Notebookcheck Logo

宏碁 Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D 变形本简短评测

超薄,超静音。 宏碁的这台厚度仅为11mm的14寸笔记本看起来的确是不错。但是,虽然它有着良好的可维护性,它的稳定性却成为了它的短板。它所搭载的 Kaby Lake ULV 处理器并没有出奇的性能甚至在当和它的上一代进行对比时,令我们感到十分失望。在阅读我们的评测后,你可以了解到为什么它的屏幕是出色的但是仍然存在一点扣分项。
Kaby Lake Convertible / 2-in-1 Windows
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D (Spin 7 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-7Y54 2 x 1.2 - 3.2 GHz, Kaby Lake
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, 双通道板载 LPDDR3
Display
14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, 十指触控, AUO B140HAN03.2 / AUO323D, IPS, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH
Storage
Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG, 256 GB 
, 金士顿 RBUSNS4180S3256GG, 195 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 复合耳机/麦克风接口, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 陀螺仪
Networking
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 10.98 x 324.6 x 229.6
Battery
42 Wh, 2770 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 4芯, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 8 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 1280x720
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: no, Type-C 转 Type-A 转接器, Acer Care Center, Acer Quick Access, Recovery Management, , 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
1.271 kg, Power Supply: 293 g
Price
1200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Acer Spin 7 (SP714-51-M09D)

Size Comparison

333 mm 229 mm 16 mm 1.3 kg324.6 mm 229.6 mm 10.98 mm 1.3 kg321 mm 219 mm 13.9 mm 1.2 kg305.6 mm 217.9 mm 13.7 mm 1.3 kg300 mm 205 mm 9.9 mm 1.2 kg291 mm 201 mm 11 mm 1.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Combined stereo jack (headphones+microphone), 2x USB 3.0 Type-C, one for charging
Combined stereo jack (headphones+microphone), 2x USB 3.0 Type-C, one for charging
Cable lug, power on/off, volume rocker
Cable lug, power on/off, volume rocker
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10
Broadcom 802.11ac
735 MBit/s +52%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (jseb)
638 MBit/s +32%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
609 MBit/s +26%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
505 MBit/s +5%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (jseb)
482 MBit/s
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)
385 MBit/s -20%
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET
Broadcom BCM43228 (jseb)
129 MBit/s -73%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (jseb)
596 MBit/s
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
526 MBit/s -12%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10
Broadcom 802.11ac (Hinum)
510 MBit/s -14%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (jseb)
500 MBit/s -16%
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)
438 MBit/s -27%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)
421 MBit/s -29%
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET
Broadcom BCM43228 (jseb)
50 MBit/s -92%
249
cd/m²
319
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
277
cd/m²
344
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
275
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AUO B140HAN03.2 / AUO323D tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 344 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 291.9 cd/m² Minimum: 23.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 72 %
Center on Battery: 332 cd/m²
Contrast: 1323:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12.65 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 12.95 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.33
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
AUO B140HAN03.2 / AUO323D, , 1920x1080, 14"
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
AU Optronics AOU272D / B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.3"
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
Chi Mei CMN1367, , 1920x1080, 13.3"
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
Samsung ATNA40JU01-0, , 2560x1440, 14"
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Panasonic VVX12T041N00, , 2160x1440, 12"
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Unknown, , 1920x1200, 12.2"
Display
5%
4%
7%
4%
Display P3 Coverage
61.5
64.8
5%
65.4
6%
65.5
7%
64.5
5%
sRGB Coverage
89.1
93.1
4%
90.4
1%
96.1
8%
92
3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
62.9
66
5%
65.8
5%
66.9
6%
65.5
4%
Response Times
35%
14%
97%
15%
24%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
51 ?(13, 38)
29 ?(11, 18)
43%
33.2 ?(16, 17.2)
35%
1 ?(0.5, 0.5)
98%
20 ?(5, 15, detail 5 schraffiert)
61%
33 ?(21, 12)
35%
Response Time Black / White *
26 ?(6, 20)
19 ?(7, 12)
27%
28 ?(5.6, 22.4)
-8%
1 ?(0.5, 0.5)
96%
34 ?(15, 19, PWM@100% mit/ohne PSU)
-31%
23 ?(10, 13)
12%
PWM Frequency
50 ?(40)
240 ?(100)
1000 ?(100)
125 ?(90)
Screen
18%
10%
32%
11%
6%
Brightness middle
344
344
0%
334.6
-3%
279
-19%
345
0%
327
-5%
Brightness
292
326
12%
319
9%
277
-5%
328
12%
324
11%
Brightness Distribution
72
86
19%
90
25%
91
26%
91
26%
88
22%
Black Level *
0.26
0.27
-4%
0.336
-29%
0.38
-46%
0.35
-35%
Contrast
1323
1274
-4%
996
-25%
908
-31%
934
-29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
12.65
5.53
56%
6.21
51%
5.15
59%
8.4
34%
6.54
48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
17.8
10.01
44%
12
33%
8.28
53%
11.9
33%
15.59
12%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
12.95
6.67
48%
7.71
40%
5.44
58%
4.3
67%
9.52
26%
Gamma
1.33 165%
2.43 91%
2.36 93%
2.28 96%
2.63 84%
2.35 94%
CCT
6441 101%
7012 93%
6458 101%
5686 114%
7368 88%
8802 74%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
58
60
3%
58.6
1%
98
69%
62
7%
59
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
89
93
4%
90
1%
100
12%
92
3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
19% / 17%
9% / 9%
65% / 45%
11% / 11%
11% / 8%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Saturation Sweeps
CalMAN Saturation Sweeps
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN Saturation Sweeps (calibrated)
CalMAN Saturation Sweeps (calibrated)
CalMAN ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN ColorChecker (calibrated)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 38 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

