Notebookcheck Logo

Razer Blade 17（2022年初）回顾。优雅的4K游戏笔记本，屏幕明亮

沉闷还是尖锐？

酷睿i9-12900H和GeForce RTX 3080 Ti为4k游戏、视频处理和渲染提供足够的性能。哑光4k显示屏（IPS，144赫兹）以良好的色彩再现和高亮度而得分。我们的测试显示了高端配置的新刀片17还能做什么。
Alder Lake Gaming Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Windows

Razer Blade 17针对的是游戏玩家和创意专业人士--特别是在我们测试的高端配置中，配备了Core i9-12900H CPU，GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU，以及17.3英寸4k显示屏，色彩准确。价位在4700欧元左右（约4900美元）。除了RTX 3080 Ti之外，其 美国的兄弟姐妹我们已经测试过，它有一个Core i7-12800H CPU和一个QHD-面板（240赫兹）。竞争对手包括极其强大的笔记本电脑，如 Alienware x17 R2 P48E，以及Medion Erazer Beast X30，以及微星隐形GS77 12UHS.

你可以在我们对相同结构的Blade 17 2022（Core i7, QHD）的评论中找到关于机箱、连接设备、输入设备和扬声器的信息。 对相同结构的Blade 17 2022 (Core i7, QHD)的评论中找到相关信息。.

Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Blade 17 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1395 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 165 W TDP, GDDR6, 30.0.15.1295, Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR4-4800, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (in use)
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AU Optronics B173ZAN06.9, IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB 
, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 876 GB free
Connections
5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: combined headset port, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 395 x 260
Battery
82 Wh, 5329 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Microsoft 365 (trial), 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.774 kg, Power Supply: 690 g
Price
4700 Euro
Links
Razer homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
89.9 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		2.8 kg19.9 mm17.30"3840x2160
Alternative specs USD 2,117.01
89.2 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2022
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		3.1 kg20.9 mm17.30"1920x1080
Alternative specs USD 2,129.98
86.7 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2022
Medion Erazer Beast X30
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		2.2 kg23 mm17.30"2560x1440
from EUR 0
87.2 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2022
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		2.9 kg20.8 mm17.30"2560x1440
Alternative specs USD 1,999.00

尺寸比较

❌
399.23 mm 299.57 mm 20.9 mm 3.1 kg397.6 mm 283.5 mm 20.8 mm 2.9 kg395 mm 262 mm 23 mm 2.2 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
左侧：电源、千兆以太网（2.5Gbit）、2个USB 3.2 Gen 2（USB-A）、雷电4（USB-C；DisplayPort，Power Delivery）、音频组合
左侧：电源、千兆以太网（2.5Gbit）、2个USB 3.2 Gen 2（USB-A）、雷电4（USB-C；DisplayPort，Power Delivery）、音频组合
右侧：存储卡读卡器（SD），Thunderbolt 4（USB-C；DisplayPort，Power Delivery），USB 3.2 Gen 2（USB-A），HDMI 2.1，电缆锁的插槽
右侧：存储卡读卡器（SD），Thunderbolt 4（USB-C；DisplayPort，Power Delivery），USB 3.2 Gen 2（USB-A），HDMI 2.1，电缆锁的插槽
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV Pro V60)
182.9 MB/s +20%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
152 MB/s
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H (AV Pro V60)
139.5 MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 197.3, n=68, last 2 years)
87.6 MB/s -42%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro V60)
72.1 MB/s -53%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
66 MB/s -57%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV Pro V60)
220.6 MB/s
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H (AV Pro V60)
169 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 263, n=68, last 2 years)
110.1 MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
83 MB/s
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro V60)
80.2 MB/s
Networking - iperf3 receive AXE11000
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1721 (1500min - 1744max) MBit/s +3%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1672 (864min - 1737max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
  (917 - 1727, n=9)
1418 MBit/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1744, n=123, last 2 years)
1390 MBit/s -17%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1642 (864-1737)
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1721 (1500-1744)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW); iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1398 (1332-1446)
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1270 (1179-1317)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1470 (1368-1570)
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1503 (1451-1558)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW); iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1209 (896-1302)
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø986 (735-1134)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1160 (1095-1239)
ColorChecker
4.9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
12 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Razer Blade 17 Early 2022: 8.47 ∆E min: 2.28 - max: 14.18 ∆E

