小米Redmi Note 10S评论。廉价的Android 智能手机是防水和防尘的
就像 Redmi Note 9S Redmi Note 10S是为价格敏感的买家准备的。有两个变种，它们有不同的存储容量（64/128GB）。这款Android 智能手机配备了 联发科Helio G95.该 ARM Mali-G76 MP4作为GPU。这款智能手机提供6GB的内存。
我们的审查设备有128GB的内部存储器。在每个部分下面，用户可以从我们的数据库中添加其他设备到对比图中。
Likely Competitors
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81.1 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4 | 178.8 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.43" | 2400x1080 | |
| 80.7 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2020 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S SD 720G, Adreno 618 | 209 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 81.7 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2021 | Realme 8 Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4 | 177 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.40" | 2400x1080 | |
| 78.9 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2021 | Oppo A74 SD 662, Adreno 610 | 175 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.43" | 2400x1080 | |
| 84.6 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2021 | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro SD 860, Adreno 640 | 215 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 |
外壳 - 重量轻，通过IP53认证
连接性 -Android 智能手机，带有红外辐射器和耳机插孔
我们已经提到，用户可以在Redmi Note 10S中插入一个microSD卡。该卡槽可以同时容纳两张nanoSIM卡和一张microSD。这款小米智能手机同时支持VoLTE和WiFi通话。Redmi Note 10S有一个3.5毫米音频插孔和一个USB-C端口，以USB 2.0速度运行。Note 10S支持Camera2 L3 API。不支持Widevine L1，这就是为什么用户将不能以高清质量进行视频流。然而，Android ，这款智能手机有一个通知LED。
读卡器
使用我们的参考级microSD卡东芝Exceria Pro M501，Redmi Note 10S在复制JPG文件时实现了18.76MB/s的数据传输率。对于这种类型的设备来说，这是一个正常的结果，但这并不意味着它在大的计划中不是一个非常差的结果。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Oppo A74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
软件--采用MIUI 12的小米智能手机
Redmi Note 10S运行Android 11（在我们审查时的安全补丁级别：2021年5月）。小米智能手机配备了一个被称为MiUI的定制启动器（在我们审查时的当前版本：12.5.6）。虽然主屏幕的布局对大多数Android 用户来说是熟悉的，但软件的其他部分需要一些时间来适应。
Redmi Note 10S配备了一大批预装的应用程序，如Facebook、TikTok和booking.com。还有一些第一方的应用程序，如小米的文件管理器和照片库。不幸的是，预装的应用程序只能被禁用。它们不能被完全卸载。
通信和GNSS - 不适合用于导航
Redmi Note 10S支持以下移动通信标准。GSM、3G、LTE。LTE调制解调器可以在LTE Cat.12速度（最大下载速度：600 Mb/s；最大上传速度：100 Mb/s）。
对于短距离通信，我们的评测设备依赖于NFC、蓝牙5和Wi-Fi 5。通过我们的参考级路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX12，Redmi Note 10S的下载速度可达283 Mb/s，上传速度可达320 Mb/s。与其他竞争者相比，这些都是中等水平的结果。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
| Realme 8 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
| Oppo A74 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
| Realme 8 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
| Oppo A74 | |
对于地理定位，我们的审查设备依赖于以下全球导航卫星系统。GPS、GLONASS、北斗和伽利略。在户外，Android 智能手机的误差范围为2米。我们使用一个被称为GPS测试的应用程序来确定误差范围。
为了确定我们的评测设备在导航方面的准确性，我们带着它去骑车。在这次骑行中，我们也由专业的导航仪Garmin Edge 500陪同。在这里，Redmi Note 10S在正确绘制我们所走的路线方面遇到困难。这可能是由过度的能量管理造成的。然而，在这次骑行中，我们确实关闭了所有可以关闭的节能功能。
电话和通话质量 - 与小米智能手机的稳定连接
电话应用提供了对最喜欢的联系人的直接访问，并允许用户轻松调出拨号盘。还有另外两个标签；一个是通话记录，另一个是保存的联系人。
Redmi Note 10S提供了较高的通话音量。通话两端的声音听起来清晰明了，而且大部分时间都能成功过滤掉背景噪音。
相机 - 适用于快照
