Notebookcheck Logo

联想 Tab 4 8 平板电脑简短评测

适合家庭使用。 联想 Tab 4 8是一台面向于全体家庭成员的平板电脑。它通过配置的不同来实现这点。在本评测中,您将了解到是否值得购买它。
Android ARM Tablet Touchscreen
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Tab 4 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) 4 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 308
Memory
2048 MB 
Display
8.00 inch 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel 189 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 9.2 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: microSD, Sensors: 加速度计,陀螺仪, Miracast
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 211 x 124
Battery
18.4 Wh, 4850 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 前置立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, charger, USB cable, SHAREit, SYNCit, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
310 g, Power Supply: 48 g
Price
169 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Lenovo Tab 4 8
Lenovo Tab 4 8
Lenovo Tab 4 8
Lenovo Tab 4 8
Lenovo Tab 4 8
Lenovo Tab 4 8
Lenovo Tab 4 8
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
209 MBit/s +404%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
86 MBit/s +107%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50.9 MBit/s +23%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
41.5 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
209 MBit/s +349%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
99.3 MBit/s +114%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.3 MBit/s +6%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.5 MBit/s
GPS Garmin Edge 500 overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 junction
GPS Garmin Edge 500 junction
GPS Garmin Edge 500 forest
GPS Garmin Edge 500 forest
GPS Lenovo Tab 4 8 overview
GPS Lenovo Tab 4 8 overview
GPS Lenovo Tab 4 8 bridge
GPS Lenovo Tab 4 8 bridge
GPS Lenovo Tab 4 8 forest
GPS Lenovo Tab 4 8 forest

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
442
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 469 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 446.4 cd/m² Minimum: 6.58 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 455 cd/m²
Contrast: 892:1 (Black: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
80.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Lenovo Tab 4 8
IPS, 1280x800, 8"
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
IPS, 1280x800, 8"
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
IPS, 1280x800, 8"
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4"
Lenovo Tab 4 10
IPS, 1280x800, 10.1"
Screen
-13%
5%
3%
15%
Brightness middle
455
419
-8%
363
-20%
460
1%
316
-31%
Brightness
446
412
-8%
348
-22%
445
0%
305
-32%
Brightness Distribution
91
91
0%
90
-1%
90
-1%
86
-5%
Black Level *
0.51
0.39
24%
0.26
49%
0.45
12%
0.2
61%
Contrast
892
1074
20%
1396
57%
1022
15%
1580
77%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.5
8.5
-55%
5.8
-5%
6.2
-13%
5
9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
14.8
13.8
7%
17.8
-20%
10.5
29%
8.7
41%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.5
10.3
-87%
5.5
-0%
6.5
-18%
5.7
-4%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.6 85%
2.24 98%
2.33 94%
2.25 98%
CCT
7852 83%
6216 105%
7388 88%
8056 81%
7921 82%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
86735 Points +135%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
36893 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 10
36868 Points 0%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
36440 Points -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
34714 Points -6%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5204 Points +17%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
4518 Points +1%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
4507 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
4457 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
4125 Points -7%
Work 2.0 performance score
Lenovo Tab 4 8
3312 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 10
3307 Points 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
2907 Points -12%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1800 Points +126%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
796 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 10
780 Points -2%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
712 Points -11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
640 Points -20%
System
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
3581 Points +142%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
1477 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 10
1475 Points 0%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
1271 Points -14%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
1152 Points -22%
Memory
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2212 Points +182%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
908 Points +16%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
784 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 10
758 Points -3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
736 Points -6%
Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1302 Points +191%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
447 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 10
444 Points -1%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
339 Points -24%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
334 Points -25%
Web
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1022 Points +32%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
773 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 10
745 Points -4%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
655 Points -15%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
593 Points -23%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Lenovo Tab 4 8
688 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 10
676 Points -2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
628 Points -9%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Lenovo Tab 4 8
1908 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 10
1896 Points -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
1683 Points -12%
Compute RenderScript Score
Lenovo Tab 4 10
1398 Points +6%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
1324 Points
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
20230 Points +229%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
6144 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 10
6100 Points -1%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
6006 Points -2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
5986 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
22141 Points +303%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
5496 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 10
5456 Points -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
5435 Points -1%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
5326 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
15538 Points +49%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
10857 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
10458 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 10
10388 Points -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
9274 Points -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1139 Points +2049%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
246 Points +364%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
234 Points +342%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
53 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 10
53 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
997 Points +2274%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
203 Points +383%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
193 Points +360%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
42 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 10
42 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2261 Points +159%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
920 Points +5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
881 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab 4 10
880 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
874 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
970 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
150 Points
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
143 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
832 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
121 Points
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
116 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2322 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
878 Points
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
793 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
23 fps +64%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
17 fps +21%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
17 fps +21%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
14 fps
Lenovo Tab 4 10
13 fps -7%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
29 fps +272%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
10 fps +28%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
9.9 fps +27%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
7.8 fps
Lenovo Tab 4 10
7.7 fps -1%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
9 fps +53%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
7.2 fps +22%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
7.1 fps +20%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
5.9 fps
Lenovo Tab 4 10
5.5 fps -7%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
13 fps +364%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
3.6 fps +29%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
3.6 fps +29%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
2.8 fps
Lenovo Tab 4 10
2.8 fps 0%

