RazerBlade Stealth 13 2021年的回顾。采用OLED面板的移动游戏机
RazerBlade Stealth 13是一款13.3英寸规格的紧凑型游戏副本,依靠英特尔的Tiger-Lake U处理器和Nvidia的快速显卡组合(GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q)。制造商提供了两个版本,一个是哑光全高清IPS显示屏,售价2000欧元(约合人民币2362元),我们在去年年底已经测试过,另一个是亮光1080p OLED触摸屏,售价2250欧元(约合人民币2657元),我们今天将仔细看看这个版本。由于屏幕是唯一的区别因素,我们将只限于新的OLED触摸屏,以及在这次审查中对电池寿命的影响。所有其他信息和关于性能的细节都可以在我们对IPS版本的详细审查中找到。
Possible competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83.8 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Razer Blade Stealth 13 2021 OLED i7-1165G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 1.5 kg | 15 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
85.5 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2021 | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q i7-1165G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 1.4 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
87.8 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2021 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.6 mm | 13.90" | 3000x2000 | |
85.3 % v7 (old) | HP Envy 13-ba1475ng i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450 | 1.3 kg | 17 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | ||
86.9 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2020 | Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 1.6 kg | 23 mm | 13.50" | 3000x2000 | |
88.3 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2021 | Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 14.8 mm | 13.40" | 3456x2160 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
显示屏 -Blade Stealth 带OLED触摸屏
我们已经回顾了Blade Stealth 13的哑光1080p IPS屏幕。 在之前的测试中.这绝不是一个糟糕的面板,但响应时间相当慢,特别是对于一个游戏笔记本电脑来说。可选的OLED触摸屏也提供全高清分辨率,但由于额外的触摸屏,它依赖于光泽的表面。
正如预期的那样,OLED屏幕没有反应时间慢的问题,而且在其他方面以出色的主观画质给人留下深刻印象。色彩鲜艳,由于完美的黑色水平,对比度非常高,而且由于该技术,没有光晕。然而,我们可以测量到典型的OLED PWM闪烁,频率为240赫兹,亮度为40%或更低,这可能会给敏感的用户带来问题。
|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 386 cd/m²
Contrast: 9625:1 (Black: 0.04 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Razer Blade Stealth 13 2021 OLED ATNA33XC01-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q Sharp LQ133M1JW46, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 TIANMA XM, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | HP Envy 13-ba1475ng CMN139D, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 Panasonic MEI96A2, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5" | Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Samsung 134XK01, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -23% | -24% | -22% | -25% | 0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 100 | 66 -34% | 64.9 -35% | 66.4 -34% | 63.5 -36% | 99.7 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 97.4 -3% | 94.4 -6% | 97.6 -2% | 95.1 -5% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.5 | 67.1 -31% | 66.3 -32% | 67.5 -31% | 65.7 -33% | 97.7 0% |
Response Times | -1288% | -835% | 2739% | -1286% | 23% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 3.6 ? | 57.6 ? -1500% | 37.6 ? -944% | 66 ? -1733% | 57 ? -1483% | 2.2 ? 39% |
Response Time Black / White * | 3.2 ? | 37.6 ? -1075% | 26.4 ? -725% | 28.8 ? -800% | 38 ? -1088% | 2.2 ? 31% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 26040 ? 10750% | 240.4 ? 0% | |||