显示屏 - 明亮且色彩准确

在我们的测试装置中，Razer使用了令人印象深刻的17.3英寸显示屏，具有4K分辨率（3840 x 2160像素）和144赫兹刷新率，提供了更高的亮度（486.3 cd/m²）和比竞争对手的显示屏更短的响应时间。这也适用于与美国兄弟机型的QHD面板的比较。 美国的兄弟姐妹机型我们已经测试过了。1,143:1的对比度也处于较高水平，而且我们在测量过程中没有观察到任何PWM闪烁。

子像素网格
子像素网格
光晕
光晕
529
cd/m²		470
cd/m²		486
cd/m²
522
cd/m²		503
cd/m²		462
cd/m²
488
cd/m²		471
cd/m²		446
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B173ZAN06.9 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 529 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 486.3 cd/m² Minimum: 25 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 503 cd/m²
Contrast: 1143:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.08 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88, calibrated: 0.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
87.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.151
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
AU Optronics B173ZAN06.9, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"		Alienware x17 R2 P48E
AU Optronics B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Medion Erazer Beast X30
BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"		MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
BOE NE173QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"		Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
BOE NE173QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Display
-10%
-18%
-2%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
99.4
79.2
-20%
67.7
-32%
96.2
-3%
98.7
-1%
sRGB Coverage
100
99.8
0%
97.6
-2%
99.7
0%
99.9
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
87.3
79.6
-9%
69.2
-21%
85.8
-2%
86.2
-1%
Response Times
-65%
-73%
-132%
-120%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
7.5 ?(2.1, 5.4)
12.4 ?(6.4, 6)
-65%
14.7 ?(7, 7.7)
-96%
17.6 ?(10, 7.6)
-135%
17.6 ?(8.4, 9.2)
-135%
Response Time Black / White *
5.6 ?(1.6, 4)
9.2 ?(5.2, 4)
-64%
8.4 ?(3.2, 5.2)
-50%
12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2)
-129%
11.4 ?(4.8, 5.6)
-104%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-63%
-58%
-92%
-37%
Brightness middle
503
365.4
-27%
377
-25%
334.8
-33%
335.9
-33%
Brightness
486
344
-29%
352
-28%
305
-37%
294
-40%
Brightness Distribution
84
85
1%
86
2%
79
-6%
75
-11%
Black Level *
0.44
0.29
34%
0.32
27%
0.34
23%
0.38
14%
Contrast
1143
1260
10%
1178
3%
985
-14%
884
-23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.08
3.17
-194%
2.91
-169%
4.1
-280%
2.82
-161%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.54
7.69
-69%
6.78
-49%
7.28
-60%
5.04
-11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.6
0.51
15%
1.3
-117%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.3
5.3
-308%
3.4
-162%
5.6
-331%
1.7
-31%
Gamma
2.151 102%
2.18 101%
2.109 104%
2.16 102%
2.14 103%
CCT
6541 99%
5879 111%
7273 89%
6314 103%
6382 102%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-46% / -52%
-50% / -51%
-75% / -77%
-53% / -41%

* ... smaller is better

在色彩再现和色彩空间覆盖方面，4K面板和兄弟型号的QHD面板是相似的，两个型号在交付状态下已经提供了几乎相同水平的良好数值。平均色彩偏差保持在DeltaE<3的目标范围内。校准带来了进一步的改善，我们的配置文件链接在上面的显示器信息窗口，供您免费下载。然而，即使在校准之后，4K面板在蓝色调方面显示出一些轻微的弱点。两台显示器都能完全覆盖sRGB和DCI-P3色彩空间，而AdobeRGB色彩空间至少也能分别覆盖到86%和87%。

卡尔曼：灰度
卡尔曼：灰度
卡尔曼：饱和度
卡尔曼：饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN：灰度（校准的）。
CalMAN：灰度（校准的）。
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
Razer Blade 17 2022年初与sRGB的对比
Razer Blade 17 2022年初与sRGB的对比
Razer Blade 17 2022年初与AdobeRGB的对比
Razer Blade 17 2022年初与AdobeRGB的对比
Razer Blade 17 2022年初与P3的比较
Razer Blade 17 2022年初与P3的比较

