华硕ROG Zephyrus Duo 16回顾。一个不寻常的游戏笔记本，拥有良好的电池寿命

Name: Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
Brand: Asus

动态的二人组。

Ryzen 9-6900HX APU和GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU将目前所有的游戏顺利带到16:10格式的哑光4k屏幕（IPS，DCI P3，FreeSync）上。它们伴随着4TB的存储空间（RAID 0），64GB的工作内存，以及令人惊讶的良好电池寿命。

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 05/24/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen) Touchscreen Windows

通过Zephyrus Duo 16，华硕为游戏玩家、流媒体和内容创作者推出了一款笔记本电脑，其最引人注目的特点立即变得明显。放在键盘上方的是第二个显示屏，包括触摸屏功能（Screenpad Plus）。竞争对手包括如下设备 Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model，以及Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5, 微星MSI GE76 Raider,Medion Erazer Beast X30Medion Erazer Beast X30，以及 Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021.

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX (ROG Zephyrus Duo Series)

Processor

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX 8 x 3.3 - 4.9 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 80 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+)

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1395 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 165 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 30.0.15.1259, Optimus

Memory

64 GB

, DDR5-4800, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 283 PPI, BOE NE160QAM-NX1, IPS level, FreeSync Premium, Pantone Validated, (second screen: 14 in, 3840 x 1100 pixels, IPS level, capacitive, stylus support), glossy: no, HDR, 120 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0), 4096 GB

, 3620 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC285

Connections

4 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: combined audio port, Card Reader: MicroSD, TPM 2.0

Networking

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 20.5 x 355 x 266

Battery

90 Wh, 5845 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 4 cells

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 6 speakers, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, palm rest, Microsoft 365 (trial), Microsoft OneNote (trial), 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.56 kg, Power Supply: 850 g

Price

4999 Euro

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
88.2 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2022	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	20.5 mm	16.00"	3840x2400
92.5 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2021	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU	2.2 kg	16.8 mm	16.20"	3456x2234
88.3 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2022	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	16.99 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
87.5 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2022	MSI GE76 Raider i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3 kg	26 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
86.7 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2022	Medion Erazer Beast X30 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	23 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
84.7 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2022	Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	22.4 mm	16.00"	3840x2400

外壳 - GX650采用坚固的金属外壳

哑光的黑色金属外壳提供了良好的做工。没有明显的缝隙，也没有明显的尖锐边缘。另一个积极的方面是，基本单元不能被扭曲。另一方面，盖子可以使用更多的硬度。铰链能够将盖子紧紧地固定在位置上。最大开启角度约为130度，你可以用一只手打开盖子。

一旦你打开显示屏盖子，Screenpad（具有触摸屏功能的第二个显示屏）就会以大约15度的固定角度向用户升起。此外，它还向主屏幕方向移动约2厘米（约0.8英寸）。由此产生的缝隙显示了一块透明的塑料板，在某些地方可以看到机箱的内部。 Screenpad的提升不仅有人体工程学的原因，而且在显示屏下面还有通风口，使空气流进机箱。

Zephyrus是我们比较领域中较重的笔记本电脑之一。只有 MSI GE76 Raider更重。其尺寸也比同类的16英寸笔记本电脑略大，如 MacBook Pro 16.

尺寸比较

MSI GE76 Raider Medion Erazer Beast X30 Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 DIN A4 ❌

设备--Zephyrus不提供Thunderbolt 4。

所有四个USB连接（2个USB-A，2个USB-C）都支持USB 3.2 Gen 2标准。两个USB-C端口中的一个提供电源交付，两个端口都通过USB-C支持DisplayPort。有了这个，该笔记本电脑提供了三个视频输出端口和HDMI 2.1连接。连接由一个组合音频端口和一个千兆以太网端口完成。

左侧：电源、USB 3.2 Gen 2（USB-A）、USB 3.2 Gen 2（USB-C；DisplayPort、Power Delivery、G-Sync）、存储卡阅读器（MicroSD）、音频组合

SD卡阅读器

MicroSD存储卡读卡器是快速型号之一，使用我们的AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60参考存储卡，最大传输速率为155 MB/s（传输250个jpg图像文件，每个约5MB）和185 MB/s（复制大数据块）。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	155 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	155 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)	95.5 MB/s -38%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	79.9 MB/s -48%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	66 MB/s -57%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	185 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)	119.3 MB/s -36%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	83 MB/s -55%

沟通

在最佳条件下确定的WLAN传输率（附近没有额外的WLAN设备，笔记本电脑和服务器PC距离很近）结果非常好，与WiFi芯片（联发科MT7922；802.11 ax，WiFi 6E）的能力相符。有线网络连接由Realtek的千兆以太网芯片（RTL8125）处理。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1695 (1556^min - 1768^max) MBit/s
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1621 (1412^min - 1672^max) MBit/s -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1503 (1451^min - 1558^max) MBit/s -11%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1333 (1044^min - 1390^max) MBit/s -21%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (358 - 1785, n=55)	1279 MBit/s -25%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=151, last 2 years)	1235 MBit/s -27%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1727 (866^min - 1759^max) MBit/s +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1721 (1500^min - 1744^max) MBit/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1692 (1567^min - 1738^max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (707 - 1775, n=55)	1397 MBit/s -17%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=151, last 2 years)	1383 MBit/s -18%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1030 (752^min - 1313^max) MBit/s -39%

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1691 (1567-1738)

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1697 (866-1759)

Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1721 (1500-1744)

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1029 (752-1313)

MSI GE76 Raider Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1117 (588-1235)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1695 (1556-1768)

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1621 (1412-1672)

Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1503 (1451-1558)

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1333 (1044-1390)

MSI GE76 Raider Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1235 (650-1337)

网络摄像头

Zephyrus的0.9MP网络摄像头产生的图像最大分辨率为1280 x 720像素。它缺乏色彩准确性，颜色与目标有很大偏差。该摄像头不具备机械盖。

ColorChecker Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX: 15.96 ∆E min: 2.53 - max: 27.32 ∆E

辅料

除了通常的文件（快速启动手册和保修信息）外，该笔记本电脑还包括一个橡胶掌托。

维护

要取下机箱的底部，首先要取下底部的螺丝。但你需要注意，因为机箱中间的一颗螺丝被一块小橡胶板覆盖。机箱的背面也被一些夹子固定住，可以通过一些小心的扭动或借助于扁平的撬动工具来松开。拆下机箱底部后，你可以看到工作内存库（两个都占用）、两个固态硬盘（PCIe 4）、风扇和电池。

担保

华硕为Zephyrus提供2年的保修。延长保修期至3年需要额外支付129欧元（约136美元）。

输入设备 - 华硕笔记本电脑的第二个显示屏

键盘

只有当你使用附带的由橡胶制成的掌托（深度：约5.5厘米，2.2英寸，有角度）时，键盘才可以舒适地打字。虽然它做得相当好，但它真的只在固定的表面上工作。发光小键盘的光滑按键行程短，压力点清晰。键的阻力还可以，键盘在打字时不会弯曲。三段式RGB照明是通过一个功能键控制的。总的来说，华硕在这里提供了一个适合日常工作的键盘。

触摸板

一个纵向的具有多点触摸功能的点击板（~5.8 x 9.6厘米，~2.3 x 3.8英寸）可作为鼠标的替代品。其光滑的表面有利于手指的滑动。鼠标垫有一个短的行程和清晰的压力点。敲击键盘上的相应符号将显示一个数字键盘。