Screen | -99% | -73% | -87% | -68% | -29% | |
Brightness middle | 385 | 356.8 -7% | 502 30% | 423 10% | 391 2% | 384 0% |
Brightness | 390 | 336 -14% | 474 22% | 405 4% | 367 -6% | 387 -1% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 88 -9% | 89 -8% | 83 -14% | 86 -11% | 97 0% |
Black Level * | 0.04 | 0.34 -750% | 0.33 -725% | 0.23 -475% | 0.19 -375% | |
Contrast | 9625 | 1049 -89% | 1521 -84% | 1839 -81% | 2058 -79% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 1.63 29% | 1.35 41% | 3.2 -39% | 3.07 -33% | 4.56 -98% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.8 | 5.03 26% | 3.67 46% | 5.8 15% | 4.74 30% | 7.27 -7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.5 | 1.08 57% | 1.2 52% | 1 60% | 1.52 39% | 4.52 -81% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 3 -131% | 1.7 -31% | 4.7 -262% | 3.6 -177% | 1.5 -15% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.23 99% | 2.24 98% | 1.99 111% | 2.29 96% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 6507 100% | 6434 101% | 6440 101% | 6362 102% | 6330 103% | 6219 105% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62 | 61.1 | 61.9 | 61 | 87.1 | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.6 | 94.3 | 97.5 | 95 | 100 | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -470% /
-252% | -311% /
-171% | 877% /
491% | -460% /
-233% | -2% /
-10% |
* ... smaller is better
亮度约为390cd/m²,比IPS机型略好。我们使用专业的CalMAN软件进行分析,Blade Stealth 13在出厂时已经配备了相应的色彩配置文件,用户无需进行后续校准。一些颜色显示出比3更高的DeltaE-2000偏差(与P3参考值相比),但在灰阶中没有明显的偏色。
通过我们自己的校准(X-Rite i1 Pro 2),我们可以略微改善灰度水平的偏差,但色彩准确度甚至在整体上变得极差。尽管有P3的全面覆盖,但该面板因此并不适合编辑图片/视频,尽管这肯定不是游戏笔记本的重点。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.6 ms rise | |
↘ 2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz | ≤ 40 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 40 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
OLED触摸屏的视角稳定性非常好,尽管根据角度不同会出现轻微的变色,但这是OLED面板的典型特征。光滑的表面使户外使用比雾面IPS面板更困难。此外,亮度不够高,无法补偿反射。因此,只有在阴天才能舒适地使用。
电池寿命 - 与OLED相比,续航能力明显下降
在电池容量方面没有任何变化(53.1Wh),但OLED触摸屏需要的电量明显多于 IPS面板.与所有采用OLED面板的设备一样,这也取决于内容;由于技术的原因,明亮的内容只是比黑暗的内容需要更多的电力。例如,在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,Blade Stealth 13的IPS型号持续了9个小时(150cd/m²),而OLED型号现在只持续了不到4.5小时。在全亮度下,它甚至只有3.5小时。这对这样一个紧凑的笔记本来说可能是一个淘汰标准,它也适合于移动使用。
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
Average of class Subnotebook (389 - 1585, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Razer Blade Stealth 13 2021 OLED |
Pros
Cons
结论 - OLED在游戏方面令人信服,但限制了移动性
基本上,RazerBlade Stealth 13没有什么变化,当然,因为它仍然是市场上最快的13英寸笔记本之一,配备GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q。两种可用配置之间的唯一区别是显示屏。如果你想要OLED触摸屏,你必须多付250欧元(约295美元)。
作为回报,你可以得到更好的主观画质,色彩艳丽,对比度极高。响应时间也要好得多;标准的IPS面板在这方面仍有问题。额外的触摸屏也可以成为一个优势,这取决于应用的情况。
画面质量好,响应时间快。对于游戏来说,可选的OLED屏幕非常好,但它也对这台紧凑的13英寸笔记本电脑的电池寿命产生了巨大影响。
然而,也有缺点,如PWM闪烁和屏幕表面的反射。此外,Blade Stealth 13是一个非常紧凑和移动的笔记本电脑,电池寿命肯定可以发挥重要作用。然而,OLED屏幕需要更多的电力,在我们的实际WLAN测试中,运行时间减半。在购买决定中肯定要考虑这一差异。
价格和可用性
配备OLED触摸屏的RazerBlade Stealth 13在数码港以2250欧元欧元(约合人民币2,657元)立即供货;配备哑光IPS面板的基本型号,价格为2,000欧元。($2,362)
Razer Blade Stealth 13 2021 OLED
- 09/20/2021 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff