38 °C
31 °C	34 °C	28 °C

Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 40 °C

Power Supply (max.) 46 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus Strix Scar III G531GW audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus GL504GS audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	2.4 / 2.7 Watt
Idle	29 / 32 / 37 Watt
Load	157 / 217 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus Strix Scar III G531GW i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	MSI GE75 8SF i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	Aorus 15 X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		33%	21%	8%	38%	28%
Idle Minimum *	29	13 55%	16.4 43%	26 10%	16 45%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=152, last 2 years) 53%
Idle Average *	32	16 50%	21.9 32%	30.8 4%	18 44%	19 ?(8 - 55.6, n=152, last 2 years) 41%
Idle Maximum *	37	21 43%	25.4 31%	34.9 6%	23 38%	26.8 ?(9 - 101.1, n=152, last 2 years) 28%
Load Average *	157	96 39%	90.7 42%	90.7 42%	88 44%	106.9 ?(32.1 - 201, n=151, last 2 years) 32%
Witcher 3 ultra *	173	172 1%	203.3 -18%	175 -1%	120 31%
Load Maximum *	217	191 12%	222.9 -3%	241.2 -11%	167 23%	250 ?(64.5 - 418, n=152, last 2 years) -15%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		5h 28min
WiFi Websurfing		2h 57min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 21min

	Asus Strix Scar III G531GW i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 46.74 Wh	MSI GE75 8SF i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 65 Wh	Aorus 15 X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-3%	20%	-46%	99%	63%
Reader / Idle	328	315 -4%		105 -68%	549 67%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=67, last 2 years) 72%
WiFi v1.3	177	224 27%	212 20%	95 -46%	382 116%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=152, last 2 years) 112%
Load	81	55 -32%		61 -25%	174 115%	85.6 ?(41 - 173, n=117, last 2 years) 6%

Pros

+ 易于保养和维修

+ 不错的扬声器

+ 醒目的RGB照明

+ 触控板内集成的数字键盘

+ Keystone安全软件

Cons

- 风扇声音大

- 温度高

- 摄像头位置尴尬

- 没有雷电3接口

The ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW laptop review. Test device courtesy of ASUS Germany.

华硕ROG Strix SCAR III G531WG是一款强大的游戏笔记本电脑。毫不奇怪，现代的3A游戏可在其240 Hz全高清显示屏上流畅地运行，而其RTX 2070 GPU也具有强大的性能，可以在外接显示器上以4K分辨率运行游戏。笔记本同时也易于维修和维护，我们很喜欢Keystone安全产品。集成在触控板中的数字键盘也很漂亮，将ROG Strix与竞争对手区分开来。

华硕ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW是台强大的15.6英寸游戏笔记本电脑。但是，其过响的风扇和一般般的RTX 2070性能使其无法获得最高分。

令人失望的是，ROG Strix的性能不如基准测试和游戏测试中预期的那样。其他笔记本电脑通过类似的硬件获得了比我们的评测设备更高的性能。此外，华硕还为设备配备了声音很大的风扇，淹没了其令人印象深刻的扬声器。不幸的是，您只有在不玩游戏时才能去欣赏这扬声器。可惜的是，华硕还没有提供4K显示选项，但是ROG Strix已经足够强大，可以以该分辨率运行现代的3A游戏。总体而言，ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW可以满足很多要求，但也有一些重大缺陷而让它使人失望。

Asus Strix Scar III G531GW - 06/03/2019 v6 ^(old)
Mike Wobker

Chassis

87 / 98 → 89%

Keyboard

85%

Pointing Device

83%

Connectivity

59 / 81 → 73%

Weight

61 / 10-66 → 91%

Battery