微软 Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB) 变形本简短评测
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 (Surface Pro Series)
Processor
Intel Core m3-7Y30 2 x 1 - 2.6 GHz, Kaby Lake
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB
, DDR3, dual-channel, onboard
Display
12.30 inch 3:2, 2736 x 1826 pixel 267 PPI, 10 finger multitouch, native pen support, LG Display LP123WQ112604, IPS, glossy: yes, detachable screen
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH
Storage
Samsung PM971 KUS020203M, 128 GB
, 80 GB free
Weight
1.072 kg, Power Supply: 154 g
Price
879 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG Display LP123WQ112604 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 461 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 444.1 cd/m² Minimum: 4.3 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 461 cd/m²
Contrast: 1356:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.08 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 3.03
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1826, 12.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3" | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB AUO B120YAN01 / AUO106F, , 2880x1920, 12" | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 LG Philips, , 1920x1280, 12.1" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 LSN120QL01L01, , 2160x1440, 12" | Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N Digital Flat Panel (NoName), , 2160x1440, 12.1" | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Panasonic VVX12T041N00, , 2160x1440, 12" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -16% | -0% | -28% | -43% | -31% | 81% | -44% | |
| Brightness middle | 461 | 482 5% | 417 -10% | 406 -12% | 322 -30% | 388.1 -16% | 363 -21% | 345 -25% |
| Brightness | 444 | 466 5% | 401 -10% | 396 -11% | 319 -28% | 344 -23% | 378 -15% | 328 -26% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 92 -1% | 88 -5% | 88 -5% | 97 4% | 78 -16% | 90 -3% | 91 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.395 -16% | 0.29 15% | 0.3 12% | 0.42 -24% | 0.39 -15% | 0.03 91% | 0.38 -12% |
| Contrast | 1356 | 1220 -10% | 1438 6% | 1353 0% | 767 -43% | 995 -27% | 12100 792% | 908 -33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.43 | 4 -17% | 3.63 -6% | 5.28 -54% | 6.02 -76% | 4.6 -34% | 4.8 -40% | 8.4 -145% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.55 | 7.2 -30% | 6.74 -21% | 9.83 -77% | 10.06 -81% | 9.1 -64% | 6.91 -25% | 11.9 -114% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.08 | 5.7 -85% | 2.18 29% | 6.71 -118% | 6.29 -104% | 6.1 -98% | 5.04 -64% | 4.3 -40% |
| Gamma | 3.03 73% | 2.28 96% | 3.09 71% | 2.29 96% | 2.4 92% | 2.07 106% | 2.57 86% | 2.63 84% |
| CCT | 7014 93% | 7950 82% | 6767 96% | 6532 100% | 7712 84% | 7104 91% | 7255 90% | 7368 88% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 64 | 62 -3% | 63 -2% | 59 -8% | 47.8 -25% | 59 -8% | 73 14% | 62 -3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | 96 -3% | 99 0% | 91 -8% | 73.2 -26% | 91 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2896 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3754 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3586 points | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 2509 points | |
Help | ||
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 HD Graphics 615, m3-7Y30, Samsung PM971 KUS020203M | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128 | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 78% | 38% | 193% | -2% | 94% | -33% | -14% | |
| Read Seq | 691 | 1308 89% | 723 5% | 2408 248% | 501 -27% | 1739 152% | 419.8 -39% | 518 -25% |
| Write Seq | 670 | 961 43% | 853 27% | 1702 154% | 297.2 -56% | 1259 88% | 162.9 -76% | 199.9 -70% |
| Read 512 | 261.1 | 227.5 -13% | 225 -14% | 1301 398% | 351.7 35% | 698 167% | 298.7 14% | 374.9 44% |
| Write 512 | 241 | 792 229% | 445 85% | 1288 434% | 295.7 23% | 869 261% | 160.9 -33% | 201 -17% |
| Read 4k | 40.11 | 53.6 34% | 46 15% | 53.6 34% | 28.31 -29% | 52.3 30% | 27.49 -31% | 29.3 -27% |
| Write 4k | 98.8 | 136.3 38% | 125 27% | 162.2 64% | 90.3 -9% | 120 21% | 48.44 -51% | 76.8 -22% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 301.8 | 485.6 61% | 423 40% | 504 67% | 285 -6% | 247.9 -18% | 236.2 -22% | 272 -10% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 172 | 421.5 145% | 373 117% | 420.8 145% | 268.4 56% | 259 51% | 135 -22% | 197.1 15% |
Samsung PM971 KUS020203M
Sequential Read:
691 MB/s
Sequential Write:
670 MB/s
512K Read:
261.1 MB/s
512K Write:
241 MB/s
4K Read:
40.11 MB/s
4K Write:
98.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
301.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
172 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1385 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 45269 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4794 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 699 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 310 points | |
Help | ||
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 42.6 | 25.2 | 20.8 | 4.6 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 31.2 | 22.7 | 18.9 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 14.2 | 9.4 |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 HD Graphics 615, m3-7Y30, Samsung PM971 KUS020203M | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128 | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 1% | 6% | -3% | 8% | -3% | -8% | -2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 40.5 | 39.2 3% | 42 -4% | 42 -4% | 39 4% | 47.2 -17% | 42.5 -5% | 46.7 -15% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 40.6 | 40.3 1% | 42 -3% | 43.6 -7% | 41.2 -1% | 49.8 -23% | 44.6 -10% | 51 -26% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 37.8 | 37 2% | 31 18% | 32.8 13% | 29.5 22% | 30.8 19% | 36.6 3% | 29.5 22% |
| Idle Bottom * | 32 | 32.3 -1% | 28 12% | 36.4 -14% | 29.8 7% | 29.2 9% | 38.6 -21% | 28.6 11% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40.5 °C / 104.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-12.4 °C / -22.3 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40.5 °C / 104.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-12.4 °C / -22.3 F).
