Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro Series
Processor: Intel Core m3 6Y30, Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974Graphics Adapter: Intel HD Graphics 515, Qualcomm Adreno 330
Display: 10.10 inch, 12.10 inch
Weight: 0.477kg, 0.693kg
Price: 599, 1000 euro
Average of 79 scores (from 113 reviews)
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 LTE-Version
Specifications
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 LTE-VersionProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 330
Display: 10.10 inch, 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixels
Weight: 0.477kg
Price: 599 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/27/2014
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 64% features: 87% display: 95% mobility: 81%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/11/2014
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
Specifications
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700NProcessor: Intel Core m3 6Y30
Graphics Adapter: Intel HD Graphics 515 1024 MB
Display: 12.10 inch, 3:2, 2160 x 1440 pixels
Weight: 0.693kg
Price: 1000 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N (Model)
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Super AMOLED风。 三星Galaxy TabPro S是一台12寸智能平板,搭配了实用的键盘,优秀的电池续航和绚丽的屏幕。
Foreign Reviews
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We love the design, the screen, and the typing experience but were hoping for more ports, power and longevity. The TabPro S will fit the bill for some users, but in an increasingly competitive market, we’re left wondering how much life is left in this slate before something with similar functionality at a lower price point comes along, IFAs just around the corner after all.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We love the design, the screen, and the typing experience but were hoping for more ports, power and longevity. The TabPro S will fit the bill for some users, but in an increasingly competitive market, we’re left wondering how much life is left in this slate before something with similar functionality at a lower price point comes along, IFAs just around the corner after all.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, Samsung's first bash at a laptop-replacement tablet gets plenty of things right. It runs full Windows 10, lasts for a full working day, has a bright and colourful screen (although it's not class-leading in terms of resolution), and a solid design compared to Samsung tablets of old. It's not perfect though: the included keyboard cover has a tiny trackpad, isn't designed especially well for folding up quickly, and its two-position stand options are restrictive (not a patch on the Surface Pro's kickstand design).
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, Samsung's first bash at a laptop-replacement tablet gets plenty of things right. It runs full Windows 10, lasts for a full working day, has a bright and colourful screen (although it's not class-leading in terms of resolution), and a solid design compared to Samsung tablets of old. It's not perfect though: the included keyboard cover has a tiny trackpad, isn't designed especially well for folding up quickly, and its two-position stand options are restrictive (not a patch on the Surface Pro's kickstand design).
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: V3.co.uk EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There’s a lot to like about the Samsung Galaxy TabPro S. The AMOLED display is one of the best we've used, the design is premium and the battery lives up to Samsung's big claims. It's not without its downsides, however, as the keyboard add-on is pretty shonky and the performance fails to match similarly-specced devices that come with Intel's Core i5 or Core i7 chips.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: V3.co.uk EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There’s a lot to like about the Samsung Galaxy TabPro S. The AMOLED display is one of the best we've used, the design is premium and the battery lives up to Samsung's big claims. It's not without its downsides, however, as the keyboard add-on is pretty shonky and the performance fails to match similarly-specced devices that come with Intel's Core i5 or Core i7 chips.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: It Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy TabPro S is a decent Windows 10 tablet, as long as you’re happy to live with the need for adapters if you want to use any wired peripherals. Its potential is somewhat hobbled though by the merely okay battery life and the absence of a stylus in the box.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: It Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy TabPro S is a decent Windows 10 tablet, as long as you’re happy to live with the need for adapters if you want to use any wired peripherals. Its potential is somewhat hobbled though by the merely okay battery life and the absence of a stylus in the box.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Techspot EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The good news is that Samsung plans on offering a “C-Pen” stylus for the TabPro S, although it’s currently not available to purchase and it doesn’t have a price. Expect it to cost somewhere in the range of $60-70 extra. If you want a more powerful tablet, you’ll have to look past the TabPro S. Again, the Surface Pro 4 could be a good option here: the Core i5 model with 8 GB of RAM and a 256 GB SSD costs $1,299 (or $1,428 with the Type Cover). But that’s more than $500 dearer than the TabPro S, a tablet that will suit buyers well enough at its more affordable asking price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Techspot EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The good news is that Samsung plans on offering a “C-Pen” stylus for the TabPro S, although it’s currently not available to purchase and it doesn’t have a price. Expect it to cost somewhere in the range of $60-70 extra. If you want a more powerful tablet, you’ll have to look past the TabPro S. Again, the Surface Pro 4 could be a good option here: the Core i5 model with 8 GB of RAM and a 256 GB SSD costs $1,299 (or $1,428 with the Type Cover). But that’s more than $500 dearer than the TabPro S, a tablet that will suit buyers well enough at its more affordable asking price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Hot Hardware EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Microsoft’s latest Surface Pro devices have higher resolution screens, more ports and – depending on the configuration – more power than the Galaxy TabPro S, but an important point to keep in mind is that the price tag on the Galaxy TabPro S is much lower than it seems at first glance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/19/2016
Source: Hot Hardware EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Microsoft’s latest Surface Pro devices have higher resolution screens, more ports and – depending on the configuration – more power than the Galaxy TabPro S, but an important point to keep in mind is that the price tag on the Galaxy TabPro S is much lower than it seems at first glance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/19/2016
