Notebookcheck Logo
Test TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper

TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper 评测--采用磨砂显示屏的智能手机能否令人信服?

再见,镜像

亮面屏幕实际上并不理想:在环境光下会形成反光,而且非常容易沾染指纹。我们来看看 TCL 50 Pro 智能手机,看看哑光显示屏是否真的有效,或者是否也有缺点。
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android ARM Smartphone

判决

TCL 的 NxtPaper 屏幕确实做得很好:可视角度良好,几乎没有反光,色彩鲜艳明亮。不过,最大亮度也只能满足需求,而且色彩保真度也不尽如人意。不过,该屏幕也可以在没有 PWM 的情况下运行,因此头痛患者可以松一口气了。

主摄像头也令人印象深刻,而广角摄像头只能记录模糊的细节。制造商本可以在性能方面做得更好一些,因为联发科 Dimensity 6300 在与同价位手机的对比中显得有些吃力。

扬声器有点弱,但电池的续航时间还算不错,充电速度也还可以。

如果你能在性能和摄像头方面稍作妥协,TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper 是光面屏幕手机的不错选择。

Pros

+ 无 PWM 的哑光显示屏
+ 色彩还原度高
+ 运行时间长
+ 充电器包含在供货范围内
+ 主摄像头质量好
+ 支持 eSIM

Cons

- 扬声器音质一般
- 性能一般
- 内存相对逊色
- 广角摄像头拍摄的图像模糊不清

价格和供应情况

据制造商称,这款智能手机的售价为 299 欧元。

不过,在亚马逊网站上,测试时的价格已经便宜了 30 欧元。

Amazon Logo
$7.98
Mocotto for TCL 50 XL 5G Phone Case TCL 50 XL NXTPAPER 5G Case with Tempered Glass Screen Protector,Slim Soft Silicone Full-Body Protective Case for TCL 50 XL 5G (Purple)
  • $4.98
    Mocotto for TCL 50 XL 5G Phone Case/TCL 50 XL NXTPAPER 5G Case + Tempered Glass Screen Protector,Electroplated PC Front Frame Soft TPU Transparent Back Cover, for TCL 50 XL (Purple)
  • $9.32
    HGJTFANY [4 Pack] for TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper 5G Screen Protector Tempered Galss, High Clear [9H Hardness] [Bubble Free] Tempered Glass Protective Film for TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper 5G (6.8 Inch)
Bestpreis 284.55€ Electronic Shops
TCL 50 Pro NXTPAPER 5G Moon Grey
2. 293.9 € alza.de
3. 295.9 € alza.at
4. 296.77 € galaxus

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
73.4%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mediatek Dimensity 6300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $7.98
Mocotto for TCL 50 XL 5G Pho...
2. $4.98
Mocotto for TCL 50 XL 5G Pho...
3. $9.32
HGJTFANY [4 Pack] for TCL 50...
List Price: 299€
196 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.80"
2460x1080
395 PPI
IPS
2.
71.8%
HMD Fusion
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 613 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $7.99
beukei (3 Pack) Designed for...
2. $9.99
Ranyi [5 Pack] Tempered Glas...
3. $11.99
18W USB-C Charger for Nokia ...
List Price: 299€
202.5 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.56"
1612x720
269 PPI
IPS
3.
75.8%
CMF Phone 1
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $7.99
Anoowkoa [2 Pack for Nothing...
2. $6.99
Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design...
3. $35.00
CMF Buds Wireless Bluetooth ...
List Price: 269€
197 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
395 PPI
Super AMOLED
4.
74.7%
Motorola Moto G85
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 619 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon: $245.00
List Price: 349€
171 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
405 PPI
P-OLED
5.
81.5% v7 (old)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon: $184.99
List Price: 299€
181 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
395 PPI
AMOLED

规格

TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper (NxtPaper Series)
Processor
Mediatek Dimensity 6300 8 x 2 - 2.4 GHz
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.80 inch 21:9, 2460 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, matte surface, glossy: no, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 512 GB 
, 500 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD up to 2GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, barometer
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B17/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B42), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n48/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 167.6 x 75.5
Battery
5010 mAh Lithium-Ion, 33 Watt charging, reverse charging (wired)
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix f/​1.75, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.0, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, eSIM support, fanless
Weight
196 g
Price
299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳和设备 - 玄武岩背板外壳

TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper 的外壳为塑料框架。背面由熔岩中的玄武岩纤维或玻璃纤维制成,具体取决于颜色。并不是所有的颜色都能随处买到,这款智能手机最有可能的颜色是月光灰,就像我们的测试设备一样。这是一种偏蓝的灰色,无光泽,表面有大理石花纹。阿尔卑斯白与之相似,但颜色要浅得多。午夜蓝、淡金色和玫紫色是背面由玻璃纤维制成的色调,比较闪亮。

在稳定性方面,TCL 智能手机的表现相当一般:很容易扭动,液晶上也能看到压力,还能听到明显的吱吱声。做工方面,TCL 50 Pro NxtPlus 还算不错,材质过渡干净利落,几乎看不出来。

TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper 配备了 6.8 英寸大显示屏,边缘较窄,因此在同类产品中不算最轻,这一点可以原谅。不过,不到 200 克(约 7 盎司)的重量还是很容易握住的。

它拥有 512 GB 的大容量存储空间和 8 GB 内存,与同价位手机相比,内存容量相当可观。配备了用于无线支付的 NFC 功能。

虽然只有一个 nano-SIM 接口,但可以存储 eSIM 配置文件,因此也可以进行双 SIM 卡操作。在使用 Angelbird V60 参考卡进行的测试中,事实证明 microSD 端口的速度相对较慢。

尺寸比较

167.6 mm 75.5 mm 8 mm 196 g164.2 mm 75.5 mm 8.3 mm 202.5 g164 mm 77 mm 8 mm 197 g161.9 mm 73.1 mm 7.6 mm 171 g161.1 mm 74.95 mm 7.98 mm 181 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (Angelbird V60)
37.3 MB/s +60%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (Angelbird V60)
34.6 MB/s +48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=82, last 2 years)
29.5 MB/s +27%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (Angelbird V60)
23.3 MB/s
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
22.1 MB/s -5%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
19.14 MB/s -18%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mali-G52 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø28.6 (20.9-38.6)
HMD Fusion Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38 (27-48.1)
CMF Phone 1 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38.2 (30.2-49.5)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.2 (28.8-46.3)
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mali-G52 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø62.5 (39.5-71.7)
HMD Fusion Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø79.6 (28-89.4)
CMF Phone 1 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø72.1 (33.5-83.5)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø64.4 (40.3-78.4)

通信和软件 - 4 年更新

TCL 手机提供的 WiFi 5 是最快的标准。接收数据时,数据传输速率相当稳定。而在发送数据时,则会反复出现掉线现象,多次重复测试时也很明显。总体而言,数据传输速率在预期范围内,但竞争对手的设备通常更快一些。

移动网络通信的最快标准是 5G。移动互联网的频率分集很好,这意味着 TCL 50 Pro 也可以在国外使用。不过,由于并非全球使用的所有频率都支持,因此如果您计划旅行,应提前告知自己。

我们还测试了手机在 4G 和 5G 网络中的接收情况。智能手机的信号质量不错。即使在困难的情况下,例如在狭窄的高楼之间,网络通常仍然可用。

使用的软件是基于Android 14 的 TCL UI。预装了一些第三方应用程序,包括用于广告目的的应用程序,但可以轻松删除。

TCL 承诺提供 2 个新的Android 版本和 4 年的安全更新。在这个价格范围内,这个承诺还算可以,但并不突出。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=192, last 2 years)
723 MBit/s +159%
CMF Phone 1
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
404 (203min - 418max) MBit/s +45%
Motorola Moto G85
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
361 (316min, 320.06P1 - 373max) MBit/s +29%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
357 (59min - 385max) MBit/s +28%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (10.5 - 718, n=187)
351 MBit/s +26%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
279 (114min, 123.57P1 - 329max) MBit/s
HMD Fusion
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
255 (208min - 322max) MBit/s -9%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=190, last 2 years)
708 MBit/s +105%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
390 (366min - 387max) MBit/s +13%
CMF Phone 1
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
381 (362min - 387max) MBit/s +10%
HMD Fusion
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
354 (331min - 374max) MBit/s +3%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
345 (331min, 331.87P1 - 356max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G85
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
341 (322min, 323.74P1 - 347max) MBit/s -1%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (20.1 - 695, n=186)
327 MBit/s -5%
050100150200250300350Tooltip
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper ; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø279 (114-329)
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper ; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø345 (331-356)

可持续性和操作 - 屏幕模式滑块

在可持续发展方面,TCL 只是泛泛而谈,例如它已引入了环境影响管理系统,并正努力通过培训和个别措施最大限度地减少二氧化碳排放。我们无法在网上找到每件产品的二氧化碳平衡表或所用材料的相关信息。至少包装是无塑料的。