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.33 / 0.7 Watt |
| Idle |  3.1 / 8.8 / 9.8 Watt |
| Load |
22.7 / 23.6 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 m3-7Y30, HD Graphics 615, Samsung PM971 KUS020203M, IPS, 2736x1826, 12.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 i7-7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 2880x1920, 12" | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Liteon L8H-256V2G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.1" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 2160x1440, 12" | Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Lite-On CV1-8B128, sAMOLED, 2160x1440, 12.1" | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2, IPS, 2160x1440, 12" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -2% | -40% | -7% | -4% | 4% | 17% | -38% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.1 | 3.6 -16% | 4.2 -35% | 3.5 -13% | 3.7 -19% | 5 -61% | 3.4 -10% | 7.3 -135% |
| Idle Average * | 8.8 | 8.1 8% | 10.1 -15% | 7.2 18% | 6.8 23% | 6.3 28% | 8 9% | 10 -14% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.8 | 8.7 11% | 14 -43% | 7.9 19% | 7.6 22% | 7.8 20% | 9 8% | 10.15 -4% |
| Load Average * | 22.7 | 25.5 -12% | 37.4 -65% | 29.6 -30% | 22.5 1% | 19.5 14% | 12 47% | 25.2 -11% |
| Load Maximum * | 23.6 | 23.5 -0% | 34 -44% | 30.8 -31% | 34.5 -46% | 19.6 17% | 16.1 32% | 29.3 -24% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.1 |
* ... smaller is better
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 m3-7Y30, HD Graphics 615, 45 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 i7-7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 45 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 37 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 37 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 39.5 Wh | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 2% | -26% | -39% | -32% | -32% | -9% | -39% | |
| Reader / Idle | 933 | 1054 13% | 713 -24% | 732 -22% | 662 -29% | 1110 19% | 640 -31% | |
| H.264 | 668 | 614 -8% | 432 -35% | 515 -23% | 468 -30% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 682 | 744 9% | 489 -28% | 345 -49% | 443 -35% | 441 -35% | 525 -23% | 321 -53% |
| Load | 198 | 168 -15% | 112 -43% | 111 -44% | 130 -34% | 134 -32% | 112 -43% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 115 |
Pros
+ 优雅的高品质材料
+ 非常好的构建
+ 绝对无声
+ 重量轻
+ 电池寿命长
+ 非常好的屏幕（视角稳定，高色彩空间覆盖）
+ 吸引人的定价
+ 稳定的系统性能
+ 优秀的相机模块与Windows Hello
Cons
- 非常保守的热限（62°C）
- 高度反光的屏幕
- 没有USB Type-C
- 没有升级选项
- 非常昂贵的配件
- 没有其他硬件组合的可能
基于英特尔的酷睿m3 Y7Y30的微软Surface Pro 2017，各方面都是合适的，安装的硬件非常平衡。高效的组件可以大大改善已经很长的电池续航。但是，这是以牺牲计算能力为代价的。英特尔酷睿m3 7Y30足以满足日常工作，但不能与更快的i5和i7 Surface Pro 2017变形本竞争。然而，系统性能评价为良好，而与更快的竞品的距离通常只有几个百分点。
微软Surface Pro 2017入门级配置机，主要靠其价格吸引用户。唯一不足是， 制造商在此基础上不提供其他硬件配置。
极好的屏幕给我们留下了深刻的印象。其高的色彩空间覆盖和高屏幕分辨率，肯定适合准专业领域。然而，其面板必须接受批评，因为它高度反光的表面显然限制了其户外适应性。最大问题仍然是其有限的配置选项。128 GB的固态硬盘存储空间很快就会被用满，无法更换存储设备。此外，为什么外观保持先进，但连接性没有。2017，该机至少应该配备一个支持雷电的USB Type-C端口。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3
- 08/07/2017 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade
Convertible - Weighted Average
Price comparison
