Notebookcheck Logo

道格 Shoot 1 智能手机简短评测

两个总比一个好? 随着充满新科技的2017年的到来,双相机系统似乎不再是高端智能手机的特权了。现在连入门级机型都可以搭配两个后置相机模组:Shoot 1是中国生产商道格带来的一台机型。不过这台实惠型设备的第二个相机模组真的可以带来拍摄效果提升吗?我们将通过详尽的评测给出答案。
Android Touchscreen Smartphone
Doogee Shoot 1 (Shoot Series)
Processor
Mediatek MT6737T 4 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Memory
2048 MB 
Display
5.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, 电容式,多点触控, Sharp LCD, IPS, 2.5D Arc, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.4 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: microSD 最大支持 256GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 环境光感应器,电子指南针,位置感应器,重力感应器,近距感应器,指纹感应器, microUSB 2.0
Networking
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, 2G:850/900/1800/1900MHz 3G:900/2100MHz 4G:FDD-LTE Band 1/3/7/8/20, Dual SIM, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.7 x 156.6 x 77
Battery
3300 mAh Lithium-Ion, 5V2A 快速充电
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 1300万+800万像素 双相机, 双闪光灯, 5片镜组, f/2.2+2.4 光圈
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 87.8广角镜头,防抖
Additional features
Speakers: 单声道, Keyboard: 触控, Keyboard Light: yes, TPU 保护壳,屏幕保护贴膜,USB数据线,充电器, Doogee UI, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
167 g, Power Supply: 63 g
Price
110 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

156.6 mm 77 mm 8.7 mm 167 g145 mm 73.1 mm 9.9 mm 177 g145 mm 72 mm 9.4 mm 152 g147.5 mm 73.6 mm 6.9 mm 118.2 g144.4 mm 72 mm 9.9 mm 137 g144 mm 72 mm 8.8 mm 141 g143 mm 71 mm 9.35 mm 155 g143.8 mm 70.2 mm 8.3 mm 135 g143 mm 70 mm 8 mm 130 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
185 MBit/s +83%
Doogee Shoot 1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
101 MBit/s
ZTE Blade A510
Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash
47.9 MBit/s -53%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
279 MBit/s +161%
Doogee Shoot 1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
107 MBit/s
ZTE Blade A510
Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s -54%
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
249 MBit/s
Ulefone Metal
Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
88.3 MBit/s
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
Mali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.6 MBit/s
TP-Link Neffos C5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
44.9 MBit/s
Wiko Lenny 3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
44.8 MBit/s
LG X Cam
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
41.8 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
205 MBit/s
Ulefone Metal
Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
73.1 MBit/s
LG X Cam
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.8 MBit/s
TP-Link Neffos C5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.3 MBit/s
Wiko Lenny 3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.2 MBit/s
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
Mali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.5 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.7 MBit/s
GPS Doogee Shoot 1
GPS Doogee Shoot 1
GPS Doogee Shoot 1
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
442
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
472
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
464
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Sharp LCD tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 488 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 462.3 cd/m² Minimum: 18.51 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 488 cd/m²
Contrast: 2122:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.4
Doogee Shoot 1
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
ZTE Blade A510
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Ulefone Metal
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Wiko Lenny 3
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
TP-Link Neffos C5
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
LG X Cam
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Huawei P9
IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Screen
-29%
-38%
-47%
-55%
-40%
-42%
-29%
-30%
-3%
Brightness middle
488
528
8%
312
-36%
344
-30%
312
-36%
374
-23%
508
4%
412
-16%
362
-26%
582
19%
Brightness
462
524
13%
302
-35%
349
-24%
315
-32%
343
-26%
491
6%
414
-10%
348
-25%
563
22%
Brightness Distribution
89
94
6%
79
-11%
89
0%
87
-2%
85
-4%
89
0%
94
6%
94
6%
91
2%
Black Level *
0.23
0.62
-170%
0.15
35%
0.65
-183%
0.56
-143%
0.47
-104%
0.58
-152%
0.42
-83%
0.25
-9%
0.38
-65%
Contrast
2122
852
-60%
2080
-2%
529
-75%
557
-74%
796
-62%
876
-59%
981
-54%
1448
-32%
1532
-28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5
5.2
-4%
8.2
-64%
5.8
-16%
6.8
-36%
6
-20%
7
-40%
5.6
-12%
6.8
-36%
4.4
12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.3
8.7
-5%
16.5
-99%
10.7
-29%
14
-69%
11.9
-43%
14.1
-70%
9.7
-17%
11.9
-43%
7.4
11%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.8
5.7
-19%
9.2
-92%
5.7
-19%
7.1
-48%
6.7
-40%
6.1
-27%
6.9
-44%
8.4
-75%
4.8
-0%
Gamma
2.4 92%
1.99 111%
2.29 96%
2.1 105%
2.77 79%
2.19 100%
2.15 102%
2.4 92%
2.22 99%
2.2 100%
CCT
7427 88%
6631 98%
9017 72%
7792 83%
7402 88%
8073 81%
8068 81%
8422 77%
8242 79%
6175 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
77.78
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.44

