微软Surface Laptop Go 2评测--旧硬件的紧凑型伴侣
通过Surface Laptop Go，微软从Surface笔记本电脑的世界中提供了一个紧凑的入门级设备，第二代产品接受了英特尔Tiger Lake 代的更快的Core i5处理器。然而，在笔记本电脑的基本设计上没有任何改变。新的Surface Laptop Go 2的价格正式从约600欧元（约602美元）开始，配备酷睿i5-1135G7，4GB内存和128GB固态硬盘，但这个型号目前只能从微软直接购买。
我们的测试设备是最昂贵的型号，建议零售价为869欧元（约872美元），提供8GB内存和256GB PCIe SSD。在这一点上，微软已经降低了价格，我们的模型现在可以从微软直接购买679欧元（约681美元）。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.3 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.1 kg | 16 mm | 12.40" | 1536x1024 | |
| 87.7 % v7 (old) | Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.2 kg | 16 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 91.1 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2020 | Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1, M1 7-Core GPU | 1.3 kg | 16.1 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P i5-1155G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 892 g | 17.8 mm | 12.50" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.6 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2020 | Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | 1.1 kg | 15.69 mm | 12.40" | 1536x1024 |
案件和设备
微软保持了Surface Laptop Go的外壳设计。 笔记本电脑没有做任何改变。它仍然是一个高质量的产品，可以轻松与明显更昂贵的竞争对手竞争。在这方面，与更昂贵的Surface机型也没有区别。金属外壳（铝制盖子和由铝和塑料制成的基本单元）的稳定性非常好，只是铰链可以变得稍微硬一些，因为它无法完全防止一些晃动。最大开启角度为135度。
我们的测试装置的颜色被称为冰蓝，看起来不错。另外，还有铂金色、鼠尾草色和砂岩色可供选择。我们喜欢这个带有锥形底座装置的紧凑型设备的视觉印象。只有显示屏边框（尤其是显示屏下面）看起来有点宽。但总体而言，Surface Laptop Go 2仍然是一个有吸引力的设备。然而，它仍然是一个很大的缺点，即终端用户几乎不可能（通过设计）进行任何维护。
在连接方面也没有变化，微软继续使用不实用的Surface Connector。另一方面，这也让你可以使用其他配件。你也可以通过USB-C为Surface Laptop Go 2充电，而且也可以通过这种方式连接外部显示器。虽然你必须在没有Thunderbolt或快速标准的情况下生活，但在日常使用中你可以从普通的USB-A连接中受益。 网络摄像头仍然是一个720p的传感器，其质量很难令人信服。
在WLAN模块方面，微软继续使用英特尔的AX201卡。它支持Wi-Fi-6网络，在与我们的华硕参考路由器的测试中达到非常高和稳定的传输速率。在我们的测试期间，我们没有遇到任何问题。蓝牙5.1也被支持。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (438 - 1715, n=71) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (467 - 1824, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (390 - 1734, n=76) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (772 - 1775, n=57, last 2 years) | |
输入设备--微软没有键盘照明装置
Surface Laptop Go 2的键盘提供了良好的打字体验，也允许你毫无问题地输入更长的文本。正如已经发生的情况一样，这里与更昂贵的Surface笔记本电脑没有明显的区别。然而，你会注意到缺乏键盘照明，考虑到原来的建议零售价，这显然是一个负面的观点。
ClickPad工作起来无懈可击，与许多其他笔记本电脑相比，点击的声音也不是太大。另外，你也可以使用电容式触摸屏进行输入，工作起来也没有任何问题。
显示屏 - Surface Laptop Go，3:2 IPS触摸屏
12.4英寸的3:2格式显示屏在生产力方面提供了一些优势，因为你有更多的垂直空间可以使用。然而，与16:9或16:10显示屏相比，那些喜欢看电影或电视剧的人不得不忍受顶部和底部一些较大的黑条。IPS面板的分辨率仍然是相对较低的1,536 x 1,024像素（148 DPI），但就图像清晰度而言，主观的图像印象还是可以。由于有亮度传感器，面板的亮度可以自动调整。
在我们用专业的CalMAN软件（X-Rite i1 Pro 2）进行的测量中，平均亮度为400cd/m²，比前代产品亮了约50cd/m²，尽管使用的是同样的面板。另一方面，黑值和由此产生的对比度变差，新的Surface Laptop Go 2几乎没有错过1000：1的对比度。在50%或更低的亮度水平下，我们测量到频率为9.7 kHz的PWM闪烁，但这不应该导致任何问题。响应时间不明显，IPS面板的可视角度也很好。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 406 cd/m²