System info: CPU-Z CPU
System info: CPU-Z Cache
System info: CPU-Z Mainboard
System info: CPU-Z Memory
System info: CPU-Z Graphics
System info: HWinfo Summary
System info: GPU-Z
Latency Monitor
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
Intel Core i7-6600U
135 Points +22%
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
Intel Core i7-7500U
126 Points +14%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel Core i7-6500U
123 Points +11%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points +5%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
114 Points +3%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Intel Core i5-7Y54
111 Points
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Intel Core m5-6Y54
107 Points -4%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Intel Core m3-6Y30
92 Points -17%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel Core i7-6500U
317 Points +55%
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
Intel Core i7-7500U
314 Points +53%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
Intel Core i7-6600U
305 Points +49%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
289 Points +41%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
246 Points +20%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Intel Core m5-6Y54
232 Points +13%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Intel Core m3-6Y30
216 Points +5%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Intel Core i5-7Y54
205 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
3830
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
5646 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
7213
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
7551
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
9681 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
7416 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
2.27 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
26.33 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.27 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
31.96 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
205 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
111 Points
Help
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
3795 Points +27%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0)
3489 Points +17%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
3435 Points +15%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
3281 Points +10%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
3264 Points +10%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG
2979 Points
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027
2717 Points -9%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
4910 Points +20%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0)
4410 Points +8%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
4315 Points +6%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4197 Points +3%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG
4076 Points
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
3996 Points -2%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027
2721 Points -33%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2979 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4076 points
Help
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0)
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-5%
73%
-17%
84%
59%
Read Seq
472.6
452.1
-4%
1376
191%
518
10%
1510
220%
1168
147%
Write Seq
407.7
421.3
3%
571
40%
199.9
-51%
1193
193%
329
-19%
Read 512
309.5
288.6
-7%
679
119%
374.9
21%
1015
228%
Write 512
368.5
310.7
-16%
571
55%
201
-45%
307
-17%
Read 4k
37.57
28.52
-24%
42.66
14%
29.3
-22%
37
-2%
33
-12%
Write 4k
75.5
72.1
-5%
137.9
83%
76.8
2%
126
67%
132
75%
Read 4k QD32
324.8
389.6
20%
535
65%
272
-16%
404
24%
525
62%
Write 4k QD32
307.4
285.3
-7%
361.2
18%
197.1
-36%
319
4%
325
6%
Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG
Sequential Read: 472.6 MB/s
Sequential Write: 407.7 MB/s
512K Read: 309.5 MB/s
512K Write: 368.5 MB/s
4K Read: 37.57 MB/s
4K Write: 75.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 324.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 307.4 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
1560 Points +51%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1489 Points +44%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6600U
1458 Points +41%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1428 Points +38%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1306 Points +27%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
1133 Points +10%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
1032 Points
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
781 Points -24%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
7969 Points +45%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
7917 Points +45%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6600U
7572 Points +38%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
