道格 Shoot 1 智能手机简短评测

Name: Doogee Shoot 1
Brand: Doogee

两个总比一个好？ 随着充满新科技的2017年的到来，双相机系统似乎不再是高端智能手机的特权了。现在连入门级机型都可以搭配两个后置相机模组：Shoot 1是中国生产商道格带来的一台机型。不过这台实惠型设备的第二个相机模组真的可以带来拍摄效果提升吗？我们将通过详尽的评测给出答案。

Marcus Herbrich, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 03/21/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of Doogee

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Doogee Shoot 1 (Shoot Series)

Processor

Mediatek MT6737T 4 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-T720 MP2

Memory

2048 MB

Display

5.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, 电容式，多点触控, Sharp LCD, IPS, 2.5D Arc, glossy: yes

Storage

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 10.4 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: microSD 最大支持 256GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 环境光感应器，电子指南针，位置感应器，重力感应器，近距感应器，指纹感应器, microUSB 2.0

Networking

802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, 2G:850/900/1800/1900MHz 3G:900/2100MHz 4G:FDD-LTE Band 1/3/7/8/20, Dual SIM, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.7 x 156.6 x 77

Battery

3300 mAh Lithium-Ion, 5V2A 快速充电

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix 1300万+800万像素双相机, 双闪光灯, 5片镜组, f/2.2+2.4 光圈
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 87.8广角镜头，防抖

Additional features

Speakers: 单声道, Keyboard: 触控, Keyboard Light: yes, TPU 保护壳，屏幕保护贴膜，USB数据线，充电器, Doogee UI, 12 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

167 g, Power Supply: 63 g

Price

110 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	185 MBit/s +83%
Doogee Shoot 1 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash	101 MBit/s
ZTE Blade A510 Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash	47.9 MBit/s -53%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	279 MBit/s +161%
Doogee Shoot 1 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash	107 MBit/s
ZTE Blade A510 Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash	48.7 MBit/s -54%
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	249 MBit/s
Ulefone Metal Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash	88.3 MBit/s
Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash	48.7 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto G4 Play Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	45.6 MBit/s
TP-Link Neffos C5 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	44.9 MBit/s
Wiko Lenny 3 Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash	44.8 MBit/s
LG X Cam Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash	41.8 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	205 MBit/s
Ulefone Metal Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash	73.1 MBit/s
LG X Cam Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash	49.8 MBit/s
TP-Link Neffos C5 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	49.3 MBit/s
Wiko Lenny 3 Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash	49.2 MBit/s
Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash	48.5 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto G4 Play Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	46.7 MBit/s

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


442 cd/m²	477 cd/m²	477 cd/m²
442 cd/m²	488 cd/m²	472 cd/m²
432 cd/m²	467 cd/m²	464 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Sharp LCD tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 488 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 462.3 cd/m² Minimum: 18.51 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 488 cd/m²
Contrast: 2122:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.4

	Doogee Shoot 1 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	ZTE Blade A510 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	ZTE Blade V7 Lite IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Archos 50 Platinum 4G IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Ulefone Metal IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Wiko Lenny 3 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	TP-Link Neffos C5 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Lenovo Moto G4 Play IPS, 1280x720, 5"	LG X Cam IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Huawei P9 IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Screen		-29%	-38%	-47%	-55%	-40%	-42%	-29%	-30%	-3%
Brightness middle	488	528 8%	312 -36%	344 -30%	312 -36%	374 -23%	508 4%	412 -16%	362 -26%	582 19%
Brightness	462	524 13%	302 -35%	349 -24%	315 -32%	343 -26%	491 6%	414 -10%	348 -25%	563 22%
Brightness Distribution	89	94 6%	79 -11%	89 0%	87 -2%	85 -4%	89 0%	94 6%	94 6%	91 2%
Black Level *	0.23	0.62 -170%	0.15 35%	0.65 -183%	0.56 -143%	0.47 -104%	0.58 -152%	0.42 -83%	0.25 -9%	0.38 -65%
Contrast	2122	852 -60%	2080 -2%	529 -75%	557 -74%	796 -62%	876 -59%	981 -54%	1448 -32%	1532 -28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5	5.2 -4%	8.2 -64%	5.8 -16%	6.8 -36%	6 -20%	7 -40%	5.6 -12%	6.8 -36%	4.4 12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.3	8.7 -5%	16.5 -99%	10.7 -29%	14 -69%	11.9 -43%	14.1 -70%	9.7 -17%	11.9 -43%	7.4 11%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.8	5.7 -19%	9.2 -92%	5.7 -19%	7.1 -48%	6.7 -40%	6.1 -27%	6.9 -44%	8.4 -75%	4.8 -0%
Gamma	2.4 ^92%	1.99 ^111%	2.29 ^96%	2.1 ^105%	2.77 ^79%	2.19 ^100%	2.15 ^102%	2.4 ^92%	2.22 ^99%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	7427 ^88%	6631 ^98%	9017 ^72%	7792 ^83%	7402 ^88%	8073 ^81%	8068 ^81%	8422 ^77%	8242 ^79%	6175 ^105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)										77.78
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)										99.44