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.1 ms rise
↘ 5.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8531 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

IPS面板提供稳定的可视角度，可以从任何角度阅读。由于显示亮度相当高，你也可以在户外轻松阅读其内容。

刀锋17的户外活动
刀锋17的户外活动
视角
视角

性能--Razer笔记本电脑使用Alder Lake和Ampere

通过Blade 17，Razer提供了一个17.3英寸的游戏笔记本电脑，能够将目前所有的游戏流畅地显示出来。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
Nvidia系统信息
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 

测试条件

你可以通过使用 "Fn "+"P "组合键在三个可用的性能配置文件（"平衡"、"静音 "和 "用户定义"）之间切换。用户定义 "配置文件允许你通过Razer Synapse软件为CPU（"低"、"中"、"高 "和 "提升"）和GPU（"低"、"中 "和 "高"）设置子预设。在电池操作中，唯一可用的配置文件是 "平衡"。

在我们的测试中，我们使用了 "用户定义 "配置文件与 "中"（CPU）和 "高"（GPU）子预置，这是交付状态下的默认设置。此外，我们使用 "沉默 "配置文件，在最高性能（CPU："Boost"，GPU："High"）和dGPU模式下运行了几个基准测试。你可以在下面的图表中找到结果。

处理器

芯片酷睿i9-12900H处理器（Alder Lake）包括六个性能核心（超线程，2.5至5 GHz）和八个效率核心（无超线程，1.8至3.8 GHz）。总的来说，这导致了20个逻辑上的CPU核心。

在CB15多线程测试中，"中等 "CPU子预设确保速度（P核：2.6至2.7GHz，E核：2.1GHz）略高于基本时钟速度。单线程测试以高时钟速度完成（P核：4至4.6GHz，E核：2.1至3.7GHz）。在电池运行中，这些数值明显较低。

使用相同的CPU预设，与Core i9相比，Core i9在峰值上只提供了轻微的性能优势。 酷睿i7-12800H处理器相比，酷睿i9在峰值上仅有轻微的性能优势。这并不奇怪，因为两个CPU提供相同数量的内核，而且酷睿i9提供略高的最大速度（5 GHz对4.8 GHz）。

多线程（电池操作）
多线程（电池操作）
单线程（电池操作）
单线程（电池操作）

在多线程运行中，Turbo的使用强度很大程度上取决于所选择的CPU子预设。在所有情况下，CPU都能以均匀的时钟速度持续运行，这一点从CB15循环测试中可以看出。值得注意的是，无论选择何种预设，CPU的时钟速度从第一次运行到第二次/第三次运行都会略有下降。与i7 CPU相比，i9 CPU只会在一些短暂的负载高峰期给用户带来值得注意的优势。在较长的负载下，两个处理器之间的性能差距正在缩小，它们最终会非常接近对方。

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

01503004506007509001050120013501500165018001950210022502400255027002850Tooltip
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø1562 (1542.73-1850.99)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2889 (2849.61-2917.79)
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2761 (2697.24-2854.49)
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2481 (2444.99-2563.45)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2150 (2140.41-2221.61)
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H; Lautlos: Ø1126 (1104.91-1561.4)
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H; Max.: Ø2226 (2196.11-2710.03)
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速度
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速度
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速度（静音模式）
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速度（静音模式）
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速度（最大）。
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速度（最大）。
CPU Performance Rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
83.6 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
79.5 pt
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H
73 pt
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H
72.8 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
72 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
70.5 pt
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H
70.1 pt
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H
62.1 pt
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H
51.3 pt

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1851 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
196.26 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
258 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4069 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
699 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1908 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
10522 Points
Help
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
99.6 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
69.7 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66.3 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
66.1 pt
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
64.8 pt
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
59 pt
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
57.2 pt
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
44.7 pt
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
37.2 pt