7307 Points +33%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
6271 Points +14%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
6178 Points +13%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
5638 Points +3%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
5478 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
964 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6600U
931 Points
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
740 Points
3DMark 06 1280x768 Score
6524 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
4123 points
3DMark 11 Performance
1141 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
37865 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
4050 points
Help
lowmed.highultra
Hitman: Absolution (2012) 21.9 14 7.6
Crysis 3 (2013) 21 12.7
Tomb Raider (2013) 51.8 23.6 16
BioShock Infinite (2013) 32 19.3 16.1
Battlefield 4 (2013) 22.3 16 11
Thief (2014) 13.9 9.2
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) 23.5 13.7 6.8
Alien: Isolation (2014) 26.3 19 9.7
Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014) 17.6 12.2
Battlefield Hardline (2015) 19.7 15.5
Dirt Rally (2015) 71.6 16.26
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 23.4 20.8 7.6
Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 (2015) 8 severe graphical problems (no menue)
Fallout 4 (2015) 10.1
Star Wars Battlefront (2015) 19.8 11.5
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 11
Doom (2016) 12.9 10.1
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 9.1
FIFA 17 (2016) 36 small graphical problems (slow down in game) 29 small graphical problems (slow down in game)
Battlefield 1 (2016) 13 9.1
 25.8 °C27.6 °C26.8 °C 
 24.3 °C25.4 °C24.9 °C 
 24 °C23.5 °C24.9 °C 
Maximum: 27.6 °C
Average: 25.2 °C
26 °C27.1 °C25.9 °C
25.1 °C25.8 °C25.1 °C
24.9 °C24.7 °C24.7 °C
Maximum: 27.1 °C
Average: 25.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  32.7 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.7 °C / 1.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.232.832.22529.732.529.73134.436.934.44030.229.930.25031.631.231.66330.326.330.38028.526.328.510037.426.637.412545.124.745.116043.724.143.72004222.24225049.521.549.53155820.75840065206550066.219.266.263065.618.565.680066.61866.6100066.11866.1125062.617.562.6160066.517.266.5200055.817.555.8250059.917.459.9315059.617.659.6400060.217.860.2500055.817.855.8630060.217.960.2800060.717.960.71000061.417.861.41250057.917.757.9160005022.150SPL74.730.274.7N36.21.436.2median 59.9median 18median 59.9Delta7.51.57.532.132.232.132.634.432.632.932.832.931.631.531.630.136.530.128.527.828.531.626.431.639.724.939.744.425.244.44225.44238.923.838.949.82249.855.421.655.458.120.658.158.619.858.655.619.455.659.518.559.566.118.166.163.417.863.462.417.762.465.817.865.862.617.762.662.717.862.761.61861.663.61863.662.818.262.861.918.261.959.118.359.15918.15952.418.152.474.730.574.734.81.534.8median 59.1median 18.2median 59.15.71.25.739.339.536.838.136.336.234.733.933.935.233.335.332.831.932.2313131.429.435.829.648.52955.228.657.42859.826.260.125.660.22561.624.36724.57024.466.923.864.523.757.723.757.323.560.223.562.423.663.523.964.92461.72462.125.166.336.676.22.837.2median 24.5median 60.21.35.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09DAsus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159THP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.48 / 0.7 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.3 / 7.4 / 8 Watt
Load midlight 22.1 / 21.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
6500U, HD Graphics 520, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
6600U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0), OLED, 2560x1440, 14"
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
6200U, HD Graphics 520, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2, IPS, 2160x1440, 12"
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1200, 12.2"
Power Consumption
-29%
-24%
-49%
-36%
-33%
Idle Minimum *
4.3
6.9
-60%
5.5
-28%
4.7
-9%
7.3
-70%
4.2
2%
Idle Average *
7.4
7.9
-7%
6.7
9%
8.6
-16%
10
-35%
11.5
-55%
Idle Maximum *
8
8.3
-4%
7.1
11%
12.2
-53%
10.15
-27%
11.7
-46%
Load Average *
22.1
30.1
-36%
33.1
-50%
29.7
-34%
25.2
-14%
31
-40%
Load Maximum *
21.7
29.6
-36%
35.2
-62%
50.5
-133%
29.3
-35%
27.4
-26%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
12h 28min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 31min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 43min
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 42 Wh
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 57 Wh
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57.8 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00
6600U, HD Graphics 520, 56 Wh
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 50 Wh
Battery Runtime
36%
27%
-9%
-21%
-19%
Reader / Idle
748
1165
56%
1233
65%
824
10%
640
-14%
696
-7%
WiFi v1.3
391
581
49%
558
43%
315
-19%
321
-18%
322
-18%
Load
163
169
4%
121
-26%
132
-19%
112
-31%
111
-32%
H.264
520
468

