Notebookcheck Logo

东芝 Satellite Pro R50-C (6006U, 高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测

办公白领。 Satellite Pro R50-C-16V是东芝带来的一台冷静15.6寸办公设备。一颗Skylake架构酷睿i3处理器提供了足够的处理性能。Windows 10 Pro让这台设备的价位提高到了接近500欧元（约3654人民币）。
Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows
Satellite Pro R50 (Satellite Pro R50 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i3-6006U 2 x 2 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 520, Core: 850 MHz, 单通道, 21.20.16.4590
Memory
4 GB 
, DDR3-1600, 单通道, 两个内存槽（一个已占用）
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 100 PPI, Toshiba, TN LED, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Storage
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075, 750 GB 
, 5400 rpm, 660 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 整合音频接口, Card Reader: SD, Sensors: TPM 2.0
Networking
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0
Optical drive
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 23.95 x 379 x 258
Battery
44 Wh Lithium-Ion, removeable, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 8 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 高清
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, McAfee LiveSafe (试用), MS Office 365 (试用), 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.1 kg, Power Supply: 229 g
Price
625 Euro
Links
Toshiba homepage
Toshiba notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

❌
384 mm 255 mm 24 mm 2.1 kg381.6 mm 256 mm 24.9 mm 2.4 kg382 mm 263 mm 24 mm 2.2 kg382 mm 259 mm 24 mm 2.3 kg380 mm 262 mm 24.7 mm 2.3 kg380 mm 262 mm 24.7 mm 2.3 kg379 mm 261 mm 25.4 mm 2.3 kg380 mm 260 mm 23.25 mm 2.1 kg379 mm 258 mm 24 mm 2.3 kg379 mm 258 mm 23.95 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Connectivity

Left: Gigabit-Ethernet, DVD burner, 2x USB 2.0 (Type-A), combo audio
Left: Gigabit-Ethernet, DVD burner, 2x USB 2.0 (Type-A), combo audio
Right: Memory card reader (SD), 2x USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Type-A), HDMI, VGA-out, power-in
Right: Memory card reader (SD), 2x USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Type-A), HDMI, VGA-out, power-in
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU
 