华硕Screenpad Plus

还有一个额外的输入选项，即Screenpad Plus（14英寸，3840 x 1100像素，哑光），这是一个包括触摸屏功能（支持主动输入笔）的第二个显示屏。它的行为与任何其他插入式外部显示器一样，可以通过单独的键打开和关闭。

屏幕板提供了将应用程序或其导航元素移动到触摸屏上的选项。例如，当游戏在主屏幕上运行时，我们可以将聊天窗口移到屏幕板上。

有几个预装的小应用程序，让人对Screenpad的可能性有了印象。例如，有一个计算器和一个手写输入区域，一个快速键应用程序捆绑了经常使用的功能，如剪切、复制和粘贴。

显示 - 良好的色彩再现

哑光16英寸显示屏（3840 x 2400像素）的亮度（433.9 cd/m²）和对比度（1043:1）符合要求。积极的一点是快速响应时间和缺乏PWM闪烁。

该显示器支持AMD的FreeSync技术，该技术可以动态地调整显示器的刷新率和GPU的帧率，使之相互适应。通过这种方式，创建的图像应该是尽可能平滑的，特别是在电脑游戏期间。


464 cd/m²	431 cd/m²	430 cd/m²
426 cd/m²	459 cd/m²	409 cd/m²
442 cd/m²	432 cd/m²	412 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE NE160QAM-NX1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 464 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 433.9 cd/m² Minimum: 22 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 459 cd/m²
Contrast: 1043:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.97 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.03
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.235

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX BOE NE160QAM-NX1, IPS-Level, 3840x2400, 16"	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2"	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI GE76 Raider AU Optronics B173HAN05.4 (AUOE295), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Medion Erazer Beast X30 BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"	Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Samsung SDC416B, AMOLED, 3840x2400, 16"
Display			-23%	-22%	-18%
Display P3 Coverage	98		65.3 -33%	63.1 -36%	67.7 -31%
sRGB Coverage	99.9		85.1 -15%	94 -6%	97.6 -2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	86.3		67.4 -22%	65.2 -24%	69.2 -20%
Response Times			-9%	-5%	-26%	74%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	14.6 ?(6.7, 7.9)		4.3 ?(2.4, 1.9) 71%	5.6 ?(2, 3.6) 62%	14.7 ?(7, 7.7) -1%	2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2) 84%
Response Time Black / White *	5.6 ?(2, 3.6)		10.5 ?(5.7, 4.8) -88%	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) -71%	8.4 ?(3.2, 5.2) -50%	2 ?(1, 1) 64%
PWM Frequency						60 ?(58)
Screen		329%	27%	20%	3%	456%
Brightness middle	459	507 10%	330 -28%	290 -37%	377 -18%	368 -20%
Brightness	434	494 14%	315 -27%	290 -33%	352 -19%	368 -15%
Brightness Distribution	88	96 9%	89 1%	96 9%	86 -2%	93 6%
Black Level *	0.44	0.02 95%	0.24 45%	0.23 48%	0.32 27%	0.01 98%
Contrast	1043	25350 2330%	1375 32%	1261 21%	1178 13%	36800 3428%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.97	1.4 53%	1.47 51%	1.59 46%	2.91 2%	2.33 22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.13	2.8 66%	2.73 66%	3.17 61%	6.78 17%	4.34 47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.03		0.63 39%	0.87 16%	1.3 -26%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.9	2.3 53%	1.8 63%	2.5 49%	3.4 31%	0.8 84%
Gamma	2.235 ^98%	2.27 ^97%	2.282 ^96%	2.253 ^98%	2.109 ^104%	2.119 ^104%
CCT	6775 ^96%	6792 ^96%	6499 ^100%	6640 ^98%	7273 ^89%	6569 ^99%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		329% / 329%	-2% / 11%	-2% / 8%	-14% / -6%	265% / 380%

* ... smaller is better

显示器的X Rite Pantone认证确保了非常自然的色彩再现。相应地，色彩显示在交付状态下已经相当准确。虽然颜色偏差仍在目标范围内，但校准仍会带来明显的改善。屏幕几乎能够完全显示sRGB（99.9%）和DCI-P3（98%）色彩空间，86%的AdobeRGB色彩空间也被覆盖。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.7 ms rise
14.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

IPS面板的可视角度很稳定，可以从任何角度阅读。如果阳光不是太亮，显示屏可以在户外阅读。

表演 - 伦勃朗与安培的相遇

通过Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX，华硕提供了一款16英寸笔记本电脑，主要定位为游戏笔记本电脑。然而，该设备也是针对流媒体和内容创作者的。

测试条件

笔记本电脑提供三个制造商特定的性能配置文件（"静音"、"性能 "和 "涡轮"），你可以通过使用 "Fn "+"F5 "组合键在它们之间切换。涡轮增压 "配置文件只能在主电源操作中使用。我们的电池测试是使用 "静音 "模式进行的，所有的基准测试都是在 "性能 "模式下进行的。

	性能	涡轮增压	静音
功率限制1	80瓦	100瓦	70瓦
功率限制2	80瓦	125瓦	70瓦

预装的Armoury Crate软件允许你创建个人配置文件（"手动"）。例如，我们单独配置了CPU的功率限制和GPU的动态提升。你还可以对图形存储进行超频。

处理器

的CPU部分 Ryzen 9-6900HXAPU（Rembrandt）由一个八核处理器组成，以3.3 GHz的基本时钟速度运行。该速度可以通过涡轮增压提高到4.9GHz。支持同步多线程（每个核心两个线程）。

Cinebench R15基准测试的多线程测试短暂地以4至4.4GHz的时钟速度运行，而单线程测试则在3.1至4.7GHz之间。在电池运行中，CPU运行在3至4.1GHz（多线程）和2至4.7GHz（单线程）。

我们通过对Cinebench R15基准的多线程测试进行至少30分钟的持续循环，来评估CPU Turbo在主电源运行中是否被持续使用。Turbo的使用水平很高。通过使用 "Turbo "性能配置文件，可以将时钟速度稍微提高。

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2247 (2222.47-2257.72)

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max; Rosetta 2: Ø1687 (1667.29-1693.05)

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø1535 (1448.91-1565.5)

MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2722 (2660.99-2908.88)

Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2761 (2697.24-2854.49)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX; Leise: Ø2069 (2039.36-2194.43)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX; Turbo: Ø2369 (2355.85-2411.64)

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2616 (2562.79-2779.9)

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2292 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

158.6 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

249 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

5489 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

595 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1566 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