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
67 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 28 ms rise
↘ 39 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
20 MB/s
ZTE Blade A510
16.5 MB/s -17%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
12.62 MB/s -37%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
15.58 MB/s -22%
Ulefone Metal
27.6 MB/s +38%
Wiko Lenny 3
19.59 MB/s -2%
TP-Link Neffos C5
18.89 MB/s -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
51.1 MB/s +156%
LG X Cam
19.3 MB/s -3%
Huawei P9
24.83 MB/s +24%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
29.18 MB/s
ZTE Blade A510
25.55 MB/s -12%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
22.77 MB/s -22%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
31.85 MB/s +9%
Ulefone Metal
49.6 MB/s +70%
Wiko Lenny 3
40.59 MB/s +39%
TP-Link Neffos C5
39.11 MB/s +34%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
65.5 MB/s +124%
LG X Cam
37.13 MB/s +27%
Huawei P9
55 MB/s +88%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
7.32 MB/s
ZTE Blade A510
4.69 MB/s -36%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.26 MB/s +13%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
4.35 MB/s -41%
Ulefone Metal
7.87 MB/s +8%
Wiko Lenny 3
6.2 MB/s -15%
TP-Link Neffos C5
6.85 MB/s -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28.31 MB/s +287%
LG X Cam
5.52 MB/s -25%
Huawei P9
47.45 MB/s +548%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
18.99 MB/s
ZTE Blade A510
14.03 MB/s -26%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
18.24 MB/s -4%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
14.31 MB/s -25%
Ulefone Metal
22.18 MB/s +17%
Wiko Lenny 3
15.1 MB/s -20%
TP-Link Neffos C5
17.16 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.9 MB/s -6%
LG X Cam
18.07 MB/s -5%
Huawei P9
39 MB/s +105%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
47.49 MB/s
ZTE Blade A510
9.94 MB/s -79%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
70.3 MB/s +48%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
7.56 MB/s -84%
Ulefone Metal
39.91 MB/s -16%
Wiko Lenny 3
11.6 MB/s -76%
TP-Link Neffos C5
52.4 MB/s +10%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
43.95 MB/s -7%
LG X Cam
65.8 MB/s +39%
Huawei P9
72.2 MB/s +52%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
207.7 MB/s
ZTE Blade A510
111.9 MB/s -46%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
187.3 MB/s -10%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
125.4 MB/s -40%
Ulefone Metal
228.8 MB/s +10%
Wiko Lenny 3
132.5 MB/s -36%
TP-Link Neffos C5
145.8 MB/s -30%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
144.1 MB/s -31%
LG X Cam
201.6 MB/s -3%
Huawei P9
281.3 MB/s +35%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
39275 Points
ZTE Blade A510
24338 Points -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
23822 Points -39%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
23657 Points -40%
Ulefone Metal
37103 Points -6%
Wiko Lenny 3
25237 Points -36%
TP-Link Neffos C5
32681 Points -17%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28399 Points -28%
LG X Cam
35471 Points -10%
Huawei P9
95743 Points +144%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
620 Points
ZTE Blade A510
429 Points -31%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
428 Points -31%
Ulefone Metal
609 Points -2%
Huawei P9
1755 Points +183%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
1684 Points
ZTE Blade A510
1195 Points -29%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
1206 Points -28%
Ulefone Metal
2458 Points +46%
Huawei P9
4904 Points +191%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
6645 Points
ZTE Blade A510
3109 Points -53%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3070 Points -54%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
3103 Points -53%
Ulefone Metal
7059 Points +6%
Wiko Lenny 3
2920 Points -56%
TP-Link Neffos C5
4906 Points -26%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4432 Points -33%
LG X Cam
6649 Points 0%
Huawei P9
19854 Points +199%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
6115 Points
ZTE Blade A510
2682 Points -56%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2645 Points -57%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2681 Points -56%
Ulefone Metal
6469 Points +6%
Wiko Lenny 3
2476 Points -60%
TP-Link Neffos C5
4223 Points -31%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
3858 Points -37%
LG X Cam
6044 Points -1%
Huawei P9
21577 Points +253%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
9525 Points
ZTE Blade A510
7025 Points -26%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
7026 Points -26%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
6902 Points -28%
Ulefone Metal
10371 Points +9%
Wiko Lenny 3
7849 Points -18%
TP-Link Neffos C5
9291 Points -2%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9256 Points -3%
LG X Cam
10234 Points +7%
Huawei P9
15517 Points +63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
282 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
124 Points -56%
Ulefone Metal
293 Points +4%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
203 Points -28%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
53 Points -81%
LG X Cam
294 Points +4%
Huawei P9
1237 Points +339%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
218 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
101 Points -54%
Ulefone Metal
243 Points +11%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
167 Points -23%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
42 Points -81%
LG X Cam
245 Points +12%
Huawei P9
1080 Points +395%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
874 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
618 Points -29%
Ulefone Metal
1057 Points +21%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
810 Points -7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
716 Points -18%
LG X Cam
1002 Points +15%
Huawei P9
2510 Points +187%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
173 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
81 Points -53%
Ulefone Metal
195 Points +13%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
125 Points -28%
LG X Cam
194 Points +12%
Huawei P9
974 Points +463%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
141 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
65 Points -54%
Ulefone Metal
158 Points +12%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
101 Points -28%
LG X Cam
158 Points +12%
Huawei P9
829 Points +488%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
852 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
609 Points -29%
Ulefone Metal
1084 Points +27%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
796 Points -7%
LG X Cam
1001 Points +17%
Huawei P9
2503 Points +194%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
11 fps
ZTE Blade A510
8.5 fps -23%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.2 fps -25%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
4.9 fps -55%
Ulefone Metal
12 fps +9%
Wiko Lenny 3
8 fps -27%
TP-Link Neffos C5
8.3 fps -25%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9.6 fps -13%
LG X Cam
12 fps +9%
Huawei P9
43 fps +291%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
11 fps
ZTE Blade A510
4.9 fps -55%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
4.9 fps -55%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
8.7 fps -21%
Ulefone Metal
19 fps +73%
Wiko Lenny 3
4.4 fps -60%
TP-Link Neffos C5
14 fps +27%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
5.2 fps -53%
LG X Cam
13 fps +18%
Huawei P9
40 fps +264%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
4 fps
ZTE Blade A510
3.5 fps -12%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.8 fps -55%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
1.2 fps -70%
Ulefone Metal
6.4 fps +60%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
2.8 fps -30%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4.1 fps +3%
LG X Cam
4.5 fps +13%
Huawei P9
19 fps +375%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
4 fps
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3.4 fps -15%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
3.6 fps -10%
Ulefone Metal
2.9 fps -27%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
6.1 fps +53%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1.8 fps -55%
LG X Cam
4.8 fps +20%
Huawei P9
18 fps +350%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
2.6 fps
ZTE Blade A510
2.5 fps -4%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.2 fps -54%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
1.2 fps -54%
Ulefone Metal
4.5 fps +73%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps -100%
LG X Cam
2.9 fps +12%
Huawei P9
11 fps +323%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
2.6 fps
ZTE Blade A510
1.1 fps -58%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2.5 fps -4%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2.7 fps +4%
Ulefone Metal
8.9 fps +242%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps -100%
LG X Cam
3.1 fps +19%
Huawei P9
10 fps +285%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
3653 Points
ZTE Blade A510
2675 Points -27%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2807 Points -23%
Ulefone Metal
4079 Points +12%
Wiko Lenny 3
2832 Points -22%
TP-Link Neffos C5
3443 Points -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4283 Points +17%
LG X Cam
3882 Points +6%
Huawei P9
7058 Points +93%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
221 Points
ZTE Blade A510
141 Points -36%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
448 Points +103%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
148 Points -33%
Ulefone Metal
273 Points +24%
Wiko Lenny 3
399 Points +81%
TP-Link Neffos C5
683 Points +209%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
603 Points +173%
LG X Cam
232 Points +5%
Huawei P9
2025 Points +816%
System (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
1164 Points
ZTE Blade A510
829 Points -29%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
801 Points -31%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
838 Points -28%
Ulefone Metal
1691 Points +45%
Wiko Lenny 3
988 Points -15%
TP-Link Neffos C5
1199 Points +3%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1035 Points -11%
LG X Cam
1178 Points +1%
Huawei P9
3930 Points +238%
Memory (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
558 Points
ZTE Blade A510
285 Points -49%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
487 Points -13%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
354 Points -37%
Ulefone Metal
802 Points +44%
Wiko Lenny 3
293 Points -47%
TP-Link Neffos C5
991 Points +78%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
741 Points +33%
LG X Cam
600 Points +8%
Huawei P9
2627 Points +371%
Graphics (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
383 Points
ZTE Blade A510
174 Points -55%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
174 Points -55%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
175 Points -54%
Ulefone Metal
433 Points +13%
Wiko Lenny 3
138 Points -64%
TP-Link Neffos C5
281 Points -27%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
313 Points -18%
LG X Cam
424 Points +11%
Huawei P9
1583 Points +313%
Web (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
10 Points
ZTE Blade A510
10 Points 0%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
592 Points +5820%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
9 Points -10%
Ulefone Metal
10 Points 0%
Wiko Lenny 3
632 Points +6220%
TP-Link Neffos C5
638 Points +6280%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
551 Points +5410%
LG X Cam
10 Points 0%
Huawei P9
1029 Points +10190%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
20.78 Points
ZTE Blade A510
12.78 Points -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
12.73 Points -39%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
12.76 Points -39%
Ulefone Metal
17.83 Points -14%
Wiko Lenny 3
14.07 Points -32%
TP-Link Neffos C5
18.21 Points -12%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.09 Points -18%
LG X Cam
18.34 Points -12%
Huawei P9
68.4 Points +229%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
3389 Points
ZTE Blade A510
2102 Points -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1910 Points -44%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2122 Points -37%
Ulefone Metal
2738 Points -19%
Wiko Lenny 3
2133 Points -37%
TP-Link Neffos C5
2738 Points -19%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2773 Points -18%
LG X Cam
2752 Points -19%
Huawei P9
11783 Points +248%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1
11058 ms *
ZTE Blade A510
17364 ms * -57%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
19234 ms * -74%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
19092 ms * -73%
Ulefone Metal
13397 ms * -21%
Wiko Lenny 3
14863 ms * -34%
TP-Link Neffos C5
12783 ms * -16%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
12953 ms * -17%
LG X Cam
12958 ms * -17%
Huawei P9
2923 ms * +74%