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
This is tricky to answer, since the device is a little schizophrenic. The fact it comes bundled with a keyboard makes it feel like a laptop replacement out of the box, but everything else about it screams tablet. The screen is the best I’ve seen on any convertible and is perfect for designers and artists. However, the fact that you have to pay extra for the C-Pen and its lack of ports mean you can’t take advantage of its prowess without shelling out more money. This isn't ideal when you consider the device’s hefty up-front £850 cost.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/18/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 60% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
This is tricky to answer, since the device is a little schizophrenic. The fact it comes bundled with a keyboard makes it feel like a laptop replacement out of the box, but everything else about it screams tablet. The screen is the best I’ve seen on any convertible and is perfect for designers and artists. However, the fact that you have to pay extra for the C-Pen and its lack of ports mean you can’t take advantage of its prowess without shelling out more money. This isn't ideal when you consider the device’s hefty up-front £850 cost.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/18/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 60% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Samsung's Galaxy TabPro S is a classic case of: it’s great, but it isn’t for everyone. In the ‘wins’ column, it’s a bit of a marvel. It is so slim, its screen is punchier and more vibrant that those of laptop three times the price and it leaves an iPad Pro looking a bit like an Early Learning Centre toy if what you need is a something to power an honest day’s work. Is it something I’m going to be recommending to everyone with £850 just begging to be spent carelessly? Not exactly.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Samsung's Galaxy TabPro S is a classic case of: it’s great, but it isn’t for everyone. In the ‘wins’ column, it’s a bit of a marvel. It is so slim, its screen is punchier and more vibrant that those of laptop three times the price and it leaves an iPad Pro looking a bit like an Early Learning Centre toy if what you need is a something to power an honest day’s work. Is it something I’m going to be recommending to everyone with £850 just begging to be spent carelessly? Not exactly.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There’s no doubting that Samsung has built a lovely laptop replacement in the TabPro S, and we love that the company has thought to include things that would be premium accessories, but it just needs more. It needs a Bluetooth stylus, and it desperately needs more storage as either a minimum or a microSD slot. And Windows 10 needs to be finessed a little more, with less of these “Galaxy Settings” stuff that feels like it dents performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 60% performance: 80% features: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There’s no doubting that Samsung has built a lovely laptop replacement in the TabPro S, and we love that the company has thought to include things that would be premium accessories, but it just needs more. It needs a Bluetooth stylus, and it desperately needs more storage as either a minimum or a microSD slot. And Windows 10 needs to be finessed a little more, with less of these “Galaxy Settings” stuff that feels like it dents performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 60% performance: 80% features: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Expert Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There’s a lot to like about the Samsung Galaxy TabPro S. Its beautiful display comes top of its class, it has great battery life, and its superior performance came as a very welcome surprise. As an inaugural 2-in-1, Samsung has got off to an impressive start. However, it’s difficult to overlook some of the TabPro S's shortcomings, such as the disappointing keyboard cover and its rather wobbly docking mechanism. As a Windows-based tablet, it’s wonderful; as a laptop, not so much.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Expert Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There’s a lot to like about the Samsung Galaxy TabPro S. Its beautiful display comes top of its class, it has great battery life, and its superior performance came as a very welcome surprise. As an inaugural 2-in-1, Samsung has got off to an impressive start. However, it’s difficult to overlook some of the TabPro S's shortcomings, such as the disappointing keyboard cover and its rather wobbly docking mechanism. As a Windows-based tablet, it’s wonderful; as a laptop, not so much.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Engadget EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy TabPro S is the latest Surface Pro competitor: a tablet with a click-in keyboard that's powerful enough to potentially replace a laptop. As a first-generation product, it excels in tablet mode, offering both a thin design and long battery life -- a rare combination. But the keyboard needs work: It's cramped layout makes typos inevitable.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Engadget EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Galaxy TabPro S is the latest Surface Pro competitor: a tablet with a click-in keyboard that's powerful enough to potentially replace a laptop. As a first-generation product, it excels in tablet mode, offering both a thin design and long battery life -- a rare combination. But the keyboard needs work: It's cramped layout makes typos inevitable.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: PC World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In the end, the Galaxy TabPro S isn’t the Surface Pro–killer some may expect it to be…but it’s an awesome little convertible, even with the keyboard’s drawbacks and the curious screen-dimming behavior. If you can look past its foibles, that OLED panel alone makes this a worthy purchase.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: PC World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In the end, the Galaxy TabPro S isn’t the Surface Pro–killer some may expect it to be…but it’s an awesome little convertible, even with the keyboard’s drawbacks and the curious screen-dimming behavior. If you can look past its foibles, that OLED panel alone makes this a worthy purchase.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pocketnow EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The consumer tablet market is kind of passe these days, but 2-in-1’s have already had a 40% yoy growth. Microsoft’s Surface Pro “the tablet that can replace your laptop” has been doing very well and even Apple is trying to market their iPad Pro as a laptop replacement. Businesses and consumers really do want their tablets to be completely capable of doing everything their desktop and laptop PCs do, even if that means latching on a keyboard and pairing a wireless mouse once in a while. Having one large-screen thin computer that you can set up on a desk for typing or write on like a clipboard while walking around is just as compelling as a phone that also plays MP3s and takes pictures was in 2002.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 73% features: 80%
