华硕ROG Strix Scar 17 SE评测--配备RTX 3080 Ti的全功能游戏笔记本

Name: Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Brand: Asus

刹车后的英特尔HX。

通过2022年的新ROG Strix Scar 17 SE，华硕提供了一个高端游戏笔记本电脑，拥有目前市场上最好的硬件。除了GeForce RTX 3080 Ti之外，还包括酷睿i9-12950HX和快速的240-Hz显示屏。

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 11/21/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Alder Lake Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Windows

ROG Strix Scar SE是华硕的游戏旗舰，在2022年也是如此，它再次配备了目前市场上最快的组件。我们测试了G733CX顶级型号，配备了英特尔酷睿i9-12950HX，NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti，两个来自三星的2TB SSD，以及一个快速的QHD面板，刷新率为240-Hz。价格也很高端，因为我们的测试设备的建议零售价为3,999欧元（约4,129美元）。

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W (ROG Strix Scar 17 G733 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i9-12950HX 16 x 1.7 - 5 GHz, 115 W PL2 / Short Burst, 70 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-HX

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1590 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), 526.86, Optimus, MUX

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-4800, dual-channel, 2 slots, max. 64 GB

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM670 (Alder Lake-S PCH)

Storage

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, 2048 GB

, 2x 2TB RAID-0, 3640 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Alder Lake-S PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port

Networking

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 28.3 x 395 x 282

Battery

90 Wh, 5845 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Additional features

Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 330W PSU, switchable ROG face plates, Asus Keystone, ROG software, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.927 kg, Power Supply: 1.1 kg

Price

4000 Euro

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86.9 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.9 kg	28.3 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
88.9 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2022	Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	20 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
88.3 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2022	MSI Titan GT77 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3.3 kg	23 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
87.6 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2022	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	27 mm	17.00"	2560x1600
89.2 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2022	Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3.1 kg	20.9 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

外壳--游戏笔记本的设计引人注目，并具有广泛的照明效果

ROG Strix Scar 17显然是一款完全不掩饰其野心的游戏笔记本电脑。这款机箱在很大程度上与去年的G733QS相同。去年的G733QS而基本单元的一个部分又是透明的。此外，还有广泛的照明元素和一些额外的设计元素或噱头，如盖子上的特殊文字，只有当你用紫外线照射时才能看到。

塑料外壳的质量总体上是好的，尽管表面仍然容易留下指纹，例如在打开显示屏时，你可能会偶尔听到轻微的吱嘎声。厚厚的底座单元的稳定性还不错，但在键盘的中央区域，你仍然可以把底座单元压得很低。虽然相对较薄的显示屏盖子做得很好，但铰链仍然无法防止笔记本电脑移动后的一些轻微晃动，例如。

即使机箱的底盖可以被拆下，但你必须小心行事。由于照明装置集成在该部件中，你首先要断开两条小的扁平电缆，然后才能拆下盖子。由于可以接触到风扇、两个固态硬盘、两个内存模块和WLAN模块，所以维护选项很好。

尺寸比较

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 Alienware x17 R2 P48E MSI Titan GT77 12UHS SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE DIN A4 ❌

设备 - ROG Strix Scar 17，配备HDMI 2.1和Wi-Fi 6E

除了Thunderbolt连接外，G733CX还提供了一个HDMI 2.1端口，背面的USB端口也可用于在路上充电（最大100瓦）。大部分连接都在后面，你只能在左侧找到两个普通的USB-A端口和3.5毫米音频端口。右侧还提供了一个华硕键鼠的插槽，允许你存储系统设置和数据。

采用英特尔AX211的无线局域网性能非常好，我们也能够毫无困难地连接到华硕参考路由器的6GHz网络。还有一个2.5Gbit/s的以太网连接用于有线连接。ROG Strix Scar 17的用户必须没有网络摄像头，但如果有必要，制造商提供了一个相应的外部网络摄像头（ROG Eye S）。

背面。USB-C 4.0与Thunderbolt 4（40 Gbit/s，DisplayPort ALT模式），USB-C 3.2 Gen.2（10 Gbit/s，DisplayPort ALT模式，Power Delivery），HDMI 2.1，2.5 Gbit/s以太网，电源

左边：2个USB-A 3.2 Gen.1（5 Gbit/s），3.5毫米音频端口

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1732 (1685^min - 1744^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1723 (1681^min, 1688.83^P1 - 1736^max) MBit/s -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1680 (1438^min - 1732^max) MBit/s -3%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (700 - 1857, n=213)	1493 MBit/s -14%
Average of class Gaming (853 - 1788, n=68, last 2 years)	1488 MBit/s -14%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1655 (1613^min, 1615.32^P1 - 1702^max) MBit/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1645 (1589^min - 1741^max) MBit/s
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1488 (1300^min - 1531^max) MBit/s -10%
Average of class Gaming (648 - 1878, n=68, last 2 years)	1429 MBit/s -13%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (385 - 1851, n=214)	1368 MBit/s -17%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1691 (1589^min - 1731^max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=147, last 2 years)	1390 MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=242)	1382 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608	967 (949^min - 978^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1610 (1421^min - 1675^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (64 - 1921, n=242)	1231 MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=147, last 2 years)	1227 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608	936 (898^min - 971^max) MBit/s