由于有一个200万像素的深度传感器，Redmi Note 10S的64万像素主摄像头可以产生非常详细的特写照片。色彩看起来非常自然。然而，远处的物体往往变得模糊不清。
800万像素的超广角摄像头能拍出色彩鲜明的照片。不过，用超广角相机拍摄的照片看起来有点颗粒感。在弱光条件下，超广角相机无法捕捉到任何细节。没有光学变焦。使用数码变焦拍摄的照片显得非常模糊。在微距摄影方面，额外的200万像素微距相机的表现比主相机差。
在专业模式下，用户可以为每个摄像头调整快门速度、亮度、ISO和白平衡。没有专业视频模式。用小米智能手机拍摄的视频看起来和照片一样好。视频可以在1080p和720p下以60或30FPS录制。Redmi Note 10S只能以30 FPS录制4K视频。
1300万像素的前置摄像头可以产生良好的自拍效果。颜色看起来很自然。有彩色滤镜和美容模式。自拍相机没有专业模式。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Close-up shotPanoramic shotUltra wide-angle shot5X zoomLow-light shot
我们使用X-Rite ColorChecker Passport来进一步检查颜色的准确性。在受控的照明条件下，大多数颜色都有点太暗。在这些照明条件下，我们测试图表的照片显得很有细节。然而，角落看起来相当模糊和冲淡
附件及保修 - 包装盒中的保护套
除了智能手机本身，Redmi Note 10S的盒子里还有一个带有适当的USB Type-C电缆的USB充电器，一个硅胶套和一个SIM卡拆卸工具。
Redmi Note 10S的保修期为12个月。要了解更多关于保修范围和相关主题，请访问我们的常见问题部分。
输入设备和处理 - 电源按钮中的指纹识别器
Redmi Note 10S配备了Android的标准键盘，这被称为GBoard。它提供了大量的定制选项，适合输入较长的文本。触摸屏对输入的反应是可靠和迅速的。由于屏幕表面非常光滑，拖放功能效果非常好。
指纹传感器被集成到电源按钮中。它非常可靠，但速度不快。面部解锁功能运行良好。
显示屏 - 明亮的AMOLED面板
小米Redmi Note 10S的6.43英寸AMOLED屏幕的原始分辨率为2400x1080像素。Redmi Note 10S的显示屏可以达到700 cd/m²，这就是为什么它在我们的比较表中占据了首位。在APL50测试中，亮度达到了938 cd/m²的峰值。在禁用环境光传感器的情况下，最大亮度为441 cd/m²。最低亮度为2.63cd/m²。
对于亮度控制，Redmi Note 10S利用脉冲宽度调制（PWM）。频率在123.8和250赫兹之间波动。有一个直接电流调光模式，可以启用它来消除闪烁。在直流调光模式下，没有色彩再现的问题。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 706 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Realme 8 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Oppo A74 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -62% | -27% | -41% | 7% | |
| Brightness middle | 706 | 622 -12% | 590 -16% | 606 -14% | 567 -20% |
| Brightness | 701 | 612 -13% | 607 -13% | 606 -14% | 524 -25% |
| Brightness Distribution | 98 | 94 -4% | 92 -6% | 98 0% | 87 -11% |
| Black Level * | 0.56 | 0.57 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 3.98 -90% | 2.64 -26% | 3.6 -71% | 1 52% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.9 | 7.33 -50% | 6.85 -40% | 6.2 -27% | 2.1 57% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 4.5 -200% | 2.4 -60% | 3.3 -120% | 1.7 -13% |
| Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.206 100% | 2.265 97% | 2.31 95% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 6447 101% | 7361 88% | 6913 94% | 6704 97% | 6343 102% |
| Contrast | 1111 | 995 | |||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 114.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 250 Hz | ≤ 57 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 57 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
小米智能手机的AMOLED面板可以实现完美的黑色，因为每个像素都可以完全关闭。色彩再现可以在设置菜单中调整。标准模式是最准确的颜色。在饱和模式下，颜色显得过于饱和。
Redmi Note 10S的默认色彩模式被称为 "自动"。在这种模式下，色温会根据照明环境自动调整。然而，在这种模式下，颜色总是显得太冷。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Redmi Note 10S的屏幕在户外是可读的，只要你呆在一个阴凉的地方。即使在阴天，屏幕反射也会被证明是令人困扰的。
AMOLED面板的可视角度非常好。然而，在非常尖锐的角度，用户可能会注意到一些颜色的闪烁。
性能 - 与Redmi Note 9S相比，几乎没有改进。
小米Redmi Note 10S采用了两年前的 联发科Helio G95.在我们的基准测试中，该SoC的表现符合预期。相比之下，Redmi Note 10S的性能并没有得到提升。 Redmi Note 9S.事实上，在一些基准测试中，Redmi Note 9S比其继任者更快。然而，Redmi Note 10S的表现与它的主要竞争对手差不多 Realme 8.
