宏碁 Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620)
Brand: Acer

设计优良。宏基的这台笔记本电脑外观设计具有吸引力，而且价格合理。我们的评测样机也充分体现了这点。除了外观上的优点，该机内部配置也很优秀。Swift 3提供了很多功能。这是一个平衡性很强的电脑。性能也不错。

Mike Wobker, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Manuel Masiero (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 11/04/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) (Swift 3 SF314 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 620

Memory

8 GB

Display

14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, Chi Mei CMN14C9, IPS, glossy: yes

Storage

Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, 256 GB

, 180 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC892 @ Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: combo audio jack, Card Reader: SD, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 4.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 17.95 x 338 x 234

Battery

48 Wh, 3220 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 10 h

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.62 kg, Power Supply: 158 g

Price

860 Euro

Links

Acer homepage
Acer notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Acer TravelMate X349-G2 HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) Fujitsu LifeBook U747 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD	74.9 MB/s +224%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747	72.6 MB/s +214%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE	71.4 MB/s +209%
Acer TravelMate X349-G2	23.6 MB/s +2%
Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620)	23.1 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE	87.5 MB/s +215%
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD	83.7 MB/s +201%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747	83.3 MB/s +200%
Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620)	27.8 MB/s
Acer TravelMate X349-G2	25.8 MB/s -7%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	674 MBit/s +34%
Acer TravelMate X349-G2 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	672 MBit/s +33%
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)	509 MBit/s +1%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	509 MBit/s +1%
Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	504 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	655 MBit/s +19%
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)	579 MBit/s +5%
Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	552 MBit/s
Acer TravelMate X349-G2 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	542 MBit/s -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	517 MBit/s -6%


259 cd/m²	274 cd/m²	264 cd/m²
259 cd/m²	281 cd/m²	265 cd/m²
229 cd/m²	255 cd/m²	242 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Chi Mei CMN14C9 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 281 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 258.7 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 281 cd/m²
Contrast: 624:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.19 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.55 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
61% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.34% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.96% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) Chi Mei CMN14C9, , 1920x1080, 14"	HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD AUO123D, , 1920x1080, 14"	Acer TravelMate X349-G2 ChiMei CN14C9, , 1920x1080, 14"	Fujitsu LifeBook U747 LG LP140WF3, , 1920x1080, 14"	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE B140HAN03_1, , 1920x1080, 14"
Display		34%	2%	48%	47%
Display P3 Coverage	40.96	55.8 36%	41.81 2%	66.1 61%	61.6 50%
sRGB Coverage	61.4	80.7 31%	62.3 1%	84.8 38%	87.6 43%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	42.34	57.7 36%	43.26 2%	62 46%	62.6 48%
Response Times		14%	4129%	17%	-11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	43 ?(24, 19)	39 ?(20, 19, Plateau) 9%	43 ?(25, 18) -0%	36 ?(16.4, 19.6) 16%	48 ?(22, 26) -12%
Response Time Black / White *	28 ?(15, 13)	23 ?(6, 17, Plateau) 18%	32 ?(19, 13) -14%	23.2 ?(12.4, 10.8) 17%	30.4 ?(18.8, 11.6) -9%
PWM Frequency	200 ?(20)		25000 ?(20) 12400%
Screen		-49%	-9%	14%	34%
Brightness middle	281	346 23%	271 -4%	291 4%	278 -1%
Brightness	259	317 22%	253 -2%	296 14%	271 5%
Brightness Distribution	81	86 6%	83 2%	84 4%	91 12%
Black Level *	0.45	0.86 -91%	0.35 22%	0.32 29%	0.16 64%
Contrast	624	402 -36%	774 24%	909 46%	1738 179%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.19	8.64 -106%	5.05 -21%	4.3 -3%	4.5 -7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.64	13.58 -28%	11.74 -10%	7.5 30%	8.4 21%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.55	11.24 -341%	4.3 -69%	4.3 -69%	3.2 -25%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.62 ^84%	2.44 ^90%	2.31 ^95%	2.02 ^109%
CCT	6555 ^99%	12530 ^52%	6726 ^97%	6529 ^100%	7042 ^92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	39	52 33%	42 8%	55.46 42%	57 46%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	61	80 31%	39 -36%	84.77 39%	87.5 43%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-0% / -24%	1374% / 769%	26% / 21%	23% / 30%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 24 ms rise
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

