Samsung Galaxy A50
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 25 MPix f/2.0
Price comparison
Average of 57 scores (from 134 reviews)
Reviews for the Samsung Galaxy A50
Triple rear-facing cameras and a bright AMOLED screen on a midrange smartphone? That may sound like an intoxicating mix, but can the Samsung Galaxy A50 match expectations? Read on in this detailed review to find out.
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Between the versatile cameras, bloat-free software and rather good gaming performance, the phone will more than suffice for most prospective users. The Samsung Galaxy A50 does it all while offering a really good user experience.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/29/2020
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 52% display: 78% mobility: 69%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Between the versatile cameras, bloat-free software and rather good gaming performance, the phone will more than suffice for most prospective users. The Samsung Galaxy A50 does it all while offering a really good user experience.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/01/2020
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 52% display: 78% mobility: 69%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Between the versatile cameras, bloat-free software and rather good gaming performance, the phone will more than suffice for most prospective users. The Samsung Galaxy A50 does it all while offering a really good user experience.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/04/2020
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 82% display: 78% mobility: 69%
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a solid midrange phone with good looks, a gorgeous OLED display, and solid battery life. If you're a die-hard Samsung fan in search of a good midrange handset, this is your best bet. If not, you should consider the Pixel 3a. It checks off all the same boxes as the A50, along with a superior fingerprint sensor, faster performance, better camera quality, and guaranteed software updates, making it our Editors' Choice.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/07/2020
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A50 offers a handsome design and decent midrange specs, but it's not quite enough to compete with the Google Pixel 3a.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/07/2020
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy A50 is very good, and it's refreshing to see Samsung take the midrange market seriously — particularly in the U.S., where it has remained laser-focused on its Galaxy S and Note products. With phone prices rising and ownership time increasing, the world needs more accessible handsets. It needs more phones like the A50.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There really is a lot to like about the Galaxy A50, which can be though of as a sort of faux flagship Samsung smartphone. It's like an S10 but at a much more affordable price. We like the attractive design which is waterproof and lightweight. You then get some amazing hardware and features for your money inlcuding a really nice screen, decent cameras and 128GB of storage. It's not all plain sailing though, as the fingerprint scanner isn't very reliable and performance can be sluggish at times. So there are better mid-range phones around this price or a little bit more if you heart isn't set on Samsung.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Buy it. While the Galaxy A50's camera won't dazzle you like the Pixel 3a's, the Galaxy A50 is still an excellent value with a class-leading display. We just wish it was available from more carriers.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: PC World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The A50 is the perfect representation of that. At $350, there’s a lot to recommend. It has a nice design, a very solid screen, and a solid camera. One rub is that it’s not available on AT&T or T-Mobile yet (and Samsung hasn’t announced whether it will be), but it’s hardly the only budget phone to be locked out of certain carriers. It brings enough to the table where non-subscribers might even consider switching.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Greenbot EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The A50 is the perfect representation of that. At $350, there’s a lot to recommend. It has a nice design, a very solid screen, and a solid camera. One rub is that it’s not available on AT&T or T-Mobile yet (and Samsung hasn’t announced whether it will be), but it’s hardly the only budget phone to be locked out of certain carriers. It brings enough to the table where non-subscribers might even consider switching.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The A50 is the perfect representation of that. At $350, there’s a lot to recommend. It has a nice design, a very solid screen, and a solid camera. One rub is that it’s not available on AT&T or T-Mobile yet (and Samsung hasn’t announced whether it will be), but it’s hardly the only budget phone to be locked out of certain carriers. It brings enough to the table where non-subscribers might even consider switching.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/19/2019
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Given that there’s such a small difference in price between the Galaxy A50 and Galaxy A70, it’s hard to choose between them. However, we think the latter is perhaps the best option but if you’re really shopping on a tight budget then the A50 isn’t likely to disappoint.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/15/2019
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Packing a large 6.4-inch AMOLED display, the Exynos 9610 chipset, and a triple-camera setup, the Samsung Galaxy A50 has plenty for the budget-conscious smartphone enthusiast to get excited about. Under the rigors of our rear-camera testing, however, the A50 can’t match the performance of some of the best mid-range devices and certainly not the image quality of the latest flagship offerings. It’s best in bright sunny conditions, where exposure, dynamic range, and color are good, and bokeh shots are very acceptable. In cloudy or low-light conditions, though, it’s not quite as effective with stills or video, and we found zoom shots to be a particular weakness.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/04/2019