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1645 (1589-1741)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1732 (1685-1744)

输入设备 - 带有良好键盘的华硕

华硕再次改变了键盘布局，现在采用了更传统的布局，特殊键更小。还有一个 "常规 "的数字块再次出现，这也意味着方向键稍微向左移动，现在更小。并非所有用户都会喜欢这样。然而，键盘的质量非常好，有2毫米长的轮毂，而且你可以疯狂地使用照明，它允许你单独配置每个键，包括通过AuraSync技术的游戏特定模式。大的ClickPad提供了良好的滑动特性，并且工作可靠，但当你按下它时，它也相当响。

显示屏 - QHD，240赫兹

除了我们在去年的Scar 17 G733QS中测试的360赫兹全高清面板外，还有去年的Scar 17 G733QS华硕还提供了一个刷新率为240赫兹的QHD面板，这就是我们测试单元中的面板。哑光IPS面板（2560 x 1440像素，16:9）的主观图像印象非常好，除了杜比视界HDR之外，还支持自适应同步。响应时间非常快，而且没有使用PWM。亮度平均约为300cd/m²，这也与360Hz的全高清面板的水平相同。另一方面，黑值有点高，也导致了1000:1左右的平庸的对比度。


302 cd/m²	303 cd/m²	279 cd/m²
311 cd/m²	320 cd/m²	296 cd/m²
303 cd/m²	317 cd/m²	294 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

NE173QHM-NZ2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 320 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 302.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 320 cd/m²
Contrast: 1067:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.13

	Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"	Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Sharp SHP1544 LQ173M1JW08, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.3"	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 BOE0A99, IPS, 2560x1600, 17"	Alienware x17 R2 P48E AU Optronics B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AU Optronics B173HAN05.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display		-16%	-14%	-16%	-8%	-14%
Display P3 Coverage	97.1	69.3 -29%	70.8 -27%	69 -29%	79.2 -18%	71 -27%
sRGB Coverage	99.9	98.2 -2%	98.9 -1%	99.8 0%	99.8 0%	99.4 -1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	84.8	70.8 -17%	73 -14%	69.6 -18%	79.6 -6%	72.2 -15%
Response Times		-38%	48%	-25%	-55%	-12%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	5.7 ?(2.7, 3)	12.6 ?(5.9, 6.7) -121%	3.03 ?(1.28, 1.75) 47%	10.8 ?(5.1, 5.7) -89%	12.4 ?(6.4, 6) -118%	6.6 ?(2.2, 4.4) -16%
Response Time Black / White *	10.1 ?(5, 5.1)	5.6 ?(1.5, 4.1) 45%	5.28 ?(2.32, 2.96) 48%	6.1 ?(2.5, 3.6) 40%	9.2 ?(5.2, 4) 9%	10.8 ?(5.2, 5.6) -7%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-41%	-63%	-9%	-89%	-25%
Brightness middle	320	547 71%	280 -12%	415 30%	365.4 14%	303.8 -5%
Brightness	303	523 73%	275 -9%	399 32%	344 14%	292 -4%
Brightness Distribution	87	88 1%	79 -9%	90 3%	85 -2%	85 -2%
Black Level *	0.3	0.44 -47%	0.4 -33%	0.43 -43%	0.29 3%	0.23 23%
Contrast	1067	1243 16%	700 -34%	965 -10%	1260 18%	1321 24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.1	2.1 -91%	2.1 -91%	1.44 -31%	3.17 -188%	1.87 -70%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.7	7 -159%	5.83 -116%	2.33 14%	7.69 -185%	3.26 -21%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.1	3.2 -191%	3.3 -200%	1.8 -64%	5.3 -382%	2.7 -145%
Gamma	2.13 ^103%	2.23 ^99%	2.13 ^103%	2.132 ^103%	2.18 ^101%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	6599 ^98%	6979 ^93%	7060 ^92%	6327 ^103%	5879 ^111%	6436 ^101%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *		0.9	1.58	0.89	0.51	1.45
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)						65.6
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)						99.4
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-32% / -35%	-10% / -35%	-17% / -13%	-51% / -65%	-17% / -20%

* ... smaller is better

该显示器涵盖了P3色彩空间，我们用专业的CalMAN软件进行的分析表明，该屏幕在交付状态下已经非常准确。也没有色差，我们自己的校准也没有导致任何额外的改进，所以我们在这里不为你提供一个配置文件。这款QHD面板适用于图像和视频处理，没有任何限制。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
10.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.7 ms rise
5.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

性能 - 刹车后的英特尔HX

测试条件

ROG软件提供广泛的配置选项和电源配置文件。例如，你可以完全停用集成GPU（MUX）或手动设置CPU和GPU的功率值。对于我们下面的基准和测量，我们使用性能配置文件，因为这已经使全部GPU性能可用。虽然在Turbo模式下，CPU的性能甚至略高，但在我们看来，这并不能证明风扇噪音的显著提高。

处理器 - 酷睿i9-12950HX

芯片英特尔酷睿i9-12950HX是目前英特尔最快的移动处理器。尽管它能够消耗高达175瓦的功率，但在我们的测试装置中，它远远没有达到这个数值。相反，我们看到最大消耗为115瓦（即使是在涡轮模式下），在某些时候，该值达到了70瓦（涡轮模式下为105瓦）。虽然CPU的性能一点也不差，但你也可以用普通的酷睿i9获得这样的性能，而HX芯片的额外溢价并不值得额外花费。