Legend

 
Doogee Shoot 1 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade A510 Mediatek MT6735P, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V7 Lite Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Ulefone Metal Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko Lenny 3 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
TP-Link Neffos C5 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G4 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG X Cam Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 41.2 °C38.5 °C33.7 °C 
 42 °C38.6 °C34.3 °C 
 43 °C41 °C34.8 °C 
Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 38.6 °C
32.1 °C33.5 °C36.3 °C
32.2 °C32.9 °C38.9 °C
32.1 °C33.4 °C40.1 °C
Maximum: 40.1 °C
Average: 34.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  29.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.645.32525.443.33125.337.84032.937.85033.638.86331.636.68028.436.31002734.912520.828.91602226.420021.332.125020.84131521.252.640019.460.750019.566.163017.768.680017.974.4100017.878.5125017.374.3160017.471.5200016.770.8250017.268.7315018.267.5400017.961.8500017.651.7630017.748800017.852.41000017.950.61250018.134.71600018.224.3SPL3082.6N1.345.4median 17.9median 52.6Delta1.41431.636.725.435.425.33932.935.233.633.731.635.428.434.9272720.823.8222421.322.820.824.621.222.219.425.419.533.417.746.617.960.617.868.217.369.317.47216.773.717.268.418.268.317.969.417.667.517.756.217.852.917.95818.156.718.2403080.31.338.2median 17.9median 56.21.418.432.441.331.337.831.735.42634.939.440.336.232.928.632.525.424.321.323.723.322.422.525.822.426.221.336.518.444.417.55617.560.817.269.516.870.117.372.817.472.316.672.217.368.717.665.417.667.117.76717.467.817.769.217.968.618.162.718.151.329.881.21.346.6median 17.7median 65.41.713.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDoogee Shoot 1ZTE Blade A510Archos 50 Platinum 4G
Doogee Shoot 1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (17.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | very high mids - on average 18% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (43.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

ZTE Blade A510 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | very high mids - on average 15.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (45.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Archos 50 Platinum 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.25 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.73 / 1.48 / 1.58 Watt
Load midlight 3.11 / 4.37 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Doogee Shoot 1
3300 mAh
ZTE Blade A510
2200 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2200 mAh
Ulefone Metal
3050 mAh
Wiko Lenny 3
2000 mAh
TP-Link Neffos C5
2200 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
LG X Cam
2500 mAh
Power Consumption
-16%
9%
-8%
-73%
-34%
-39%
0%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
0.73
0.61
16%
0.63
14%
0.59
19%
1.41
-93%
0.76
-4%
0.72
1%
0.68
7%
0.64
12%
Idle Average *
1.48
1.75
-18%
1.37
7%
1.68
-14%
2.46
-66%
2.16
-46%
1.87
-26%
1.58
-7%
1.38
7%
Idle Maximum *
1.58
1.83
-16%
1.71
-8%
1.79
-13%
2.83
-79%
2.35
-49%
2
-27%
1.61
-2%
1.43
9%
Load Average *
3.11
4.49
-44%
2.82
9%
4.22
-36%
5.15
-66%
4.65
-50%
5.99
-93%
3.36
-8%
3.99
-28%
Load Maximum *
4.37
5.14
-18%
3.36
23%
4.26
3%
7.05
-61%
5.35
-22%
6.45
-48%
3.91
11%
4.49
-3%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
8h 21min
Doogee Shoot 1
3300 mAh
ZTE Blade A510
2200 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2200 mAh
Ulefone Metal
3050 mAh
Wiko Lenny 3
2000 mAh
TP-Link Neffos C5
2200 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
LG X Cam
2500 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
501
416
-17%
517
3%
384
-23%
403
-20%
549
10%
453
-10%
630
26%
457
-9%

Pros

+ 明亮的IPS屏幕
+ 1080p分辨率
+ 对比度和色彩还原
+ 优秀的无线模组速度
+ 价格实惠
+ 硬件性能强(相比其他入门级设备)

Cons

- GPS信号弱
- 双相机系统有其不足
- 发热量
- 扬声器品质较差
In Review: Doogee Shoot 1. Test device courtesy of Doogee.

在我们的测试中,道格Shoot 1证明了自己是一台优秀的低价位入门级智能手机。16GB的闪存和2GB的工作内存在这个价位上合情合理。同时搭配MediaTek系统芯片,它的硬件可以为系统流畅运行提供足够的性能。另外,道格Shoot 1提供了一块高对比度,高分辨率的IPS屏幕,和优秀的电池续航。

这台低价智能手机的特别之处在于机背的双相机系统,不过遗憾的是它的实际表现十分让人失望。这台设备的软件系统没有能够完全利用多出来的信息,它的焦外虚化效果十分不准确,同时会影响照片的拍摄主体的清晰度。整体上,它在“标准”模式中的拍摄品质可以达到同价位产品的水平。

相比之下,我们并不喜欢它品质较低的扬声器,不够准确的GPS模组,和负载下相对较高的机身温度。我们认为它的机身也可以得到更雅致的外观设计。 

道格Shoot 1是一台有意思的入门级智能手机,不过它的双相机系统并没有得到很好的利用。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Doogee Shoot 1 - 03/13/2017 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
68 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
38 / 60 → 63%
Weight
91%
Battery
91%
Display
85%
Games Performance
11 / 63 → 17%
Application Performance
31 / 70 → 44%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
51 / 91 → 56%
Camera
62%
Average
68%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 道格 Shoot 1 智能手机简短评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2017-03-21 (Update: 2017-03-25)