对抗: 微软 Surface Pro 4 酷睿 i7 vs. Surface Pro 4 酷睿 i5 vs. Surface Pro 4 酷睿 m3
Microsoft CQ9-00003 (Surface Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-6650U 2 x 2.2 - 3.4 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
Intel Iris Graphics 540
Memory
8 GB
, 双通道 1866 MHz
Display
12.30 inch 3:2, 2736 x 1824 pixel, 10点触控, Samsung 123YL01-001 ID: SDC3853, IPS, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Storage
Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe, 256 GB
, 87 GB free
Weight
1.092 kg, Power Supply: 204 g
Price
1249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Samsung 123YL01-001 ID: SDC3853 tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Maximum: 474.6 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 433.2 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 436.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 1340:1 (Black: 0.326 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.82 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.44 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 12.3", 2736x1824 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 12.3", 2736x1824 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 12.3", 2736x1824 | Microsoft Surface Pro 3 12", 2160x1440 | Microsoft Surface 3 10.8", 1920x1280 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | 0% | -6% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.9 | 65 -3% | 67.5 1% | 63.6 -5% | 68.8 3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.5 | 96.5 -1% | 96.6 -1% | 88.8 -9% | 98.7 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.6 | 67 -2% | 69 1% | 65.6 -4% | 70.4 3% |
| Response Times | -28% | -27% | |||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 48.4 ? | 46 ? 5% | 46 ? 5% | ||
| Response Time Black / White * | 35.6 ? | 31.2 ? 12% | 31 ? 13% | ||
| PWM Frequency | 10420 | 50 ? -100% | 50 ? -100% | ||
| Screen | -31% | -28% | -72% | -21% | |
| Brightness middle | 436.7 | 413 -5% | 389.2 -11% | 355.3 -19% | 399 -9% |
| Brightness | 433 | 396 -9% | 392 -9% | 338 -22% | 380 -12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 87 0% | 92 6% | 91 5% | 90 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.326 | 0.36 -10% | 0.27 17% | 0.33 -1% | 0.49 -50% |
| Contrast | 1340 | 1147 -14% | 1441 8% | 1077 -20% | 814 -39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.82 | 3.09 -70% | 3.61 -98% | 4.72 -159% | 1.66 9% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.44 | 3.92 -172% | 3.8 -164% | 6.53 -353% | 2.75 -91% |
| Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.3 96% | 2.16 102% | 2.17 101% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 6560 99% | 7333 89% | 5969 109% | 6707 97% | 6358 102% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62.3 | 61 -2% | 63 1% | 59.37 -5% | 64.4 3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.5 | 97 -1% | 97 -1% | 98.8 1% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.24 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -20% /
-25% | -18% /
-22% | -39% /
-54% | -10% /
-15% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 48.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | Microsoft Surface Pro 3 | Microsoft Surface 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -30% | -36% | -16% | -84% | |
| Write 4k QD32 | 292.3 | 153.6 -47% | 149.2 -49% | 294.4 1% | 11.2 -96% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 393.1 | 368.3 -6% | 243.7 -38% | 345 -12% | 27.94 -93% |
| Write 4k | 106.3 | 101.5 -5% | 68 -36% | 76.2 -28% | 9.52 -91% |
| Read 4k | 40.75 | 28.51 -30% | 30.14 -26% | 20.81 -49% | 12.64 -69% |
| Write 512 | 304.3 | 154.2 -49% | 158.2 -48% | 324.6 7% | 39.9 -87% |
