Razer Blade 17(2022年初)回顾。优雅的4K游戏笔记本,屏幕明亮
Razer Blade 17针对的是游戏玩家和创意专业人士--特别是在我们测试的高端配置中,配备了Core i9-12900H CPU,GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU,以及17.3英寸4k显示屏,色彩准确。价位在4700欧元左右(约4900美元)。除了RTX 3080 Ti之外,其 美国的兄弟姐妹我们已经测试过,它有一个Core i7-12800H CPU和一个QHD-面板(240赫兹)。竞争对手包括极其强大的笔记本电脑,如 Alienware x17 R2 P48E,以及Medion Erazer Beast X30,以及微星隐形GS77 12UHS.
你可以在我们对相同结构的Blade 17 2022(Core i7, QHD)的评论中找到关于机箱、连接设备、输入设备和扬声器的信息。 对相同结构的Blade 17 2022 (Core i7, QHD)的评论中找到相关信息。.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.9 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
89.2 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 3.1 kg | 20.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
86.7 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Medion Erazer Beast X30 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 23 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
87.2 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 20.8 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (AV Pro V60) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (AV Pro V60) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (AV Pro V60) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (AV Pro V60) |
Networking - iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (917 - 1727, n=9) | |
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=147, last 2 years) |
显示屏 - 明亮且色彩准确
在我们的测试装置中,Razer使用了令人印象深刻的17.3英寸显示屏,具有4K分辨率(3840 x 2160像素)和144赫兹刷新率,提供了更高的亮度(486.3 cd/m²)和比竞争对手的显示屏更短的响应时间。这也适用于与美国兄弟机型的QHD面板的比较。 美国的兄弟姐妹机型我们已经测试过了。1,143:1的对比度也处于较高水平,而且我们在测量过程中没有观察到任何PWM闪烁。
|
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 503 cd/m²
Contrast: 1143:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.08 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.151
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 AU Optronics B173ZAN06.9, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Alienware x17 R2 P48E AU Optronics B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Medion Erazer Beast X30 BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US BOE NE173QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti BOE NE173QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -10% | -18% | -2% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.4 | 79.2 -20% | 67.7 -32% | 96.2 -3% | 98.7 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.8 0% | 97.6 -2% | 99.7 0% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 87.3 | 79.6 -9% | 69.2 -21% | 85.8 -2% | 86.2 -1% |
Response Times | -65% | -73% | -132% | -120% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 7.5 ? | 12.4 ? -65% | 14.7 ? -96% | 17.6 ? -135% | 17.6 ? -135% |
Response Time Black / White * | 5.6 ? | 9.2 ? -64% | 8.4 ? -50% | 12.8 ? -129% | 11.4 ? -104% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | -63% | -58% | -92% | -37% | |
Brightness middle | 503 | 365.4 -27% | 377 -25% | 334.8 -33% | 335.9 -33% |
Brightness | 486 | 344 -29% | 352 -28% | 305 -37% | 294 -40% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 85 1% | 86 2% | 79 -6% | 75 -11% |
Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.29 34% | 0.32 27% | 0.34 23% | 0.38 14% |
Contrast | 1143 | 1260 10% | 1178 3% | 985 -14% | 884 -23% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.08 | 3.17 -194% | 2.91 -169% | 4.1 -280% | 2.82 -161% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.54 | 7.69 -69% | 6.78 -49% | 7.28 -60% | 5.04 -11% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.6 | 0.51 15% | 1.3 -117% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 5.3 -308% | 3.4 -162% | 5.6 -331% | 1.7 -31% |
Gamma | 2.151 102% | 2.18 101% | 2.109 104% | 2.16 102% | 2.14 103% |
CCT | 6541 99% | 5879 111% | 7273 89% | 6314 103% | 6382 102% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -46% /
-52% | -50% /
-51% | -75% /
-77% | -53% /
-41% |
* ... smaller is better
在色彩再现和色彩空间覆盖方面,4K面板和兄弟型号的QHD面板是相似的,两个型号在交付状态下已经提供了几乎相同水平的良好数值。平均色彩偏差保持在DeltaE<3的目标范围内。校准带来了进一步的改善,我们的配置文件链接在上面的显示器信息窗口,供您免费下载。然而,即使在校准之后,4K面板在蓝色调方面显示出一些轻微的弱点。两台显示器都能完全覆盖sRGB和DCI-P3色彩空间,而AdobeRGB色彩空间至少也能分别覆盖到86%和87%。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.6 ms rise | |