哑光涂层的触摸屏易于使用,边角部分也很灵敏。除了设备右侧的音量摇杆和待机键外,TCL 还安装了一个滑块,可用于改变显示屏的属性:您可以切换到黑白模式,由于对比度高,这种模式特别适合阅读文件;还可以切换到更节能的特殊模式,在这种模式下,剩余运行时间也会显示在启动屏幕上。

待机键上还集成了指纹传感器。可以存储多个手指指纹,一旦存储了一个指纹,传感器就能非常可靠地识别它,并在短暂等待后解锁手机。使用面部识别解锁也是可行的,但这是通过前置摄像头使用 2D 方法完成的,因此不太安全。

摄像头 - 主摄像头性能良好,广角图像模糊不清

前置摄像头
前置摄像头

TCL 50 Pro 背面有三个镜头:1.08 亿像素的主摄像头、800 万像素的广角摄像头和 200 万像素的微距镜头。主摄像头通常只使用 1/9 的分辨率,即拍摄 1200 万像素的照片。不过,传感器的像素较大,可以捕捉到更多光线。如果需要,您也可以使用全部的 1.08 亿像素,但必须在设置中指定。

主摄像头拍摄的图像通常光线充足,细节丰富。我们也喜欢它的色彩。TCL 只能在细节清晰度方面做得更好一些。暗光和高对比度下的图像效果也不错。在实验室中,测试图的中央部分对比度较低,而边缘部分对比度较高。细节水平一般。在亮度仅为 1 勒克斯的情况下仍能识别主体,但细节显得非常粗糙。

视频最高可录制 1080p 和 30 fps。您必须在录制前确定镜头,录制过程中无法更换镜头。质量不错,自动对焦通常反应足够快。

不过,广角摄像头令人失望,只能拍摄出非常模糊的照片。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera PlantMain camera EnvironmentMain camera Low LightWide Angle camera
ColorChecker
8.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
ColorChecker TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper : 7.33 ∆E min: 3.74 - max: 12.54 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
54 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
58 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
33.5 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
61.6 ∆E
62.1 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
72.5 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
40.7 ∆E
76.3 ∆E
68.3 ∆E
51 ∆E
37 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper : 45.12 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 76.26 ∆E

显示屏 - 哑光面板作为亮点

TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper 的屏幕实际上是一块标准的 IPS 面板,分辨率为 2,460 x 1,080 像素,帧频高达 120 Hz。如果你阅读制造商的产品描述,你可能会认为这是一款电子墨水显示屏,但这样的显示屏帧率太低,色彩太少,不适合日常使用。

不过,亚光涂层使观看体验与众不同:与许多其他智能手机不同,TCL 50 Pro 在明亮的环境中不会出现反光问题,而且色彩看起来非常鲜艳。500 cd/m² 左右的亮度值在这个价位的手机中只能算中等水平,但哑光涂层并不需要如此高的亮度来确保户外的良好可读性。

在我们的测试中,涂层也显得非常耐磨,几乎不会限制视角,这让人不禁要问,为什么更多的制造商不采用这种方案。

在 TCL 50 Pro 上测不到 PWM 闪烁,因此即使是敏感的人也会喜欢这款手机。

489
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
499
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 501 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 492.8 cd/m² Minimum: 7.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 500 cd/m²
Contrast: 1000:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.95 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.241
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
IPS, 2460x1080, 6.8"
HMD Fusion
IPS, 1612x720, 6.6"
CMF Phone 1
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Motorola Moto G85
P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
17%
68%
73%
65%
Brightness middle
500
554
11%
1169
134%
1207
141%
1016
103%
Brightness
493
533
8%
1183
140%
1177
139%
1016
106%
Brightness Distribution
95
94
-1%
97
2%
94
-1%
94
-1%
Black Level *
0.5
0.27
46%
Contrast
1000
2052
105%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.95
3.28
17%
1.5
62%
1.36
66%
1.1
72%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.23
5.97
17%
2.9
60%
2.8
61%
1.9
74%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.1
3.6
-71%
1.9
10%
1.4
33%
1.3
38%
Gamma
2.241 98%
2.145 103%
2.22 99%
2.23 99%
2.28 96%
CCT
6481 100%
7322 89%
6733 97%
6591 99%
6420 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8698 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.


卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
35.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.2 ms rise
↘ 17.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms rise
↘ 19.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 动力一般

联发科 联发科 Dimensity 6300联发科 Dimensity 6300 是一款中端 SoC,在我们的基准测试中,它的性能在同价位产品中相当低。在处理器、系统和图形基准测试中,它在对比设备中仅处于中游位置。

上网速度相当快,但在滚动浏览大型网站时偶尔需要等待内容。UFS 2.2 闪存的速度在同价位产品中也是相当慢的。

在 41.7 °C(约 107 °F)的温度下,我们仅测出在长时间负载后机壳有适度升温。3DMark 压力测试也表明,性能几乎没有受到废热的影响。

TCL 50 Pro 提供立体声音效,听筒可用作第二个扬声器。最大音量尚可,但声音显得遥远,不够饱满。声音中也几乎没有低频。因此,最好使用 3.5 毫米音频接口或蓝牙连接耳机或扬声器。这样做没有任何问题,而且有多种编解码器可用于无线音频传输。

电池容量为 5,010 毫安时,因此比同类设备稍强。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,这款智能手机的续航时间达到了 15:29 小时。这意味着,在没有电源插座的情况下,一天的使用时间不会受到任何影响。通过随附的电源适配器,智能手机的最大充电功率为 33 瓦,需要约 2 小时才能充满电。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=177, last 2 years)
1488 Points +102%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1027 Points +40%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
940 Points +28%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
922 Points +25%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (736 - 798, n=2)
767 Points +4%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
736 Points
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
730 Points -1%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=177, last 2 years)
4173 Points +118%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
2948 Points +54%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
2240 Points +17%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
2067 Points +8%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (1910 - 2129, n=2)
2020 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1994 Points +4%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1910 Points
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1044 Points +83%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
703 Points +23%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
572 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  ()
572 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
551 Points -4%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3484 Points +113%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
1917 Points +17%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1903 Points +16%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1637 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  ()
1637 Points 0%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=198, last 2 years)
13213 Points +20%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
12367 Points +13%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
11724 Points +7%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (10990 - 11365, n=2)
11178 Points +2%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
10990 Points
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
10603 Points -4%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
8160 Points -26%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 1501, n=16, last 2 years)
423 Points +142%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
196 Points +12%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
175 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  ()
175 Points 0%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 9453, n=16, last 2 years)
966 Points +452%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
196 Points +12%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
175 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  ()
175 Points 0%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 13084, n=16, last 2 years)
1674 Points +328%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
471 Points +20%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
391 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  ()
391 Points 0%
3DMark
Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (144 - 2838, n=56, last 2 years)
1135 Points +688%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
346 Points +140%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (144 - 152, n=2)
148 Points +3%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
144 Points
Steel Nomad Light Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (145 - 2849, n=57, last 2 years)
1185 Points +717%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
344 Points +137%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (145 - 153, n=2)
149 Points +3%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
145 Points
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 7212, n=195, last 2 years)
2161 Points +494%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
847 Points +133%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
410 Points +13%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (364 - 371, n=2)
368 Points +1%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
364 Points
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
335 Points -8%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
163 Points -55%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (61 - 7094, n=196, last 2 years)
2177 Points +477%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
850 Points +125%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
418 Points +11%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (377 - 381, n=2)
379 Points +1%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
377 Points
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
345 Points -8%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
165 Points -56%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (271 - 25785, n=190, last 2 years)
7914 Points +515%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
3130 Points +143%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
1578 Points +23%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (1286 - 1357, n=2)
1322 Points +3%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1286 Points
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1221 Points -5%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
669 Points -48%
Wild Life Score
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
3123 Points +131%
Average of class Smartphone
  (270 - 13896, n=114, last 2 years)
2787 Points +106%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
1575 Points +16%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (1352 - 1372, n=2)
1362 Points +1%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1352 Points
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1233 Points -9%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
675 Points -50%
GFXBench
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 321, n=208, last 2 years)
85.3 fps +402%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
40 fps +135%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
23 fps +35%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
17 fps
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (15 - 17, n=2)
16 fps -6%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
14 fps -18%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
12 fps -29%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 166, n=208, last 2 years)