Contrast: 990:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 LP125WX112403, IPS, 1536x1024, 12.4" | Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD Sharp SHP14AE, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P Chi Mei N125HCG-GQ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 LG Philips LP125WX112403, IPS, 1536x1024, 12.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 4% | 31% | 6% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.6 | 66.3 4% | 98.6 55% | 67.6 6% | 64.4 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 93.8 | 97.1 4% | 100 7% | 99.2 6% | 94.6 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65 | 67.1 3% | 85.9 32% | 69.4 7% | 65.7 1% |
| Response Times | -44% | 380% | -55% | 43% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39 ? | 55 ? -41% | 31 ? 21% | 60 ? -54% | 34.8 ? 11% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26.9 ? | 27 ? -0% | 26.1 ? 3% | 41.6 ? -55% | 29.2 ? -9% |
| PWM Frequency | 9700 ? | 996 ? -90% | 118000 ? 1116% | 21930 ? 126% | |
| Screen | -12% | 7% | 23% | 5% | |
| Brightness middle | 406 | 486 20% | 417 3% | 384.8 -5% | 354.3 -13% |
| Brightness | 401 | 446 11% | 395 -1% | 361 -10% | 353 -12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 77 -19% | 91 -4% | 90 -5% | 95 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.4 2% | 0.39 5% | 0.18 56% | 0.29 29% |
| Contrast | 990 | 1215 23% | 1069 8% | 2138 116% | 1222 23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 2.54 -41% | 1.12 38% | 1.54 14% | 1.41 22% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.3 | 4.34 -32% | 2.71 18% | 2.95 11% | 2.96 10% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.3 | 1.04 20% | 0.77 41% | 0.96 26% | 1.44 -11% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 2.34 -95% | 1.7 -42% | 1.2 -0% | 1.2 -0% |
| Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.28 96% | 2207 0% | 2.1 105% | 2.26 97% |
| CCT | 6662 98% | 6864 95% | 6870 95% | 6419 101% | 6600 98% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62 | 60.2 | |||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97 | 94.4 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -17% /
-15% | 139% /
87% | -9% /
8% | 16% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
通过我们自己的校准（可从上面的链接免费下载配置文件），偏差甚至可以进一步降低，尽管这并不是真正必要的。不幸的是，该面板甚至不能完全覆盖小型sRGB色彩空间。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 9700 Hz | ≤ 50 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 9700 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 9700 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在户外，你总是会与触摸屏的反光作斗争，你应该尽量避免背后有直接的光源。
性能 - IntelTiger Lake Core i5
Surface Laptop Go 2的所有型号都配备了 英特尔酷睿i5-1135G7.考虑到未来几年的可用性，我们不会推荐只有4GB内存的基本型号。工作内存是焊接的，不能升级。
测试条件
微软没有实施任何额外的性能配置文件。在下面的基准测试和测量中，我们使用了最佳性能的Windows模式。然而，特别是对于简单的任务，你也可以毫无顾虑地保持推荐预设，因为性能总体上处于相当低的水平，然后风扇会保持稍微安静的状态（但后面会有更多介绍）。
处理器 - 酷睿i5-1135G7
芯片酷睿i5-1135G7是英特尔老一代的四核芯片Tiger Lake ，所以它不再是真正的最新产品。此外，微软在TDP限制方面相当保守，因为该芯片被允许最多消耗25瓦，然后迅速平移到15瓦。相应地，处理器的性能也不是特别好。虽然与处理器相比有30%左右的优势，但Surface Laptop Go 2仍然不适合执行高要求的任务。但至少，在电池运行中，性能并没有进一步降低。关于更多的CPU基准测试，我们建议你到 我们的技术部分.