↘ 4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
7.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.1 ms rise | |
↘ 5.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
IPS面板提供稳定的可视角度,可以从任何角度阅读。由于显示亮度相当高,你也可以在户外轻松阅读其内容。
性能--Razer笔记本电脑使用Alder Lake和Ampere
通过Blade 17,Razer提供了一个17.3英寸的游戏笔记本电脑,能够将目前所有的游戏流畅地显示出来。
测试条件
你可以通过使用 "Fn "+"P "组合键在三个可用的性能配置文件("平衡"、"静音 "和 "用户定义")之间切换。用户定义 "配置文件允许你通过Razer Synapse软件为CPU("低"、"中"、"高 "和 "提升")和GPU("低"、"中 "和 "高")设置子预设。在电池操作中,唯一可用的配置文件是 "平衡"。
在我们的测试中,我们使用了 "用户定义 "配置文件与 "中"(CPU)和 "高"(GPU)子预置,这是交付状态下的默认设置。此外,我们使用 "沉默 "配置文件,在最高性能(CPU:"Boost",GPU:"High")和dGPU模式下运行了几个基准测试。你可以在下面的图表中找到结果。
处理器
芯片酷睿i9-12900H处理器(Alder Lake)包括六个性能核心(超线程,2.5至5 GHz)和八个效率核心(无超线程,1.8至3.8 GHz)。总的来说,这导致了20个逻辑上的CPU核心。
在CB15多线程测试中,"中等 "CPU子预设确保速度(P核:2.6至2.7GHz,E核:2.1GHz)略高于基本时钟速度。单线程测试以高时钟速度完成(P核:4至4.6GHz,E核:2.1至3.7GHz)。在电池运行中,这些数值明显较低。
使用相同的CPU预设,与Core i9相比,Core i9在峰值上只提供了轻微的性能优势。 酷睿i7-12800H处理器相比,酷睿i9在峰值上仅有轻微的性能优势。这并不奇怪,因为两个CPU提供相同数量的内核,而且酷睿i9提供略高的最大速度(5 GHz对4.8 GHz)。
在多线程运行中,Turbo的使用强度很大程度上取决于所选择的CPU子预设。在所有情况下,CPU都能以均匀的时钟速度持续运行,这一点从CB15循环测试中可以看出。值得注意的是,无论选择何种预设,CPU的时钟速度从第一次运行到第二次/第三次运行都会略有下降。与i7 CPU相比,i9 CPU只会在一些短暂的负载高峰期给用户带来值得注意的优势。在较长的负载下,两个处理器之间的性能差距正在缩小,它们最终会非常接近对方。
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
Cinebench R23 | |
Multi Core | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (7359 - 19648, n=28) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
Single Core | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1634 - 1930, n=28) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2681 - 7471, n=28) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (624 - 738, n=28) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1395 - 3077, n=28) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (235 - 277, n=29) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (160 - 451, n=28) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 | |
7z b 4 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34684 - 76677, n=28) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5302 - 6289, n=28) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 |
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Multi-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8519 - 14376, n=31) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
Single-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1631 - 1897, n=31) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8.05 - 22.5, n=28) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36.8 - 59.8, n=28) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (0.4218 - 0.506, n=28) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (4074 - 18289, n=28) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (22307 - 93236, n=28) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1378 - 4215, n=28) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (78172 - 111241, n=28) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5709 - 10410, n=28) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (11257 - 45581, n=28) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (31935 - 151546, n=28) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (449 - 1193, n=28) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2235 - 10511, n=28) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (20960 - 48269, n=29) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) |
系统性能
平稳运行的系统的硬件为游戏、视频切割和渲染提供了更充分的计算性能。工作内存的传输率在DDR5-4800存储的正常水平上。它们伴随着良好的PC Mark结果。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (7139 - 8083, n=6) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (10254 - 11178, n=6) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (9102 - 11186, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average of class Gaming (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (9847 - 12627, n=6) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1696 - 1965, n=3) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1622 - 1870, n=3) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1855 - 2135, n=3) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1483 - 1777, n=3) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4671 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 6358 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5464 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 7139 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34438 - 74264, n=28) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36365 - 74642, n=28) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (32276 - 67858, n=28) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (74.7 - 118.1, n=27) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