14085 Points

Help

... in comparison

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	82.6 pt
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	78 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	76.3 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	70.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	65.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	63.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	62.6 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max ^-5! Apple M1 Max	62.2 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	60.6 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	56.8 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years)	21651 Points +54%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	18935 Points +34%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	18288 Points +30%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	18106 Points +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	15100 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	14085 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	13966 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (9709 - 15100, n=19)	13307 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	12385 Points -12%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	9777 Points -31%
Single Core
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1940 Points +24%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	1909 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years)	1877 Points +20%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1799 Points +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1659 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	1576 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	1570 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1566 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1516 - 1616, n=19)	1565 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	1530 Points -2%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)	8240 Points +50%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	7203 Points +31%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	6941 Points +26%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	6849 Points +25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	5813 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5489 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	5403 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (3742 - 5813, n=19)	5162 Points -6%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	3741 Points -32%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	2735 Points -50%
CPU (Single Core)
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	734 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)	722 Points +21%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	695 Points +17%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	685 Points +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	612 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	610 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (595 - 631, n=19)	610 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	596 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	595 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	390 Points -34%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)	3394 Points +48%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	2909 (2660.99^min - 2908.88^max) Points +27%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	2854 Points +25%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	2780 Points +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	2411 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2292 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	2194 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1588 - 2411, n=19)	2163 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max (Rosetta 2)	1693 (1667^min - 1693^max) Points -26%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1566 (1448.91^min - 1565.5^max) Points -32%
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	279 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)	276 Points +11%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	275 Points +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	253 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (241 - 261, n=19)	250 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	249 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	249 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	242 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	240 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max (Rosetta 2)	197 Points -21%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	306 Seconds * -39%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	242 Seconds * -10%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (212 - 357, n=21)	239 Seconds * -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	220 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	212 Seconds * +4%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	200 Seconds * +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max (Blender 3.0 beta for mac)	189 Seconds * +14%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	181 Seconds * +18%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	175.8 Seconds * +20%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)	172.1 Seconds * +22%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)	84653 MIPS +31%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	73485 MIPS +14%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	72836 MIPS +13%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	68520 MIPS +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	65336 MIPS +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	64457 MIPS
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	63706 MIPS -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (49526 - 65336, n=20)	60091 MIPS -7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	44553 MIPS -31%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)	6281 MIPS +10%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	6186 MIPS +8%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	6144 MIPS +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	5920 MIPS +3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	5892 MIPS +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	5813 MIPS +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (5090 - 6070, n=20)	5799 MIPS +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5727 MIPS
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	5257 MIPS -8%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)	14891 Points +46%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	13865 Points +36%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	13648 Points +34%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	12708 Points +25%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	12559 Points +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	10490 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	10167 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	10071 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (8313 - 10490, n=21)	9642 Points -5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	9607 Points -6%
Single-Core
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	1918 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)	1882 Points +18%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1870 Points +17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1842 Points +16%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	1782 Points +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	1604 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1596 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1594 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1523 - 1652, n=21)	1589 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	1523 Points -4%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)	23.3 fps +29%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	20.5 fps +14%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	19.9 fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	18.7 fps +4%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	18.1 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	18 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	17.6 fps -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (12.6 - 18.7, n=20)	16.7 fps -7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	11.7 fps -35%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (44.8 - 81.7, n=20)	53.1 s * -18%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	49.5 s * -10%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)	47.6 s * -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	45.2 s * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	45 s *
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	44.8 s * -0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	42.9 s * +5%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	39 s * +13%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	38.9 s * +14%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	0.4936 sec * -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (0.4627 - 0.4974, n=20)	0.483 sec * -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	0.4808 sec * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	0.4799 sec *
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	0.4742 sec * +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	0.4522 sec * +6%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)	0.4402 sec * +8%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	0.4252 sec * +11%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	0.4155 sec * +13%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating | AIDA64

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	96 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	87.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	84.3 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	83 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	78 pt
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	65 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	64.7 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	61.2 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	47.2 pt

AIDA64
FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years)	21640 KRay/s +28%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	17963 KRay/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	16852 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	16192 KRay/s -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (10950 - 17963, n=20)	15327 KRay/s -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	9405 KRay/s -44%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	9065 KRay/s -46%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	8265 KRay/s -51%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	5839 KRay/s -65%
FPU Julia
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	110797 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years)	106090 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	103794 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	101849 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (71414 - 110797, n=20)	96546 Points -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	42843 Points -59%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	40570 Points -61%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	38277 Points -63%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	27801 Points -73%
CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years)	4852 MB/s +37%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	3804 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	3547 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	3480 MB/s -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	3354 MB/s -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (2471 - 3804, n=20)	3301 MB/s -7%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	3178 MB/s -10%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	2931 MB/s -17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	2013 MB/s -43%
CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years)	116237 Points +11%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	107042 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	107007 Points +2%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	106414 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	106369 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	104920 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	104649 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (84185 - 107544, n=20)	100656 Points -4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	85965 Points -18%
FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years)	13175 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	13062 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	12957 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	12955 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (10970 - 13205, n=20)	12630 Points -3%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	10237 Points -21%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	10226 Points -21%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	9655 Points -25%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	7027 Points -46%
FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	61370 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	57334 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	56121 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years)	53471 Points -7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (39164 - 61370, n=20)	52842 Points -8%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	26859 Points -53%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	24693 Points -57%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	22873 Points -60%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	15765 Points -73%
CPU AES
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	140776 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	139407 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	137667 MB/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (54613 - 142360, n=20)	115891 MB/s -17%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years)	109176 MB/s -22%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	100062 MB/s -28%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	91041 MB/s -35%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	67814 MB/s -51%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	65871 MB/s -53%
CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years)	1349 MB/s +52%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	1174 MB/s +32%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	1085 MB/s +22%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	988 MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	911 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	890 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	863 MB/s -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (578 - 911, n=20)	803 MB/s -10%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	701 MB/s -21%
FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years)	11654 KRay/s +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	9540 KRay/s +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	9001 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	8759 KRay/s -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (5798 - 9540, n=20)	8175 KRay/s -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	5596 KRay/s -38%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	5239 KRay/s -42%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	4776 KRay/s -47%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	3257 KRay/s -64%
CPU PhotoWorxx
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	40095 MPixel/s +35%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	40000 MPixel/s +35%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years)	39919 MPixel/s +34%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	39666 MPixel/s +34%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	38990 MPixel/s +31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	29975 MPixel/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	29894 MPixel/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	29705 MPixel/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (26873 - 30604, n=20)	29389 MPixel/s -1%

系统性能

运行平稳的系统为未来几年的游戏、视频编辑和渲染提供了足够的性能。内置工作存储器的传输率仍然低于配备DDR5-4800存储的同类笔记本电脑的数值。伴随着这一点的是非常好的PC-Mark结果。

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4418 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		5798 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4622 points
PCMark 10 Score		6351 points
Help

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI GE76 Raider GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8007 Points +26%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	7816 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)	7774 Points +22%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7313 Points +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7149 Points +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	6351 Points

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	10945 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)	10836 Points +16%
MSI GE76 Raider GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10688 Points +14%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10597 Points +13%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9870 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	9374 Points

PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI GE76 Raider GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10100 Points +31%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	10050 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)	9878 Points +28%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9675 Points +26%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9173 Points +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	7704 Points

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI GE76 Raider GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	12905 Points +34%
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)	12030 Points +25%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	11777 Points +22%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10951 Points +14%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10351 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	9626 Points

CrossMark / Overall
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	2113 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years)	1899 Points +11%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1768 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1727 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1711 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R	1586 Points -7%

CrossMark / Productivity
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	2031 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years)	1801 Points +6%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1719 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1698 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1585 Points -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R	1361 Points -20%

CrossMark / Creativity
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	2161 Points +25%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R	2102 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years)	2083 Points +21%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1985 Points +15%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1868 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1724 Points

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	2228 Points +30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1715 Points
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years)	1699 Points -1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1633 Points -5%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1471 Points -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R	1080 Points -37%

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years)	64907 MB/s +22%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	62554 MB/s +18%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	62419 MB/s +17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	61946 MB/s +17%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	61605 MB/s +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	53162 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (47938 - 53345, n=20)	50405 MB/s -5%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years)	68658 MB/s +29%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	65865 MB/s +24%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	65835 MB/s +23%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	65452 MB/s +23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	65277 MB/s +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	53321 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (43892 - 53321, n=20)	51062 MB/s -4%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years)	66727 MB/s +17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	65772 MB/s +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	65159 MB/s +14%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	64282 MB/s +12%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	61981 MB/s +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	57180 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (51085 - 57202, n=20)	55188 MB/s -3%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	95.2 ns * -3%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years)	94.1 ns * -2%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	92.6 ns * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	92.3 ns *
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	89.7 ns * +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (80.7 - 120.6, n=20)	88.7 ns * +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