系统性能

平稳运行的系统的硬件为游戏、视频切割和渲染提供了更充分的计算性能。工作内存的传输率在DDR5-4800存储的正常水平上。它们伴随着良好的PC Mark结果。

有两个工作记忆库。
有两个工作记忆库。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
8186 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=135, last 2 years)
7821 Points +10%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7744 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7139 - 8083, n=6)
7705 Points +8%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7435 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7149 Points 0%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7139 Points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4671 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
6358 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5464 points
PCMark 10 Score
7139 points
Help
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming
  (21750 - 94222, n=149, last 2 years)
65754 MB/s +10%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
62324 MB/s +4%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
62024 MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
61605 MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Max.)
61550 MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Lautlos)
61533 MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
60030 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (34438 - 74264, n=28)
58945 MB/s -2%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
53861 MB/s -10%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

标准化的延迟监测测试（网络冲浪、4k视频再现、Prime95高负载）显示了DPC延迟的一些明显行为。该系统似乎并不适合实时视频和音频处理。未来的软件更新可能会带来改进，甚至使事情变得更糟。

延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2256 μs * -481%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1101.9 μs * -184%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1000 μs * -157%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
879.6 μs * -126%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
388.5 μs *

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

Razer为Blade配备了来自三星的1TB SSD（PCIe 4，M.2-2280），提供了非常好的传输速率。 此外，该笔记本电脑还提供了第二个SSD（PCIe 4，M.2-2280）的空间。

一个PCIe-4 SSD作为系统驱动器。
一个PCIe-4 SSD作为系统驱动器。
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7076 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5235 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 691.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 479.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3959 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3837 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 90.25 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 228.2 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
82.2 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.7 pt
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.6 pt
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
75.6 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
 
70.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
68.4 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
66.3 pt

* ... smaller is better

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

06601320198026403300396046205280594066007260792085809240990010560112201188012540Tooltip
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6586 (6083.62-6649.44)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0): Ø13136 (12495.08-13196.72)
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6290 (5297.3-6328.92)
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH: Ø6510 (4327.84-6640.63)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6594 (6402.4-6612.32)

图形卡

2022年6月的一项BIOS更新增加了内置的TGP GeForce RTX 3080 Ti LaptopGPU（VRAM：16,384 MB GDDR6）从165瓦增加到175瓦--对基准测试结果没有显示任何影响。然而，在所有情况下，结果的范围仍然高于我们之前确定的RTX 3080 Ti的平均水平。TGP没有被完全使用，这一点从我们的TheWitcher 3 测试中可以看出。图形性能可以在不更新BIOS的情况下提高，因为笔记本电脑提供了通过GeForce GPU直接输出图像的选项。

在更新BIOS之前
在更新BIOS之前
在更新BIOS后
在更新BIOS后
DGPU还是Optimus？
DGPU还是Optimus？
需要重新启动。
需要重新启动。
3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | SPECviewperf 13 | SPECviewperf 2020
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Alienware x17 R2 P48E -25!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
99.5 pt
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti -25!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
96.6 pt
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 -25!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
94.7 pt
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 -25!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
94.2 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X30 -25!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
92 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
89 pt
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 -2!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
86.4 pt
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 -25!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
84 pt
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US -25!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
82.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX -2!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
77.9 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
77.4 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
69.6 pt
3DMark 11 Performance
30538 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
42346 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
24291 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
11457 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
3076 points
Help

游戏性能

该硬件允许在高至最高设置下进行4k游戏。通常情况下，帧率范围高于RTX 3080 Ti的平均水平。通过GeForce GPU的直接图像输出，有时会导致数值的大幅增加。在类似的性能设置下，兄弟姐妹的模型产生的数值处于相同的水平。即使在较长的时间内，帧率也保持在一个恒定的水平，这在我们的TheWitcher 3 测试中得到了证明（FHD，最大设置，60分钟运行时间）。

The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | GTA V | Strange Brigade | F1 2021 | Far Cry 5
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
128 (124min) fps +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 214, n=122, last 2 years)
124.7 fps +4%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
124.6 (114min) fps +4%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (dGPU, 175W)
123.7 (17.1min, 41.8P0.1, 92.8P1) fps +3%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Max.)
123.4 (32.6min, 35.4P0.1, 91.7P1) fps +3%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
119.6 (28.2min, 31P0.1, 74.4P1) fps
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
117.4 (26.9min, 30.4P0.1, 81.6P1) fps -2%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Lautlos)
113 fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 130.6, n=43)
112.1 fps -6%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
109.1 (101min) fps -9%