在电池运行时，功耗被限制在35瓦，导致多核性能降低约40%。你可以在我们相应的技术部分找到更多的CPU基准测试我们相应的技术部分.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX: Ø2740 (2605.18-3101.02)

Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø3279 (3244.91-3512.16)

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø3311 (3259.45-3569.52)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2230 (2203.37-2292.39)

Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2889 (2849.61-2917.79)

Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2216 (2202.89-2222.96)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	84.3 pt
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	84 pt
Average of class Gaming	79.8 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	78.4 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX	76.8 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	74.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	59.2 pt
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	57.3 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	22982 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	22449 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)	21994 Points +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	19965 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (16277 - 23113, n=7)	19930 Points 0%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	18870 (18654.1^min - 18869.7^max) Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	14152 Points -29%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	13618 (13498.1^min - 13618.3^max) Points -32%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	1935 Points +2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	1913 Points +1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	1905 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	1903 Points
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years)	1894 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (1465 - 1922, n=7)	1835 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1557 Points -18%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1497 Points -21%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	8667 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	8522 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)	8352 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (6625 - 8777, n=7)	7689 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	7511 Points
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	7169 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5549 Points -26%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	5277 Points -30%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	743 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	741 Points
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	738 Points 0%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	727 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (703 - 741, n=7)	727 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)	727 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	605 Points -18%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	572 Points -23%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	3570 (3259.45^min - 3569.52^max) Points +15%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	3512 (3244.91^min - 3512.16^max) Points +13%
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)	3440 Points +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	3101 (2605.18^min - 3101.02^max) Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (2464 - 3530, n=7)	3090 Points 0%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	2918 (2849.61^min - 2917.79^max) Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2296 Points -26%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	2223 (2202.89^min - 2222.96^max) Points -28%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	280 Points +2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	278 Points +1%
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)	278 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	274 Points
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	272 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (167 - 276, n=7)	257 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	248 Points -9%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	240 Points -12%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	230 Seconds * -31%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	216 Seconds * -23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	175 Seconds *
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	173.6 Seconds * +1%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (138 - 193, n=7)	171.4 Seconds * +2%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)	169.4 Seconds * +3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	149 Seconds * +15%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	147 Seconds * +16%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	86384 MIPS +12%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	86234 MIPS +12%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)	85738 MIPS +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (65637 - 85019, n=7)	77515 MIPS +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	77003 MIPS
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	69146 MIPS -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	64439 MIPS -16%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	62023 MIPS -19%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	6358 MIPS +2%
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)	6322 MIPS +1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	6256 MIPS 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	6255 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (6022 - 6318, n=7)	6174 MIPS -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5872 MIPS -6%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	5803 MIPS -7%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	5747 MIPS -8%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	16447 Points +9%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	16250 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	15144 Points
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)	15098 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (14028 - 16009, n=7)	15046 Points -1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	13717 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	10126 Points -33%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	8732 Points -42%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	1923 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)	1898 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (1847 - 1945, n=7)	1891 Points +1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	1878 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	1874 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	1868 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1590 Points -15%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1539 Points -18%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	25.6 fps +14%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	25.4 fps +13%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)	23.6 fps +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	22.5 fps
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (18.6 - 26.5, n=7)	22.3 fps -1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	21.4 fps -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	17.5 fps -22%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	16.9 fps -25%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	56 s * -61%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years)	48.1 s * -39%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	45.9 s * -32%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	40.7 s * -17%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (34.7 - 45.4, n=7)	40.2 s * -16%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	39 s * -12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	34.7 s *
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	34.5 s * +1%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	0.4964 sec * -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	0.4808 sec * -13%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (0.4251 - 0.4515, n=7)	0.4374 sec * -3%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)	0.4366 sec * -3%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	0.4323 sec * -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX	0.4251 sec *
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	0.4209 sec * +1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	0.4194 sec * +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

3101 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

257 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

274 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

7511 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

741 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1903 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