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy A50 is very good, and it's refreshing to see Samsung take the midrange market seriously — particularly in the U.S., where it has remained laser-focused on its Galaxy S and Note products. With phone prices rising and ownership time increasing, the world needs more accessible handsets. It needs more phones like the A50.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/23/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy A50 has a significantly better Super AMOLED display and a nicer design. Performance-wise too, the Samsung Galaxy A50 is more than capable of holding its own with popular games like PUBG. This is one of the best mid-rangers Samsung has produced in years and I would have no qualms recommending it to all but the most demanding users.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/07/2019
Source: Tech Nave EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Looking at the past models of Samsung's mid-range mobile phones, I found them to have a slightly lower price to performance ratio. This has changed with the new Samsung Galaxy A50. Never have we seen an in-display fingerprint sensor, triple rear cameras with an ultra-wide sensor, a 4000mAh battery capacity, an AMOLED screen, 6GB RAM + 128GB ROM, all for the price of RM1199!
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/13/2019
Source: Fone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In the ever changing Indian smartphone market, the South Korean tech giant Samsung learnt its lesson, recouped itself, and here they are with some amazing smartphones (Galaxy M series, Galaxy A series) posing a direct threat to the likes of Xiaomi, Realme, Vivo, HONOR and OPPO. Samsung overhauled its smartphone strategy at the mid-range price point in order to appeal more to millennials by bringing in cutting-edge features. As promised the company launched Galaxy A50 with an in-display fingerprint scanner, triple rear cameras and a huge battery. We’ve used the Galaxy A50 for sometime and come up with a reason on why you should and should not buy it.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/04/2019
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy A50 looks like it has a decent amount of potential to compete in the tough mid-range market and hits a very attractive price point. It’s got some unexpected features like triple rear cameras and a fingerprint scanner embedded in the screen. There are also some excellent core specs here. There’s lots of things that need testing in the real world, though, so stay tuned.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/01/2019
Source: Tech PP EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So where does that leave the Galaxy A50? Well, as we said at the very beginning, considering that it starts at Rs 19,990 for the 4 GB/ 64 GB option (the 6 GB/64 GB one will set you back by Rs 22,990), its major rival is expected to the Poco F1, and while that phone might have boasting rights when it comes to processors (thanks to its Qualcomm Snapdragon 845), the A50 more than matches it in other regards. The display and design are very good, and while the camera is prone to the sin of inconsistency, and the battery might not last as long as some would expect from its numbers, what cannot be denied is that the Galaxy A50 is perhaps one of Samsung’s best efforts in the budget flagship segment.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 90% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It’s been a long time coming but we definitely think that Samsung hit the nail on the head with this mid-range offering. It might be hard to figure out which of their devices to purchase given the tremendous amount of products they’ve been dishing out in the past few weeks but if your budget can handle the Php 17,990 asking price and want to or have been wanting to try out then put this phone on your radar.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/23/2019
Source: Manila Shaker EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
With its premium design, Samsung Galaxy A50 was able to impress its take on the design and build. Lightweight in hand, this device feels like a flagship phone. Camera performance is just average despite having a larger sensor and triple-rear camera set up. On the other hand, over-all performance in gaming and multi-tasking is a bit above what we expected. Plus, the use of Super AMOLED and USB Type-C technologies have made Samsung Galaxy A50 stand out.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 80% performance: 85% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy A50 and the Galaxy A30 actually differ a great deal in terms of price. In the United States, you can find both these phones unlocked over at B&H, and the Galaxy A50 costs $300, while the A50 rocks a price of $230. In Europe and the rest of the world, the price delta between the two is bigger: the A50 costs 350 euro in Europe, while the A30 sells for just around 200 euro.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 04/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Samsung got a lot of things right in the Galaxy A50 - the design and color options, the screen, the performance, and the battery life. The still images, while not impressive in detail, are of high-resolution and dependable to get the scene right no matter the available light and weather conditions. The 1080p videos are impressive, too.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Phone World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy A50 is a complete package with many premium features such as AMOLED display, 4GB RAM and 4000 mAh big battery. It is a perfect device for mid-range users plus its size is also very satisfactory for the game and social media lovers. If you are looking for a good midrange device of Samsung then Samsung Galaxy A50 is a perfect choice for you.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/17/2019
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a big and bold device, which was very quick to navigate and use, but we're yet to be convinced by its camera capabilities.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/11/2019