标准化的延迟监测测试（网络冲浪、4k视频再现、Prime95高负荷）显示了DPC延迟的一些明显的延迟。该系统似乎并不适合实时视频和音频处理。然而，未来的软件更新可能会带来一些改进，甚至使情况变得更糟。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4836 μs * -827%
MSI GE76 Raider GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1642 μs * -215%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	879.6 μs * -69%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	623 μs * -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	521.5 μs *

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

两个存储容量为2TB的PCIe 4固态硬盘（M.2-2280）被组合在一个RAID 0阵列中，因此操作系统将这两个固态硬盘视为一个4TB的固态硬盘。所有需要存储的数据都分布在这两块SSD上。由此产生的高传输率和短加载时间是游戏的最佳选择。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 9490 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 10135 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 563.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 412 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 5266 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 9867 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 71.92 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 327.5 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	81.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	75.5 pt
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	73.7 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	71.5 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	71.3 pt
Average of class Gaming	57.9 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	4903 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3946 (3883.92^min - 3946.42^max) MB/s -20%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3887 MB/s -21%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	3819 (3405.77^min - 3819.33^max) MB/s -22%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=168, last 2 years)	3487 MB/s -29%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2529 (2450.31^min - 2528.54^max) MB/s -48%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	7889 (6495.73^min - 7888.81^max) MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	4457 MB/s -44%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3923 (3818.83^min - 3922.64^max) MB/s -50%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3899 (3880.57^min - 3898.61^max) MB/s -51%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3863 (3808.78^min - 3862.78^max) MB/s -51%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=168, last 2 years)	3797 MB/s -52%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	10557 (9742.97^min - 10557.3^max) MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	7028 (6634.28^min - 7027.76^max) MB/s -33%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6722 (5765.49^min - 6722^max) MB/s -36%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6666 (5850.89^min - 6666.43^max) MB/s -37%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6643 (6200.62^min - 6642.94^max) MB/s -37%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=168, last 2 years)	6328 MB/s -40%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	9830 (9799.27^min - 9829.82^max) MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	5004 (4980.32^min - 5004.43^max) MB/s -49%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4999 (4978.75^min - 4998.98^max) MB/s -49%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4951 (4938.35^min - 4951.38^max) MB/s -50%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4939 (4931.24^min - 4938.77^max) MB/s -50%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=168, last 2 years)	4823 MB/s -51%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	90.6 (86.51^min - 90.63^max) MB/s +24%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	89.8 (89.42^min - 89.75^max) MB/s +23%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	88.7 MB/s +21%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	87.3 (86.6^min - 87.26^max) MB/s +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	73.1 (72.79^min - 73.06^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=168, last 2 years)	65.8 MB/s -10%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	373 (371.9^min - 373.21^max) MB/s +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	359 (324.09^min - 358.58^max) MB/s
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	275 (273.95^min - 275.11^max) MB/s -23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	252 (240.11^min - 252.24^max) MB/s -30%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=168, last 2 years)	222 MB/s -38%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	210 (209.55^min - 210.02^max) MB/s -42%
4k q32 t16 read
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4073 (4064.94^min - 4073.47^max) MB/s +70%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3908 (3879.66^min - 3907.88^max) MB/s +64%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	3555 (3552.55^min - 3555.1^max) MB/s +49%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3493 (3465.14^min - 3493.06^max) MB/s +46%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=168, last 2 years)	2555 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	2390 (2226.95^min - 2390.15^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	3612 (3585.78^min - 3612.01^max) MB/s +134%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3004 (2951.07^min - 3004.3^max) MB/s +95%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2645 (2612.9^min - 2645.36^max) MB/s +72%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=168, last 2 years)	2101 MB/s +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1542 (1501.74^min - 1541.63^max) MB/s
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1066 (1060.72^min - 1066.17^max) MB/s -31%

AS SSD
Score Total
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	9380 Points +41%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8982 Points +35%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8658 Points +30%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8103 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=159, last 2 years)	6737 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	6635 Points
Score Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	3634 Points +39%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3344 Points +28%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3192 Points +22%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3054 Points +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	2619 Points
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=159, last 2 years)	2441 Points -7%
Score Write
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3997 Points +56%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	3991 Points +56%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3893 Points +52%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3545 Points +39%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=159, last 2 years)	3113 Points +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	2556 Points
Seq Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	5588 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	5344.88 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5205 MB/s -3%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5120 MB/s -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5098.67 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=159, last 2 years)	4944 MB/s -8%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	7663.27 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3936 MB/s -49%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3872.7 MB/s -49%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=159, last 2 years)	3720 MB/s -51%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3692 MB/s -52%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	3267 MB/s -57%
4K Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	109.4 MB/s +59%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	82.8 MB/s +20%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	81.55 MB/s +18%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	76.99 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	68.93 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=159, last 2 years)	65.1 MB/s -6%
4K Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	328.69 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	321.6 MB/s -2%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	241.3 MB/s -27%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=159, last 2 years)	211 MB/s -36%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	201.1 MB/s -39%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	176.69 MB/s -46%
4K-64 Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	2966 MB/s +47%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2749 MB/s +36%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2604.76 MB/s +29%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2451.55 MB/s +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	2015.68 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=159, last 2 years)	1876 MB/s -7%
4K-64 Write
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3387 MB/s +132%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	3342 MB/s +129%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3329.28 MB/s +128%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2950.05 MB/s +102%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=159, last 2 years)	2533 MB/s +73%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1460.96 MB/s
Access Time Read
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.057 ms * -8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	0.056 ms * -6%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=158, last 2 years)	0.05509 ms * -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	0.053 ms *
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.044 ms * +17%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.029 ms * +45%
Access Time Write
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=159, last 2 years)	0.04843 ms * -273%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.023 ms * -77%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.021 ms * -62%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.018 ms * -38%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	0.013 ms *
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	0.012 ms * +8%

* ... smaller is better

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0): Ø8257 (5868.26-10519.1)

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6642 (6357.38-6687.03)

MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB: Ø4011 (3422.21-6714.24)

Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6290 (5297.3-6328.92)

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT: Ø7004 (6456.5-7039.72)

图形卡

RTX 3000 GPU的实际性能取决于几个因素：冷却、存储设备，以及制造商在Nvidia定义的限制范围内配置的最大TGP。华硕允许 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti LaptopGPU的最大TGP为165瓦（140瓦+25瓦的动态提升）。该GPU能够使用快速的GDDR6图形存储（16,384 MB）。

根据华硕的说法，动态提升（最大10瓦）只有在选择了 "Turbo "性能配置时才能使用，Witcher 3 测试证实了这一点。最大（25瓦）需要使用Armoury Crate软件（"手动 "配置文件）来启用。基准结果的范围刚刚超过我们迄今为止确定的RTX 3080 Ti的平均水平。

但这并不是终点。还有一个选项是通过GeForce GPU直接输出图像（Armoury Crate，MUX开关：独立的GPU）。结合手动将动态提升至25瓦，图形性能明显增加。

3DMark 11 Performance		31771 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		47119 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		24278 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | SPECviewperf 13 | SPECviewperf 2020