Source: Notebookreview.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Device mobility requires functional compromise. For the Samsung Galaxy TabPro S, that compromise comes in the form of a lone USB Type-C port for charging and everything else, and an uncomfortable keyboard. Both are a nuisance we can live with if relegating the TabPro S to a travel device. Its strengths, like its slick design and outstanding battery life lend itself to such. And maybe that’s how Samsung distinguishes its high-end 2-in-1 with Microsoft’s. The TabPro S is built for mobility, while the Surface Pro 4 strikes more of a balance with its complement of ports and slightly bulkier build.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Comp Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Tablets being used as productivity tools has not really caught on too well with consumers. Much of this has to do with the high cost or the lack of support for traditional software. Samsung's Galaxy TabPro S does a great job at making a 2-in-1 tablet design that is not incredibly expensive but still remains portable and functional.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pocketnow EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The consumer tablet market is kind of passe these days, but 2-in-1’s have already had a 40% yoy growth. Microsoft’s Surface Pro “the tablet that can replace your laptop” has been doing very well and even Apple is trying to market their iPad Pro as a laptop replacement. Businesses and consumers really do want their tablets to be completely capable of doing everything their desktop and laptop PCs do, even if that means latching on a keyboard and pairing a wireless mouse once in a while. Having one large-screen thin computer that you can set up on a desk for typing or write on like a clipboard while walking around is just as compelling as a phone that also plays MP3s and takes pictures was in 2002.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 73% features: 80%
Source: Notebookreview.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Device mobility requires functional compromise. For the Samsung Galaxy TabPro S, that compromise comes in the form of a lone USB Type-C port for charging and everything else, and an uncomfortable keyboard. Both are a nuisance we can live with if relegating the TabPro S to a travel device. Its strengths, like its slick design and outstanding battery life lend itself to such. And maybe that’s how Samsung distinguishes its high-end 2-in-1 with Microsoft’s. The TabPro S is built for mobility, while the Surface Pro 4 strikes more of a balance with its complement of ports and slightly bulkier build.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Comp Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Tablets being used as productivity tools has not really caught on too well with consumers. Much of this has to do with the high cost or the lack of support for traditional software. Samsung's Galaxy TabPro S does a great job at making a 2-in-1 tablet design that is not incredibly expensive but still remains portable and functional.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Laptop Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The TabPro S offers a vibrant Super AMOLED display and decent performance for less than a grand, with the best battery life of any detachable we've tested this year. However, this hybrid is a better tablet than it is a laptop, because of its shallow keyboard and a display that can wobble in your lap. Plus, you'll have to be willing to sacrifice a full-size USB port and memory card slot.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Laptop Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The TabPro S offers a vibrant Super AMOLED display and decent performance for less than a grand, with the best battery life of any detachable we've tested this year. However, this hybrid is a better tablet than it is a laptop, because of its shallow keyboard and a display that can wobble in your lap. Plus, you'll have to be willing to sacrifice a full-size USB port and memory card slot.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung TabPro S has left me smitten. It is, hands down, the best Windows 10 tablet for watching video and reading online. This should come as no surprise considering the company's rich history of Android devices. That said, the keyboard case is a major let down. It's works well when you grab it out of your bag and set it on a table, but it's almost too unstable to safely use on your lap. Plus, you'll need a place to throw the keyboard accessory whenever you want to use the TabPro S as a straight tablet.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/23/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Samsung TabPro S has left me smitten. It is, hands down, the best Windows 10 tablet for watching video and reading online. This should come as no surprise considering the company's rich history of Android devices. That said, the keyboard case is a major let down. It's works well when you grab it out of your bag and set it on a table, but it's almost too unstable to safely use on your lap. Plus, you'll need a place to throw the keyboard accessory whenever you want to use the TabPro S as a straight tablet.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/23/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mobile Tech Review EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It's hard not to crush on the Samsung Galaxy TabPro S: it's breathtakingly slim, light and extremely good looking. The 2K AMOLED display is an absolute delight, even if it's a bit hard to calibrate for professional graphics work. It's bright, it's cinematic and it will make your photos look better than most consumer printers.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mobile Tech Review EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It's hard not to crush on the Samsung Galaxy TabPro S: it's breathtakingly slim, light and extremely good looking. The 2K AMOLED display is an absolute delight, even if it's a bit hard to calibrate for professional graphics work. It's bright, it's cinematic and it will make your photos look better than most consumer printers.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computerworld.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While I have only used the tablet for a short time so far, performance seems quite satisfactory -- and the display is really excellent. The keyboard cover is a bit more awkward to use than the Surface Pro's, but offers a very satisfactory typing experience -- and doesn't have to be purchased separately. You get both the tablet and the keyboard cover for $900, which is $129 less than you'd pay for the equivalent Surface Pro 4.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/18/2016
Source: Computerworld.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While I have only used the tablet for a short time so far, performance seems quite satisfactory -- and the display is really excellent. The keyboard cover is a bit more awkward to use than the Surface Pro's, but offers a very satisfactory typing experience -- and doesn't have to be purchased separately. You get both the tablet and the keyboard cover for $900, which is $129 less than you'd pay for the equivalent Surface Pro 4.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/18/2016
Source: e-media - Heft 07/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: e-media - Heft 07/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 85% performance: 86% display: 97%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 85% performance: 86% display: 97%
Source: Futurezone.at DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/29/2016
Source: Futurezone.at DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/29/2016
Source: Areamobile DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 85% mobility: 95% workmanship: 93% ergonomy: 72%
Source: Areamobile DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 85% mobility: 95% workmanship: 93% ergonomy: 72%
Source: Blick DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/13/2016
Source: Blick DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/13/2016
Source: Connect - Heft 6/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 71%
Source: Connect - Heft 6/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 71%
Source: PocketPC DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/14/2016
Source: PocketPC DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/14/2016
Source: Turn On DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/13/2016
Source: Turn On DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/13/2016
Source: PC Welt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/08/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 95% features: 89% display: 89% mobility: 80%
Source: Spiegel Online DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/08/2016
Source: Ubergismo Deutsch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/08/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Spiegel Online DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/08/2016
Source: PC Welt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/08/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 95% features: 89% display: 89% mobility: 80%
Source: Spiegel Online DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/08/2016
Source: Ubergismo Deutsch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/08/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Spiegel Online DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/08/2016
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/04/2016
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/04/2016
Source: Areamobile - Heft 5/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Connect - Heft 5/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: c't - Heft 08/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2016
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 5/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 95%
Source: Telecom Handel - Heft 7/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Areamobile - Heft 5/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Connect - Heft 5/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: c't - Heft 08/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2016
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 5/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 95%
Source: Telecom Handel - Heft 7/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 80% display: 85% mobility: 85%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 80% display: 85% mobility: 85%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 85% performance: 86% features: 78% display: 97% mobility: 94%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 85% performance: 86% features: 78% display: 97% mobility: 94%
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/07/2016
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/07/2016
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 80% features: 70% display: 90%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 80% features: 70% display: 90%
Source: Areamobile DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/06/2016
Source: Areamobile DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/06/2016
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/31/2016
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/31/2016
Source: Techzine NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 65% features: 75% display: 85% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 65%
Source: Techzine NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 65% features: 75% display: 85% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 65%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 75% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 75% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Les Androides FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/10/2016
Source: Les Androides FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/10/2016
Source: Tablette-tactile.net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/10/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/10/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Mobi France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mobi France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/12/2016
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/12/2016
Source: Mobilsiden.dk DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Mobilsiden.dk DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Ljud och Bild SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/10/2016
Source: Ljud och Bild SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/10/2016
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W703
Specifications
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W703Processor: Intel Core m3 6Y30
Graphics Adapter: Intel HD Graphics 515
Display: 12.10 inch, 3:2, 2160 x 1440 pixels
Weight: 0.693kg
Price: 1000 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section Galaxy Tab Pro S W703 (Model)
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 95% price: 69% performance: 80% features: 60% display: 100% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/08/2016
Source: GadgetGear.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/21/2016
Comment
Samsung:
Qualcomm Adreno 330:
支持OpenGL ES 3.0标准的集成显卡。
Intel HD Graphics 515:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
Intel Core m3:
6Y30:
为平板和二合一笔记本电脑设计的Skylake架构超低电压双核处理器。 它提供了一块集成的HD Graphics 515显卡,采用14纳米工艺制造。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
0.477 kg:
0.693 kg:
大体上,大尺寸平板电脑或变形本的重量介于这个水平之间。
80.2%: No rating comment found (one expected)!
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.