此外，由于系统限制，一些基准测试无法进行。Redmi Note 10S在AI Mark和Basemark OS II中的表现相当差，可能是因为能量管理过于激进。
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
| Oppo A74 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G95 (42 - 49, n=4) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
| Oppo A74 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G95 (43 - 53, n=4) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
| Oppo A74 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G95 (26 - 31, n=4) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
| Oppo A74 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G95 (29 - 33, n=4) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
| Oppo A74 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G95 (282417 - 295778, n=2) | |
| AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
| Oppo A74 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G95 (6118 - 12983, n=3) | |
Remdi Note 10S在我们的浏览器基准测试中排在最后。我们重新进行了几次浏览器基准测试，但总是得到相同的结果。我们不清楚为什么Remdi Note 10S在这些基准测试中表现得如此糟糕。
尽管如此，小米智能手机提供了一个良好的网络浏览体验。滚动很流畅，网站加载也相对较快。
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G95 (16.9 - 50.8, n=5) | |
| Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G95 (26.7 - 72.4, n=3) | |
| Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chome 81) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G95 (14.7 - 34.2, n=4) | |
| Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81) | |
| Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G95 (28 - 57, n=5) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G95 (4808 - 16289, n=4) | |
| Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G95 (2673 - 10797, n=5) | |
| Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
Redmi Note 10S的读写速度与其他竞争对手非常相似。这里唯一的例外是小米Poco X3 Pro，它的内部内存明显更快。Redmi Note 10S有两个变体：一个是64GB的内部存储器，另一个是128GB的内部存储。
根据规格表，Redmi Note 10S具有UFS 2.2内存。然而，Helio G95不能完全利用这种快速内存。根据规格表，Redmi Note 10S具有UFS 2.2内存。但是， Helio G95不能完全利用这么快的内存。UFS 2.0是联发科SoC能处理的最快的内存类型。
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | Realme 8 | Oppo A74 | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -4% | -1% | 1% | 85% | 54% | 220% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 498.8 | 496.6 0% | 526 5% | 515 3% | 1330 167% | 728 ? 46% | 1882 ? 277% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 372 | 214.8 -42% | 187.8 -50% | 255.3 -31% | 527 42% | 527 ? 42% | 1467 ? 294% |
| Random Read 4KB | 110.5 | 137 24% | 144 30% | 139.4 26% | 203.1 84% | 191.7 ? 73% | 278 ? 152% |
| Random Write 4KB | 121 | 123.6 2% | 133 10% | 126.4 4% | 176.9 46% | 185.8 ? 54% | 310 ? 156% |
游戏--不稳定的帧率
Redmi Note 10S可以顺利地运行非要求较高的标题。在我们的游戏基准测试中，Redmi Note 10S设法达到相对较高的帧率。然而，帧时间的一致性非常差。我们使用Gamebench来记录帧率。
Redmi Note 10S无法在我们基准测试的任何图形设置中保持一致的帧率。然而，触摸屏和运动传感器的工作没有任何问题。
排放 - 带有立体声扬声器的智能手机
温度