Pros

+ 紧凑而轻巧的
+ 优秀的应用性能
+ 出色的触摸板
+ 高对比度
+ 校色后良好的色彩
+ 很好的维护性

Cons

- 只有Type-C接口,例如连接屏幕需要通过宏碁Type-C扩展坞
- 底壳应该更坚固一下
- 扬声器音量小
- 调整前色彩较差
- 糟糕的键盘
- 糟糕的摄像头质量
In review: Acer Spin 7 (SP714-51-M09D). Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.
In review: Acer Spin 7 (SP714-51-M09D). Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

整体上,它是一台很有野心的机器,但在细节的处理上却不尽人意。宏碁 Spin 7 (不带有 "Aspire") 是全新的超薄360度变形本系列。我们所评测的14寸型号 SP714-51-M09D 有一些缺点,来自于它所配备的 Kaby Lake Y 系列 CPU(4.5W TDP),在应用性能上,其上一代 Skylake 处理器有时甚至会有更好的表现。我们对它紧凑而轻便的机身赞许有加,但出色的外观无法掩盖它过薄的底面以及整体外壳稳定性缺失所带来的影响。

纤薄的机壳看起来很不错,但却缺失了一些稳定性。事实上,它的屏幕在经过校色之后是十分出色的,但在出厂状态却有较大的色差。

它优秀而较大的触摸板具有出色的反馈,但键盘不仅键程较短,且反馈有限。它的屏幕不仅有着高亮度而且还有有出色的对比度。但它的色彩准确度在经过处理前却不尽人意。的确色彩校准是可以解决这个问题,但多少消费者家里会有校色仪?你可以通过使用下面链接中的色彩文件来改善这个情况,尽管这样做比不上手动校色的效果。

通过移除巨大的底壳就可以轻松地进行的维护操作,这一点是堪称模范的。剩下的只有糟糕的摄像头和音量较小的扬声器。

Kaby Lake ULV 处理器无法令我们完全满意;这款 Soc 经常出现在排名表的最底部,甚至不如上一代的Core m5处理器。

这台14英寸 SP714-51-M09D 变形本现在的售价高达1200欧元(约合1336美金)。它的竞争对手 ZenBook UX360UA-C4159T,带有512GB固态硬盘和性能更高的 i7-6500u 售价为1130欧元(约合1258美金),而且它有着更长的续航时间,更高的出场色彩准确度(当使用来自华硕的出场色彩文件时)。如果华硕能够解决转轴摇晃这个问题,那么华硕UX360UA 显然将会是更好的推荐项。

那么 惠普 Spectre x360 13 是不是更好的选择呢?带有 Kaby Lake 处理器的型号并不是在每个地方能购买到,但它的上一代起价已经高达1000欧元(约合1114美金)。这款型号带有更快的6200u处理器,256G固态硬盘和更好的键盘,而且续航时间能够与 Spin 7 相媲美。相比之下,除了维护性和无风扇外,宏碁 Spin 7 并没有很多的优势。它现在只是太贵了,合理价位应为1000欧元(约合1114美金)附近。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D - 10/24/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch

Chassis
84 /  98 → 86%
Keyboard
69%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
29 / 80 → 36%
Weight
72 / 35-78 → 86%
Battery
89%
Display
79%
Games Performance
56 / 68 → 82%
Application Performance
80 / 87 → 91%
Temperature
91 / 91 → 100%
Noise
100%
Audio
59 / 91 → 65%
Camera
38 / 85 → 44%
Average
71%
82%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 宏碁 Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D 变形本简短评测
Sebastian Jentsch, 2016-11-15 (Update: 2016-11-18)