| Read 512 | 396.7 | 266.3 -33% | 313.1 -21% | 357.8 -10% | 133.7 -66% |
| Write Seq | 304 | 154.2 -49% | 158.2 -48% | 324 7% | 47.99 -84% |
| Read Seq | 834 | 666 -20% | 663 -21% | 501 -40% | 149.3 -82% |
| AS SSD | -44% | -44% | -49% | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 273.9 | 105.6 -61% | 101.3 -63% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 209.8 | 63.5 -70% | 65.8 -69% | ||
| Copy ISO MB/s | 409.9 | 121.9 -70% | 120.9 -71% | ||
| Score Total | 2518 | 1190 -53% | 1759 -30% | 965 -62% | |
| Score Write | 385 | 239 -38% | 189 -51% | 319 -17% | |
| Score Read | 1445 | 645 -55% | 1060 -27% | 430 -70% | |
| Access Time Write * | 0.036 | 0.037 -3% | 0.043 -19% | 0.075 -108% | |
| Access Time Read * | 0.047 | 0.079 -68% | 0.083 -77% | 0.087 -85% | |
| 4K-64 Write | 268.7 | 138.5 -48% | 112 -58% | 215 -20% | |
| 4K-64 Read | 1280 | 528 -59% | 944 -26% | 358.3 -72% | |
| 4K Write | 89.2 | 86.5 -3% | 63.2 -29% | 73.7 -17% | |
| 4K Read | 33.47 | 34.24 2% | 31.39 -6% | 22 -34% | |
| Seq Write | 274.8 | 142.5 -48% | 138.1 -50% | 303 10% | |
| Seq Read | 1312 | 832 -37% | 845 -36% | 493.7 -62% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -37% /
-39% | -40% /
-41% | -33% /
-35% | -84% /
-84% |
* ... smaller is better
| ComputeMark v2.1 - 1024x600 Normal, Score (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2624 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 73990 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7822 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1395 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 598 points | |
Help | ||
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | Microsoft Surface Pro 3 | Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -6% | -1% | -0% | ||
| Idle Minimum * | 28.4 | 31.5 -11% | 30.1 -6% | 29.5 -4% | |
| Idle Average * | 28.6 | 31.5 -10% | 30.2 -6% | 29.6 -3% | |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.7 | 31.5 -10% | 30.4 -6% | 29.7 -3% | |
| Load Average * | 40.8 | 40.5 1% | 31.9 22% | 37.5 8% | |
| Load Maximum * | 41.4 | 40.7 2% | 44.4 -7% | 40.9 1% |
* ... smaller is better
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 28.4 / 28.6 / 28.7 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 40.8 / 41.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer (15 cm distance) | ||
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.8 °C / 103.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-11.8 °C / -21.2 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.8 °C / 103.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-11.8 °C / -21.2 F).
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 38 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 38 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 38 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 3 42 Wh | Microsoft Surface 3 28 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 41% | 54% | 63% | 65% | |
| Reader / Idle | 654 | 899 37% | 791 21% | 1096 68% | 828 27% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 293 | 427 46% | 488 67% | 437 49% | |
| Load | 79 | 111 41% | 138 75% | 124 57% | 173 119% |
| WiFi | 504 | 425 |
Pros
+ 无明显降频问题
+ 较强的显卡性能
+ 准确的屏幕
+ 更快的固态硬盘速度
Cons
- 相比酷睿i5版本性能仅仅略有提高
- 更短的电池续航
- 主动式散热系统
- 屏幕略微漏光
Surface Pro 4 酷睿i7机型相比酷睿i5机型在处理器性能上仅仅略微领先。对于文字处理和上网浏览，它们的性能区别将会很难察觉。
另一方面，由于Iris 540相比HD 520的优势，酷睿i7配置将会对更需要显卡性能的用户更有吸引力。它的较高图形性能将可以在低分辨率下流畅运行最新游戏，同时也将会对Photoshop以及视频剪辑有所帮助。出厂前已经校对过的屏幕和相比酷睿i5与酷睿m3机型更快的256 GB固态硬盘，让酷睿i7机型不仅仅是简单的处理器升级。
更准确的屏幕，更快的固态硬盘，和相比售价更低机型更好的散热，都对需要强劲性能的用户必不可少；同时这也意味着它对只需要轻量办公以及PowerPoint的用户来说用处不大。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7
- 04/18/2016 v5.1 (old)
Allen Ngo
Convertible - Weighted Average
Price comparison