根据我们的测量，Redmi Note 10S的表面温度在负载下达到38.6℃（101.48°F）。这款小米智能手机变得相当温暖。然而，它总是舒适地拿在手里。
我们的GFXBench压力测试显示，Redmi Note 10S可以在持续负载下保持所有的性能。小米智能手机不应该因为过热而在负载下节流。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
发言人
Redmi Note 10S的扬声器提供了一个相对较高的音量。然而，高音部分明显过高。扬声器在再现声音方面表现良好。对于媒体消费，我们建议使用一套耳机或外部扬声器。
用户可以通过3.5毫米音频插孔或蓝牙5将耳机或外部扬声器连接到小米智能手机上。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Realme 8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - 良好的电池运行时间
能源消耗
小米Redmi Note 10S是一款非常节能的智能手机。事实上，当涉及到功耗时，它在我们的比较表中占据了首位。在Geekbench基准测试中，耗电量峰值为8W。
附带的充电器的额定输出为33W。
| Off / Standby |   0.01 / 0.12 Watt |
| Idle |  0.69 / 1.46 / 1.5 Watt |
| Load |
3.67 / 5.58 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S 5020 mAh | Oppo A74 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 5160 mAh | Average Mediatek Helio G95 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -61% | -2% | -53% | -43% | -38% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.69 | 1.5 -117% | 0.62 10% | 0.79 -14% | 1.273 ? -84% | 0.882 ? -28% |
| Idle Average * | 1.46 | 2.1 -44% | 1.59 -9% | 2.21 -51% | 1.865 ? -28% | 1.448 ? 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.5 | 2.5 -67% | 1.63 -9% | 2.26 -51% | 2.05 ? -37% | 1.603 ? -7% |
| Load Average * | 3.67 | 5.2 -42% | 4.05 -10% | 6.17 -68% | 4.87 ? -33% | 6.57 ? -79% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.58 | 7.5 -34% | 5.2 7% | 10.09 -81% | 7.32 ? -31% | 9.92 ? -78% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench, GFXBench and when idle (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
在我们面向实际的Wi-Fi测试中，Redmi Note 10S的电池运行时间达到了18小时以上。而 Realme 8在同一测试中持续了差不多的时间。但 Redmi Note 9S在我们的上网测试中比Redmi Note 10S持续的时间长。总而言之，Redmi Note 10S为一款拥有5000毫安时电池的智能手机提供了良好的电池寿命。
小米智能手机支持快速充电。用附带的充电器给Redmi Note 10S充满电大约需要一个半小时。
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S 5020 mAh | Realme 8 5000 mAh | Oppo A74 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 5160 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -11% | -4% | -15% | -24% | |
| Reader / Idle | 3612 | 2263 -37% | 2386 -34% | 2372 -34% | |
| H.264 | 1172 | 1269 8% | 1179 1% | 973 -17% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 1087 | 1187 9% | 1039 -4% | 982 -10% | 879 -19% |
| Load | 368 | 279 -24% | 314 -15% | 276 -25% |
Pros
Cons
评语 - 性能稳定，硬件良好
Redmi Note 10S是小米的另一款价格低廉的中档智能手机。它提供了一个体面的性能水平，可以处理大多数应用程序。在要求很高的应用程序中，小米智能手机可能会感到滞后。此外，在非常繁重的网站上加载网页内容可能需要一段时间。电池运行时间相当好，相机系统也很不错。
Redmi Note
10提供了一个非常好的硬件组合。
现在的问题是选择哪个。Redmi Note 10 ，Redmi Note 10S或Redmi Note 10 Pro 。这些智能手机的价格从200到300欧元（约240-360美元）不等。通过选择合适的产品，你可以为自己节省一些钱。虽然Redmi Note 10没有NFC芯片，但Note 10 Pro有，但它也配备了更好的相机系统。这就是为什么Redmi Note 10S看起来是一个很好的折衷方案。Redmi Note 10S的主要竞争对手是realme 8 ，它的性能水平非常相似。Redmi Note 9S 的用户不应该升级到Redmi Note 10S。
价格和可用性
小米Redmi Note 10目前在Walmart售价为270美元。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