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI GE76 Raider ^-25! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	99.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	97.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX ^-25! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	96.9 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X30 ^-25! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	90.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX ^-25! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	89.7 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	79.3 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX ^-2! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	79.2 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 ^-25! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	72.7 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	71.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX ^-25! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	57.4 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GE76 Raider NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	45050 Points +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	44012 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)	43521 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (sep. GPU, 25W)	42275 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	41590 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	40257 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (13920 - 45841, n=45)	39402 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	33249 Points -17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	31565 Points -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	14745 Points -63%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (sep. GPU, 25W)	34080 Points +24%
MSI GE76 Raider NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	34041 Points +24%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)	31245 Points +13%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	31082 Points +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (6928 - 34439, n=43)	29496 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	27562 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	26460 Points -4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	25240 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	24580 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	14198 Points -48%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GE76 Raider NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	13324 Points +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (sep. GPU, 25W)	13302 Points +18%
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)	13034 Points +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	12269 Points +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	12060 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (4921 - 13835, n=43)	11850 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	11227 Points
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	9646 Points -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	9515 Points -15%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	9488 Points -15%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming (371 - 14592, n=114, last 2 years)	8661 Points +18%
MSI GE76 Raider NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	8462 Points +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (sep. GPU, 25W)	8139 Points +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	7919 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (6423 - 8462, n=28)	7800 Points +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	7733 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	7329 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	7251 Points -1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	6423 Points -12%

SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Average of class Gaming (87.4 - 159.1, n=10, last 2 years)	118.5 fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (62.9 - 133.4, n=8)	108.8 fps 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	108.6 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	102.3 fps -6%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Average of class Gaming (16.2 - 99.6, n=10, last 2 years)	32.7 fps +54%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (18.3 - 25.3, n=8)	22.3 fps +5%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	21.7 fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	21.2 fps
Showcase (showcase-02)
Average of class Gaming (25.9 - 281, n=10, last 2 years)	154.7 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	148.9 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (110 - 175, n=8)	146.6 fps -2%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	127.2 fps -15%
Medical (medical-02)
Average of class Gaming (57.6 - 122.8, n=10, last 2 years)	86 fps +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	75.2 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (65.3 - 79.1, n=8)	74.5 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	71.9 fps -4%
Maya (maya-05)
Average of class Gaming (83.7 - 601, n=10, last 2 years)	365 fps +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (212 - 430, n=8)	321 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	308.1 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	275.8 fps -10%
Energy (energy-02)
Average of class Gaming (20.3 - 74.7, n=10, last 2 years)	45.3 fps +74%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	26.1 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (19.3 - 27.3, n=8)	24.5 fps -6%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	21.7 fps -17%
Creo (creo-02)
Average of class Gaming (70.4 - 461, n=10, last 2 years)	271 fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (177.4 - 311, n=8)	249 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	239.7 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	215.7 fps -10%
Catia (catia-05)
Average of class Gaming (47.7 - 281, n=10, last 2 years)	174.4 fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	171.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (130.4 - 190.3, n=8)	170 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	161.6 fps -6%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Average of class Gaming (49.1 - 373, n=10, last 2 years)	232 fps +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (161 - 260, n=8)	223 fps +7%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	210.2 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	208.7 fps

SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Average of class Gaming (47.1 - 515, n=21, last 2 years)	307 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	210.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (174.7 - 211, n=3)	198.6 fps
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average of class Gaming (16.2 - 231, n=27, last 2 years)	37.3 fps +77%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (18.1 - 25, n=6)	21.8 fps +3%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	21.4 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	21.1 fps
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 59.9, n=27, last 2 years)	40.3 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	38.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (33 - 40.2, n=6)	37.4 fps -3%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	36.2 fps -6%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Gaming (99.8 - 687, n=26, last 2 years)	416 fps +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (248 - 456, n=6)	351 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	336 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	308.7 fps -8%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Average of class Gaming (20.6 - 76.5, n=27, last 2 years)	47.6 fps +82%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	26.2 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (19.6 - 27, n=6)	23.7 fps -10%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	21.6 fps -18%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Average of class Gaming (44 - 141.9, n=27, last 2 years)	107.9 fps +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (55.3 - 114.7, n=6)	92.3 fps +7%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	89.6 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	86.4 fps
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Average of class Gaming (17.8 - 117.2, n=27, last 2 years)	73.4 fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (51.8 - 78.7, n=6)	67.4 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	66.6 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	65.1 fps -2%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	128.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (99.2 - 153, n=6)	128.4 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 221, n=27, last 2 years)	125.8 fps -2%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	121.5 fps -6%
3840x2160 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Average of class Gaming (97.2 - 251, n=4, last 2 years)	180 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (87.9 - 255, n=4)	137.6 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	104.1 fps
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average of class Gaming (17.5 - 32.8, n=6, last 2 years)	25.1 fps +39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (15.5 - 21.1, n=7)	18.9 fps +4%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	18.1 fps 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	18.1 fps
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)
Average of class Gaming (10.9 - 56, n=6, last 2 years)	29 fps +80%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (13.2 - 34.3, n=7)	17.9 fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	16.1 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	14.5 fps -10%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Gaming (188 - 474, n=6, last 2 years)	332 fps +106%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (137.4 - 345, n=7)	208 fps +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	161.1 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	152.1 fps -6%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	118.7 fps
Average of class Gaming (20 - 118.3, n=6, last 2 years)	66.1 fps -44%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (27.7 - 118.7, n=7)	65.1 fps -45%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	64.6 fps -46%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)
Average of class Gaming (78 - 132, n=6, last 2 years)	108.6 fps +48%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (49 - 93.3, n=7)	77.4 fps +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	73.5 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	70.4 fps -4%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)
Average of class Gaming (33.8 - 109, n=6, last 2 years)	65 fps +61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30.3 - 69.6, n=7)	43.7 fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	40.3 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	37.6 fps -7%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Gaming (61.6 - 199, n=6, last 2 years)	116.1 fps +32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (69.5 - 144, n=7)	95.7 fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	87.9 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	84.4 fps -4%

游戏性能

该硬件以FHD到QHD的分辨率和最大设置将当前所有的游戏流畅地带到屏幕上。使用3840 x 2400像素的全显示分辨率有时需要降低设置。帧率的范围在RTX 3080 Ti的平均值左右。通过GeForce GPU（MUX开关：独立的GPU）直接输出图像，结合动态提升至25瓦，导致帧率略有增加。

激活 "静音 "配置文件时的低帧率是由于GeForce GPU的 "耳语模式2.0"，它应该尽可能地保持低噪音水平，同时帧率水平仍然足以应付游戏（至少30至60帧）。这意味着GPU不必在全功率下运行，从而产生更少的热量，使风扇保持更安静。

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)	126.9 fps +14%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	126 (108^min) fps +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (sep. GPU, 25W)	124.4 (20.1^min, 40.2^P0.1, 88.9^P1) fps +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)	120.7 (22.4^min, 49.9^P0.1, 82.6^P1) fps +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	117.4 (26.9^min, 30.4^P0.1, 81.6^P1) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 130.6, n=43)	112.1 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	111.1 (30^min, 41.5^P0.1, 74.7^P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	92.2 (19.1^min, 45.8^P0.1, 67.7^P1) fps -17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	89.3 (64^min) fps -20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)	60 (33.6^min, 39^P0.1, 47.5^P1) fps -46%
3840x2160 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (42.8 - 107.6, n=11, last 2 years)	71.6 fps +32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (44.8 - 62.7, n=5)	56.4 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	54.4 (30.3^min, 36.3^P0.1, 43.6^P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	44.8 (14.7^min, 26.1^P0.1, 36.7^P1) fps -18%

Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	160 (139.4^min) fps +44%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	156 (137^min) fps +40%
Average of class Gaming (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)	149.3 fps +34%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	145.1 (124.5^min) fps +30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (29.9 - 170.5, n=45)	141.1 fps +27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (sep. GPU, 25W)	118.5 (101.8^min) fps +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)	115 (97.7^min) fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	111.3 (96.1^min) fps
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	59.9 (57.1^min) fps -46%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)	59.6 (57.5^min) fps -46%
3840x2160 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming (26.5 - 205, n=67, last 2 years)	143.4 fps +61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (70.8 - 155.6, n=19)	124.8 fps +40%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	112 (98.7^min) fps +26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)	105.5 (92.7^min) fps +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)	92.3 (81.3^min) fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	89.2 (77.6^min) fps

X-Plane 11.11
3840x2160 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming (26.3 - 145.5, n=64, last 2 years)	101.5 fps +54%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (32.9 - 109.5, n=20)	82.7 fps +25%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	78.6 fps +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)	66.7 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	66.1 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)	58.5 fps -11%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	109 fps +39%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	108 fps +38%
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years)	107.2 fps +37%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (32.6 - 127, n=45)	101.1 fps +29%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	99.3 fps +27%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	93.4 fps +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (sep. GPU, 25W)	82.8 fps +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)	79.7 fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	78.2 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)	60.4 fps -23%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
3840x2160 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (32.2 - 94.7, n=53, last 2 years)	66.4 fps +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, sep. GPU, 25W)	58.4 fps +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, Turbo)	55.4 fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (35.1 - 61.2, n=18)	52.7 fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	51.4 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, Leise)	47.2 fps -8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	40.1 fps -22%
1920x1080 High Quality
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	131 (86^min) fps +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, sep. GPU, 25W)	125.1 fps +16%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)	119 fps +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, Turbo)	118.5 fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30.7 - 140.6, n=42)	113.8 fps +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	108 fps
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	90.4 fps -16%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	89.4 fps -17%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	85.8 fps -21%

GTA V
3840x2160 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (33.6 - 90.9, n=41, last 2 years)	65.6 fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)	63.2 (14.7^min, 47.6^P1) fps +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	59 (14.1^min, 43.5^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (37.7 - 67.2, n=14)	58.6 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	41.8 (13^min, 32.3^P1) fps -29%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	125 (10.6^min, 83.3^P1) fps +23%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	113 (20.6^min, 76.9^P1) fps +11%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years)	113 fps +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 139.2, n=42)	111 fps +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	110.9 (20.6^min, 71.4^P1) fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (sep. GPU, 25W)	106.6 (3.82^min, 71.4^P1) fps +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)	102.7 (18.1^min, 76.9^P1) fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	101.5 (21.1^min, 71.4^P1) fps
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	92.4 (7.56^min, 62.5^P1) fps -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)	60 (11.5^min, 58.8^P1) fps -41%

F1 2021
3840x2160 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (50.2 - 115.1, n=6, last 2 years)	96.8 fps +61%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	68 (59^min) fps +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, sep. GPU, 25W)	66.4 (58^min, 57^P1) fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, Turbo)	64.4 (56^min, 53^P1) fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (41.1 - 70.2, n=18)	60.9 fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931)	60 (51^min, 49^P1) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, Leise)	56.5 (50^min, 47^P1) fps -6%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (852849)	47.3 (39^min, 38^P1) fps -21%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	157 (132^min) fps +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, sep. GPU, 25W)	155.9 (129^min, 120^P1) fps +20%
Average of class Gaming (27.6 - 271, n=17, last 2 years)	142.5 fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, Turbo)	142.1 (121^min, 103^P1) fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931)	130.2 (109^min, 92^P1) fps
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931)	126.3 (112^min, 91^P1) fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30.2 - 160.6, n=30)	126.1 fps -3%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (852849)	103 (76^min, 83^P1) fps -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, Leise)	60 (59^min, 57^P1) fps -54%

Strange Brigade
3840x2160 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (54.5 - 298, n=49, last 2 years)	118.5 fps +40%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Turbo)	92.9 (64.3^min, 67.3^P1) fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (61.7 - 100.7, n=15)	87.6 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	84.5 (30.7^min, 66.2^P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	68.4 (41.3^min, 58.5^P1) fps -19%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)	227 fps +24%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	221 (94.6^min, 162^P1) fps +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, sep. GPU, 25W)	221 (76.3^min, 154.1^P1) fps +21%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	196.3 (44.4^min, 139.6^P1) fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Turbo)	194.9 (119.9^min, 137.3^P1) fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (42.3 - 224, n=41)	187.3 fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	182.4 (66.8^min, 132.6^P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	151 (35.4^min, 116^P1) fps -17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	149.8 (29.6^min, 114.2^P1) fps -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Leise)	60 (44^min, 59.5^P1) fps -67%

Far Cry 5
3840x2160 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (39 - 113, n=29, last 2 years)	84.5 fps +41%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (45 - 76, n=9)	67.6 fps +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	60 (54^min) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	45 (37^min) fps -25%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (111 - 162, n=24)	133 fps +20%
Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=103, last 2 years)	130.5 fps +18%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	130 (93^min) fps +17%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	122 (97^min) fps +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	111 (82^min) fps

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	49.9 (28.1^min) fps +24%
Average of class Gaming (19.1 - 74, n=26, last 2 years)	48.1 fps +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (39.2 - 49.9, n=7)	43.3 fps +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	40.3 (29.8^min) fps
3840x2160 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming (17.4 - 56, n=35, last 2 years)	35.7 fps +42%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (19.6 - 32.4, n=6)	27.1 fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	25.2 (16.6^min) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	19.6 (13^min) fps -22%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	99.1 (29^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (54 - 144.1, n=16)	93.6 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming (16.7 - 159.7, n=71, last 2 years)	92.4 fps -7%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	73.2 (55.1^min) fps -26%

Far Cry 6
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	114 (96^min) fps +32%
Average of class Gaming (35 - 167, n=28, last 2 years)	110.6 fps +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (71.3 - 114, n=6)	98.7 fps +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	86.2 (65^min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	71.3 (59^min) fps -17%
3840x2160 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T
Average of class Gaming (3.38 - 92, n=16, last 2 years)	63.8 fps +38%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	57 (47^min) fps +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (46.2 - 57, n=4)	52.9 fps +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	46.2 (42^min) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR AA:T
Average of class Gaming (71.9 - 119, n=9, last 2 years)	93.6 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (91 - 92, n=3)	91.3 fps
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	91 (81^min) fps

Rainbow Six Extraction
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (with Fixed Resolution Quality)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	169 (107^min) fps
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	159 (114^min) fps -6%
Average of class Gaming (33 - 314, n=7, last 2 years)	153.6 fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (128 - 169, n=3)	152 fps -10%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	128 fps -24%
3840x2160 Ultra Preset (with Fixed Resolution Quality)
Average of class Gaming (37 - 112, n=4, last 2 years)	72.4 fps +27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	57 (30^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (44 - 57, n=2)	50.5 fps -11%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	44 (19^min) fps -23%