标准化的延迟监测测试(网络冲浪、4k视频再现、Prime95高负载)显示了DPC延迟的一些明显行为。该系统似乎并不适合实时视频和音频处理。未来的软件更新可能会带来改进,甚至使事情变得更糟。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
Razer为Blade配备了来自三星的1TB SSD(PCIe 4,M.2-2280),提供了非常好的传输速率。 此外,该笔记本电脑还提供了第二个SSD(PCIe 4,M.2-2280)的空间。
* ... smaller is better
Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
2022年6月的一项BIOS更新增加了内置的TGP GeForce RTX 3080 Ti LaptopGPU(VRAM:16,384 MB GDDR6)从165瓦增加到175瓦--对基准测试结果没有显示任何影响。然而,在所有情况下,结果的范围仍然高于我们之前确定的RTX 3080 Ti的平均水平。TGP没有被完全使用,这一点从我们的TheWitcher 3 测试中可以看出。图形性能可以在不更新BIOS的情况下提高,因为笔记本电脑提供了通过GeForce GPU直接输出图像的选项。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E -25! | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti -25! | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 -25! | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 -25! | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 -25! | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 -2! | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 -25! | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US -25! | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX -2! | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 -1! |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (dGPU, 175W) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (13920 - 45841, n=45) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 30538 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 42346 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 24291 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 11457 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
该硬件允许在高至最高设置下进行4k游戏。通常情况下,帧率范围高于RTX 3080 Ti的平均水平。通过GeForce GPU的直接图像输出,有时会导致数值的大幅增加。在类似的性能设置下,兄弟姐妹的模型产生的数值处于相同的水平。即使在较长的时间内,帧率也保持在一个恒定的水平,这在我们的TheWitcher 3 测试中得到了证明(FHD,最大设置,60分钟运行时间)。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (dGPU, 175W) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 130.6, n=43) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US |
Dota 2 Reborn | |
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 220, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (dGPU, 175W) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (29.9 - 170.5, n=45) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
3840x2160 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Average of class Gaming (101.2 - 205, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (dGPU, 175W) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (70.8 - 155.6, n=19) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) |
X-Plane 11.11 | |
3840x2160 high (fps_test=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (64.3 - 145.5, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (dGPU, 175W) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (32.9 - 109.5, n=20) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (dGPU, 175W) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (32.6 - 127, n=45) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
3840x2160 High Quality | |
Average of class Gaming (32.2 - 94.7, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (1.3, dGPU, 175W) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (1.3, Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (1.3) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (35.1 - 61.2, n=18) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (1.3, Lautlos) | |
1920x1080 High Quality | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (1.3) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (1.3, dGPU, 175W) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (1.3) | |