Source: The Indian Express EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Given the price point, the Samsung Galaxy A50 offers good features and decent value for money. The camera is fairly good, however, the in-display fingerprint reader is a tad slow, however, this may get resolved in the coming updates. At this price point, the Samsung Galaxy A50 looks like a good buy at the moment.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Yes, it looks pretty good and yes, the performance is more than sufficient for the price, but what really stood out for me was the clean and optimized user experience. This phone does not get in the way or bother you with extended permissions, and it definitely does not pop up advertisements. For me, and I would imagine a significant number of users, this is a pretty big incentive.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/20/2019
Source: Tech2 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For those who are in for design, a great AMOLED display, and a decent camera, the Galaxy A50 is your device.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy A50 can be considered as one of the best-designed smartphones from Samsung. The Prism-style gradient finish gives a pretty cool look, while the display is another plus point. The new user interface comes with its share of hits and misses and the camera performance is a mixed bag one. Overall, if you are a Samsung loyalist then this phone might excite, else you can consider Xiaomi Poco F1, Nokia 8.1 and Vivo V11 Pro which comes loaded with some great performance coupled with capable cameras and new technologies.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/20/2019
Source: Tech2 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For those who are in for design, a great AMOLED display, and a decent camera, the Galaxy A50 is your device.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Business Standard EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Priced at Rs 19,990 (4GB/64GB), the Samsung Galaxy A50 seems to be an identical twin of the Galaxy M30; albeit, with a gradient reflective design, sleek operating system, an in-display fingerprint sensor and a slightly powerful processor. At its price, the phone competes with the likes of Xiaomi Poco F1 and Honor Play.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/18/2019
Source: Hitech Century EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Both phones also come with a generously sized 4,000mAh battery paired up with 15W fast charging and a bundled fast charger as well. In Malaysia, the Galaxy A30 comes in your choice of black, white or blue for RM799 while the Galaxy A50 comes in your choice of black, white and blue for RM1199. Both phones are now available at all authorised retailers nationwide and all Samsung Experiencr stores and the Samsung Online Store.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 03/18/2019
Source: Sam Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy A50, like the Galaxy M20, isn’t great in any one aspect other than that Super AMOLED display, but the overall package is a good one for the asking price (₹19,990, or $292) for a Samsung smartphone. Samsung continues to be the only manufacturer giving you ultra-wide rear cameras in the budget and mid-range, and the Galaxy A50 has excellent battery life and comes with Android Pie and Samsung’s latest One UI interface and features.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2019
Source: Mobygyaan EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Moving to the verdict, this is yet Samsung’s best smartphone in this segment that offers value. It has an on-screen fingerprint scanner, gorgeous AMOLED display, and an impressive design that makes it a worthy challenger. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a recommended buy if you are looking for a midrange phone with an all-rounder package.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/15/2019
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Unfortunately for Samsung, the Galaxy A50 with its starting price of Rs. 19,990 competes with Xiaomi's Poco F1 (Review) which features the top-end Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 processor. That's obviously the better choice of phone if you're a gamer or want the smoothest possible experience, but it doesn't have three rear cameras or a modern all-screen design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We'll be running our usual battery of tests and using both phones out in the real world, and we'll soon bring you our detailed reviews of both phone's performance, display quality, camera quality, battery life, software, usability, and durability, so stay tuned to Gadgets 360.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 03/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy A50 comes with a beautiful design language and the display looks immersive. The camera seems to be promising, while the performance and battery are to be tested out. As for the competition is concerned, the smartphone will face stiff competition from the Vivo V11 Pro, Nokia 8.1, Honor Play and Xiaomi Poco F1.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/28/2019
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There's lots of things that need testing out in the real world but the Galaxy A50 has the potential to be a great mid-range smartphone. It's got Galaxy S10-esque features like a triple rear camera and embedded fingerprint scanner but without the high price tag.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2019
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There’s no pricing set as of yet for both phones, but it’s clear that Samsung is positioning them at the mid-range segment of the market. We’re hoping Samsung has learned that pricing matters in the hyper-competitive mid-range segment, and prices both phones accordingly if and when they’re released in the Philippines.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2019
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a big and bold device, which was very quick to navigate and use, but we're yet to be convinced by its camera capabilities.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/25/2019
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We would love to test this performance in more depth, though. So, hopefully, the Tab S5e stops by the office at some point. We're also kind interested to see how Samsung's new phone sync feature works. As per press materials, it should allow you to pick up a phone call on your tablet, without having your phone around just as you can with an iPad/iPhone combo.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 02/25/2019