50.6 fps +261%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
36 fps +157%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
21 fps +50%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
21 fps +50%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
14 fps
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (13 - 14, n=2)
13.5 fps -4%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
12 fps -14%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 129, n=209, last 2 years)
34.4 fps +446%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
15 fps +138%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
8.6 fps +37%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
6.3 fps
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (5.9 - 6.3, n=2)
6.1 fps -3%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
5.4 fps -14%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
4 fps -37%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=209, last 2 years)
39.2 fps +326%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
22 fps +139%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
13 fps +41%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
13 fps +41%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
9.2 fps
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (9.2 - 9.2, n=2)
9.2 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
8.3 fps -10%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 53, n=209, last 2 years)
16.1 fps +496%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
6.5 fps +141%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
3.8 fps +41%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
2.7 fps
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (2.6 - 2.7, n=2)
2.65 fps -2%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
2.4 fps -11%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
1.7 fps -37%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=212, last 2 years)
38666 Points +55%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
34162 Points +37%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
31097 Points +25%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (24975 - 25748, n=2)
25362 Points +2%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
24975 Points
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
22739 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
22678 Points -9%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper HMD FusionCMF Phone 1Motorola Moto G85Xiaomi Poco M6 ProAverage 512 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
25%
49%
1%
42%
56%
127%
Sequential Read 256KB
528.8
894.5
69%
1024.12
94%
529.8
0%
973.53
84%
1054 ?(529 - 1860, n=6)
99%
Sequential Write 256KB
498.7
778
56%
535.66
7%
525.3
5%
910.9
83%
Random Read 4KB
227.7
218.4
-4%
294.28
29%
220.7
-3%
236.72
4%
264 ?(228 - 337, n=6)
16%
Random Write 4KB
235.8
189.4
-20%
394.59
67%
237
1%
228.61
-3%
277 ?(222 - 390, n=6)
17%
Max. Load
 41.6 °C33.1 °C31.5 °C 
 41.4 °C37.2 °C31.5 °C 
 39.8 °C37.3 °C32 °C 
Maximum: 41.6 °C
Average: 36.2 °C
33.1 °C34.2 °C38.6 °C
33.1 °C35.5 °C41.7 °C
33.2 °C35.5 °C40.9 °C
Maximum: 41.7 °C
Average: 36.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.9 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
HMD Fusion
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mali-G52 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 %
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
CMF Phone 1
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
CMF Phone 1
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 % +1%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 % +1%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % +1%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mali-G52 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.6 %
HMD Fusion
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.1 % -1%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
CMF Phone 1
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.9 % +1%
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
Mali-G52 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.3 %
0123456789101112131415161718Tooltip
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mali-G52 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.25 (2.23-2.26)
HMD Fusion Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.989 (0.986-1.005)
CMF Phone 1 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.11 (5.1-5.12)
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.5 (2.49-2.51)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.06 (2.06-2.07)
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mali-G52 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø8.12 (8.1-8.14)
HMD Fusion Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.04 (4.04-4.05)
CMF Phone 1 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø18.6 (18.6-18.7)
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø9.43 (9.4-9.46)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.4 (7.39-7.42)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.33 (7.32-7.33)
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mali-G52 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø1.088 (1.077-1.095)
CMF Phone 1 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.56 (2.54-2.57)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.8422538.239.23132.932.54033.534.75037.539.46327.127.88021.124.81002423.212521.723.916019.535.920016.845.52501351.831515.552.440014.147.250015.745.863020.347.380022.659.1100019.258.6125016.160.8160014.370.9200012.376.125001573.2315019.970.6400021.766.9500024.167.8630023.272.2800026.971.91000025.771.11250019.165.4160002457.3SPL33.582.3N1.746.2median 19.5median 59.1Delta412.236.241.830.736.125.635.526.735.136.736.424.634.117.637.518.738.818.239.215.950.717.349.615.252.914.156.813.460.513.867.414.369.113.773.512.482.212.782.112.179.912.977.612.576.812.278.912.876.713.179.913.58213.180.813.777.71468.713.357.125.291.10.787.1median 13.5median 76.71.211.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
15h 29min
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
5010 mAh
HMD Fusion
5000 mAh
CMF Phone 1
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G85
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-2%
19%
-4%
-9%
WiFi v1.3
929
915
-2%
1104
19%
894
-4%
845
-9%
Reader / Idle
1974
H.264
1114
Load
286

Notebookcheck 总体评分

TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper 的哑光显示屏效果非常好,具有多项优势。

不过,与同价位智能手机相比,该测试设备的性能略逊一筹。

TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper - 01/03/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
83%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
42 / 69 → 61%
Weight
89%
Battery
90%
Display
85%
Games Performance
6 / 55 → 10%
Application Performance
57 / 85 → 68%
AI Performance
12%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
65 / 90 → 72%
Camera
64%
Average
57%
73%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
10%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
50%
Repairability
22%
Software Updates
53.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 37.6%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper 评测--采用磨砂显示屏的智能手机能否令人信服?
Florian Schmitt, 2025-01- 5 (Update: 2025-01- 5)