宏碁 Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV 笔记本简短评测

Name: Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV
Brand: Acer

纤薄的伴侣。 宏碁将大多数轻薄本所需要的特性结合起来，并将成品称为Swift 5。精致而令人熟悉的设计使人印象深刻。

Nino Ricchizzi, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Delta Zhang), Published 02/12/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Laptop / Notebook Windows Kaby Lake

Test device courtesy of Acer Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV (Swift 5 SF514 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake, 2 cores, TDP 15W

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 620, Core: 1000 MHz, 21.20.16.4494

Memory

8 GB

, DDR3-RAM, Dual-Channel, not expandable

Display

14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, AU Optronics B140HAN3.2, IPS, glossy: yes

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Storage

SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, 256 GB

, M.2 SSD SATA 3.1

Soundcard

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Audio combo, Card Reader: SD

Networking

Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 14.6 x 327 x 228

Battery

53.9 Wh Lithium-Ion, 3 cells

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.353 kg, Power Supply: 260 g

Price

900 Euro

Links

Acer homepage
Acer notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

We would like to see much better cameras.

The overall build quality is good apart from small things.

Size Comparison

Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T DIN A4 ❌

Left side: USB 3.0, audio combo, SD-card reader

Right side: USB 3.0 Type-C, USB 3.0 Type-A, HDMI-out, AC power

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5	107.8 MB/s +58%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE	77.8 MB/s +14%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV	68.1 MB/s
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234	16.5 MB/s -76%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5	250.6 MB/s +185%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV	88 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE	84.6 MB/s -4%
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234	17.7 MB/s -80%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (jseb)	677 MBit/s +5%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (jseb)	643 MBit/s
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)	385 MBit/s -40%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	56.1 MBit/s -91%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (jseb)	659 MBit/s
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (jseb)	528 MBit/s -20%
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)	438 MBit/s -34%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	54.8 MBit/s -92%


332 cd/m²	349 cd/m²	314 cd/m²
332 cd/m²	393 cd/m²	312 cd/m²
346 cd/m²	352 cd/m²	314 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AU Optronics B140HAN3.2 tested with i1 Pro

Maximum: 393 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 338.2 cd/m² Minimum: 21.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 79 %
Center on Battery: 393 cd/m²
Contrast: 1355:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.17 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
51% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27

Download ICC File (26.6)

	Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV AU Optronics B140HAN3.2, , 1920x1080, 14"	Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE LG Philips LP133WF2-SPL1, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 LG Philips LP133QD1-SPA3, , 3200x1800, 13.3"	Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T AUO B125HAN03.0 AUO306D, , 1920x1080, 12.5"
Display		-38%	-1%	-21%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	62.8	38.61 -39%	64.6 3%	48.94 -22%	64.7 3%
sRGB Coverage	91.3	57.9 -37%	87.3 -4%	73.3 -20%	89.6 -2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	64.3	39.92 -38%	63.8 -1%	50.5 -21%	65.4 2%
Response Times		19%	22%	9%	24%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	51 ?(20, 31)	39 ?(14, 25) 24%	34 ?(15, 19) 33%	32.8 ?(16, 16.8) 36%	30 ?(13, 17) 41%
Response Time Black / White *	28 ?(7, 21)	24 ?(5, 19) 14%	25 ?(8, 17) 11%	33.2 ?(10.8, 22.4) -19%	26 ?(6, 20) 7%
PWM Frequency		250 ?(80)			50 ?(10)
Screen		-10%	-10%	4%	1%
Brightness middle	393	259 -34%	295 -25%	351.2 -11%	355 -10%
Brightness	338	253 -25%	283 -16%	325 -4%	341 1%
Brightness Distribution	79	82 4%	88 11%	89 13%	87 10%
Black Level *	0.29	0.33 -14%	0.65 -124%	0.195 33%	0.3 -3%
Contrast	1355	785 -42%	454 -66%	1801 33%	1183 -13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.17	5.12 17%	4 35%	7.4 -20%	5.97 3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.21	10.12 10%	7.26 35%	9.08 19%	10.55 6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.8	3.8 44%	3.38 50%	6.71 1%	6.45 5%
Gamma	2.27 ^97%	2.39 ^92%	2.38 ^92%	2.74 ^80%	2.45 ^90%
CCT	6873 ^95%	7405 ^88%	6520 ^100%	7222 ^90%	7694 ^84%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	51	37 -27%	57 12%	50.48 -1%	58 14%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	91	58 -36%	85 -7%	73.31 -19%	89 -2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-10% / -12%	4% / -4%	-3% / -0%	9% / 4%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20 ms rise
51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 31 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 Intel Core i7-7500U	144 Points +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE Intel Core i7-7500U	141 Points +10%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV Intel Core i5-7200U	128 Points
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T Intel Core i5-7200U	124 Points -3%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel Core i5-7200U	124 Points -3%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 Intel Core i7-7500U	344 Points +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE Intel Core i7-7500U	333 Points +4%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV Intel Core i5-7200U	320 Points
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel Core i5-7200U	318 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T Intel Core i5-7200U	314 Points -2%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