Ghostwire Tokyo
1920x1080 Highest Settings
Average of class Gaming (65.9 - 231, n=7, last 2 years)	151.7 fps +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	143.3 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (125 - 143.3, n=2)	134.2 fps -6%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	125 (28.2^min, 41.7^P0.1, 80.1^P1) fps -13%
3840x2160 Highest Settings
Average of class Gaming (29.6 - 100, n=6, last 2 years)	64.8 fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	59.9 (20.5^min, 29.9^P0.1, 40.4^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU ()	59.9 fps 0%
1920x1080 Highest Settings + Maximum Ray Tracing
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 127, n=7, last 2 years)	75.9 fps +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	68.3 (19.2^min, 29.1^P0.1, 43.2^P1) fps +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (66.1 - 68.3, n=2)	67.2 fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	66.1 (22.5^min, 32.9^P0.1, 42.2^P1) fps

Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12)
Average of class Gaming (22.3 - 189.4, n=47, last 2 years)	123.1 fps +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (100.7 - 110.5, n=4)	104.6 fps 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	104.3 fps
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	103 fps -1%
3840x2160 Badass Preset (DX12)
Average of class Gaming (21.9 - 73.7, n=31, last 2 years)	52.2 fps +30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (40.1 - 43.9, n=2)	42 fps +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	40.1 fps

Guardians of the Galaxy
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	155 (87^min) fps +38%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (112 - 155, n=3)	139.7 fps +25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	112 (74^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (42 - 163, n=10, last 2 years)	110.6 fps -1%
3840x2160 Ultra Preset
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	75 (20^min) fps +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (60 - 75, n=2)	67.5 fps +13%
Average of class Gaming (42 - 96, n=3, last 2 years)	66 fps +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	60 (45^min) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray-Tracing
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	104 (72^min) fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (82 - 104, n=2)	93 fps +13%
Average of class Gaming (54 - 128, n=7, last 2 years)	83.1 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	82 (52^min) fps

Alan Wake Remastered
3840x2160 High Preset
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	89 (40.7^min, 52^P0.1, 72.3^P1) fps +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (71.6 - 89, n=2)	80.3 fps +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	71.6 (21.9^min, 39.4^P0.1, 48.8^P1) fps
1920x1080 High Preset
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	155 (49.6^min, 56^P0.1, 120^P1) fps +30%
Average of class Gaming (131.6 - 144.9, n=2, last 2 years)	138.3 fps +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (118.8 - 155, n=2)	136.9 fps +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	118.8 (31.4^min, 50^P0.1, 97.7^P1) fps

Dying Light 2
1920x1080 High Quality Raytracing
Average of class Gaming (19.8 - 83.9, n=11, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	38.8 (22.1^min, 25.7^P0.1, 30.7^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (33.4 - 42.3, n=5)	38.5 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	33.4 (23.3^min, 24.3^P0.1, 27.8^P1) fps -14%
3840x2160 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (20.8 - 62, n=8, last 2 years)	44.9 fps +45%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	31 (24.4^min, 26^P0.1, 27.8^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (27.3 - 31, n=2)	29.2 fps -6%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	27.3 (15.7^min, 18.5^P0.1, 24.9^P1) fps -12%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (52 - 174, n=11, last 2 years)	107.7 fps +39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (69.2 - 88.4, n=5)	80.5 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	77.6 (65.2^min, 69.1^P0.1, 71.6^P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	69.2 (52^min, 58.4^P0.1, 62.9^P1) fps -11%

为了评估帧率是否在较长的时间内保持相当稳定，我们让游戏"TheWitcher 3"在全高清分辨率和最高质量设置下运行了约60分钟，没有移动游戏角色。我们没有注意到帧率的下降。

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø111.3 (107-116)

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø87.2 (70-92)

MSI GE76 Raider i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø122.2 (107-127)

Medion Erazer Beast X30 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø112.9 (95-119)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; Leise: Ø60 (59-61)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; Turbo: Ø117.9 (98-124)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; sep. GPU, 25W: Ø124.6 (120-128)

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø91.2 (87-96)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	180.4	175.4	158.9	101.5	92.2	101.5
The Witcher 3 (2015)	345	298	197.9	111.1		80.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	133.8	122.2	114.8	111.3		89.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	177.8	138.7	108		84.6	51.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	112.9	95.1	78.2			66.1
Far Cry 5 (2018)	146	124	120	111	104	60
Strange Brigade (2018)	359	229	198.8	182.4	140.2	84.5
F1 2021 (2021)	330	275	225	130.2	102.5	60
Alan Wake Remastered (2021)	142.4	123.4	118.8		114.4	71.6
Far Cry 6 (2021)	116.2	100.3	90.9	71.3	75.2	46.2
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021)	118	113	112	112	103	60
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022)	243	207	202	169	113	57
Dying Light 2 (2022)	106.9	88.4	77.6		55.8	31
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)	136.3	119.6	98.3	99.1	53.7	25.2
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022)	148.1	146.8	143.8	143.3	110.6	59.9
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	192.7	167.3	128.9	104.3	73.5	40.1

排放--华硕ROG 16的噪音和热量发展可以接受

噪声排放

在日常办公和互联网任务的操作中，这两个风扇很轻松，只产生非常小的噪音。有时，它们甚至保持关闭状态。另一方面，在满负荷的情况下，它们会变得很吵，在压力测试中最大的噪音水平为50 dB(A)，在Witcher 3 测试中为48 dB(A)。虽然可以通过选择 "静音 "配置文件来减少噪音的发展，但这是以计算性能为代价的。

Noise Level

Idle		26 / 27 / 29 dB(A)
Load		41 / 50 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 26 dB(A)

	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI GE76 Raider i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Beast X30 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Noise		10%	4%	-11%	-8%	-9%
off / environment *	26	24.2 7%	26 -0%	26 -0%	26 -0%	25 4%
Idle Minimum *	26	24.2 7%	26 -0%	26 -0%	27 -4%	30 -15%
Idle Average *	27	24.2 10%	27 -0%	27 -0%	29 -7%	32 -19%
Idle Maximum *	29	24.2 17%	29 -0%	40 -38%	34 -17%	33 -14%
Load Average *	41	42.9 -5%	37 10%	50 -22%	48 -17%	45 -10%
Witcher 3 ultra *	48	39.5 18%	44 8%	53 -10%	51 -6%	50 -4%
Load Maximum *	50	42.9 14%	45 10%	53 -6%	53 -6%	52 -4%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在日常操作中（办公室、互联网），机箱温度保持在绿色范围内。在负载情况下（压力测试，Witcher 3 测试），笔记本电脑升温而不会变得过热。CPU的温度范围在可接受的水平内。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


35 °C	36 °C	35 °C
44 °C	45 °C	39 °C
41 °C	40 °C	38 °C

Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 39.2 °C


50 °C	50 °C	46 °C
45 °C	46 °C	44 °C
43 °C	44 °C	42 °C

Maximum: 50 °C
Average: 45.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 47 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


29 °C	29 °C	28 °C
32 °C	33 °C	31 °C
29 °C	29 °C	28 °C

Maximum: 33 °C
Average: 29.8 °C


33 °C	33 °C	32 °C
33 °C	33 °C	32 °C
30 °C	31 °C	30 °C

Maximum: 33 °C
Average: 31.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 34 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


35 °C	39 °C	37 °C
46 °C	44 °C	39 °C
42 °C	41 °C	38 °C

Maximum: 46 °C
Average: 40.1 °C


51 °C	51 °C	46 °C
45 °C	46 °C	43 °C
43 °C	44 °C	43 °C

Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 45.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-13.1 °C / -23.6 F).