Legend

 
Lenovo Tab 4 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)
11404 Points +293%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 (Chrome 60)
2955 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)
2903 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)
2826 Points -3%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A (Chrome 52.0.2743.91)
2821 Points -3%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)
136 Points +97%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)
69 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 10 (Chrome 60)
62 Points -10%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A (Chrome 52.0.2743.91)
57 Points -17%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)
57 Points -17%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)
53.7 Points +192%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)
19.52 Points +6%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A (Chrome 52.0.2743.91)
19.3 Points +5%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)
18.36 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Lenovo Tab 4 10 (Chrome 60)
12386 ms * -3%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A (Chrome 52.0.2743.91)
12161 ms * -1%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)
12033 ms *
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)
11818 ms * +2%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)
2823 ms * +77%

* ... smaller is better

Lenovo Tab 4 8Amazon Fire HD 8 2017Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026AHuawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inchLenovo Tab 4 10
AndroBench 3-5
-25%
-38%
47%
-6%
Sequential Read 256KB
265.1
159.1
-40%
158.4
-40%
249.7
-6%
275
4%
Sequential Write 256KB
72.3
47.23
-35%
45.71
-37%
117.2
62%
45.3
-37%
Random Read 4KB
44
21.55
-51%
21.96
-50%
32.04
-27%
32.3
-27%
Random Write 4KB
7.1
11.51
62%
8.35
18%
31.35
342%
8.9
25%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.8
51.1
-40%
35.2
-58%
61.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-27%
84.5
0%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.1
34.15
-44%
24.9
-59%
23.52 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-62%
59.9
-2%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high18 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps
Max. Load
 35.8 °C31.2 °C34.6 °C 
 38.5 °C32.1 °C35.1 °C 
 31.8 °C33.2 °C35.2 °C 
Maximum: 38.5 °C
Average: 34.2 °C
32 °C32.2 °C37.7 °C
33 °C31.8 °C40.1 °C
32 °C31.8 °C36.3 °C
Maximum: 40.1 °C
Average: 34.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43.7 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Heat-map front
Heat-map front
Heat-map rear
Heat-map rear
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.529.233.52532.529.332.53132.830.732.84036.241.136.25032.532.732.56333.531.633.58036.628.336.610035.427.535.412542.828.742.816041.323.641.320049.522.649.525052.426.952.431555.521.755.540059.32159.350064.920.864.963071.31871.380075.817.575.8100077.517.377.5125075.416.875.4160075.515.875.5200071.615.871.6250070.316.170.3315072.715.972.7400073.91673.9500072.415.972.4630066.21666.2800061.916.161.91000059.11659.11250049.11649.11600033.915.833.9SPL84.829.784.8N59.21.359.2median 64.9median 16.8median 