200 Hz

≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 Intel Core i5-7200U	130 Points +2%
Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) Intel Core i5-7200U	128 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE Intel Core i5-7200U	126 Points -2%
Acer TravelMate X349-G2 Intel Core i5-7200U	124 Points -3%
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD Intel Core i5-7200U	119 Points -7%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 Intel Core i5-7200U	331 Points +1%
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD Intel Core i5-7200U	329 Points +1%
Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) Intel Core i5-7200U	327 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE Intel Core i5-7200U	321 Points -2%
Acer TravelMate X349-G2 Intel Core i5-7200U	318 Points -3%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

128 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

327 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

45.47 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.7 %

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK	3824 Points +5%
Acer TravelMate X349-G2 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7	3668 Points +1%
Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	3636 Points
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	3506 Points -4%
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3486 Points -4%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3636 points
Help

	Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	Acer TravelMate X349-G2 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7	Fujitsu LifeBook U747 Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		63%	19%	-18%	11%
Write 4k QD32	251	410.2 63%	210.8 -16%	249.7 -1%	241.2 -4%
Read 4k QD32	290.1	513 77%	373.7 29%	399.1 38%	477.3 65%
Write 4k	108.3	157.1 45%	133.4 23%	87.8 -19%	128.5 19%
Read 4k	31.6	61.4 94%	34.93 11%	35.73 13%	34.63 10%
Write 512	564	804 43%	586 4%	283.4 -50%	311 -45%
Read 512	800	922 15%	1134 42%	396.7 -50%	972 22%
Write Seq	606	1263 108%	582 -4%	497.8 -18%	648 7%
Read Seq	1137	1819 60%	1818 60%	504 -56%	1277 12%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7

Sequential Read: 1137 MB/s

Sequential Write: 606 MB/s

512K Read: 800 MB/s

512K Write: 564 MB/s

4K Read: 31.6 MB/s

4K Write: 108.3 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 290.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 251 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1555 Points +3%
Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1509 Points
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1413 Points -6%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1409 Points -7%

3DMark 11 Performance		1662 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	48.61	30.87	25.2	7.83

Noise Level

Idle		30.6 / 30.6 / 31.1 dB(A)
Load		34 / 31.45 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.6 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


39.6 °C	38.6 °C	33.4 °C
36.1 °C	35.1 °C	28 °C
29.5 °C	27 °C	26.6 °C

Maximum: 39.6 °C
Average: 32.7 °C


30.4 °C	38.2 °C	40.4 °C
27.5 °C	33.5 °C	33.9 °C
26.5 °C	27.8 °C	29.9 °C

Maximum: 40.4 °C
Average: 32 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45.3 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.7 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.5 °C / 85.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F).

Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.28 / 0.35 Watt
Idle	3.7 / 6.1 / 8.8 Watt
Load	30.6 / 29.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh	653 min
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh	571 min -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh	547 min -16%
Acer TravelMate X349-G2 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48.9 Wh	456 min -30%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 50 Wh	430 min -34%

Battery Runtime

WiFi Surfing		10h 53min
WiFi Websurfing		10h 53min

Pros

+ 设计极富吸引力

+ 优秀的续航时间

+ 轻便

Cons

- 反光的屏幕

- 没有维护性

- 触控板性能不稳定

Verdict

Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620). Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

Swift 3是一台适合日常使用的笔记本电脑。设计富有吸引力，内部配置也物有所值。由我们的测试结果可以得知，我们的测试机甚至可以和价格更高的竞品抗衡。实际性能也和同配置的机型相当。可以说宏碁的这台机子，性价比很高。

Swift3适合那些需要便携设备的设计行业的用户使用。然而，它那块很容易反光的屏幕还是不适合户外使用。

维护性的缺失，使得Swift 3略显失色。非专业的用户难以在不破坏它的情况下打开机身。因此，风扇不能自己清灰，内存条也难以更换。用户必须在移动性和反光屏幕之间做出权衡。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) - 2017-10-07 10/07/2017 v6 ^(old)
Mike Wobker

Chassis

82 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard

76%

Pointing Device

58%

Connectivity

49 / 80 → 61%

Weight

68 / 35-78 → 76%

Battery

97%

Display

80%

Games Performance

56 / 68 → 82%

Application Performance

86 / 87 → 99%

Temperature

94 / 91 → 100%

Noise

93%

Camera

40 / 85 → 46%

Average

73%

81%

Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 宏碁 Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Mike Wobker, 2017-11- 4 (Update: 2017-11- 4)