Source: Sam Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In the brief time that we have spent with the devices at MWC 2019, the Galaxy A50 and Galaxy A30 appear to be worthy successors to the Galaxy A handsets of 2018. The new naming convention aside, they offer a nice mix of features at what will undoubtedly be a relatively affordable price. The Galaxy A50 and Galaxy A30 will go on sale in mid-March with India most likely being the first country to get them. The sheer amount of localized content on the devices on display here suggest that much.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 02/23/2019
Source: Computerbild DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/07/2020
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 90% features: 87% display: 93% mobility: 92%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/03/2019
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/15/2019
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/04/2019
Source: Connect - 7/19
Single Review, , Medium, Date: 06/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 77% features: 68% mobility: 96% ergonomy: 72%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/13/2019
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% features: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% features: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 83% features: 77% display: 88% mobility: 86%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 70% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/08/2019
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/01/2019
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2019
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/15/2019
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/16/2019
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/25/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Hipertextual ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 85% display: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/07/2019
Source: Incognitosis ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/01/2019
Source: Everyeye.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% features: 75% display: 85% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 80% features: 85% display: 89% mobility: 92% ergonomy: 73%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/03/2019
Rating: price: 78% features: 86%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 75% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 72%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2019
Source: Nieuwe Mobiel.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/14/2019
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Portablegear NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/11/2019
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 80% display: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/21/2019
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/30/2019
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 70% mobility: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Erenumerique FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/22/2019
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/26/2019
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2019
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 75%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/23/2019
Rating: Total score: 71% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/17/2019
Source: Tekno Seyir TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/04/2019
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 04/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 50% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 60%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/31/2019
Source: Geeks.hu HU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/10/2019
Source: CZC CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/25/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 09/23/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/15/2019
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/04/2019
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/22/2019
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/09/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/06/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/12/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 04/26/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/25/2019
Source: VNReview VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/12/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/10/2019
Source: Cell Phones VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/09/2019
Source: Viettelstore VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/29/2019
Source: Viettelstore VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/27/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/25/2019
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/23/2019
Source: Cell Phones VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/23/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/22/2019
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/21/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/20/2019
Source: Viettelstore VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/20/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/19/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/19/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/19/2019
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/15/2019
Source: Viettelstore VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/14/2019
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/13/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/12/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/11/2019
Source: TechZ VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/08/2019
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/06/2019
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Mobil DK DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 77% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Computerblog.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/09/2019
Source: Arena IT →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/13/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Comment
ARM Mali-G72 MP3:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Exynos 9610:
中端SoC,它在两个群集中集成了8个处理器内核:四个主频高达2.3 GHz的ARM Cortex-A73内核和4个主频高达1.7 GHz的ARM Cortex-A53内核。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.40":
只有较少的手机有很大的屏幕。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.