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø118.8 (94-125)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø121.3 (111-128)
Medion Erazer Beast X30 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø112.9 (95-119)
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø102.5 (93-111)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø121 (110-130)
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; dGPU, 175W: Ø122.3 (111-130)
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; Lautlos: Ø108.2 (95-113)
Witcher 3 测试中的GPU测量
Witcher 3 测试中的GPU测量
Witcher 3 测试期间的GPU测量值（dGPU，175瓦）。
Witcher 3 测试期间的GPU测量值（dGPU，175瓦）。
Witcher 3 测试期间的GPU测量结果（静音）。
Witcher 3 测试期间的GPU测量结果（静音）。
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 179.4 175.2 166 106 102.7 118
The Witcher 3 (2015) 328 289 218 119.6 89.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 176.1 149.2 140 131.9 117.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 155.9 139.3 112.2 90.8 55.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 127.9 115.5 95.6 82.1
Far Cry 5 (2018) 148 127 122 116 110 70
Strange Brigade (2018) 382 272 229 204 152.7 91.1
F1 2021 (2021) 295 255 219 132.8 104.3 62.5
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 117.7 84.4 46
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 91.43 57.12 25.46

排放--刀片17不会过度升温

噪声排放

在日常操作中（办公室、互联网），笔记本电脑并没有产生过多的噪音。偶尔，风扇甚至完全关闭，一片寂静。在负载情况下，它可以变得很响亮，最大噪音水平高达51 dB(A)（压力测试，Witcher 3 测试）。

静音 "性能配置可用于日常操作。虽然笔记本电脑不能静音运行，但它仍然产生较少的噪音和热量。减少的计算性能也足够用于游戏。

Noise Level

Idle
26 / 27 / 32 dB(A)
Load
50 / 51 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 26 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.741.241.938.439.82537.43738.737.936.43147.646.24646.648.84036.433.533.23235.55030.825.427.625.738.56329.925.827.226.834.38028.6212522.329.510024.719.32018.628.212527.921.428.618.13316026.820.726.619.331.72002822.223.222.129.125029.423.626.724.230.231529.72122.220.331.940030.818.826.315.332.650032.917.721.417.634.26303516.421.915.135.680037.415.321.613.937.8100037.913.920.81338.512504013.422.211.940.6160039.712.721.311.839.7200043.913.419.211.645250038.616.81612.339.6315036.512.814.612.937.3400035.213.114.513.135.9500033.215.91713.734630033.314.315.514.433.8800027.813.619.113.728.81000024.513.215.713.1251250020.41316.712.721.9160002012.41712.118.8SPL49.827.431.926.350.6N6.50.91.70.86.9median 32.9median 15.3median 20.8median 13.7median 33.8Delta5.22.93.22.84.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseRazer Blade 17 Early 2022
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR		Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)		Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR		MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH		Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Noise
14%
-2%
8%
11%
off / environment *
26
22.7
13%
26
-0%
24.5
6%
23.3
10%
Idle Minimum *
26
23.1
11%
27
-4%
24.5
6%
23.3
10%
Idle Average *
27
23.1
14%
29
-7%
24.5
9%
23.3
14%
Idle Maximum *
32
23.1
28%
34
-6%
30.8
4%
26.3
18%
Load Average *
50
31.9
36%
48
4%
34.6
31%
38.2
24%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51
52.5
-3%
51
-0%
46.2
9%
50.9
-0%
Load Maximum *
51
52.5
-3%
53
-4%
56.8
-11%
49.1
4%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在日常操作中（办公室、互联网），机箱温度保持在绿色范围内。虽然笔记本电脑在负载下明显升温（压力测试，Witcher 3 测试），但热量发展仍然保持在可接受的范围内。 然而，CPU温度有时会达到红色范围。