128 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

320 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

43.28 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.7 %

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	3574 Points +6%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	3535 Points +5%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	3370 Points
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Phison S10C-512G	3085 Points -8%
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	2880 Points -15%

PCMark 7 Score		5367 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3370 points
Help

... in comparison

	Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 Phison S10C-512G	Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		15%	25%	87%	15%
Read Seq	517	494.5 -4%	522 1%	1233 138%	508 -2%
Write Seq	258.1	494.1 91%	384.4 49%	733 184%	454.4 76%
Read 512	355	383.9 8%	412 16%	1036 192%	335.5 -5%
Write 512	258.5	155.5 -40%	395.5 53%	439.9 70%	413.9 60%
Read 4k	29.65	36.08 22%	34.07 15%	29.31 -1%	28.13 -5%
Write 4k	77.3	96.4 25%	100.9 31%	116.9 51%	69.8 -10%
Read 4k QD32	277.1	403.3 46%	316.3 14%	479.2 73%	245.7 -11%
Write 4k QD32	242.5	176.4 -27%	286.4 18%	218.3 -10%	277.6 14%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A

Sequential Read: 517 MB/s

Sequential Write: 258.1 MB/s

512K Read: 355 MB/s

512K Write: 258.5 MB/s

4K Read: 29.65 MB/s

4K Write: 77.3 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 277.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 242.5 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1550 Points +1%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1545 Points +1%
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	1543 Points +1%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1529 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	1474 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1403 Points -8%
HP 15-ay116ng Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1394 Points -9%

3DMark - 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	8219 Points
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	8177 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	8171 Points -1%
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	7211 Points -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	7174 Points -13%
HP 15-ay116ng Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	6876 Points -16%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	6670 Points -19%

3DMark 11 Performance		1684 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		6378 points
Help

... in comparison

BioShock Infinite
1366x768 Medium Preset
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	30.9 fps
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Phison S10C-512G	28.9 fps -6%
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	27.2 fps -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	25.3 fps -18%
1366x768 High Preset
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	25.6 fps
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Phison S10C-512G	23.7 fps -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	21.3 fps -17%
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	20.7 fps -19%

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	51	30.9	25.6	8.2
The Witcher 3 (2015)	12.1	8.4	4.2
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	20.23	11.42	6.42	4.8

Noise Level

Idle		30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB(A)
Load		32.25 / 32.6 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


30.6 °C	39.4 °C	27.8 °C
26.7 °C	33.5 °C	31.5 °C
26.3 °C	27.1 °C	27.3 °C

Maximum: 39.4 °C
Average: 30 °C


40 °C	39.9 °C	26.8 °C
32 °C	31.1 °C	27.1 °C
27.8 °C	28 °C	26.6 °C

Maximum: 40 °C
Average: 31 °C

Power Supply (max.) 50.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.3 °C / 81.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1 °C / 1.8 F).

Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.19 / 0.28 Watt
Idle	3.6 / 7 / 9.3 Watt
Load	37 / 32.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Phison S10C-512G, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3"	Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5"
Power Consumption		16%	-11%	24%	10%
Idle Minimum *	3.6	3.3 8%	4.2 -17%	4.1 -14%	3.3 8%
Idle Average *	7	5.8 17%	9 -29%	4.2 40%	6.2 11%
Idle Maximum *	9.3	7.4 20%	10.6 -14%	5.1 45%	10.4 -12%
Load Average *	37	29.2 21%	34 8%	22.1 40%	28 24%
Load Maximum *	32.6	28.6 12%	33 -1%	29.4 10%	25.7 21%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		16h 54min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 9min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		9h 15min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 40min

	Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 53.9 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 35 Wh	Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh	Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh	Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh
Battery Runtime		-24%	-35%	36%	-18%
Reader / Idle	1014	650 -36%	722 -29%	1295 28%	844 -17%
H.264	555	330 -41%	243 -56%		383 -31%
WiFi v1.3	549	340 -38%	278 -49%	677 23%	397 -28%
Load	100	118 18%	96 -4%	157 57%	105 5%

Pros

+ design

+ swipe-style fingerprint scanner

+ no throttling under load

+ heat development

+ quiet operation

+ battery runtime

Cons

- keyboard attracts fingerprints

- keyboard bounces a bit

- slightly uneven brightness distribution

- poor webcam

- speakers

In review: Acer Swift 5. Test model courtesy of Acer Germany.

成功的组合：宏碁将纤薄的机身和足够的性能结合起来，同时也没有忘记重要的散热。我们喜欢纤薄的外壳设计，特别是超窄边框。这还不是全部：宏碁加入了坚固的金属元素并用出色的制造工艺使我们满意，只有键盘模块不是那么好。键程相对偏短，但我们对它稳定的压力触发点及打字时的低噪音感到满意。镜面IPS屏幕有着全高清的分辨率，并在亮度及对比度测试中表现出色。Swift 5的硬件配置是十分平衡的，处理器在负载下基本上能够发挥出其最大的性能，这在它的竞争对手上是不多见的。考虑到它的性能表现，它的温度表现就还是可以的了。对于轻薄本来说最后的重点是续航时间，虽然Swift 5的续航能力不如戴尔XPS13，但依旧可以满足一天的不插电使用。