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
67 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 28 ms rise
67 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 39 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	20 MB/s
ZTE Blade A510	16.5 MB/s -17%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	12.62 MB/s -37%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	15.58 MB/s -22%
Ulefone Metal	27.6 MB/s +38%
Wiko Lenny 3	19.59 MB/s -2%
TP-Link Neffos C5	18.89 MB/s -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	51.1 MB/s +156%
LG X Cam	19.3 MB/s -3%
Huawei P9	24.83 MB/s +24%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	29.18 MB/s
ZTE Blade A510	25.55 MB/s -12%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	22.77 MB/s -22%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	31.85 MB/s +9%
Ulefone Metal	49.6 MB/s +70%
Wiko Lenny 3	40.59 MB/s +39%
TP-Link Neffos C5	39.11 MB/s +34%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	65.5 MB/s +124%
LG X Cam	37.13 MB/s +27%
Huawei P9	55 MB/s +88%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	7.32 MB/s
ZTE Blade A510	4.69 MB/s -36%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	8.26 MB/s +13%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	4.35 MB/s -41%
Ulefone Metal	7.87 MB/s +8%
Wiko Lenny 3	6.2 MB/s -15%
TP-Link Neffos C5	6.85 MB/s -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	28.31 MB/s +287%
LG X Cam	5.52 MB/s -25%
Huawei P9	47.45 MB/s +548%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	18.99 MB/s
ZTE Blade A510	14.03 MB/s -26%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	18.24 MB/s -4%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	14.31 MB/s -25%
Ulefone Metal	22.18 MB/s +17%
Wiko Lenny 3	15.1 MB/s -20%
TP-Link Neffos C5	17.16 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	17.9 MB/s -6%
LG X Cam	18.07 MB/s -5%
Huawei P9	39 MB/s +105%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	47.49 MB/s
ZTE Blade A510	9.94 MB/s -79%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	70.3 MB/s +48%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	7.56 MB/s -84%
Ulefone Metal	39.91 MB/s -16%
Wiko Lenny 3	11.6 MB/s -76%
TP-Link Neffos C5	52.4 MB/s +10%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	43.95 MB/s -7%
LG X Cam	65.8 MB/s +39%
Huawei P9	72.2 MB/s +52%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	207.7 MB/s
ZTE Blade A510	111.9 MB/s -46%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	187.3 MB/s -10%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	125.4 MB/s -40%
Ulefone Metal	228.8 MB/s +10%
Wiko Lenny 3	132.5 MB/s -36%
TP-Link Neffos C5	145.8 MB/s -30%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	144.1 MB/s -31%
LG X Cam	201.6 MB/s -3%
Huawei P9	281.3 MB/s +35%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	39275 Points
ZTE Blade A510	24338 Points -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	23822 Points -39%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	23657 Points -40%
Ulefone Metal	37103 Points -6%
Wiko Lenny 3	25237 Points -36%
TP-Link Neffos C5	32681 Points -17%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	28399 Points -28%
LG X Cam	35471 Points -10%
Huawei P9	95743 Points +144%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	620 Points
ZTE Blade A510	429 Points -31%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	428 Points -31%
Ulefone Metal	609 Points -2%
Huawei P9	1755 Points +183%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	1684 Points
ZTE Blade A510	1195 Points -29%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	1206 Points -28%
Ulefone Metal	2458 Points +46%
Huawei P9	4904 Points +191%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	6645 Points
ZTE Blade A510	3109 Points -53%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	3070 Points -54%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	3103 Points -53%
Ulefone Metal	7059 Points +6%
Wiko Lenny 3	2920 Points -56%
TP-Link Neffos C5	4906 Points -26%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	4432 Points -33%
LG X Cam	6649 Points 0%
Huawei P9	19854 Points +199%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	6115 Points
ZTE Blade A510	2682 Points -56%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	2645 Points -57%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	2681 Points -56%
Ulefone Metal	6469 Points +6%
Wiko Lenny 3	2476 Points -60%