19965 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	97.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	95 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	85.8 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX	83.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	79.5 pt
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	77.9 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	75 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	65 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years)	21963 KRay/s +25%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	21797 KRay/s +24%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (15499 - 22868, n=7)	17911 KRay/s +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	17542 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	16115 KRay/s -8%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	16014 KRay/s -9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	11535 KRay/s -34%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	9759 KRay/s -44%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	107354 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years)	106952 Points +23%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	100718 Points +16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	98800 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (77846 - 115907, n=7)	92341 Points +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	86936 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	52916 Points -39%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	43695 Points -50%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	4945 MB/s +18%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years)	4920 MB/s +18%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	4216 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	4179 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (3426 - 5069, n=7)	4106 MB/s -2%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3504 MB/s -16%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	3439 MB/s -18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3422 MB/s -18%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years)	117347 Points +12%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	107120 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	104422 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (102752 - 104726, n=7)	103895 Points -1%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	103894 Points -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	103770 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	102167 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	101029 Points -3%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years)	13290 Points +16%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	13062 Points +14%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	12969 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	12783 Points +11%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	12726 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (10134 - 12823, n=7)	11619 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	11502 Points
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	10402 Points -10%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	55679 Points +31%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	54060 Points +27%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years)	53819 Points +26%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	52544 Points +23%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (37146 - 57340, n=7)	44595 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	42613 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	31779 Points -25%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	27285 Points -36%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	179186 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	167077 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	135833 MB/s -19%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	134473 MB/s -20%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	125268 MB/s -25%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (72599 - 181128, n=7)	119390 MB/s -29%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years)	109208 MB/s -35%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	106367 MB/s -36%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	1392 MB/s +16%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	1389 MB/s +15%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years)	1369 MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	1205 MB/s
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	1203 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (996 - 1417, n=7)	1195 MB/s -1%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	875 MB/s -27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	845 MB/s -30%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years)	11830 KRay/s +24%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	11612 KRay/s +22%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (8455 - 12432, n=7)	9620 KRay/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	9507 KRay/s
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	8630 KRay/s -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	8529 KRay/s -10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	6663 KRay/s -30%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	5748 KRay/s -40%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	42438 MPixel/s
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	41007 MPixel/s -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (35479 - 42655, n=7)	40844 MPixel/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years)	40303 MPixel/s -5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	40239 MPixel/s -5%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	34534 MPixel/s -19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	30226 MPixel/s -29%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	20034 MPixel/s -53%

系统性能

主观性能印象很好，这也被良好的基准测试结果所证实。在测试过程中，我们完全没有注意到任何问题。

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	8636 Points +20%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8203 Points +14%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	8186 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years)	7813 Points +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7208 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU ()	7208 Points 0%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	7184 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6966 Points -3%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	11205 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	11190 Points +9%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11093 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years)	10836 Points +5%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	10593 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10306 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU ()	10306 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9740 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10932 Points +11%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10178 Points +3%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	10144 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years)	9909 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9856 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU ()	9856 Points 0%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	9573 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9564 Points -3%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	14291 Points +43%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	13270 Points +33%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	13098 Points +31%
Average of class Gaming (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years)	12168 Points +22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10003 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU ()	10003 Points 0%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	9923 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9848 Points -2%

CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2132 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2112 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU ()	2112 Points 0%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2108 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=144, last 2 years)	1910 Points -10%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1903 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1699 Points -20%

CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2012 Points +2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1978 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1966 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU ()	1966 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=144, last 2 years)	1809 Points -8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1808 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1646 Points -16%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2336 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU ()	2336 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2307 Points -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2288 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=144, last 2 years)	2099 Points -10%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	2095 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1867 Points -20%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2007 Points +4%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1991 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1936 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU ()	1936 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=144, last 2 years)	1707 Points -12%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1666 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1405 Points -27%

PCMark 10 Score		7208 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years)	65546 MB/s +3%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	64030 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	63993 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	63831 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (59731 - 64732, n=7)	63039 MB/s -1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	53861 MB/s -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	50231 MB/s -21%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	42260 MB/s -34%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	69716 MB/s +1%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years)	69486 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	69256 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (59744 - 70359, n=7)	66028 MB/s -5%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	62140 MB/s -10%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	57237 MB/s -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	51403 MB/s -26%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	47331 MB/s -32%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years)	67309 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	65800 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	63527 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (57750 - 67899, n=7)	63186 MB/s -4%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	60014 MB/s -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	55263 MB/s -16%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	54443 MB/s -17%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	45155 MB/s -31%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	98.4 ns * -15%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years)	93.8 ns * -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	90.8 ns * -7%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	88.8 ns * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (84.5 - 92.2, n=7)	87.9 ns * -3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	86 ns * -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	85.2 ns *
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	76.5 ns * +10%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试中（上网，4K YouTube视频，CPU负载），我们的测试装置与其BIOS版本有一些问题，所以它不适合实时视频和音频处理。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4362 μs * -28%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3413 μs *
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2203.2 μs * +35%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	638.25 μs * +81%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1155.7 μs * +66%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1101.9 μs * +68%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	611 μs * +82%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

