Notebookcheck Logo

联想 Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L 平板电脑简短评测

优秀的连接性。 时尚外观,移动网络和高性价比让联想Tab 3 10 Business十分适合办公用户。在接下来的测试中我们将会看看它是否也能够满足个人用户的需要。
Android ARM Tablet Touchscreen
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L (Tab 3 Series)
Processor
Mediatek MT8735 4 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Memory
2048 MB 
Display
10.10 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, 电容式, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 26.8 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: microSD 最大支持 64 GB, NFC, Sensors: 加速感应器,霍尔感应器, USB-OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4, GSM (2/3/5/8), UMTS (1/2/4/5/8), LTE (1/3/4/5/7/8/19/20), LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 247 x 171
Battery
26.6 Wh, 7000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 12 h
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix 自动对焦
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器,USB数据线, YOZO Note, SYNCit HD, SHAREit, , 12 Months Warranty, FM 收音机
Weight
509 g, Power Supply: 83 g
Price
319 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

280 mm 182 mm 14.4 mm 850 g254.2 mm 155.3 mm 8.2 mm 525 g254.3 mm 161.1 mm 7.8 mm 487 g247 mm 171 mm 8.9 mm 509 g239 mm 172 mm 7.3 mm 500 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
485 MBit/s +102%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
323 MBit/s +35%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
240 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
532 MBit/s +124%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
320 MBit/s +35%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
237 MBit/s

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
401
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
403
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 435 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 425.1 cd/m² Minimum: 48.36 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 435 cd/m²
Contrast: 1279:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.11
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"
HP Pro Tablet 10 EE G1
IPS, 1280x800, 10.1"
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
TFT, 1920x1200, 10.1"
LG G Pad II 10.1
AH-IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"
Screen
-16%
-12%
-10%
-17%
Brightness middle
435
385
-11%
389
-11%
542
25%
355
-18%
Brightness
425
383
-10%
357
-16%
520
22%
367
-14%
Brightness Distribution
92
91
-1%
71
-23%
91
-1%
89
-3%
Black Level *
0.34
0.41
-21%
0.41
-21%
0.68
-100%
0.53
-56%
Contrast
1279
939
-27%
949
-26%
797
-38%
670
-48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.1
5.31
-30%
4.64
-13%
4.2
-2%
3.2
22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.5
8.57
-1%
11.97
-41%
6.7
21%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.4
5.58
-27%
1.96
55%
4.8
-9%
4.36
1%
Gamma
2.11 104%
2.4 92%
2.43 91%
2.42 91%
2.2 100%
CCT
7414 88%
7044 92%
6414 101%
7434 87%
7240 90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
60

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52322 Points +53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
44191 Points +29%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
34148 Points
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
15658 Points +193%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
12530 Points +135%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
6905 Points +29%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5337 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
15554 Points +232%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
13198 Points +182%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
6151 Points +31%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4681 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
16031 Points +53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
12095 Points +15%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
10643 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
10473 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
468 Points +125%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
208 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
388 Points +127%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
171 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1657 Points +94%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
856 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps +175%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
17 fps +113%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps +38%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8 fps
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps +153%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps +93%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps +45%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8.3 fps
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8.7 fps +200%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8.7 fps +200%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4.5 fps +55%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2.9 fps
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8.8 fps +193%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8.8 fps +193%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4.9 fps +63%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3 fps
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3.1 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2.8 fps -10%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1.9 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1.7 fps -11%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4796 Points +33%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4458 Points +23%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3617 Points
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3525 Points -3%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1146 Points +409%
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1069 Points +375%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1015 Points +351%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
225 Points
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2240 Points +88%
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1955 Points +64%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1943 Points +63%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1192 Points
Memory
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1362 Points +77%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1283 Points +67%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
769 Points
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
462 Points -40%
Graphics
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1997 Points +589%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
903 Points +211%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
511 Points +76%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
290 Points
Web
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
767 Points +7570%
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
725 Points +7150%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
682 Points +6720%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
10 Points
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
597 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1651 Points
Compute RenderScript Score
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
772 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4692 Points +73%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4682 Points +72%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3855 Points +42%
HP Pro Tablet 10 EE G1
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3408 Points +25%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2718 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
12334 ms *
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9903 ms * +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9789 ms * +21%
HP Pro Tablet 10 EE G1
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9343 ms * +24%
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8253 ms * +33%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
28.27 Points +58%
HP Pro Tablet 10 EE G1
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash
26.11 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
23.71 Points +32%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
17.9 Points
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
74 Points +40%
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
73 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
65 Points +23%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53 Points