64.9Delta10.7310.724.330.828.624.325.930.22725.926.329.83026.329.130.334.929.127.627.531.627.623.624.935.323.622.824.528.122.827.627.728.827.638.638.236.338.620.12321.720.122.926.720.422.92933.620.12939.943.921.139.947.752.123.347.755.159.72455.151.25618.751.258.462.918.458.46164.518616265.916.5626064.414.36058.162.515.658.156.760.714.156.75963.314596165.214.36158.96314.858.959.263.513.759.257.361.313.457.351.955.913.251.960.263.913.260.256.960.613.156.97175.129.47126.734.41.326.7median 56.9median 60.7median 16.5median 56.9109.93.910hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Tab 4 8Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
Lenovo Tab 4 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.16 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.1 / 3.51 / 4.14 Watt
Load midlight 4.86 / 6.13 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Tab 4 8
4850 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
 mAh
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
4000 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5100 mAh
Lenovo Tab 4 10
7000 mAh
Power Consumption
16%
13%
-24%
-3%
Idle Minimum *
1.1
0.99
10%
1.32
-20%
1.51
-37%
1.09
1%
Idle Average *
3.51
2.74
22%
2.71
23%
3.64
-4%
3.71
-6%
Idle Maximum *
4.14
2.83
32%
2.83
32%
3.68
11%
3.84
7%
Load Average *
4.86
4.51
7%
4.24
13%
6.95
-43%
5.07
-4%
Load Maximum *
6.13
5.69
7%
5.01
18%
9.11
-49%
6.88
-12%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
20h 07min
WiFi Websurfing
7h 32min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 03min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 36min
Lenovo Tab 4 8
4850 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
 mAh
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
4000 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5100 mAh
Lenovo Tab 4 10
7000 mAh
Battery Runtime
51%
5%
2%
40%
Reader / Idle
1207
2032
68%
1305
8%
1110
-8%
H.264
603
744
23%
624
3%
583
-3%
WiFi v1.3
452
770
70%
472
4%
546
21%
632
40%
Load
276
393
42%
287
4%
268
-3%

Pros

+ 机身符合人体工程学设计
+ 优秀的前置扬声器
+ 显示屏明亮而且具有宽广视角
+ 温度较低
+ 带有用户帐户管理功能的纯安卓系统
+ 相当精确的GPS
+ 使用顺畅
+ 快速存储

Cons

- GPS锁定非常慢
- 屏幕偏冷
- 照片有时会模糊
- 没有环境光线传感器
- Wi-Fi慢
Lenovo Tab 4 8. Review unit courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de
Lenovo Tab 4 8. Review unit courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

联想Tab 4 8是一台价格实惠却又难以脱颖而出的平板电脑。它的设计拘谨保守,外壳容易因为扭曲和压力变形。摄像头解决方案、照相水平、机器性能、拓展性与同类产品类似。

换言之:该机在任何方面都显得普通,却又在许多方面做的很稳健。明亮的显示屏拥有宽广的可视角度。GPS定位系统非常准确。在高负载下,该机也不会过热。它的前置扬声器、纯净的安卓系统、和大容量电池(虽然联想在电池拓容上失败了),都是值得一提的。我们必须强调的是:联想在如何通过可选配置,来提升一个廉价平板上花了很多时间和精力。

联想Tab 4 8是一台没有太多花哨功能,而且性能稳定的8寸平板电脑。

总的来说,像联想Yoga系列的平板电脑这样的设备,会比该机跟富吸引力。该机性能稳定,价格实惠,而且没有明显的缺陷。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Lenovo Tab 4 8 - 10/06/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
74%
Keyboard
65 / 80 → 82%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
27 / 65 → 41%
Weight
86 / 40-88 → 96%
Battery
91%
Display
83%
Games Performance
6 / 68 → 9%
Application Performance
39 / 76 → 52%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
61 / 91 → 67%
Camera
62 / 85 → 73%
Average
67%
79%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想 Tab 4 8 平板电脑简短评测
Florian Wimmer, 2017-11- 6 (Update: 2017-11- 6)