Max. Load
 49 °C50 °C46 °C 
 43 °C44 °C38 °C 
 40 °C37 °C36 °C 
Maximum: 50 °C
Average: 42.6 °C
50 °C56 °C48 °C
43 °C49 °C43 °C
38 °C42 °C40 °C
Maximum: 56 °C
Average: 45.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  55 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-13.1 °C / -23.6 F).
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
15%
-1%
3%
5%
Maximum Upper Side *
50
49.6
1%
55
-10%
50.6
-1%
46
8%
Maximum Bottom *
56
42.4
24%
62
-11%
59.6
-6%
46.8
16%
Idle Upper Side *
36
29.2
19%
32
11%
30
17%
36.2
-1%
Idle Bottom *
38
32
16%
36
5%
37.4
2%
38.6
-2%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在压力测试的开始阶段（Prime95和Furmark至少运行了一个小时），CPU就已经在低时钟速度下运行了（P核：2.1至2.2GHz；E核：1.6至1.7GHz）。继续下去，P核心的数值下降到1.8GHz，E核心的数值下降到1.4GHz。GPU的时钟速度从大约1500MHz下降到1250MHz左右。压力测试代表了一种极端情况，我们用它来评估系统在满负荷时是否保持稳定。

ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.437.42537.934.63146.644.1403232.25025.725.26326.829.98022.337.410018.650.212518.156.416019.35920022.161.425024.26831520.368.640015.367.650017.665.763015.168.580013.967.510001371.3125011.970.7160011.873.4200011.675.8250012.374.2315012.967.8400013.163500013.767.3630014.468.1800013.764.31000013.165.51250012.761.31600012.163.2SPL26.382.7N0.855.8median 13.7median 67.5Delta2.83.144.339.944.336.636.736.634.13134.134.926.734.932.42732.432.930.932.938.126.738.14425.5444923.54955.323.155.359.22259.263.921.163.965.620.265.664.718.964.768.817.968.873.217.973.275.61875.674.720.174.772.321.172.374.321.874.375.321.775.371.619.471.674.518.574.575.81575.867.713.367.764.71264.760.811.660.857.911.757.962.511.562.558.910.958.984.830.884.862.21.362.2median 65.6median 18.9median 65.67.13.87.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRazer Blade 17 Early 2022MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电源管理--Razer笔记本电脑提供了微薄的电池寿命

消耗功率

在空闲运行期间，功耗变成了相对较高的34瓦，而一些竞争对手在这里的效率更高。在高负荷下，刀片的消耗量与竞争对手的水平相似，有时甚至更低。该 Alienware x17 R2 P48E代表了顶部的一个异类。虽然它的耗电量明显较高，但通常也会产生最好的基准测试结果。附带的280瓦电源是足够大的。

注：QHD兄弟姐妹型号 ，在测试时预设了 "Boost "CPU和启动了dGPU模式。这解释了它在空闲操作和低负载下的高消耗。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.5 / 1.7 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 17 / 23 / 34 Watt
Load midlight 120 / 243 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"		Alienware x17 R2 P48E
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Medion Erazer Beast X30
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"		MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"		Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"		Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-32%
13%
9%
-41%
-2%
15%
Idle Minimum *
17
24.1
-42%
12
29%
20
-18%
29.8
-75%
17.2 ?(7 - 33.2, n=28)
-1%
13.4 ?(2 - 39, n=126, last 2 years)
21%
Idle Average *
23
28.5
-24%
16
30%
21.4
7%
37.1
-61%
23.3 ?(11 - 38, n=28)
-1%
18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=126, last 2 years)
18%
Idle Maximum *
34
60
-76%
22
35%
27
21%
60.8
-79%
30.8 ?(17 - 60.8, n=28)
9%
26.5 ?(9 - 101.1, n=126, last 2 years)
22%
Load Average *
120
128.7
-7%
118
2%
100.5
16%
135.3
-13%
121.2 ?(92 - 150, n=28)
-1%
103.1 ?(32.1 - 201, n=124, last 2 years)
14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
229
254
-11%
223
3%
165
28%
243
-6%
Load Maximum *
243
323
-33%
290
-19%
247.1
-2%
273.1
-12%
276 ?(179 - 401, n=28)
-14%
246 ?(64.5 - 431, n=126, last 2 years)
-1%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240Tooltip
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø229 (225-233)
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø196.2 (178.1-244)

Power Consumption With External Monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø70.2 (67.8-85.6)
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø87.7 (74.7-103.7)
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø221 (213-227)
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø220 (215-227)