68.1 MB/s +200%
Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE
 
68 MB/s +200%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
 
62.5 MB/s +175%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
 
23.7 MB/s +4%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
 
22.7 MB/s 0%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
 
22.7 MB/s
Dell Latitude 15-3570
 
22.24 MB/s -2%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
 
15.35 MB/s -32%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
 
81.7 MB/s +207%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
 
27.7 MB/s +4%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
 
27.5 MB/s +3%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
 
26.6 MB/s
Dell Latitude 15-3570
 
24.15 MB/s -9%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
583 MBit/s +71%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
434 MBit/s +27%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
341 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
628 MBit/s +103%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
495 MBit/s +60%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
310 MBit/s
226
cd/m²		215
cd/m²		220
cd/m²
216
cd/m²		226
cd/m²		208
cd/m²
211
cd/m²		222
cd/m²		206
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Toshiba tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 226 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 216.7 cd/m² Minimum: 12 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 226 cd/m²
Contrast: 390:1 (Black: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 11.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
61% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.95% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"		Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-B-112
TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"		Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"		Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"		Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE
TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"		HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
TN, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
-14%
0%
-8%
-9%
-10%
Display P3 Coverage
40.6
34.8
-14%
40.71
0%
37.24
-8%
36.81
-9%
36.51
-10%
sRGB Coverage
61.2
52.4
-14%
61.1
0%
56
-8%
55.4
-9%
55
-10%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
41.95
35.95
-14%
42.07
0%
38.48
-8%
38.03
-9%
37.72
-10%
Response Times
122%
6%
18%
28%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
68 ?(32, 36)
52 ?(28, 24)
24%
58 ?(27, 31)
15%
47 ?(23, 24)
31%
40 ?(20, 20)
41%
Response Time Black / White *
26 ?(20, 6)
31 ?(14, 17)
-19%
27 ?(10, 17)
-4%
25 ?(8, 17)
4%
22 ?(6, 16)
15%
PWM Frequency
217 ?(90)
1000
361%
Screen
-35%
1%
-6%
-4%
-3%
Brightness middle
226
199
-12%
211
-7%
204
-10%
215
-5%
219
-3%
Brightness
217
182
-16%
200
-8%
198
-9%
208
-4%
222
2%
Brightness Distribution
91
76
-16%
83
-9%
85
-7%
90
-1%
85
-7%
Black Level *
0.58
1.47
-153%
0.43
26%
0.48
17%
0.45
22%
0.39
33%
Contrast
390
135
-65%
491
26%
425
9%
478
23%
562
44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
9.84
9.74
1%
10.53
-7%
11.62
-18%
12.03
-22%
12.67
-29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
16.77
17.79
-6%
19.97
-19%
20.32
-21%
20.99
-25%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
11.1
11.26
-1%
11.85
-7%
12.3
-11%
13.06
-18%
13.82
-25%
Gamma
2.35 94%
2.62 84%
2.25 98%
2.22 99%
2.71 81%
2.63 84%
CCT
11979 54%
12294 53%
13758 47%
13244 49%
15959 41%
15633 42%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
39
33
-15%
39
0%
36
-8%
35
-10%
35
-10%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
61
61
0%
56
-8%
56
-8%
55
-10%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-25% / -29%
41% / 23%
-3% / -5%
2% / -2%
5% / -0%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 217 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 217 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 217 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
68 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 32 ms rise
↘ 36 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
5803
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
7388
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
3227
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
23.32 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
2.39 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
0.96 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
30.06 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
216 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
84 Points
Help
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R10 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.0 | JetStream 1.1
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE
Intel Core i7-6500U
131 Points +56%
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU
Intel Core i7-6500U
130 Points +55%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points +54%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Z2Y44ES
Intel Core i5-7200U
128 Points +52%
Dell Latitude 15-3570
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points +38%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points +38%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-B-112
Intel Core i5-4210U
100 Points +19%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
87 Points +4%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U
84 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Intel Core i3-5005U
82 Points -2%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
82 Points -2%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
Intel Core i3-5005U
81 Points -4%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Intel Core i5-7200U
330 Points +53%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Z2Y44ES
Intel Core i5-7200U
330 Points +53%
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU
Intel Core i7-6500U
329 Points +52%
Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE
Intel Core i7-6500U
312 Points +44%
Dell Latitude 15-3570
Intel Core i5-6200U
290 Points +34%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Core i5-6200U
288 Points +33%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
261 Points +21%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-B-112
Intel Core i5-4210U
236 Points +9%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U
216 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Intel Core i3-5005U
210 Points -3%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
208 Points -4%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
Intel Core i3-5005U
206 Points -5%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU
Intel Core i7-6500U
11200 Points +52%
Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE
Intel Core i7-6500U
10908 Points +48%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
9080 Points +23%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U
7388 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Intel Core i3-5005U
6953 Points -6%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
6927 Points -6%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
Intel Core i3-5005U
6897 Points -7%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU
Intel Core i7-6500U
4860 Points +51%
Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE
Intel Core i7-6500U
4841 Points +50%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
3505 Points +9%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U
3227 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Intel Core i3-5005U
3151 Points -2%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
3133 Points -3%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
Intel Core i3-5005U
3113 Points -4%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU
Intel Core i7-6500U
3239 Points +67%
Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE
Intel Core i7-6500U
2823 Points +45%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
2228 Points +15%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U
1943 Points
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
1928 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Intel Core i3-5005U
1907 Points -2%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU
Intel Core i7-6500U
6904 Points +62%
Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE
Intel Core i7-6500U
6179 Points +45%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
5144 Points +21%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U
4265 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Intel Core i3-5005U
4093 Points -4%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
4075 Points -4%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU
Intel Core i7-6500U
3872 Points +57%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U
2468 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU
Intel Core i7-6500U
7550 Points +60%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U
4723 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Intel Core i5-7200U
208.9 Points +46%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Core i5-6200U
160.6 Points +13%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
151.9 Points +7%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel Core i3-6006U
142.6 Points
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
132.7 Points -7%
Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE
Intel Core i7-6500U
127.8 Points -10%
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU
Intel Core i7-6500U
126.6 Points -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Intel Core i3-5005U
75.1 Points -47%
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R10 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.0 | JetStream 1.1
PCMark 7 Score
2453 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2937 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3234 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3707 points
Help
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU
GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Liteonit CV3-8D256
3823 Points +30%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
3550 Points +21%
Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE
Radeon R5 M330, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
3509 Points +19%
Dell Latitude 15-3570
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
3337 Points +14%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
3317 Points +13%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
HD Graphics 5500, 5005U, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)
2980 Points +1%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
HD Graphics 520, 6006U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075
2937 Points
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABF050
2834 Points -4%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-B-112
HD Graphics 4400, 4210U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075
2173 Points -26%
HD Tune
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
hddimg
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075
Transfer Rate Minimum: 67 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 118 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 97.3 MB/s
Access Time: 16.4 ms
Burst Rate: 162.6 MB/s
CPU Usage: 4.5 %
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075		Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-B-112
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075		Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Toshiba MQ01ABF050		Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)		Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE
Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP		HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
10%
26%
27%
17274%
9490%
Read Seq
96.5
102.5
6%
104.7
8%
102.5
6%
520
439%
509
427%
Write Seq
77.9
102.7
32%
95.7
23%
90.7
16%
302.2
288%
322.1
313%
Read 512
20.82
28.27
36%
33
59%
32.58
56%
466
2138%
321.2
1443%
Write 512
19.83
31.01
56%
38.3
93%
35.65
80%
299.7
1411%
289.4
1359%
Read 4k
0.342
0.331
-3%
0.375
10%
0.426
25%
37.3
10806%
20.99
6037%
Write 4k
0.836
0.826
-1%
0.782
-6%
0.64
-23%
120.4
14302%
88
10426%
Read 4k QD32
0.595
0.288
-52%
0.675
13%
0.987
66%
395.7
66404%
141.3
23648%
Write 4k QD32
0.706
0.734
4%
0.769
9%
0.645
-9%
300.1
42407%
228.5
32265%
3DMark 11 Performance
1167 points
Help
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
4243 Points +289%
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
2821 Points +159%
Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE
AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i7-6500U
1756 Points +61%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Z2Y44ES
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1412 Points +30%
Dell Latitude 15-3570
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1273 Points +17%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1257 Points +15%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1162 Points +7%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U
1090 Points
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
Intel HD Graphics 5500, Intel Core i3-5005U
968 Points -11%
lowmed.highultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 28.9 19.4 16
For Honor (2017) 14.7 7.4
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 6.6 2.9

Noise Level

Idle
31.8 / 31.8 / 31.8 dB(A)
HDD
31.9 dB(A)
DVD
37.8 / dB(A)
Load
31.9 / 31.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30.4 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.432.330.430.331.42531.93331.432.231.93136.536.835.335.136.54029.82828.728.329.8502828.828.531.428632726.726.627.5278031.431.631.225.831.410032.232.832.125.332.212525.324.92524.125.316024.424.623.923.524.420022.623.522.622.122.625022.322.221.821.722.331521.621.221.721.121.640021.321.42120.621.350020.119.819.52020.163019.319.319.519.419.380022.122.221.818.722.1100020.62120.918.620.6125020.420.120.91820.4160021.22120.81821.2200019.518.919.117.619.5250019.218.918.917.719.2315018.318.218.317.818.3400018.218.518.418.218.2500018.418.318.618.318.4630018.718.618.618.418.7800018.618.518.518.418.61000018.718.418.518.618.71250018.518.418.318.518.51600018.618.418.418.618.6SPL31.931.831.830.631.9N1.71.71.71.41.7median 20.1median 19.8median 19.5median 18.6median 20.1Delta2.31.61.612.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseToshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Max. Load
 23 °C30.8 °C30 °C 
 23 °C28.9 °C30 °C 
 22.6 °C23.3 °C28.7 °C 
Maximum: 30.8 °C
Average: 26.7 °C
40 °C27.5 °C22.1 °C
30.2 °C25 °C22.6 °C
27.1 °C26.4 °C22 °C
Maximum: 40 °C
Average: 27 °C
Power Supply (max.)  37.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.9 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.7 °C / 83.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-1 °C / -1.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.330.328.32531.232.231.23135.435.135.44028.728.328.75027.931.427.96326.327.526.38032.325.832.310033.625.333.612525.924.125.916024.823.524.820024.122.124.125023.321.723.331526.921.126.940045.320.645.350056.52056.563054.219.454.280055.318.755.3100052.718.652.7125055.21855.2160067.41867.4200070.217.670.2250064.517.764.5315062.417.862.4400058.418.258.4500059.118.359.1630053.218.453.2800058.218.458.21000057.118.657.11250055.818.555.81600052.918.652.9SPL74.930.674.9N28.41.428.4median 55.2median 18.6median 55.2Delta9.119.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseToshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16VApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (18.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.35 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 6 / 8.7 / 9.2 Watt
Load midlight 18.6 / 23.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)
5h 56min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Dell Latitude 15-3570
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 65 Wh
542 min +52%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 41 Wh
462 min +30%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
6006U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh
356 min
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh
347 min -3%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh
315 min -12%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
5005U, HD Graphics 5500, 32 Wh
295 min -17%
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU
6500U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh
280 min -21%
Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE
6500U, Radeon R5 M330, 31 Wh
279 min -22%

Pros

+ 雾面屏幕
+ 运行安静
+ 低发热量
+ 不错的电池续航
+ 大容量硬盘
+ AC标准无线网络模组

Cons

- 灰暗，低对比度，可视角度窄的屏幕
- 无维护底盖
In review: Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

东芝Satellite Pro R50-C是一台主要面向专业用户的15.6寸基础办公笔记本电脑。它搭载的酷睿i3处理器可以满足办公和网络浏览的需要。这台笔记本电脑在使用中几乎不会变热，且十分安静。但是东芝没能完全发挥这颗高能效处理器的全部潜能。它的风扇在系统待机时本可以保持安静，但很遗憾它会一直运转。

由于搭配了750GB硬盘，用户不用担心存储空间不足。用户也可以自行打开它的机身，升级固态硬盘。这台设备没有提供维护底盖。它搭配的键盘整体使用感受不错。在电池续航方面，它可以在无线上网测试中持续运行5小时56分，基本让人满意。与许多同类设备相似，Satellite Pro的屏幕并不算优秀。东芝为它选择了一款昏暗，低对比度，可视角度有限的屏幕面板。只有雾面防反光设计算是一个优势。

Satellite Pro R50-C-16-V是一款实用的办公笔记本电脑。

这台笔记本电脑售价约500欧元（约3654人民币），对于一款基础酷睿i3笔记本电脑来说并不算便宜。而Windows 10也进一步提高了它的成本。相比其他生产商的同类机型，搭配酷睿i3-6006U处理器，预装Windows 10家庭版的设备售价从400到450欧元（约2923人民币到3289人民币）不等。无预装系统的机型售价甚至低于400欧元。这些设备相比性价比更高。需要Windows 10专业版的用户可以自行购买Windows 7专业版安装，目前它还可以免费升级到Windows 10专业版。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。 

Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V - 03/29/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
78 / 98 → 80%
Keyboard
75%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
43 / 80 → 54%
Weight
62 / 20-67 → 90%
Battery
88%
Display
75%
Games Performance
52 / 68 → 76%
Application Performance
65 / 92 → 71%
Temperature
95%
Noise
92%
Audio
50%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Average
69%
78%
Office - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V (Satellite Pro R50 Series)
Review
•
东芝 Satellite Pro R50-B-112 笔记本...

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 东芝 Satellite Pro R50-C (6006U, 高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测
Sascha Mölck, 2017-04- 8 (Update: 2017-04- 8)