华硕在这里使用了两个来自三星的快速2TB固态硬盘（PM91A）的RAID 0配置。这允许超过10GB/s的极高传输率。然而，在恒定的负载下，性能并不稳定，反而大量下降。但这在日常游戏中不应该造成任何限制。你可以找到更多的SSD基准测试这里.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 5370.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 10109.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 1005.85 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 767.97 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 80.63 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 229.37 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1886.09 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2061.23 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	81.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	76.3 pt
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	72.6 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	70.7 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	67 pt
Average of class Gaming	59.6 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	57.8 pt
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	50.3 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5568 (5541.55^min - 5568.34^max) MB/s
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	4931 (4875.77^min - 4930.83^max) MB/s -11%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4343 MB/s -22%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (2376 - 5676, n=32)	3898 MB/s -30%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3872 (3855.82^min - 3871.97^max) MB/s -30%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3561 (3468.06^min - 3560.96^max) MB/s -36%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)	3477 MB/s -38%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	2931 (2925.53^min - 2931.41^max) MB/s -47%
seq write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7531 (7479^min - 7530.7^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4954 (4429.55^min - 4954.26^max) MB/s -34%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	4819 (4728.89^min - 4819.25^max) MB/s -36%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4242 (4225.7^min - 4241.7^max) MB/s -44%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (2370 - 7628, n=32)	4122 MB/s -45%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3966 (3885.39^min - 3966.13^max) MB/s -47%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)	3818 MB/s -49%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	3530 (3445.02^min - 3530^max) MB/s -53%
seq q8 t1 read
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	13195 (9412.86^min - 13194.8^max) MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	12556 (4870.54^min - 12556.3^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (3471 - 12556, n=32)	7102 MB/s -43%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6722 (987.46^min - 6721.79^max) MB/s -46%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6693 (6460.49^min - 6692.89^max) MB/s -47%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6384 (5573.36^min - 6384.17^max) MB/s -49%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)	6318 MB/s -50%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	5541 (2954.89^min - 5540.89^max) MB/s -56%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10261 (10045.2^min - 10261.4^max) MB/s
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	8227 (8104.29^min - 8226.71^max) MB/s -20%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	5907 (5803.79^min - 5907.4^max) MB/s -42%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (3537 - 10261, n=32)	5469 MB/s -47%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5043 (5032.12^min - 5043.21^max) MB/s -51%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5037 (5025^min - 5036.73^max) MB/s -51%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4985 (4772.28^min - 4984.61^max) MB/s -51%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)	4859 MB/s -53%
4k q1 t1 read
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	79.3 (77.82^min - 79.25^max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	79.1 (78.08^min - 79.08^max) MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	79 (77.42^min - 79.03^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (56.2 - 91.2, n=32)	77.5 MB/s -2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	77 (74.91^min - 76.95^max) MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	74.1 (72.94^min - 74.14^max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)	65.9 MB/s -17%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	49.6 (49.23^min - 49.56^max) MB/s -37%
4k q1 t1 write
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	258 (233.29^min - 257.8^max) MB/s +17%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	244 (215.8^min - 243.91^max) MB/s +10%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	241 MB/s +9%
Average of class Gaming (78 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)	223 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	221 (218.91^min - 220.66^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (115.5 - 295, n=32)	214 MB/s -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	195.1 (194.02^min - 195.09^max) MB/s -12%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	170.2 (168.21^min - 170.2^max) MB/s -23%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4483 (4465.42^min - 4482.78^max) MB/s +109%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3797 (3780.09^min - 3796.62^max) MB/s +77%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (658 - 4075, n=32)	2876 MB/s +34%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2842 (2837.59^min - 2841.89^max) MB/s +32%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)	2565 MB/s +19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2148 (1952.04^min - 2148.3^max) MB/s
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	971 (953.87^min - 970.88^max) MB/s -55%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	874 (867.39^min - 873.79^max) MB/s -59%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4383 (4358.15^min - 4383.06^max) MB/s +109%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3504 (3465.89^min - 3503.69^max) MB/s +67%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2658 (2651.88^min - 2657.7^max) MB/s +27%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (387 - 3548, n=32)	2190 MB/s +4%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)	2128 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2101 (1969.73^min - 2101.4^max) MB/s
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	626 (612.08^min - 626.28^max) MB/s -70%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	461 (442.02^min - 461.29^max) MB/s -78%

AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9218 Points +23%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8492 Points +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7498 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7400 Points -1%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (3537 - 9031, n=31)	7222 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=155, last 2 years)	6733 Points -10%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	4941 Points -34%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	4428 Points -41%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3428 Points +14%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3327 Points +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3012 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2855 Points -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (1224 - 3399, n=31)	2666 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=155, last 2 years)	2440 Points -19%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1948 Points -35%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	1760 Points -42%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4113 Points +37%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3531 Points +17%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (1081 - 3999, n=31)	3262 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3128 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=155, last 2 years)	3109 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3013 Points
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	2137 Points -29%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	1857 Points -38%
Seq Read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9971 MB/s
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	6561.69 MB/s -34%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (2591 - 9971, n=31)	5479 MB/s -45%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	5232 MB/s -48%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5157 MB/s -48%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5061.06 MB/s -49%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	4981 MB/s -50%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=155, last 2 years)	4948 MB/s -50%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8590 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4336 MB/s -50%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (1900 - 8590, n=31)	3992 MB/s -54%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3764.99 MB/s -56%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=155, last 2 years)	3759 MB/s -56%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3733 MB/s -57%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	3480.87 MB/s -59%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	3050 MB/s -64%
4K Read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	72.43 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (49.8 - 86.4, n=31)	72.4 MB/s 0%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	69.89 MB/s -4%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	69.21 MB/s -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	68.93 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	67.72 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=155, last 2 years)	65 MB/s -10%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	57 MB/s -21%
4K Write
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	261.3 MB/s +28%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=155, last 2 years)	212 MB/s +4%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	211.73 MB/s +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	204.33 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	203.82 MB/s 0%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (112.6 - 254, n=31)	197.6 MB/s -3%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	184.49 MB/s -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	157.01 MB/s -23%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2842.96 MB/s +46%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2751.05 MB/s +42%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2264.38 MB/s +17%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (662 - 2811, n=31)	2045 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1942.29 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=155, last 2 years)	1874 MB/s -4%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1223.07 MB/s -37%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	1205 MB/s -38%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3582.58 MB/s +84%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2942.87 MB/s +51%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (567 - 3414, n=31)	2665 MB/s +37%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=155, last 2 years)	2524 MB/s +29%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2490.61 MB/s +28%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1949.41 MB/s
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1604.89 MB/s -18%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	1290 MB/s -34%
Access Time Read
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=154, last 2 years)	0.05551 ms * -152%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.049 ms * -123%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (0.018 - 0.078, n=31)	0.03406 ms * -55%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.034 ms * -55%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	0.032 ms * -45%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	0.03 ms * -36%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.027 ms * -23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.022 ms *
Access Time Write
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	0.066 ms * -187%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=155, last 2 years)	0.04751 ms * -107%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	0.044 ms * -91%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (0.017 - 0.092, n=31)	0.03371 ms * -47%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.025 ms * -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.023 ms *
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.021 ms * +9%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.02 ms * +13%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W: Ø1479 (639.61-10176.63)