电池寿命

在WLAN测试（通过脚本加载网站）和视频测试（持续循环播放短片Big Buck Bunny（H.264编码，FHD））中，17.3英寸笔记本电脑的运行时间分别达到了3:49 h和4:50 h。由于QHD刀片的显示分辨率较低 QHD刀片由于QHD Blade的显示分辨率较低，使用同样的82瓦时电池可以达到更长的电池寿命，这并不令人惊讶。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
7h 08min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 102)
3h 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
4h 50min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 43min
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 82 Wh		Alienware x17 R2 P48E
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 87 Wh		Medion Erazer Beast X30
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 91.2 Wh		MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh		Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 82 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-50%
33%
31%
8%
35%
Reader / Idle
428
234
-45%
463
8%
647
51%
482
13%
580 ?(239 - 1290, n=51, last 2 years)
36%
H.264
290
386
33%
444 ?(129 - 884, n=60, last 2 years)
53%
WiFi v1.3
229
117
-49%
341
49%
369
61%
330
44%
384 ?(85 - 889, n=126, last 2 years)
68%
Load
103
46
-55%
145
41%
84
-18%
68
-34%
84.6 ?(41 - 164, n=87, last 2 years)
-18%

Pros

+ 明亮的显示屏
+ 4K分辨率
+ 良好的色彩还原性
+ 良好的色彩空间覆盖率
+ 纤细的显示屏边框
+ 坚固的金属外壳
+ 系统性能高
+ PCIe-4固态硬盘
+ 可容纳第二个PCI-4 SSD的空间
+ 雷电4
+ 电源传输

Cons

- 电池寿命很短
- 闲置时的高耗电量
- 价格高
- 没有先进的Optimus

结论 - 在一个紧凑的箱子里有很多的性能

Razer Blade 17（2022年初），测试装置由Razer德国提供。
Razer Blade 17（2022年初），测试装置由Razer德国提供。

我们对Blade 17的测试配置针对的是游戏玩家和创意专业人士。酷睿i9-12900H处理器、GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU（BIOS更新后为175瓦TGP，16GB的VRAM）和32GB的工作内存，使笔记本电脑具备了视频处理、渲染和4K游戏的最高水平。此外，一个快速的PCIe-4固态硬盘（1TB）确保了较短的加载和存储时间。

通过Blade 17（2022年初），Razer为创意专业人士提供了一个成功而强大的工作设备。但这也有其代价。

CPU和GPU能够以高时钟速度持续运行。和这个设备级别一样，噪音和热量的发展处于较高的水平。对于一台强大的4K笔记本电脑来说，4到5小时的实际电池寿命还是可以的。亮点是明亮和反应灵敏的17.3英寸显示屏（4K，IPS，144Hz），色彩还原准确（DCI-P3：100%）。

刀片的价格约为4650欧元（约合人民币4847元），比QHD型号多出约400欧元（约合人民币417元）。 QHD型号.这值得吗？与兄弟机型的酷睿i7相比，酷睿i9几乎没有提供任何额外的功率，特别是在持续负载下。而且该兄弟姐妹提供更好的电池寿命。我们之前测试的QHD机型的另一点是对高级优化的支持。4k刀片不提供这个。

与QHD面板相比，4K显示屏的亮度明显更高，响应时间更短。如果除了更高的分辨率外，这些标准不是决定性因素，你可以安全地选择QHD刀片。在色彩再现和色彩空间覆盖方面，QHD和4K面板的表现同样出色。

作为Blade 17的替代产品，你也可以得到 Medion Erazer Beast X30.它具有几乎相同的尺寸，但带来的重量较轻。在图形性能方面，它仍然略微落后于Razer笔记本电脑。

价格和可用性

类似配置的Razer Blade 17（Core i9-12900H,GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop, 32 GB RAM, 1 TB SSD, 4k显示屏）在亚马逊的售价为 4,300美元也可从Razer直接提供相同的价格。

Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 - 07/05/2022 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
91 / 98 → 93%
Keyboard
83%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
75 / 80 → 94%
Weight
58 / 10-66 → 86%
Battery
58 / 95 → 61%
Display
93%
Games Performance
99%
Application Performance
92%
Temperature
75 / 95 → 79%
Noise
75 / 90 → 83%
Audio
89%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Average
78%
90%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Razer Blade 17（2022年初）回顾。优雅的4K游戏笔记本，屏幕明亮
Sascha Mölck, 2022-07- 6 (Update: 2024-08-15)