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry -1! | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD -2! | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 -2! | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (2786 - 6136, n=55) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (1062 - 1373, n=53) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (979 - 2382, n=62) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (375 - 527, n=62) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (431 - 941, n=65) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (141.4 - 205, n=61) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (499 - 1044, n=60) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (14745 - 24873, n=62) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3924 - 4921, n=62) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3475 - 5472, n=58) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (1147 - 1428, n=58) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3.57 - 7.6, n=57) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (44.2 - 62.9, n=60) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (0.619 - 0.727, n=59) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=57, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (4313 - 7952, n=45) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (19402 - 32283, n=45) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (1316 - 2172, n=45) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (39000 - 46951, n=45) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3497 - 4445, n=45) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (12569 - 19635, n=45) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (28988 - 67977, n=45) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (265 - 373, n=51) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (2226 - 4291, n=45) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 54881, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (9004 - 45366, n=45) | |
系统性能
在实践中，对性能的印象是不错的，由于采用了固态硬盘，在日常操作中没有出现加载时间较长或卡顿的问题。然而，我们的测试装置通常在基准测试中被竞争对手超越。但对于常规任务，如文本输入、上网和流媒体视频，其性能很容易满足。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (4026 - 4952, n=53) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (8149 - 9917, n=53) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (5040 - 6619, n=53) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (3548 - 5255, n=53) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1058 - 1293, n=11) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1148 - 1332, n=11) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (895 - 1263, n=11) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (923 - 1320, n=11) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4384 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (17443 - 63889, n=45) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (19716 - 63705, n=45) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 117897, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (18722 - 66778, n=45) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.4 - 187.8, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (68.3 - 107, n=51) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试中（上网冲浪、播放YouTube 4K视频、CPU负载），我们的测试装置在其当前BIOS版本中显示出一些轻微的限制，因此并不适合使用实时音频应用程序。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
微软使用了东芝的PCIe 3.0 x4固态硬盘，存储容量为256GB，其中只有198GB在首次启动后仍可供用户使用。传输速率是足够的。然而，用户无法更换SSD，因为机箱无法打开。你可以找到更多的固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
* ... smaller is better
Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
集成显卡是著名的Iris Xe Graphics G7，有80个EUs，它也继续用于目前的Alder Lake处理器中。只要你不对游戏性能有任何夸大的期望，iGPU在日常操作中也能取得非常好的成绩。它甚至可以毫无问题地处理高分辨率视频的播放，但由于显示屏分辨率低，即使是1080p的视频也不能以其原始分辨率播放。
但是，如果你仍然想玩一些游戏，我们推荐较老的游戏，这样在低分辨率和较低的细节设置下运行也是可以接受的（例如，DOTA 2）。此外，GPU也会保持稳定，因为Surface Laptop Go 2甚至可以在99.7%的情况下顺利通过苛刻的Time Spy 压力测试，没有任何问题。在电池运行中也没有性能限制。你可以在我们的技术部分找到更多的GPU基准测试 我们的技术部分.
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD -1! | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (968 - 16296, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (2246 - 6477, n=109) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5577 - 58319, n=30, last 2 years) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (6361 - 30894, n=95) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (832 - 11887, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1560 - 5305, n=111) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (999 - 4501, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P | |
| Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (561 - 1511, n=108) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4589 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 15140 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3226 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1131 points | |
Help | ||
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 43 | 35 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 77.1 | 70.4 | 41.1 | 36.1 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 30.7 | 14 | 8.19 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 19.5 | 25.4 | 26.4 |
排放和电源管理
噪声排放
在日常操作中，风扇经常保持非常安静，只是偶尔打开。然而，在更大的负载下，风扇的高频噪音绝对是引人注目的，在极端情况下，其水平几乎达到42 dB(A)。考虑到低性能水平，我们发现这个噪音水平总体上也太响了。在这里，你应该坚持使用推荐的电源模式，因为即使在压力测试中，我们也只能测到近37 dB(A)的最大噪音水平。在我们的测试中，我们没有注意到任何其他电子噪音（如线圈啸叫）。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24.3 / 24.3 / 24.3 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 33.1 / 41.8 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.3 dB(A) | ||
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe | Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1155G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 0% | -24% | -9% | |
| off / environment * | 24.3 | 26 -7% | 23.2 5% | 26.4 -9% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24.3 | 26 -7% | 30.7 -26% | 26.4 -9% |
| Idle Average * | 24.3 | 26 -7% | 30.8 -27% | 26.4 -9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 24.3 | 26 -7% | 30.8 -27% | 26.4 -9% |
| Load Average * | 33.1 | 33.5 -1% | 48.3 -46% | 36.9 -11% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 36.7 | 33.5 9% | 46.4 -26% | |
| Load Maximum * | 41.8 | 33.5 20% | 50.3 -20% | 44.2 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在空闲操作时，紧凑的Surface Laptop Go 2的温度就已经比预期的略高。但这并没有导致任何限制。这也适用于要求较高的情况，我们在底部测得的最高温度几乎达到47℃（117°F）。然而，由于热点在设备的中心，即使在那个时候，你仍然可以把笔记本放在你的腿上。
在压力测试期间，处理器的功耗很快就达到了15瓦的水平。大约一小时后，即使这个数值也进一步下降到14瓦。 此时，GPU时钟速度的强烈变化非常突出。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.7 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.3 °C / 90.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-4 °C / -7.2 F).