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (1.3, Max.) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30.7 - 140.6, n=42) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (1.3) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (1.3) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (1.3) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (1.3, Lautlos) |
GTA V | |
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (dGPU, 175W) | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 139.2, n=42) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
3840x2160 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (33.6 - 90.9, n=40, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (dGPU, 175W) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (37.7 - 67.2, n=14) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) |
Strange Brigade | |
3840x2160 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Average of class Gaming (54.5 - 298, n=48, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (1.47.22.14 D3D12, dGPU, 175W) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (61.7 - 100.7, n=15) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Lautlos) | |
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=177, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (1.47.22.14 D3D12, dGPU, 175W) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (42.3 - 224, n=41) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Lautlos) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (1.47.22.14 D3D12) |
F1 2021 | |
3840x2160 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (50.2 - 115.1, n=6, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (874931, dGPU, 175W) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (874931, Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (874931) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (41.1 - 70.2, n=18) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (874931, Lautlos) | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (874931, dGPU, 175W) | |
Average of class Gaming (27.6 - 271, n=16, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (874931, Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (874931) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (874931) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30.2 - 160.6, n=30) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (874931, Lautlos) |
Far Cry 5 | |
3840x2160 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (39 - 113, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (dGPU, 175W) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (45 - 76, n=9) | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (111 - 162, n=24) | |
Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=100, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (dGPU, 175W) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 179.4 | 175.2 | 166 | 106 | 102.7 | 118 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 328 | 289 | 218 | 119.6 | 89.6 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 176.1 | 149.2 | 140 | 131.9 | 117.3 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 155.9 | 139.3 | 112.2 | 90.8 | 55.2 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 127.9 | 115.5 | 95.6 | 82.1 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 148 | 127 | 122 | 116 | 110 | 70 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 382 | 272 | 229 | 204 | 152.7 | 91.1 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 295 | 255 | 219 | 132.8 | 104.3 | 62.5 |
排放--刀片17不会过度升温
噪声排放
在日常操作中(办公室、互联网),笔记本电脑并没有产生过多的噪音。偶尔,风扇甚至完全关闭,一片寂静。在负载情况下,它可以变得很响亮,最大噪音水平高达51 dB(A)(压力测试,Witcher 3 测试)。
静音 "性能配置可用于日常操作。虽然笔记本电脑不能静音运行,但它仍然产生较少的噪音和热量。减少的计算性能也足够用于游戏。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 26 / 27 / 32 dB(A) |
Load |
| 50 / 51 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 26 dB(A) |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0) | Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 14% | -2% | 8% | 11% | |
off / environment * | 26 | 22.7 13% | 26 -0% | 24.5 6% | 23.3 10% |
Idle Minimum * | 26 | 23.1 11% | 27 -4% | 24.5 6% | 23.3 10% |