TP-Link Neffos C5	4223 Points -31%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	3858 Points -37%
LG X Cam	6044 Points -1%
Huawei P9	21577 Points +253%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	9525 Points
ZTE Blade A510	7025 Points -26%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	7026 Points -26%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	6902 Points -28%
Ulefone Metal	10371 Points +9%
Wiko Lenny 3	7849 Points -18%
TP-Link Neffos C5	9291 Points -2%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	9256 Points -3%
LG X Cam	10234 Points +7%
Huawei P9	15517 Points +63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	282 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	124 Points -56%
Ulefone Metal	293 Points +4%
Wiko Lenny 3	Points -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5	203 Points -28%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	53 Points -81%
LG X Cam	294 Points +4%
Huawei P9	1237 Points +339%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	218 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	101 Points -54%
Ulefone Metal	243 Points +11%
Wiko Lenny 3	Points -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5	167 Points -23%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	42 Points -81%
LG X Cam	245 Points +12%
Huawei P9	1080 Points +395%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	874 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	618 Points -29%
Ulefone Metal	1057 Points +21%
Wiko Lenny 3	Points -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5	810 Points -7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	716 Points -18%
LG X Cam	1002 Points +15%
Huawei P9	2510 Points +187%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	173 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	81 Points -53%
Ulefone Metal	195 Points +13%
Wiko Lenny 3	Points -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5	125 Points -28%
LG X Cam	194 Points +12%
Huawei P9	974 Points +463%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	141 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	65 Points -54%
Ulefone Metal	158 Points +12%
Wiko Lenny 3	Points -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5	101 Points -28%
LG X Cam	158 Points +12%
Huawei P9	829 Points +488%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	852 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	609 Points -29%
Ulefone Metal	1084 Points +27%
Wiko Lenny 3	Points -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5	796 Points -7%
LG X Cam	1001 Points +17%
Huawei P9	2503 Points +194%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	11 fps
ZTE Blade A510	8.5 fps -23%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	8.2 fps -25%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	4.9 fps -55%
Ulefone Metal	12 fps +9%
Wiko Lenny 3	8 fps -27%
TP-Link Neffos C5	8.3 fps -25%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	9.6 fps -13%
LG X Cam	12 fps +9%
Huawei P9	43 fps +291%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	11 fps
ZTE Blade A510	4.9 fps -55%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	4.9 fps -55%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	8.7 fps -21%
Ulefone Metal	19 fps +73%
Wiko Lenny 3	4.4 fps -60%
TP-Link Neffos C5	14 fps +27%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	5.2 fps -53%
LG X Cam	13 fps +18%
Huawei P9	40 fps +264%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	4 fps
ZTE Blade A510	3.5 fps -12%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	1.8 fps -55%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	1.2 fps -70%
Ulefone Metal	6.4 fps +60%
Wiko Lenny 3	fps -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5	2.8 fps -30%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	4.1 fps +3%
LG X Cam	4.5 fps +13%
Huawei P9	19 fps +375%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	4 fps
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	3.4 fps -15%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	3.6 fps -10%
Ulefone Metal	2.9 fps -27%
Wiko Lenny 3	fps -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5	6.1 fps +53%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	1.8 fps -55%
LG X Cam	4.8 fps +20%
Huawei P9	18 fps +350%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	2.6 fps
ZTE Blade A510	2.5 fps -4%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	1.2 fps -54%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	1.2 fps -54%
Ulefone Metal	4.5 fps +73%
Wiko Lenny 3	fps -100%
LG X Cam	2.9 fps +12%
Huawei P9	11 fps +323%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	2.6 fps
ZTE Blade A510	1.1 fps -58%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	2.5 fps -4%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	2.7 fps +4%
Ulefone Metal	8.9 fps +242%
Wiko Lenny 3	fps -100%
LG X Cam	3.1 fps +19%
Huawei P9	10 fps +285%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	3653 Points
ZTE Blade A510	2675 Points -27%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	2807 Points -23%
Ulefone Metal	4079 Points +12%
Wiko Lenny 3	2832 Points -22%
TP-Link Neffos C5	3443 Points -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	4283 Points +17%
LG X Cam	3882 Points +6%
Huawei P9	7058 Points +93%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	221 Points
ZTE Blade A510	141 Points -36%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	448 Points +103%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	148 Points -33%
Ulefone Metal	273 Points +24%
Wiko Lenny 3	399 Points +81%
TP-Link Neffos C5	683 Points +209%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	603 Points +173%
LG X Cam	232 Points +5%
Huawei P9	2025 Points +816%
System (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	1164 Points
ZTE Blade A510	829 Points -29%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	801 Points -31%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	838 Points -28%
Ulefone Metal	1691 Points +45%
Wiko Lenny 3	988 Points -15%
TP-Link Neffos C5	1199 Points +3%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	1035 Points -11%
LG X Cam	1178 Points +1%
Huawei P9	3930 Points +238%
Memory (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	558 Points
ZTE Blade A510	285 Points -49%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	487 Points -13%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	354 Points -37%
Ulefone Metal	802 Points +44%
Wiko Lenny 3	293 Points -47%
TP-Link Neffos C5	991 Points +78%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	741 Points +33%
LG X Cam	600 Points +8%
Huawei P9	2627 Points +371%
Graphics (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	383 Points
ZTE Blade A510	174 Points -55%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	174 Points -55%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	175 Points -54%
Ulefone Metal	433 Points +13%
Wiko Lenny 3	138 Points -64%
TP-Link Neffos C5	281 Points -27%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	313 Points -18%
LG X Cam	424 Points +11%
Huawei P9	1583 Points +313%
Web (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	10 Points
ZTE Blade A510	10 Points 0%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	592 Points +5820%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	9 Points -10%
Ulefone Metal	10 Points 0%
Wiko Lenny 3	632 Points +6220%
TP-Link Neffos C5	638 Points +6280%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	551 Points +5410%
LG X Cam	10 Points 0%
Huawei P9	1029 Points +10190%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	20.78 Points
ZTE Blade A510	12.78 Points -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	12.73 Points -39%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	12.76 Points -39%
Ulefone Metal	17.83 Points -14%
Wiko Lenny 3	14.07 Points -32%
TP-Link Neffos C5	18.21 Points -12%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	17.09 Points -18%
LG X Cam	18.34 Points -12%
Huawei P9	68.4 Points +229%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	3389 Points
ZTE Blade A510	2102 Points -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	1910 Points -44%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	2122 Points -37%
Ulefone Metal	2738 Points -19%
Wiko Lenny 3	2133 Points -37%
TP-Link Neffos C5	2738 Points -19%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	2773 Points -18%
LG X Cam	2752 Points -19%
Huawei P9	11783 Points +248%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Doogee Shoot 1	11058 ms *
ZTE Blade A510	17364 ms * -57%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	19234 ms * -74%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	19092 ms * -73%
Ulefone Metal	13397 ms * -21%
Wiko Lenny 3	14863 ms * -34%
TP-Link Neffos C5	12783 ms * -16%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	12953 ms * -17%
LG X Cam	12958 ms * -17%
Huawei P9	2923 ms * +74%

Legend

Doogee Shoot 1 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Blade A510 Mediatek MT6735P, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Blade V7 Lite Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Ulefone Metal Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Wiko Lenny 3 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

TP-Link Neffos C5 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Moto G4 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

LG X Cam Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


41.2 °C	38.5 °C	33.7 °C
42 °C	38.6 °C	34.3 °C
43 °C	41 °C	34.8 °C

Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 38.6 °C


32.1 °C	33.5 °C	36.3 °C
32.2 °C	32.9 °C	38.9 °C
32.1 °C	33.4 °C	40.1 °C

Maximum: 40.1 °C
Average: 34.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 29.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Doogee Shoot 1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (17.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | very high mids - on average 18% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (43.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

ZTE Blade A510 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | very high mids - on average 15.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (45.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Archos 50 Platinum 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.05 / 0.25 Watt
Idle	0.73 / 1.48 / 1.58 Watt
Load	3.11 / 4.37 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Doogee Shoot 1 3300 mAh	ZTE Blade A510 2200 mAh	ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh	Archos 50 Platinum 4G 2200 mAh	Ulefone Metal 3050 mAh	Wiko Lenny 3 2000 mAh	TP-Link Neffos C5 2200 mAh	Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh	LG X Cam 2500 mAh
Power Consumption		-16%	9%	-8%	-73%	-34%	-39%	0%	-1%
Idle Minimum *	0.73	0.61 16%	0.63 14%	0.59 19%	1.41 -93%	0.76 -4%	0.72 1%	0.68 7%	0.64 12%
Idle Average *	1.48	1.75 -18%	1.37 7%	1.68 -14%	2.46 -66%	2.16 -46%	1.87 -26%	1.58 -7%	1.38 7%
Idle Maximum *	1.58	1.83 -16%	1.71 -8%	1.79 -13%	2.83 -79%	2.35 -49%	2 -27%	1.61 -2%	1.43 9%
Load Average *	3.11	4.49 -44%	2.82 9%	4.22 -36%	5.15 -66%	4.65 -50%	5.99 -93%	3.36 -8%	3.99 -28%
Load Maximum *	4.37	5.14 -18%	3.36 23%	4.26 3%	7.05 -61%	5.35 -22%	6.45 -48%	3.91 11%	4.49 -3%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		8h 21min

	Doogee Shoot 1 3300 mAh	ZTE Blade A510 2200 mAh	ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh	Archos 50 Platinum 4G 2200 mAh	Ulefone Metal 3050 mAh	Wiko Lenny 3 2000 mAh	TP-Link Neffos C5 2200 mAh	Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh	LG X Cam 2500 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	501	416 -17%	517 3%	384 -23%	403 -20%	549 10%	453 -10%	630 26%	457 -9%

Pros

+ 明亮的IPS屏幕

+ 1080p分辨率

+ 对比度和色彩还原

+ 优秀的无线模组速度

+ 价格实惠

+ 硬件性能强（相比其他入门级设备）

Cons

- GPS信号弱

- 双相机系统有其不足

- 发热量

- 扬声器品质较差

In Review: Doogee Shoot 1. Test device courtesy of Doogee.

在我们的测试中，道格Shoot 1证明了自己是一台优秀的低价位入门级智能手机。16GB的闪存和2GB的工作内存在这个价位上合情合理。同时搭配MediaTek系统芯片，它的硬件可以为系统流畅运行提供足够的性能。另外，道格Shoot 1提供了一块高对比度，高分辨率的IPS屏幕，和优秀的电池续航。

这台低价智能手机的特别之处在于机背的双相机系统，不过遗憾的是它的实际表现十分让人失望。这台设备的软件系统没有能够完全利用多出来的信息，它的焦外虚化效果十分不准确，同时会影响照片的拍摄主体的清晰度。整体上，它在“标准”模式中的拍摄品质可以达到同价位产品的水平。

相比之下，我们并不喜欢它品质较低的扬声器，不够准确的GPS模组，和负载下相对较高的机身温度。我们认为它的机身也可以得到更雅致的外观设计。

道格Shoot 1是一台有意思的入门级智能手机，不过它的双相机系统并没有得到很好的利用。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Doogee Shoot 1 - 03/13/2017 v6 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

82%

Keyboard

68 / 75 → 90%

Pointing Device

88%

Connectivity

38 / 60 → 63%

Weight

91%

Battery

91%

Display

85%

Games Performance

11 / 63 → 17%

Application Performance

31 / 70 → 44%

Temperature

87%

Noise

100%

Audio

51 / 91 → 56%

Camera

62%

Average

68%

79%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 道格 Shoot 1 智能手机简短评测

Marcus Herbrich, 2017-03-21 (Update: 2017-03-25)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Doogee Shoot 1 audio analysis

ZTE Blade A510 audio analysis

Archos 50 Platinum 4G audio analysis

Pros

Cons

Price comparison