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1, Apple M1 7-Core GPU | VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P Intel Core i5-1155G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 6% | 5% | 17% | -6% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 41.4 | 43.5 -5% | 44 -6% | 30.4 27% | 42 -1% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 46.7 | 44.8 4% | 44 6% | 44.4 5% | 51 -9% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28.5 | 26.2 8% | 27 5% | 21.8 24% | 30 -5% |
| Idle Bottom * | 31.5 | 26.4 16% | 27 14% | 28 11% | 34.6 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
从主观上讲，这款扬声器产生了一个体面的声音，虽然缺乏一些声压。然而，高频是非常平衡的，这对声音的再现是有益的。
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
消耗功率
与前代产品相比，空闲运行时的功耗略有增加，这是由于最大亮度更高。在负载下，我们确定最大约为40瓦，因此达到了39瓦电源的极限。然而，由于消耗量随后不断下降，电源只是勉强够大。
| Off / Standby | 0.2 / 0.46 Watt |
| Idle | 3.8 / 7.8 / 8.6 Watt |
| Load |
29.8 / 39.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Power Consumption With External Monitor
电池寿命
在电池寿命方面，新的Surface Laptop Go 2被所有的对比设备甚至是它的前辈所超越。在150cd/m²亮度的WLAN测试中，我们确定的运行时间约为7.5小时，在全亮度下，仅有4.5小时。尽管电池容量相当低，只有41Wh，但考虑到低显示分辨率，结果还是有点低。
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 41 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 52 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1, M1 7-Core GPU, 49.9 Wh | VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P i5-1155G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 53 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 39 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | ||||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 453 | 554 22% | 960 112% | 803 77% | 481 6% | 727 ? 60% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - Surface Laptop Go 2显示了一些弱点
微软并没有真正进一步开发第二代Surface Laptop Go 2，而只是为其配备了一个稍微强大的Core i5处理器。然而，性能总体上仍然处于相当低的水平，但对于许多用户来说，绝对应该仍然能够满足日常任务。但价格仍然是个问题，因为原建议零售价近900欧元（约903美元）实在是太高了，甚至不能用高质量的机箱来证明，它根本不提供任何维护选项。另一方面，价格在发布后仅几周就已经下降，现在你必须为配备8GB内存和256GB固态硬盘的配置支付大约700欧元（约合702美元）。考虑到较低的显示分辨率，特别是缺乏键盘照明，这个价格对我们来说仍然略高。
即使有更强大的Tiger Lake 处理器，Surface Laptop Go 2的性能水平仍然很低。考虑到功能的缺乏，微软的建议零售价显然定得太高。在日常操作中，我们特别想念键盘照明。
除了高质量的外壳，我们喜欢良好的打字体验，也喜欢交货状态下体面的色彩还原。WLAN性能很好，在日常操作中的连接通常是足够的，即使你不得不在没有当前标准（如雷电）的情况下生活。如果价格还能再降一点，你可以开始考虑购买。Surface Laptop Go 2在700欧元（约702美元）的价格上其实没有任何竞争对手。虽然 戴尔XPS 13 9305采用旧的16:9显示屏，提供更多的设备功能，但它目前的价格至少是800欧元（约803美元）。目前，你几乎找不到Apple MacBook Air M1价格低于1000欧元（约合1004美元）。然而，这两个竞争对手都有一些优势，也是总体上更好的设备。
价格和可用性
Surface Laptop Go 2的价格略有不同，取决于供应商。从 570美元起，从微软直接购买，该设备是最实惠的，你也可以从亚马逊购买，起价为600美元，例如。
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
- 08/18/2022 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Price comparison