Idle Average * | 27 | 23.1 14% | 29 -7% | 24.5 9% | 23.3 14% |
Idle Maximum * | 32 | 23.1 28% | 34 -6% | 30.8 4% | 26.3 18% |
Load Average * | 50 | 31.9 36% | 48 4% | 34.6 31% | 38.2 24% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 51 | 52.5 -3% | 51 -0% | 46.2 9% | 50.9 -0% |
Load Maximum * | 51 | 52.5 -3% | 53 -4% | 56.8 -11% | 49.1 4% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在日常操作中(办公室、互联网),机箱温度保持在绿色范围内。虽然笔记本电脑在负载下明显升温(压力测试,Witcher 3 测试),但热量发展仍然保持在可接受的范围内。 然而,CPU温度有时会达到红色范围。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-13.1 °C / -23.6 F).
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 15% | -1% | 3% | 5% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 50 | 49.6 1% | 55 -10% | 50.6 -1% | 46 8% |
Maximum Bottom * | 56 | 42.4 24% | 62 -11% | 59.6 -6% | 46.8 16% |
Idle Upper Side * | 36 | 29.2 19% | 32 11% | 30 17% | 36.2 -1% |
Idle Bottom * | 38 | 32 16% | 36 5% | 37.4 2% | 38.6 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在压力测试的开始阶段(Prime95和Furmark至少运行了一个小时),CPU就已经在低时钟速度下运行了(P核:2.1至2.2GHz;E核:1.6至1.7GHz)。继续下去,P核心的数值下降到1.8GHz,E核心的数值下降到1.4GHz。GPU的时钟速度从大约1500MHz下降到1250MHz左右。压力测试代表了一种极端情况,我们用它来评估系统在满负荷时是否保持稳定。
发言人
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理--Razer笔记本电脑提供了微薄的电池寿命
消耗功率
在空闲运行期间,功耗变成了相对较高的34瓦,而一些竞争对手在这里的效率更高。在高负荷下,刀片的消耗量与竞争对手的水平相似,有时甚至更低。该 Alienware x17 R2 P48E代表了顶部的一个异类。虽然它的耗电量明显较高,但通常也会产生最好的基准测试结果。附带的280瓦电源是足够大的。
注:QHD兄弟姐妹型号 ,在测试时预设了 "Boost "CPU和启动了dGPU模式。这解释了它在空闲操作和低负载下的高消耗。
Off / Standby | 0.5 / 1.7 Watt |
Idle | 17 / 23 / 34 Watt |
Load |
120 / 243 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Medion Erazer Beast X30 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -32% | 13% | 9% | -41% | -2% | 13% | |
Idle Minimum * | 17 | 24.1 -42% | 12 29% | 20 -18% | 29.8 -75% | 17.2 ? -1% | 13.6 ? 20% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 28.5 -24% | 16 30% | 21.4 7% | 37.1 -61% | 23.3 ? -1% | 19 ? 17% |
Idle Maximum * | 34 | 60 -76% | 22 35% | 27 21% | 60.8 -79% | 30.8 ? 9% | 26.9 ? 21% |
Load Average * | 120 | 128.7 -7% | 118 2% | 100.5 16% | 135.3 -13% | 121.2 ? -1% | 106.1 ? 12% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 229 | 254 -11% | 223 3% | 165 28% | 243 -6% | ||
Load Maximum * | 243 | 323 -33% | 290 -19% | 247.1 -2% | 273.1 -12% | 276 ? -14% | 250 ? -3% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Power Consumption With External Monitor
电池寿命
在WLAN测试(通过脚本加载网站)和视频测试(持续循环播放短片Big Buck Bunny(H.264编码,FHD))中,17.3英寸笔记本电脑的运行时间分别达到了3:49 h和4:50 h。由于QHD刀片的显示分辨率较低 QHD刀片由于QHD Blade的显示分辨率较低,使用同样的82瓦时电池可以达到更长的电池寿命,这并不令人惊讶。
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 82 Wh | Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 87 Wh | Medion Erazer Beast X30 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 91.2 Wh | MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 82 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -50% | 33% | 31% | 8% | 31% | |
Reader / Idle | 428 | 234 -45% | 463 8% | 647 51% | 482 13% | 574 ? 34% |
H.264 | 290 | 386 33% | 413 ? 42% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 229 | 117 -49% | 341 49% | 369 61% | 330 44% | 378 ? 65% |
Load | 103 | 46 -55% | 145 41% | 84 -18% | 68 -34% | 85.8 ? -17% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 在一个紧凑的箱子里有很多的性能
我们对Blade 17的测试配置针对的是游戏玩家和创意专业人士。酷睿i9-12900H处理器、GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU(BIOS更新后为175瓦TGP,16GB的VRAM)和32GB的工作内存,使笔记本电脑具备了视频处理、渲染和4K游戏的最高水平。此外,一个快速的PCIe-4固态硬盘(1TB)确保了较短的加载和存储时间。
通过Blade 17(2022年初),Razer为创意专业人士提供了一个成功而强大的工作设备。但这也有其代价。
CPU和GPU能够以高时钟速度持续运行。和这个设备级别一样,噪音和热量的发展处于较高的水平。对于一台强大的4K笔记本电脑来说,4到5小时的实际电池寿命还是可以的。亮点是明亮和反应灵敏的17.3英寸显示屏(4K,IPS,144Hz),色彩还原准确(DCI-P3:100%)。
刀片的价格约为4650欧元(约合人民币4847元),比QHD型号多出约400欧元(约合人民币417元)。 QHD型号.这值得吗?与兄弟机型的酷睿i7相比,酷睿i9几乎没有提供任何额外的功率,特别是在持续负载下。而且该兄弟姐妹提供更好的电池寿命。我们之前测试的QHD机型的另一点是对高级优化的支持。4k刀片不提供这个。
与QHD面板相比,4K显示屏的亮度明显更高,响应时间更短。如果除了更高的分辨率外,这些标准不是决定性因素,你可以安全地选择QHD刀片。在色彩再现和色彩空间覆盖方面,QHD和4K面板的表现同样出色。
作为Blade 17的替代产品,你也可以得到 Medion Erazer Beast X30.它具有几乎相同的尺寸,但带来的重量较轻。在图形性能方面,它仍然略微落后于Razer笔记本电脑。
价格和可用性
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
- 07/05/2022 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck