Realme C3智能手机评测：底价的诱惑
Realme C3 (C Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G70 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G52 MP2, RAM: 820 MHz
Memory
3 GB
, LPDDR4X
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 270 PPI, 10-point multi-touch screen, IPS, Gorilla Glass 3, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB
, 20.6 GB free
Weight
195 g, Power Supply: 71 g
Price
160 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Comparison devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76.9 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2020 | Realme C3 Helio G70, Mali-G52 MP2 | 195 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 77.5 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2020 | Umidigi Power 3 Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3 | 218 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.53" | 2340x1080 | |
| 78.1 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2020 | Motorola Moto G8 Power SD 665, Adreno 610 | 197 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 2300x1080 | |
| 75.3 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2020 | Wiko View 4 Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320 | 180 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.52" | 1600x720 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Umidigi Power 3 | |
| Realme C3 | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Wiko View 4 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Umidigi Power 3 | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Realme C3 | |
| Wiko View 4 | |
Realme C3 Mediatek Helio G70, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø51.9 (17-62)
Wiko View 4 Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø45.7 (29-62)
Realme C3 Mediatek Helio G70, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø65.4 (34-69)
Wiko View 4 Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø38.7 (15-64)
9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
4 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
50.7 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
59.4 ∆E
50.3 ∆E
34.4 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
62.2 ∆E
62.2 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
46.6 ∆E
32.3 ∆E
71.9 ∆E
40.3 ∆E
41.4 ∆E
71.8 ∆E
66.9 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 531 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 492.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.16 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 531 cd/m²
Contrast: 2042:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.14
| Realme C3 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Umidigi Power 3 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.5" | Motorola Moto G8 Power IPS, 2300x1080, 6.4" | Wiko View 4 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -24% | -23% | 22% | |
| Brightness middle | 531 | 443 -17% | 462 -13% | 546 3% |
| Brightness | 492 | 450 -9% | 483 -2% | 504 2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 91 3% | 93 6% | 84 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.46 -77% | 0.65 -150% | 0.2 23% |
| Contrast | 2042 | 963 -53% | 711 -65% | 2730 34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.1 | 7.13 -17% | 5.7 7% | 4.19 31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.6 | 13.56 -17% | 8.9 23% | 9.21 21% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.4 | 8 -8% | 6.5 12% | 2.3 69% |
| Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.512 88% | 2.303 96% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 8028 81% | 7192 90% | 8073 81% | 6922 94% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 29.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 4.4 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v8 | Basemark GPU 1.1 | VRMark | BaseMark OS II
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Realme C3 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G70 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Realme C3 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G70 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Realme C3 | |
| Realme C3 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G70 (3231 - 4825, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Realme C3 | |
| Umidigi Power 3 | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Wiko View 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G70 () | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Realme C3 | |
| Umidigi Power 3 | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Wiko View 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G70 () | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Realme C3 | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Wiko View 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G70 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Realme C3 | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Wiko View 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G70 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Realme C3 | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Wiko View 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G70 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Realme C3 | |
| Realme C3 | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Wiko View 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G70 (1 - 21, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Realme C3 | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Wiko View 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G70 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Realme C3 | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Wiko View 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G70 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Realme C3 | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
| Wiko View 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G70 () | |
| Basemark GPU 1.1 - 1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Realme C3 | |
| Wiko View 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G70 () | |
| VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
| Realme C3 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G70 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G70 () | |
| Realme C3 (Chrome 81) | |
| Wiko View 4 (Chrome 80) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Realme C3 (Chrome 81) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G70 () | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80) | |
| Wiko View 4 (Chrome 80) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
| Realme C3 (Chrome 81) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G70 () | |
| Wiko View 4 (Chome 80) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80) | |
| Realme C3 (Chrome 81) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G70 () | |
| Wiko View 4 (Chrome 80) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Realme C3 (Chrome 81) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G70 () | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80) | |
| Wiko View 4 (Chrome 80) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Wiko View 4 (Chrome 80) | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80) | |
| Realme C3 (Chrome 81) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G70 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Realme C3 | Umidigi Power 3 | Motorola Moto G8 Power | Wiko View 4 | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -15% | 19% | -17% | -25% | 609% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 294.1 | 290.5 -1% | 300.9 2% | 235.7 -20% | 242 ? -18% | 1887 ? 542% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 122.2 | 207.8 70% | 181.9 49% | 133.5 9% | 100.5 ? -18% | 1471 ? 1104% |
| Random Read 4KB | 51.8 | 78.5 52% | 57.7 11% | 46.2 -11% | 43.2 ? -17% | 278 ? 437% |
| Random Write 4KB | 68.5 | 16.4 -76% | 132.6 94% | 18.5 -73% | 22.4 ? -67% | 311 ? 354% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.6 ? | 39.6 ? -53% | 69.4 ? -18% | 81.8 ? -3% | 71.8 ? -15% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 63.5 ? | 13.3 ? -79% | 49.7 ? -22% | 60.7 ? -4% | 52.9 ? -17% |
PUBG
Asphalt 9 Legends
Temple Run 2
Realme C3; 1.66.2: Ø59.5 (50-60)
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Realme C3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Wiko View 4 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.01 / 0.09 Watt |
| Idle |  0.44 / 1.65 / 1.69 Watt |
| Load |
3.81 / 6.22 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Realme C3 5000 mAh | Umidigi Power 3 6150 mAh | Motorola Moto G8 Power 5000 mAh | Wiko View 4 5000 mAh | Average Mediatek Helio G70 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -15% | 0% | -43% | |||
| Idle Minimum * | 0.44 | 0.9 -105% | 0.44 ? -0% | 0.883 ? -101% | ||
| Idle Average * | 1.65 | 1.3 21% | 1.65 ? -0% | 1.467 ? 11% | ||
| Idle Maximum * | 1.69 | 1.6 5% | 1.69 ? -0% | 1.621 ? 4% | ||
| Load Average * | 3.81 | 3.2 16% | 3.81 ? -0% | 6.55 ? -72% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 6.22 | 7.1 -14% | 6.22 ? -0% | 9.9 ? -59% |
* ... smaller is better
| Realme C3 5000 mAh | Umidigi Power 3 6150 mAh | Motorola Moto G8 Power 5000 mAh | Wiko View 4 5000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 1371 | 1124 -18% | 1002 -27% | 1074 -22% |
Pros
+ 现代的SoC
+ 做工好
+ 续航时间长
+ 便宜
+ 三镜头
Cons
- 主摄性能一般
- 没有NFC
在realme于4月正式进入德国市场的三款手机中，realme C3是编辑们的心头好。对于这个决定而言，重要的不是红色的金属外观，而是硬件。
32 GB的存储容量有点跟不上时代。
性能不错，但是这个级别普遍提供的32GB存储空间实在是不够。 如果有64 GB可选的话情况看起来会更好。 但是，那些需要好相机的人就不要考虑C3了。
Realme C3
- 05/29/2020 v7 (old)
Inge Schwabe
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Price comparison