	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat		20%	-12%	-1%	-13%	-5%
Maximum Upper Side *	45	42.3 6%	53 -18%	43 4%	55 -22%	49 -9%
Maximum Bottom *	50	41.7 17%	53 -6%	47 6%	62 -24%	55 -10%
Idle Upper Side *	33	23.9 28%	36 -9%	33 -0%	32 3%	33 -0%
Idle Bottom *	33	23.9 28%	38 -15%	37 -12%	36 -9%	33 -0%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在Prime95和Furmark运行至少一个小时的压力测试开始时，CPU（4至4.1 GHz）和GPU（1,000至1,600 MHz）以高时钟速度运行。继续下去，数值下降到3至3.1GHz（CPU）和850至900MHz（GPU）之间。压力测试代表了一种极端情况，我们用这个测试来评估系统在满负荷情况下是否保持稳定。

发言人

立体声扬声器产生了一个体面的声音，尽管它可以使用更多的低音。为了获得更好的声音体验，建议使用耳机或外部扬声器。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - Zephyrus Duo提供良好的电池寿命

消耗功率

在空闲运行期间，GX650的功耗略高于大多数其他Windows竞争对手。然而，其他竞争对手都无法达到MacBook Pro 16的低值。 MacBook Pro 16.压力测试或Witcher-3测试导致Zephyrus的消耗量增加，最高达到256瓦或平均186.5瓦，这对这里使用的硬件来说是正常值。虽然在Witcher 3 测试期间功耗保持不变，但在压力测试过程中功耗略有下降。额定功率为280瓦，附带的电源尺寸足够大。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / Watt
Idle	19 / 24 / 31 Watt
Load	104 / 256 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI GE76 Raider i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Beast X30 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		42%	16%	4%	9%	-15%	13%
Idle Minimum *	19	5.4 72%	17 11%	12 37%	12 37%	26 -37%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years) 29%
Idle Average *	24	16.4 32%	19 21%	17 29%	16 33%	30 -25%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years) 21%
Idle Maximum *	31	16.7 46%	25 19%	28 10%	22 29%	37 -19%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years) 14%
Load Average *	104	94 10%	108 -4%	118 -13%	118 -13%	127 -22%	106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years) -3%
Witcher 3 ultra *	186.5	104 44%	150 20%	252 -35%	223 -20%	176 6%
Load Maximum *	256	135 47%	179 30%	272 -6%	290 -13%	236 8%	249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years) 3%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø186.5 (182.4-193.3)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø202 (151.3-250)

Power Consumption With External Monitor

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø130.5 (128-133.6)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø129.5 (127.8-130.9)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø166.2 (157.9-172.1)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø174.7 (170-184)

电池寿命

在通过脚本加载网站的WLAN测试中，以及在持续循环运行短片《Big Buck Bunny》（H.264编码，FHD）的视频测试中，16英寸笔记本电脑分别持续了7：49小时和9：19小时。在这两项测试中，笔记本电脑的省电功能被停用，显示亮度被调整到大约150cd/m²。在运行视频测试时，通信模块也被关闭。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		12h 29min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 101)		7h 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		9h 19min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 02min

	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	MSI GE76 Raider i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.99 Wh	Medion Erazer Beast X30 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 91.2 Wh	Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		59%	-3%	-35%	10%	-3%	-9%
Reader / Idle	749		484 -35%		463 -38%	533 -29%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years) -25%
H.264	559	1021 83%	356 -36%		386 -31%	452 -19%	408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years) -27%
WiFi v1.3	469	894 91%	293 -38%	306 -35%	341 -27%	381 -19%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years) -20%
Load	62	63 2%	122 97%		145 134%	96 55%	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years) 38%

Pros

+ 16:10格式的哑光4K显示器

+ 良好的色彩再现（Pantone认证）

+ 高色彩空间覆盖率

+ 杜比视界/HDR

+ FreeSync和G-Sync（后者通过USB-C）。

+ 高系统性能

+ 超频选项

+ 坚固的金属外壳

+ 2个PCIe 4固态硬盘(Raid 0)

+ 大量的存储空间（4TB）

+ 快速存储卡读卡器

+ 卓越的WLAN传输速率

+ 非常好的电池寿命

+ 电源交付

Cons

- 没有Thunderbolt 4或USB 4

- 比同类设备更大、更重

结论 - 一款针对创意领域的强大笔记本电脑

华硕将Zephyrus主要宣传为游戏笔记本，但该笔记本的概念也是针对内容创作者的。视频和图像处理、渲染，当然还有游戏是核心学科。4k游戏在高至最大设置下是可能的。

虽然Screenpad Plus应该在某些应用场景中提供一定的附加价值，但它也增加了笔记本电脑的重量、购买价格和尺寸。

ARyzen 9-6900HXAPU和 GeForce RTX 3080-Ti LaptopGPU提供必要的计算性能，而且这两个组件都以恒定的高时钟速度运行。两个PCIe 4固态硬盘（RAID 0）确保了短的加载时间，并提供了大量的存储空间（4TB）。整个包由64GB的工作内存来完善。

负载下的噪音和热量发展范围是该类笔记本电脑的通常水平。然而，在日常操作中，笔记本电脑仍然非常安静。16:10格式的良好的16英寸显示屏具有出色的色彩再现能力（潘通认证），完全覆盖DCI-P3色彩空间。

尽管计算性能很高，但你不必忍受短暂的电池寿命。一次电池充电（90Wh）可维持近8小时的无线网络运行时间。另一个积极因素是能够使用通用的USB-C充电器（最小45瓦）为电池充电，因为左边的USB-C第二代端口也支持Power Delivery。这意味着你不一定要带着高大上的280瓦的电源。

Zephyrus的另一个选择是技嘉Aero 16，它提供了更高的CPU性能和一个Thunderbolt 4端口。其缺点是电池寿命较差，显示屏反光，发热量较大。如果你需要一个强大的计算性能和尽可能长的电池寿命，你很难绕过 Apple MacBook Pro 16.另一方面，那时你既不能更换或扩展固态硬盘，也不能更换或扩展工作内存。此外，MacBook还使用反射式屏幕。

价格和可用性

虽然ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX已经在华硕的美国网站上上市了在本次测试时，其他在线商店，如CDW ($4097)和B&H Photo ($4000)显示它还没有存货。

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX - 05/23/2022 v7 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis

86 / 98 → 88%

Keyboard

81%

Pointing Device

83%

Connectivity

70 / 80 → 88%

Weight

59 / 10-66 → 88%

Battery

80 / 95 → 84%

Display

89%

Games Performance

98%

Application Performance

97%

Temperature

80 / 95 → 84%

Noise

81 / 90 → 90%

Audio

74%

Camera

41 / 85 → 48%

Average

78%

88%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕ROG Zephyrus Duo 16回顾。一个不寻常的游戏笔记本，拥有良好的电池寿命

Sascha Mölck, 2022-05-24 (Update: 2022-05-24)

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - GX650采用坚固的金属外壳

尺寸比较

设备--Zephyrus不提供Thunderbolt 4。

SD卡阅读器

沟通

网络摄像头

辅料

维护

担保

输入设备 - 华硕笔记本电脑的第二个显示屏

键盘

触摸板

华硕Screenpad Plus

显示 - 良好的色彩再现

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

表演 - 伦勃朗与安培的相遇

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

系统性能

DPC延迟

存储解决方案

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

排放--华硕ROG 16的噪音和热量发展可以接受

噪声排放

温度

压力测试

发言人

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX audio analysis

电源管理 - Zephyrus Duo提供良好的电池寿命

消耗功率

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Power Consumption With External Monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 一款针对创意领域的强大笔记本电脑

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison