华硕ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW (Core i7-9750H, RTX 2070) 笔记本电脑评测

Name: Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Brand: Asus

强大且轻薄。

轻薄游戏笔记本电脑是现在的潮流，技嘉，微星和Razer等都处于领先地位。华硕现在已经更新了其GX502系列，但其超薄机身可以压住Core i7-9750H和GeForce RTX 2070吗？请仔细阅读，找出答案。

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 07/14/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Coffee Lake Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW (ROG Zephyrus S GX502 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1215 MHz, RAM: 7000 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 419.71, Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, DDR4-2666, 19-19-19-43, 双通道

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, Full HD, 144 Hz, G-Sync, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel HM370

Storage

2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0), 1024 GB

, 2 x M.2 2280 drive bays

Soundcard

Realtek ALC294 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm二合一接口

Networking

Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 19 x 360 x 252

Battery

76 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4 cells

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 外接摄像头

Additional features

Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 230 W power supply, 3D sculpture for crafting, Asus Giftbox, Install, Hello, Keyboard Hotkeys, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.064 kg, Power Supply: 632 g

Price

17999 EUR

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Acer Predator Triton 500 Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q DIN A4 ❌

Left-hand side: ventilation grille, power connector, RJ45 LAN, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-A, microphone jack, headphone jack

Right-hand side: USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C, 2 x USB 3.0 Type-A, ventilation grille, Kensington lock slot

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Predator Triton 500 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	683 MBit/s 0%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Wireless-AC 9560	683 MBit/s
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	680 MBit/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Wireless-AC 9560	655 MBit/s -4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel Wireless-AC 9560	644 MBit/s -6%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Wireless-AC 9560	684 MBit/s +1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Wireless-AC 9560	680 MBit/s
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	678 MBit/s 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	671 MBit/s -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel Wireless-AC 9560	661 MBit/s -3%


270 cd/m²	284 cd/m²	258 cd/m²
278 cd/m²	286 cd/m²	272 cd/m²
272 cd/m²	285 cd/m²	273 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 286 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 275.3 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 286 cd/m²
Contrast: 773:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.19 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.27
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 1920x1080	Acer Predator Triton 500 AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
Display		1%	0%	2%	-1%
Display P3 Coverage	64.9	65.6 1%	64.2 -1%	65.3 1%	63.5 -2%
sRGB Coverage	91	92.2 1%	92.6 2%	94.9 4%	93.1 2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	65.9	66.9 2%	65.7 0%	66.3 1%	64.5 -2%
Response Times		-3%	-19%	-83%	-92%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	7.2 ?(3.8, 3.4)	7 ?(3.6, 3.4) 3%	8 ?(4, 4) -11%	16.8 ?(9.2, 7.6) -133%	16.4 ?(8.8, 7.6) -128%
Response Time Black / White *	8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)	9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2) -9%	11.2 ?(6, 5.2) -27%	11.6 ?(7.2, 4.4) -32%	13.6 ?(8.4, 5.2) -55%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-3%	-24%	-2%	12%
Brightness middle	286	323.6 13%	304 6%	314.7 10%	250 -13%
Brightness	275	315 15%	299 9%	312 13%	235 -15%
Brightness Distribution	90	91 1%	89 -1%	90 0%	85 -6%
Black Level *	0.37	0.29 22%	0.27 27%	0.38 -3%	0.29 22%
Contrast	773	1116 44%	1126 46%	828 7%	862 12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.19	3.31 -51%	4.66 -113%	2.56 -17%	1.46 33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.4	5.74 -30%	9.65 -119%	4.89 -11%	2.47 44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.27	2.73 -20%	1.72 24%	1.71 25%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.2	2.9 -32%	5.53 -151%	3.4 -55%	1.27 42%
Gamma	2.41 ^91%	2.29 ^96%	2.5 ^88%	2.3 ^96%	2.4 ^92%
CCT	6405 ^101%	6765 ^96%	8028 ^81%	6435 ^101%	6749 ^96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	59	59.7 1%	60 2%	60.7 3%	60 2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	91	91.8 1%	93 2%	94.6 4%	93 2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-2% / -2%	-14% / -19%	-28% / -11%	-27% / -4%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.4 ms rise
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.8 ms rise
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1072 (986.63-1110.9)

Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø980 (961.82-1019.05)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)	276 Points +56%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H	177 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H	176 Points -1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H	174 Points -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel Core i7-8750H	168 Points -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H	166 Points -6%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)	3394 Points +187%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H	1182 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H	1156 Points -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel Core i7-8750H	1122 Points -5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H	1019 Points -14%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H	999 Points -15%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

177 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1182 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

2507 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

430 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)	7774 Points +37%
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)	5883 Points +4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)	5654 Points
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5492 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5416 Points -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8	5353 Points -5%

	Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Acer Predator Triton 500 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-29%	7%	-10%	-11%
Write 4K	97	93.9 -3%	93.6 -4%	93.9 -3%	97.1 0%
Read 4K	49.58	46.29 -7%	38.82 -22%	40.56 -18%	53.7 8%
Write Seq	1838	974 -47%	2455 34%	1468 -20%	1526 -17%
Read Seq	2421	1425 -41%	2107 -13%	1540 -36%	2020 -17%
Write 4K Q32T1	326.9	259.4 -21%	298.7 -9%	293.5 -10%	285.6 -13%
Read 4K Q32T1	372.9	296.5 -20%	338.7 -9%	346 -7%	321.8 -14%
Write Seq Q32T1	1894	977 -48%	2902 53%	1941 2%	1533 -19%
Read Seq Q32T1	2828	1666 -41%	3536 25%	3266 15%	2351 -17%

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2828 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1894 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 372.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 326.9 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2421 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1838 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 49.58 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 97 MB/s

3DMark 11 Performance		18686 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		30754 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		16290 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		6890 points
Help

... in comparison

Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0): Ø70 (63-76)

Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0): Ø76.1 (70-81)

Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8: Ø51.3 (44-61)

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)	31245 Points +63%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	21237 Points +11%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	19123 Points
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	18153 Points -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	17598 Points -8%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)	13034 Points +79%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	8171 Points +12%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	7277 Points
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	6728 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	6562 Points -10%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)	43521 Points +79%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	28997 Points +19%
Acer Predator Triton 500 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	28083 Points +16%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	24267 Points
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	22723 Points -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	22089 Points -9%

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)	126.9 fps +81%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	80.3 fps +14%
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	76.5 (63^min) fps +9%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H	70.2 (58^min) fps
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	68.9 fps -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	58.3 (48^min) fps -17%

	low	med.	high	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)			130	70.2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	91.3	86	80.3	74.2
Apex Legends (2019)			128	126
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)			91	83
Metro Exodus (2019)	91.1	82.6	66.3	54.6
Anthem (2019)			84	79
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019)			121	75
The Division 2 (2019)	121	111	94	73
Anno 1800 (2019)			76.8	39.5
Rage 2 (2019)	180	122	103	101
Control (2019)	152	90	68
Borderlands 3 (2019)	94	84	71	61

Noise Level

Idle		31 / 33 / 38 dB(A)
Load		50 / 56 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

	Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Average of class Gaming
Noise		4%	9%	17%	7%	16%
off / environment *	30	28.7 4%	29 3%	28.8 4%	30 -0%	24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=157, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Minimum *	31	29.8 4%	30 3%	28.8 7%	32 -3%	25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=158, last 2 years) 18%
Idle Average *	33	32.4 2%	32 3%	28.8 13%	34 -3%	27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=158, last 2 years) 18%
Idle Maximum *	38	38 -0%	34 11%	29.4 23%	36 5%	30.2 ?(23 - 47, n=158, last 2 years) 21%
Load Average *	50	38.2 24%	44 12%	35.7 29%	42 16%	42.5 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=158, last 2 years) 15%
Witcher 3 ultra *	53	56.6 -7%	46 13%	42.5 20%	44 17%
Load Maximum *	56	56.6 -1%	47 16%	45 20%	48 14%	53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=158, last 2 years) 5%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


52 °C	54 °C	50 °C
48 °C	50 °C	43 °C
38 °C	36 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 54 °C
Average: 44.9 °C


41 °C	41 °C	44 °C
42 °C	44 °C	47 °C
33 °C	35 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 40 °C

Power Supply (max.) 44 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


32 °C	33 °C	31 °C
33 °C	33 °C	30 °C
31 °C	30 °C	28 °C

Maximum: 33 °C
Average: 31.2 °C


29 °C	30 °C	30 °C
31 °C	33 °C	34 °C
28 °C	31 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 34 °C
Average: 30.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 38 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


50 °C	53 °C	49 °C
47 °C	51 °C	44 °C
36 °C	33 °C	34 °C

Maximum: 53 °C
Average: 44.1 °C


42 °C	42 °C	47 °C
43 °C	43 °C	46 °C
31 °C	35 °C	35 °C

Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 40.4 °C

Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).

	Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Average of class Gaming
Heat		6%	-3%	12%	-1%	5%
Maximum Upper Side *	54	47 13%	49 9%	49 9%	56 -4%	46.1 ?(28.2 - 60, n=156, last 2 years) 15%
Maximum Bottom *	47	48.6 -3%	58 -23%	49 -4%	66 -40%	49.2 ?(33.6 - 66, n=156, last 2 years) -5%
Idle Upper Side *	33	28.8 13%	33 -0%	25.4 23%	27 18%	31.2 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=156, last 2 years) 5%
Idle Bottom *	34	33.2 2%	33 3%	27.2 20%	27 21%	32.2 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=156, last 2 years) 5%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.5 / 1.2 Watt
Idle	24 / 27 / 33 Watt
Load	129 / 216 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		18%	20%	36%	31%	19%
Idle Minimum *	24	16.1 33%	16 33%	10.4 57%	16 33%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years) 44%
Idle Average *	27	20.9 23%	22 19%	14.6 46%	18 33%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years) 30%
Idle Maximum *	33	27 18%	32 3%	16.3 51%	23 30%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years) 19%
Load Average *	129	93.4 28%	89 31%	88.5 31%	88 32%	106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years) 17%
Witcher 3 ultra *	176	168.2 4%	147 16%	155.4 12%	120 32%
Load Maximum *	216	215.3 -0%	173 20%	182.4 16%	167 23%	249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years) -15%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		5h 53min
WiFi Websurfing		3h 40min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 02min

	Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 76 Wh	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 50 Wh	Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 82 Wh	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 80 Wh	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 94.24 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-18%	4%	70%	104%	56%
Reader / Idle	353		335 -5%	682 93%	549 56%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years) 60%
WiFi v1.3	220	181 -18%	190 -14%	387 76%	382 74%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years) 71%
Load	62		81 31%	88 42%	174 181%	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years) 38%
H.264					364	408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 支持Nvidia Optimus和G-Sync

+ 紧凑时尚的设计

+ 色彩准确的屏幕

+ 144 Hz刷新率

+ 有用的原厂软件

+ 不错的性能表现

+ 重量对于一台15.6英寸游戏本来说很轻

+ RGB背光键盘

Cons

- 高负载下温度高

- 没有雷电3

- 没有读卡器

- 部分焊死内存

- 很一般的续航时间

- 功耗高

- 一般般的扬声器

华硕ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW笔记本电脑评测. Test device courtesy of ASUS Germany.

从表面上看，华硕ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW目前是您可以购买的最好的游戏笔记本电脑之一。尽管它有一些可能会让人失望的弱点。

该设备采用轻薄的设计，但仍然塞入了功能强大的组件。它的高端CPU和GPU使其能够毫不费力地在高特效下运行近期的所有3A游戏。它的低响应时间，G-Sync，144 Hz刷新率使游戏看起来也很流畅。但是，你必须忍受低对比度的视觉效果和可怕的续航时间。我们仍然建议您在不玩游戏时激活Nvidia Optimus，因为如果始终启用GPU，电池将很快耗尽。

华硕ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW有很多功能。它时尚，紧凑，提供出色的游戏体验。然而，它运行起来很吵，缺少一些有用的接口，续航时间也很一般。

我们无法理解华硕所做出的一些决定。将一半的RAM焊接到主板似乎很傻，还没有配备读卡器，摄像头或雷电3端口。而且，GX502GW作为一台优质的轻薄游戏笔记本电脑，运行时声音太大而且太热。

简而言之，几乎没有理由考虑GX502系列，而是去选择Aero 15-X9或Razer Blade 15。可能你是为了那块非Max-Q GPU，但拥有满血RTX 20系列笔记本电脑也有其他牺牲。如果你正在寻找一台15.6英寸的游戏笔记本电脑，GX502GW仍然是一个不错的选择，但还是比不上技嘉和Razer的竞品。

Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW - 05/14/2020 v7 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Chassis

81 / 98 → 82%

Keyboard

79%

Pointing Device

75%

Connectivity

58 / 80 → 73%

Weight

63 / 10-66 → 94%

Battery