图形卡

华硕使用GeForce RTX 3080 Ti版本，其TGP为150瓦，而且GPU还能使用处理器的额外25瓦动态提升。它在性能模式下也能达到这个数值（175瓦），所以没有必要使用涡轮模式。还有一个MUX，允许你完全停用集成GPU（需要重新启动），这可以改善游戏时的延迟，但对图形性能本身没有太大影响。

图形性能属于顶级性能组，也高于我们数据库中RTX 3080 Ti的平均数值。此外，图形性能保持完全稳定。3DMarkTime Spy 压力测试顺利通过，在我们的TheWitcher 3 恒定负载测试中也没有性能下降。游戏性能很容易满足原生QHD分辨率下的最大细节，即使在要求很高的游戏中也是如此。

在电池操作中，允许GPU最大消耗44瓦，这相当于性能下降了约70%。你可以在这里找到额外的GPU基准测试移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Alienware x17 R2 P48E ^-4! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	97.6 pt
Average of class Gaming	94.8 pt
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS ^-2! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	93.9 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	90.3 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE ^-2! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	90 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	90 pt
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 ^-3! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	84.5 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	84 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	44906 Points +2%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	44381 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	44134 Points
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)	43891 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	43823 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	43337 Points -2%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	40704 Points -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (13920 - 45841, n=45)	39402 Points -11%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	34439 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	33120 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	33025 Points +2%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	32849 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	32505 Points
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years)	31461 Points -3%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	29508 Points -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (6928 - 34439, n=43)	29496 Points -9%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	13554 Points +6%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	13455 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=188, last 2 years)	13142 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	12791 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	12684 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	12325 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (4921 - 13835, n=43)	11850 Points -7%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	11598 Points -9%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	28879 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	27878 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	27501 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	26982 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (20846 - 28879, n=9)	26251 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (4663 - 44948, n=20, last 2 years)	25566 Points -5%

V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=114, last 2 years)	1580 mpaths +19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1384 mpaths +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	1333 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (846 - 1384, n=20)	1273 mpaths -5%
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=112, last 2 years)	2199 mpaths +16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	1893 mpaths
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1880 mpaths -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1225 - 1915, n=19)	1745 mpaths -8%

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 - GPU
Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=150, last 2 years)	715 mpaths +39%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	526 mpaths +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	513 mpaths
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	511 mpaths 0%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	502 mpaths -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (311 - 552, n=35)	500 mpaths -3%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	499 mpaths -3%

Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	151633 Points
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	147189 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	138625 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	138534 Points -9%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	137987 Points -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (88580 - 151633, n=41)	136691 Points -10%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	136135 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 237138, n=188, last 2 years)	127665 Points -16%

3DMark 11 Performance		35997 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		28793 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		12904 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom CPU

Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (20 - 28, n=13)	23.1 Seconds * -0%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	23 Seconds * -0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	23 Seconds *
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	22 Seconds * +4%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=178, last 2 years)	20.8 Seconds * +10%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=184, last 2 years)	36.9 Seconds * -9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	36 Seconds * -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (32 - 41, n=13)	35 Seconds * -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	34 Seconds *
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	32 Seconds * +6%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX	301 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (261 - 429, n=13)	295 Seconds * +2%
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=187, last 2 years)	293 Seconds * +3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	268 Seconds * +11%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	263 Seconds * +13%

* ... smaller is better

The Witcher 3 | Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | GTA V | F1 22 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	129.3 (110^min, 111.14^P1) fps +9%
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years)	128.5 fps +8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	128 (124^min) fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	121 (98^min) fps +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	118.8 (111^min, 113^P1) fps
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	114.4 (108^min, 109^P1) fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 130.6, n=43)	112.1 fps -6%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	105.5 (91^min) fps -11%

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	115.7 (46.4^min) fps +33%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	99.4 (40.7^min) fps +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (54 - 144.1, n=16)	93.6 fps +8%
Average of class Gaming (16.7 - 159.7, n=68, last 2 years)	93.5 fps +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	87 fps
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	54 fps -38%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming (37.7 - 116, n=56, last 2 years)	69.6 fps +24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	56 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (36 - 69.6, n=13)	55.4 fps -1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	36 fps -36%

GTA V
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	131.8 (6.21^min, 90.9^P1) fps +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	126.7 (9.75^min, 76.9^P1) fps
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	126.3 (5.94^min, 90.9^P1) fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)	113.8 fps -10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	111.4 (6.89^min, 66.7^P1) fps -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 139.2, n=42)	111 fps -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	101.8 (18.4^min, 71.4^P1) fps -20%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	93 (7.94^min, 71.4^P1) fps -27%
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	114.1 (7.48^min, 76.9^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (36.9 - 160.6, n=111, last 2 years)	107.1 fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	101.1 (9.21^min, 71.4^P1) fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 121.2, n=28)	98.2 fps -14%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	82.4 (6.53^min, 52.6^P1) fps -28%

F1 22
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	91 fps +15%
Average of class Gaming (13 - 144.7, n=95, last 2 years)	85.3 fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (78.9 - 91, n=4)	82.7 fps +5%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	79.8 (65^min, 29^P1) fps +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	78.9 (69^min, 50^P1) fps
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	62 fps +17%
Average of class Gaming (29.9 - 92.2, n=76, last 2 years)	61.9 fps +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (52.9 - 62, n=2)	57.5 fps +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	52.9 (46^min, 41^P1) fps

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 High Quality
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	137.6 fps +16%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	127.8 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	122.8 fps +4%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	121.2 fps +2%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)	120.1 fps +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	118.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30.7 - 140.6, n=42)	113.8 fps -4%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	106 fps -11%
2560x1440 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (32.5 - 169.2, n=132, last 2 years)	104.7 fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	96.4 fps +4%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	92.8 fps 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	92.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30.8 - 105.8, n=34)	85.9 fps -7%

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø118.8 (111-126)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)		186.8	180.7	126.7	114.1
The Witcher 3 (2015)				118.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	211	191	180.8	169.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	173.3	156.2	118.5		92.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	165.3	143.5	116.2
Strange Brigade (2018)			236	211	157.7
F1 2021 (2021)		236	211	132.8	106.2
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)	103	101	98	87	56
F1 22 (2022)	235	235	199.7	78.9	52.9
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022)		135	109	107	78

排放和电源管理

噪声水平

华硕在这里使用了一个蒸气室冷却系统。在高性能电源模式下，该设备也保持相对安静，在压力测试和游戏时，我们能够测量到最大46分贝（A）。当然，这仍然是明显的，但我们的测试设备仍然比竞争对手明显更安静。在Turbo模式下，游戏性能只是微不足道的提高，但两个运行中的风扇产生了54 dB(A)的噪音。在空闲运行时，风扇经常保持关闭状态，但我们几乎总是注意到一些安静的电子噪音。在负载情况下，我们猜测也有一些可听的线圈啸叫声来自GPU。

Noise Level

Idle		23.9 / 23.9 / 23.9 dB(A)
Load		34.3 / 45.9 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.9 dB(A)

	Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
Noise		-19%	-9%	-27%	1%	-4%
off / environment *	23.9	24.5 -3%	21.9 8%	26 -9%	22.7 5%	25 -5%
Idle Minimum *	23.9	24.5 -3%	24.53 -3%	26 -9%	23.1 3%	25.2 -5%
Idle Average *	23.9	30 -26%	24.53 -3%	29 -21%	23.1 3%	25.2 -5%
Idle Maximum *	23.9	32.5 -36%	24.53 -3%	40 -67%	23.1 3%	25.2 -5%
Load Average *	34.3	43.9 -28%	46.25 -35%	47 -37%	31.9 7%	30.7 10%
Load Maximum *	45.9	54.2 -18%	54.25 -18%	54 -18%	52.5 -14%	51.3 -12%
Witcher 3 ultra *		48.8	56.86	52	52.5	51.3

* ... smaller is better

温度

尽管风扇相对安静，但表面温度没有理由让人担心。尽管我们在一些孤立的地方测量到了超过50°C（122°F）的负载，但键盘仍然非常凉爽，在游戏过程中也没有任何限制。

在压力测试中，GPU得到了优先处理，当处理器的功率达到36瓦时，它就稳定地运行在150瓦。在压力测试之后，性能并没有下降。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


41.7 °C	45.5 °C	48.8 °C
39.7 °C	40.1 °C	45.3 °C
24.7 °C	25.1 °C	25.4 °C

Maximum: 48.8 °C
Average: 37.4 °C


50.4 °C	49.3 °C	48.2 °C
40.3 °C	52.4 °C	51.1 °C
25.6 °C	27.2 °C	25.2 °C

Maximum: 52.4 °C
Average: 41.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


30.3 °C	30.4 °C	30 °C
30.2 °C	30.4 °C	29.1 °C
26 °C	25.3 °C	25.6 °C

Maximum: 30.4 °C
Average: 28.6 °C


34.1 °C	33.8 °C	32.2 °C
32.5 °C	33.6 °C	31.2 °C
26.7 °C	28.4 °C	28.4 °C

Maximum: 34.1 °C
Average: 31.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 26.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


40.2 °C	42 °C	44.7 °C
34.5 °C	39.3 °C	42.4 °C
24.8 °C	24 °C	24.1 °C

Maximum: 44.7 °C
Average: 35.1 °C


49.8 °C	48 °C	49.6 °C
40.5 °C	49.2 °C	49.3 °C
24.3 °C	28.4 °C	24 °C

Maximum: 49.8 °C
Average: 40.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.4 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2.9 °C / 5.2 F).

	Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Heat		-8%	-3%	1%	7%	4%
Maximum Upper Side *	48.8	44.4 9%	40.8 16%	49 -0%	49.6 -2%	40 18%
Maximum Bottom *	52.4	60.8 -16%	52.4 -0%	52 1%	42.4 19%	39.8 24%
Idle Upper Side *	30.4	33.8 -11%	34.6 -14%	30 1%	29.2 4%	34.6 -14%
Idle Bottom *	34.1	38.8 -14%	38.4 -13%	33 3%	32 6%	38.4 -13%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

该音响系统由总共四个模块组成，能产生强大而宽敞的声音。尽管扬声器不是市场上最响亮的，但总体来说质量非常好。然而，由于游戏时的风扇噪音很大，我们仍然建议使用耳机。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 71.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 71.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 71.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (107.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 100% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

消耗功率

ROG Strix Scar 17 SE并不是一个非常高效的笔记本电脑，考虑到强大的硬件，这并不十分令人惊讶。我们已经测量到空闲运行时的功率高达27瓦，而在游戏时，该值增加到约230瓦。因此，330瓦的电源已经足够大了。待机消耗也相当高，为2.6瓦，但这是由于默认激活的照明效果。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.58 / 2.6 Watt
Idle	19.3 / 26.5 / 27.1 Watt
Load	141 / 307.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø225 (221-232)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø238 (220-308)

Power Consumption With External Monitor

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø127 (115.4-183.5)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø78.3 (73.5-109)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø148.3 (141.9-156.4)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø215 (206-220)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø214 (211-217)

电池寿命

在我们的WLAN运行时间测试中，在150cd/m²（相当于最大亮度的48%）下，我们的测试设备只持续了约4小时。考虑到高消耗值，这并不十分令人惊讶。一些竞争对手在这里持续的时间明显更长，如果你需要弥补离开插座的时间。游戏可以持续一小时左右，但性能会有明显下降。完全为90瓦时的电池充电需要大约100分钟，大约53分钟后，80%的容量已经可用。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Edge 107)		4h 10min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 107)		3h 40min

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	559 min +124%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	537 min +115%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	412.1 min +65%
Average of class Gaming (85 - 889, n=153, last 2 years)	376 min +50%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	267 min +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	250 min
Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 87 Wh	117 min -53%

Pros

+ 良好的QHD面板，240赫兹

+ 高水平和稳定的游戏性能

+ 广泛的机箱照明

+ TB4，Wi-Fi 6E，和PCIe 4.0

+ 游戏时风扇相对安静

Cons

- 不稳定的SSD性能

- HX CPU的附加费用并不值得购买

- 没有网络摄像头

- 电子噪音

结论 - 一个装备齐全的快速游戏笔记本电脑

目前，华硕ROG Strix Scar 17 SE提供了真正的一切游戏玩家的心愿。一个快速的QHD面板，240赫兹，加上GeForce RTX 3080 Ti，这也为原生分辨率的最大细节提供了足够的动力。虽然CPU性能对于游戏笔记本来说也很好，但HX处理器的潜力不能完全发挥。因此，你应该为自己省去购买更强大的处理器的额外溢价，直接选择普通的Core i9。

其他优点包括非常准确的色彩，如果你必须直接进行视频处理，例如，适度的表面温度，以及游戏期间相对安静的风扇。虽然有一个涡轮模式，它也会变得非常响亮，但这对游戏性能没有太大的影响，所以在我们看来，这并不值得。

新的华硕ROG Strix Scar 17 SE提供了大量的性能和游戏功能，但你应该节省英特尔HX处理器的额外溢价。

游戏市场上的竞争对手提供类似的性能规格，但也有更明亮的显示器部分和不那么华丽的外壳。此外，从长远来看，电子噪音会变得很烦人。

价格和可用性

我们的测试配置ROG Strix Scar 17 SE可从亚马逊，售价3899美元和一个较小的配置，与常规的酷睿i9-12900H也可在那里$2278.

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W - 11/18/2022 v7 ^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

81 / 98 → 82%

Keyboard

86%

Pointing Device

83%

Connectivity

61 / 80 → 77%

Weight

57 / 10-66 → 84%

Battery

59 / 95 → 62%

Display

91%

Games Performance

100%

Application Performance

95%

Temperature

85 / 95 → 90%

Noise

91 / 90 → 100%

Audio

74%

Average

74%

87%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 535 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 470341 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕ROG Strix Scar 17 SE评测--配备RTX 3080 Ti的全功能游戏笔记本

Andreas Osthoff, 2022-11-21 (Update: 2022-11-21)

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳--游戏笔记本的设计引人注目，并具有广泛的照明效果

尺寸比较

设备 - ROG Strix Scar 17，配备HDMI 2.1和Wi-Fi 6E

输入设备 - 带有良好键盘的华硕

显示屏 - QHD，240赫兹

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 刹车后的英特尔HX

测试条件

处理器 - 酷睿i9-12950HX

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

系统性能

DPC延迟

存储解决方案

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

排放和电源管理

噪声水平

温度

发言人

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W audio analysis

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS audio analysis

消耗功率

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Power Consumption With External Monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 一个装备齐全的快速游戏笔记本电脑

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison