Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar惠普 Spectre x2 12-a003ng (K3D42EA) 笔记本电脑简短评测
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA (Spectre 12 Series)
Processor
Intel Core m7-6Y75 2 x 1.2 - 3.1 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 515, Core: 950 MHz
Memory
8 GB
, 双通道
Display
12.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, 10点触控, native pen support, LGD04A5, IPS, WUXGA-UWVA BrightView, glossy: yes, detachable screen
Mainboard
Intel Skylake-Y Premium PCH
Storage
Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006, 256 GB
, M.2 SSD
Weight
1.229 kg, Power Supply: 328 g
Price
1400 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LGD04A5 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 366 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 347.1 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 353 cd/m²
Contrast: 802:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.09 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.24 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
46% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
52.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
52.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
| HP Spectre x2 12 1920x1080 | MS Surface Pro 4 2736x1824 | Lenovo TP Helix 2 1920x1080 | Toshiba Z20t-B 1920x1080 | MS Surface Book i5 3000x2000 | Acer AS R7-371T 1920x1080 | Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 31% | -15% | 30% | 29% | |||
| Display P3 Coverage | 52.9 | 67.5 28% | 42.63 -19% | 67 27% | 66.1 25% | ||
| sRGB Coverage | 71.8 | 96.6 35% | 63.6 -11% | 95.8 33% | 96.4 34% | ||
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 52.6 | 69 31% | 44.1 -16% | 68.9 31% | 68.1 29% | ||
| Response Times | -9% | -15% | -83% | ||||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 47 ? | 46 ? 2% | 48.4 ? -3% | 74 ? -57% | |||
| Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 31 ? -19% | 32.8 ? -26% | 54 ? -108% | |||
| PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 211 ? | |||||
| Screen | 33% | 20% | -17% | 44% | 15% | 25% | |
| Brightness middle | 353 | 389.2 10% | 365 3% | 342 -3% | 430.9 22% | 321 -9% | 332 -6% |
| Brightness | 347 | 392 13% | 342 -1% | 301 -13% | 410 18% | 322 -7% | 321 -7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 92 1% | 86 -5% | 76 -16% | 93 2% | 83 -9% | 86 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.27 39% | 0.329 25% | 0.393 11% | 0.254 42% | 0.32 27% | 0.19 57% |
| Contrast | 802 | 1441 80% | 1109 38% | 870 8% | 1696 111% | 1003 25% | 1747 118% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.09 | 3.61 41% | 4.37 28% | 9.69 -59% | 2.06 66% | 4.79 21% | 5.56 9% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.24 | 3.8 39% | 2.8 55% | 9.27 -49% | 2.22 64% | 2.67 57% | 7.01 -12% |
| Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.16 102% | 2.3 96% | 2.95 75% | 2.13 103% | 2.52 87% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 7238 90% | 5969 109% | 6595 99% | 6010 108% | 6520 100% | 6835 95% | 8459 77% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 46 | 63 37% | 40.4 -12% | 64 39% | 63 37% | ||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 71 | 97 37% | 96 35% | 97 37% | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 18% /
27% | 20% /
20% | -16% /
-16% | 20% /
33% | 15% /
15% | -10% /
11% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 31 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8782 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2675 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3362 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4078 points | |
Help | ||
| HP Spectre x2 12 Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G | MS Surface Pro 4 m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | MS Surface Pro 4 i7 Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe | Lenovo TP Helix 2 Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU | Toshiba Z20t-B Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU | MS Surface Book i5 Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe | Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 Samsung PM851 MZNTE256HMHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 53% | 120% | 3% | 42% | 121% | 29% | |
| Seq Read | 439.1 | 845 92% | 1312 199% | 473.9 8% | 513 17% | 1223 179% | 509 16% |
| Seq Write | 216.9 | 138.1 -36% | 274.8 27% | 216.4 0% | 457.2 111% | 275.2 27% | 232.7 7% |
| 4K Read | 23.12 | 31.39 36% | 33.47 45% | 14.63 -37% | 21.4 -7% | 34.31 48% | 30.4 31% |
| 4K Write | 49.2 | 63.2 28% | 89.2 81% | 41.14 -16% | 76.8 56% | 85 73% | 77.6 58% |
| Score Total | 722 | 1759 144% | 2518 249% | 1152 60% | 954 32% | 2712 276% | 943 31% |
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 12% | 62% | -17% | 32% | 25% | ||
| Read Seq | 410.1 | 663 62% | 834 103% | 422.7 3% | 530 29% | 526 28% | |
| Write Seq | 316 | 158.2 -50% | 304 -4% | 247.4 -22% | 473.3 50% | 242.1 -23% | |
| Read 4k | 27.4 | 30.14 10% | 40.75 49% | 19.44 -29% | 22.91 -16% | 34.32 25% | |
| Write 4k | 53.5 | 68 27% | 106.3 99% | 43.08 -19% | 88.2 65% | 90.6 69% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 33% /
35% | 91% /
94% | -7% /
-6% | 37% /
37% | 121% /
121% | 27% /
27% |
Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
Sequential Read:
410.1 MB/s
Sequential Write:
316 MB/s
512K Read:
260.8 MB/s
512K Write:
241.6 MB/s
4K Read:
27.4 MB/s
4K Write:
53.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
196 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
147.8 MB/s
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 6293 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1098 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 42545 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4546 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 660 points | |
Help | ||
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crysis 3 (2013) | 20.2 | 12.9 | 8.3 | |
| Fifa 15 (2014) | 38.3 | 29.6 | 15.1 | |
| Battlefield Hardline (2015) | 25.9 | 20.5 | 8.3 |
| HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 Iris Graphics 540, 6650U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe | Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2 HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU 256 GB | Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU | Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), 6300U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe | Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -2% | -24% | 9% | 0% | 1% | 10% | -5% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 43.5 | 43.6 -0% | 52.3 -20% | 45.4 -4% | 42.1 3% | 48.3 -11% | 44.2 -2% | 50.8 -17% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 42 | 45.2 -8% | 51.4 -22% | 43.2 -3% | 42.3 -1% | 43.2 -3% | 41.2 2% | 45.1 -7% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 33 | 32.4 2% | 43.2 -31% | 25.2 24% | 31.3 5% | 28.9 12% | 26 21% | 33.1 -0% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29.3 | 29.6 -1% | 36 -23% | 24 18% | 31.3 -7% | 27.7 5% | 23.8 19% | 28.1 4% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
| HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 2 HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU 256 GB | Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 12 HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive | Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -8% | 13% | 18% | -26% | 29% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.5 | 4.4 2% | 2 56% | 2.4 47% | 3.6 20% | 3.3 27% |
| Idle Average * | 7.7 | 9 -17% | 6 22% | 4.6 40% | 8 -4% | 5.2 32% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.3 | 10.7 -29% | 6.6 20% | 5.6 33% | 8.9 -7% | 6.4 23% |
| Load Average * | 19.8 | 19.6 1% | 17.6 11% | 15.6 21% | 32.7 -65% | 13.6 31% |
| Load Maximum * | 20.6 | 19.9 3% | 29.7 -44% | 30.7 -49% | 35.7 -73% | 14 32% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.5 / 1.4 Watt |
| Idle |  4.5 / 7.7 / 8.3 Watt |
| Load |
19.8 / 20.6 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Spectre x2 12 42 Wh 1920x1080 | MS Surface Pro 4 m3 38 Wh 2736x1824 | MS Surface Pro 4 i5 38 Wh 2736x1824 | MS Surface Pro 4 i7 38 Wh 2736x1824 | Lenovo TP Helix 2 35 Wh 1920x1080 | Toshiba Z20t-B 72 Wh 1920x1080 | Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 38 Wh 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 0% | -7% | -34% | 10% | 97% | 37% | |
| Reader / Idle | 954 | 791 -17% | 899 -6% | 654 -31% | 964 1% | 1616 69% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 361 | 488 35% | 427 18% | 293 -19% | 760 111% | 495 37% | |
| Load | 166 | 138 -17% | 111 -33% | 79 -52% | 197 19% | 348 110% | |
| H.264 | 360 | 787 | |||||
| WiFi | 396 |
Pros
+ 充电通过USB C型接口
+ 坚固，实用的键盘底座
+ 键盘品质
+ 背光键盘附带扬声器
+ 明亮的IPS触控屏幕
+ 后置RealSense相机
+ 不错的图片品质
+ 优秀的麦克风
+ 可调整支架
+ 不错的整体性能
+ 无噪音
Cons
- 机身有些小弱点
- 低游戏性能
- 低于平均的处理器速度
连接上时尚而不失坚固的键盘，Spectre x2可以有效的用作桌面笔记本电脑。USB C型接口被用作充电接口，它可以通过附带的转接埠连接现有的A型接口外置设备。平板背面的主相机可以拍摄非常不错的照片和视频。我们很久没有在Windows平板中感受到这一点了。另外，RealSense相机支持3D扫描——至少以后会。它可以用于测量结构深度，例如脸型。
Spectre x2也有一些还算可以接受的缺点。一些用户可能会怀念标准SD卡的读卡器。如果倾斜一点平板它的支架会错位。它的电池续航还不错，不过考虑到售价和酷睿M处理器，它应该实现7到8小时的上网时间而不只是测试结果的6小时。
仅仅达到Surface Pro Core M3水平的运算性能让我们十分失望。潜在用户应该考虑它的m3-6Y30版本(2x 900 MHz)，它应该在普通用途下提供更好的节能。它们的售价相同，不过较“弱”的机型搭配了LTE模组。如果需要性能的话，则需要考虑微软的Surface Pro 4酷睿i5/i7版本，它们也搭配了更快的NVMe固态硬盘。
实际上尺寸稍大的惠普 Spectre x360 13变形本搭配i5-6200U，性能更高，在我们的测试中得到了84%的分数。微软的Surface Book，Acer的Aspire R7-371T-52EL，联想的ThinkPad Yoga 12一级微软Surface Pro (i5/i7)都提供了相同水平的处理器性能。尽管需要高性能的用户可能需要考虑这些设备，不过也不一定就一定排除Spectre x2。它作为二合一设备十分实用。它的M7处理器的应用程序性能还有一定的竞争力。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
-
04/18/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch
Convertible - Weighted Average