富士通 Stylistic V535 (Z3795,128 GB, LTE) 平板电脑简短评测
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Fujitsu Stylistic V535 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| Fujitsu Stylistic V535 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 284 cd/m²
Contrast: 717:1 (Black: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.26 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
47% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
51.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
49.67% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
| Fujitsu Stylistic V535 LG Philips LGD0000, , 1920x1080, 8.3" | Panasonic Toughpad FZ-B2 1280x800, 7" | HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA OspresCR PO, , 1280x800, 8" | Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 MS 9001, , 1920x1200, 8" | Panasonic ToughPad FZ-M1 LFP14, , 1280x800, 7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 12% | 3% | -13% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 49.67 | 56.6 14% | 50.9 2% | 42.73 -14% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 72.6 | 80 10% | 75.3 4% | 64.2 -12% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 51.4 | 58 13% | 52.7 3% | 44.17 -14% | |
| Response Times | -32% | 4% | |||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 29 ? | 26 ? 10% | 28 ? 3% | ||
| Response Time Black / White * | 19 ? | 33 ? -74% | 18 ? 5% | ||
| PWM Frequency | 378 ? | ||||
| Screen | -72% | 9% | -28% | -16% | |
| Brightness middle | 344 | 540 57% | 347 1% | 279 -19% | 561 63% |
| Brightness | 310 | 498 61% | 333 7% | 255 -18% | 528 70% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 85 2% | 91 10% | 85 2% | 86 4% |
| Black Level * | 0.48 | 0.32 33% | 0.11 77% | 0.2 58% | 0.77 -60% |
| Contrast | 717 | 1688 135% | 3155 340% | 1395 95% | 729 2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.98 | 23.34 -683% | 5.45 -83% | 7.64 -156% | 5.55 -86% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.11 | 9.42 -54% | 15.3 -150% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.26 | 6.82 -109% | 10.63 -226% | 6.22 -91% | 7.04 -116% |
| Gamma | 2.42 91% | 2.21 100% | 1.34 164% | 2.17 101% | 2.46 89% |
| CCT | 6106 106% | 6334 103% | 6404 101% | 6798 96% | 6323 103% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 47 | 52 11% | 49 4% | 41 -13% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 72 | 80 11% | 71 -1% | 64 -11% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -72% /
-72% | -4% /
4% | -7% /
-17% | -15% /
-16% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
| PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Fujitsu Stylistic V535 | |
| HP Pro Tablet 10 EE G1 | |
| HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 1139 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 1227 points | |
Help | ||
| Fujitsu Stylistic V535 128 GB eMMC Flash | HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA 64 GB eMMC Flash | Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 Hynix HCG8E 64 GB | Panasonic ToughPad FZ-M1 Samsung MZNTE128HMGR-000SO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -3% | -18% | 442% | |
| Read Seq | 164.3 | 114.8 -30% | 125.9 -23% | 503 206% |
| Write Seq | 61.1 | 55.3 -9% | 58.4 -4% | 138 126% |
| Read 512 | 156.3 | 118 -25% | 101.9 -35% | 422.7 170% |
| Write 512 | 42.27 | 63.5 50% | 43.9 4% | 137.8 226% |
| Read 4k | 15.75 | 17.4 10% | 13.6 -14% | 34.19 117% |
| Write 4k | 12.04 | 8.719 -28% | 8.2 -32% | 92.6 669% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 29.17 | 38.77 33% | 26.2 -10% | 364.4 1149% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 13.97 | 10.39 -26% | 10 -28% | 135.8 872% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| HP ElitePad 1000 G2 | |
| Fujitsu Stylistic V535 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 10 | |
| HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA | |
| Dell Venue 11 Pro 5130-9356 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 218 points | |
Help | ||
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 8.4 | 3.5 |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Fujitsu Stylistic V535 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.3 / 1.7 Watt |
| Idle |  4.9 / 7.4 / 7.5 Watt |
| Load |
11.8 / 8.9 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Fujitsu Stylistic V535 Z3795, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 17.7 Wh | Panasonic Toughpad FZ-B2 N2930, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 24 Wh | HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA Z3736F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 18 Wh | Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 Z8500, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 18.3 Wh | Panasonic ToughPad FZ-M1 4302Y, HD Graphics 4200, 22 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi Websurfing | 252 | 300 19% | 491 95% | 320 27% | 246 -2% |
Pros
Cons
用于高端工业要求的平板电脑。富士通Stylistic V535 平板电脑面向那些需要在恶劣环境中使用可靠平板电脑的用户。为了实现这一目标，8.3英寸平板电脑满足了多项标准，如MIL STD 810测试。此外，制造商为各种使用场景提供了附件，例如对接解决方案、坚固的框架和皮带。当我们的测试机提供多种通信选项时，Wi-Fi通信速度非常慢。可惜的是，显示效果也落后于我们的期望。远远达不到400 cd /m²的指定亮度。由于行业设备也将在室外使用，所以低亮度可能会是不购买此平板电脑的原因。
我们对该设备的性能表现也不满意:测试机通常显得被过度扩展。长时间的延迟和卡顿并不罕见。完全成熟的Windows系统对于Stylistic来说似乎太吃力了。这点也体现在温度的升高方面。在环境温度为23℃的空闲模式下，甚至可以观察到温度的升高。而容易于更换的电池和4小时以上的电池续航则是它的优势。
Stylistic V535 是一台这样的机器：适用于那些正在寻找拥有多种通信模式和开放性Windows操作系统的工业级平板电脑的用户。
无论如何，它的竞争对手都值得被考虑：松下 Toughpad 拥有一个更亮的哑光屏幕，以及安卓系统。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
- 07/24/2017 v6 (old)
Nino Ricchizzi
Price comparison