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
215.8 MB/s +9%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
198 MB/s
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
155.8 MB/s -21%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
146 MB/s -26%
Sequential Write 256KB
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
76 MB/s +80%
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
59.1 MB/s +40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.88 MB/s +9%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
42.14 MB/s
Random Read 4KB
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
25 MB/s +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
23.46 MB/s +10%
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
21.61 MB/s +1%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
21.33 MB/s
Random Write 4KB
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
17 MB/s +144%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
10.01 MB/s +44%
LG G Pad II 10.1
Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9.52 MB/s +37%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6.96 MB/s
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
75.5 MB/s +76%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50.3 MB/s +17%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
42.9 MB/s
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50.1 MB/s +136%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
23.14 MB/s +9%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 32 GB eMMC Flash
21.22 MB/s
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high18 fps
 very low29 fps
Max. Load
 32.9 °C32.8 °C33.7 °C 
 31.4 °C31.4 °C34.1 °C 
 29.6 °C29.8 °C33.2 °C 
Maximum: 34.1 °C
Average: 32.1 °C
32 °C32.4 °C35.3 °C
31.1 °C32.5 °C34.5 °C
31.3 °C30.6 °C29.6 °C
Maximum: 35.3 °C
Average: 32.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  44.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Heatmap Front
Heatmap Front
Heatmap Back
Heatmap Back
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.644.92525.434.83125.328.84032.927.65033.641.26331.637.38028.439.61002728.112520.829.31602230.420021.334.425020.841.631521.252.440019.458.150019.563.863017.770.680017.975.3100017.875.1125017.371.2160017.470.3200016.768.7250017.272.1315018.272.3400017.974.7500017.674.6630017.773.4800017.870.91000017.967.21250018.163.11600018.251.1SPL3084.3N1.359.6median 17.9median 68.7Delta1.411.139.432.336.737.632.439.433.729.835.128.731.333.730.631.425.928.431.730.631.829.739.639.12631.840.437.636.43739.440.433.335.529.331.536.233.328.436.131.129.228.628.428.826.833.430.225.428.831.125.63625.721.331.14133.546.841.623.3415447.857.148.822.55457.647.263.655.622.457.663.956.473.260.921.363.969.859.274.862.118.469.868.756.176.862.917.568.77058.379.665.817.57069.95478.462.517.269.965.248.576.358.216.865.266.949.175.956.917.366.977.456.978.76217.477.477.359.580.261.916.677.373.154.7806217.373.17555.780.862.717.67574.955.380.76317.674.97858.28263.617.77873.955.180.663.117.473.967.348.777.860.317.767.357.239.271.453.817.957.250.831.561.943.218.150.840.623.75233.918.140.68667.791.27429.88664.522.994.234.91.364.5median 67.3median 54median 76.8median 60.9median 17.7median 67.310.18.89.17.71.710.137.932.437.930.931.330.934.231.734.233.72633.731.439.431.430.436.230.431.628.631.625.125.425.126.921.326.932.823.332.842.522.542.549.322.449.356.121.356.160.618.460.666.117.566.170.517.570.573.217.273.277.216.877.276.917.376.975.517.475.574.516.674.575.417.375.475.317.675.380.317.680.380.517.780.579.717.479.781.717.781.776.917.976.969.818.169.863.818.163.889.429.889.479.21.379.2median 74.5median 17.7median 74.510.91.710.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70LHuawei MediaPad M2 10 inchSamsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.14 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.7 / 4.4 / 4.7 Watt
Load midlight 8.4 / 9.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
7000 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
6660 mAh
HP Pro Tablet 10 EE G1
 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
7300 mAh
LG G Pad II 10.1
7400 mAh
Power Consumption
11%
-42%
16%
-46%
Idle Minimum *
1.7
1.6
6%
3.5
-106%
1.18
31%
3.6
-112%
Idle Average *
4.4
4.13
6%
5.5
-25%
4.65
-6%
6.2
-41%
Idle Maximum *
4.7
4.22
10%
5.7
-21%
4.74
-1%
6.3
-34%
Load Average *
8.4
6.57
22%
10.7
-27%
5.75
32%
10
-19%
Load Maximum *
9.2
8.32
10%
12.2
-33%
6.97
24%
11.4
-24%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
16h 15min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 47min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 51min
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
7000 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
6660 mAh
HP Pro Tablet 10 EE G1
 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
7300 mAh
LG G Pad II 10.1
7400 mAh
Battery Runtime
3%
-23%
77%
47%
Reader / Idle
975
988
1%
2634
170%
1676
72%
H.264
587
602
3%
893
52%
1020
74%
WiFi v1.3
601
698
16%
464
-23%
826
37%
782
30%
Load
291
266
-9%
428
47%
325
12%

Pros

+ 明亮、高对比度的屏幕
+ 丰富的音响和图像设置
+ 相对低的价位
+ 支持移动网络
+ 具备基本的防尘防水功能
+ 支持NFC和USB-OTG
+ 高速无线网
+ 不错的摄像头
+ 几乎不会变热

Cons

- 性能低
- 负载下功耗高
- 质保仅一年
In review: Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

联想Tab 3 10 Business有一些很明显的优势:出色的屏幕和丰富的设置选项。它的散热控制很优秀,移动网络模组也十分可靠。而这些只需要300欧元(约2258人民币)。

不过它也有一个严重问题:这台平板电脑的性能相比同类设备低了很多。它很难满足游戏的需要,甚至上网浏览都会遇到困难。

值得庆幸的是,联想没有给它预装垃圾软件,也提供了不错的相机和可靠的GPS模组。它甚至具备一定的防尘防水功能呢个。当然,它不是为建筑工地设计的,但至少有一定的防护性。如果你在寻找更坚固的设备,那么我们推荐松下三防平板电脑惠普 Pro Tablet 10

联想Tab 3 10 Business是一款优秀,实惠的办公平板。性能不高,却功能丰富。

它的传统的设计也是一个优势。需要平板电脑用于上网冲浪或玩游戏的用户,可以考虑三星 Galaxy Tab A 10.1

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L - 10/20/2016 v5.1 (old)
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
81%
Keyboard
70 / 80 → 87%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
38 / 65 → 58%
Weight
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Battery
92%
Display
85%
Games Performance
10 / 68 → 14%
Application Performance
32 / 76 → 42%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
57 / 91 → 63%
Camera
56 / 85 → 66%
Average
68%
82%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想 Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L 平板电脑简短评测
Florian Wimmer, 2016-11- 5 (Update: 2016-11- 6)